Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:19:24PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thierry Carrez wrote: > > [...] > > That will not solve all issues. We should also collectively make sure > > that *usage questions are re-routed* to the openstack general > > mailing-list, where they belong. Too many people still an

Re: [openstack-dev] [reviews] putting numbers on -core team load

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:29:36PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: > At the summit there were lots of discussions about reviews, and I made > the mistake of sending a mail to Russell proposing a few new stats we > could gather. > > I say mistake, because he did so and then some... we new have extra >

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing the new OpenStack service for Containers

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 07:10:53PM -0500, Krishna Raman wrote: > We should probably meet on IRC or conf. call and discuss the suggested > architecture, open questions and REST API. > > I have set up a doodle poll at http://doodle.com/w7y5qcdvq9i36757 to gather a > times when we can meet. > Pleas

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing the new OpenStack service for Containers

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:57:51AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Russell Bryant wrote: > > My view of the outcome of the session was not "it *will* be a new > > service". Instead, it was, "we *think* it should be a new service, but > > let's do some more investigation to decide for sure". > > >

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint: standard specification of guest CPU topology

For attention of maintainers of Nova virt drivers A while back there was a bug requesting the ability to set the CPU topology (sockets/cores/threads) for guests explicitly https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1199019 I countered that setting explicit topology doesn't play well with booting im

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Core pinning

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Tuomas Paappanen wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to hear your thoughts about core pinning in Openstack. > Currently nova(with qemu-kvm) supports usage of cpu set of PCPUs > what can be used by instances. I didn't find blueprint, but I think > this featur

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Core pinning

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:57:22AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 11/13/2013 11:40 AM, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: > > >>But, from performance point of view it is better to exclusively > >>dedicate PCPUs for VCPUs and emulator. In some cases you may want > >>to guarantee that only one instance(and its

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] When is a blueprint unnecessary?

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:56:10AM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > Greetings, > > One of the bits of feedback that came from the "Nova Project Structure > and Process" session at the design summit was that it would be nice to > skip having blueprints for smaller items. > > In an effort to capture

Re: [openstack-dev] New hypervisor to manage LXC containers on Nova with Docker

On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:33:12AM -0700, Sam Alba wrote: > Hi all, > > I work for dotCloud and I wanted to share our recent work on Nova[1]. > We've been using LXC containers on our PaaS product for more than 2 > years now and we recently released the Docker project[2] that you may > have heard a

Re: [openstack-dev] Quantum's new name is….

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:14:24PM -0400, Mark McClain wrote: > All- > > The OpenStack Networking team is happy to announce that the Quantum > project will be changing its name to Neutron. You'll soon see Neutron > in lots of places as we work to implement the name change within OpenStack. Are th

Re: [openstack-dev] Efficiently pin running VMs to physical CPUs automatically

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 09:10:32AM +, Bob Ball wrote: > It seems that numad is libvirt specific - is that the case? No, it is a completely independant project https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/numad.git It existed before libvirt started using it for automatic placement. Daniel -- |: http:

Re: [openstack-dev] Efficiently pin running VMs to physical CPUs automatically

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:48:16PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 06/20/2013 10:36 AM, Giorgio Franceschi wrote: > > Hello, I created a blueprint for the implementation of: > > > > A tool for pinning automatically each running virtual CPU to a physical > > one in the most efficient way, balanci

Re: [openstack-dev] SecurityImpact tagging in gerrit

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:08:43PM -0400, Yun Mao wrote: > Interesting. Does it automatically make the commit in "stealth mode" so > that it's not seen in public? Thanks, This tag is about asking for design input / code review from people with security expertize for new work. As such the code is a

Re: [openstack-dev] Efficiently pin running VMs to physical CPUs automatically

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:09:24PM +, Bob Ball wrote: > Sorry, my point about numad being libvirt specific was that I > couldn't find references to other hypervisors using numad for > their placement. I recognise that it's not _tied_ to libvirt > but the reality seems to be that only libvirt u

Re: [openstack-dev] Termination of the title line of commit messages

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:50:18PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hey, > > Pulling this out of gerrit for discussion. > > Background is one of my patches to diskimage-builder was -1ed because I > terminated the title line of the commit message with a period: > > https://review.openstack.org/3

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nominating John Garbutt for nova-core

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:09:34AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > Greetings, > > I would like to nominate John Garbutt for the nova-core team. > > John has been involved with nova for a long time now. He's primarily > known for his great work on the xenapi driver. However, he has been > contrib

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] python-selenium is non-free, Horizon shouldn't use it

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 09:34:01AM -0400, Julie Pichon wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > "Sascha Peilicke" wrote: > > On 07/04/2013 02:34 PM, Sascha Peilicke wrote: > > > On 07/04/2013 12:03 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: > > >> On 04/07/13 11:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > >>> Horizon seems to use python-seleni

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Mellanox VIF Driver

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:53:45AM +0300, Itzik Brown wrote: > Hi, > > We released a code for a VIF Driver that will work with Mellanox > Quantum Plugin. > Mellanox plugin provisions Virtual Networks via embedded HCA > switching functionality (SR-IOV capability of Network adapter). > > The code i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Change I30b127d6] Cheetah vs Jinja

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:41:55AM -0400, Solly Ross wrote: > (This email is with regards to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36316/) > > Hello All, > > I have been implementing the Guru Meditation Report blueprint > (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/guru-meditation-report), > and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] New DB column or new DB table?

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 07:05:10AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 07/17/2013 10:54 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote: > >Hi fellows, > > > >Currently we're implementing the BP > >https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/utilization-aware-scheduling. > >The main idea is to have an extensible plugin framewor

Re: [openstack-dev] Python overhead for rootwrap

On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 10:58:11AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 14:40 -0600, Mike Wilson wrote: > > In my opinion: > > > > 1. Stop using rootwrap completely and get strong argument checking support > > into sudo (regex). > > 2. Some sort of long lived rootwrap process, eit

Re: [openstack-dev] Python overhead for rootwrap

On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 12:50:08PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote: > Hi > > On 2 August 2013 11:15, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > better is really missing the bigger picture. In Linux, there has been > > a move away from use of sudo or similar approaches, towards the idea

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for Nova native image building

On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:20:00PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 08/06/2013 11:53 AM, Ian Mcleod wrote: > > Hello, > > > > A blueprint has been registered regarding API additions to Nova to > > enable the creation of base images from external OS install sources. > > This provides a way to buil

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for Nova native image building

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:34:57AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 08/06/2013 06:06 PM, Ian McLeod wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 16:02 -0300, Monty Taylor wrote: > > The proof of concept approach is limited to full-virt hypervisors. It's > > unclear to me if there's a way we can make this wor

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for Nova native image building

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:44:29AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 08/07/2013 10:34 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > >>> That said - if we did service-ify the tool, wouldn't glance be a more > >>> appropriate place for that sort of thing? > >> > >> Possibly, though the proof of concept (and we hope ou

Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] Python dependencies: PyPI vs distro packages

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 05:43:19PM +, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Interesting, I should look into conary. > > I was hoping that DNF (the yum rewrite) would be a little better at this > stage, but it still seems a ways off. I don't know about what future plans the developers may have, but currently

Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] Python dependencies: PyPI vs distro packages

On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:36:44PM -0300, Monty Taylor wrote: > > > On 08/06/2013 11:14 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > > On 7 August 2013 11:22, Jay Buffington wrote: > > > >> ln -s /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirtmod_qemu.so > >> $(VENV)/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ > >> > >> Why is

Re: [openstack-dev] Osl and dangerous code merging

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:39:44AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > What do you mean by "dangerous code merging" in the subject? The body of > your mail doesn't make any reference to whatever "danger" you're seeing. > > On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 14:16 +0400, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > C

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for Nova native image building

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:28:51AM -0500, Ian McLeod wrote: > On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 12:05 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > > On 08/07/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:20:00PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > > >> On 08/06/2

Re: [openstack-dev] Code review study

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:42:09PM +0930, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Robert Collins > wrote: > > > This may interest data-driven types here. > > > > > > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/11-proven-practices-for-peer-review/ > > > > Note specifical

Re: [openstack-dev] Code review study

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:46:07AM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange > > wrote:Commit message quality has improved somewhat > > since I first wrote & >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live-snapshot/cloning of virtual machines

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:53:01PM -0700, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I have been trying for some time to get the code for the live-snapshot > blueprint[1] > in. Going through the review process for the rpc and interface code[2] was > easy. I > suspect the api-extension code[3]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live-snapshot/cloning of virtual machines

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 08:28:58AM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: > On 17 August 2013 07:01, Russell Bryant wrote: > > >> Maybe we've grown up to the point where we have to be more careful and > >> not introduce > >> these kind of features and the maintenance cost of introducing > >> experimental f

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live-snapshot/cloning of virtual machines

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:28:25AM -0700, Tim Smith wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Robert Collins > wrote: > > > On 17 August 2013 07:01, Russell Bryant wrote: > > > > >> Maybe we've grown up to the point where we have to be more careful and > > >> not introduce > > >> these kind of fe

[openstack-dev] Stats on blueprint design info / creation times

In this thread about code review: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-August/013701.html I mentioned that I thought there were too many blueprints created without sufficient supporting design information and were being used for "tickbox" process compliance only. I based this

Re: [openstack-dev] Code review study

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:02:12PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 11:26 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 14:12 +1200, Robert Collins wrote: > > > This may interest data-driven types here. > > > > > > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/

Re: [openstack-dev] Stats on blueprint design info / creation times

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:36:39AM -0500, Anne Gentle wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange > wrote: > > The data for the last 3 releases is: > > > > Series: folsom > > Specs: 178 > > Specs (no URL): 144 > > Sp

Re: [openstack-dev] Stats on blueprint design info / creation times

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:53:25PM -0300, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Anne Gentle wrote: > > - Less than 1 in 4 blueprints is created before the devel > > period starts for a release. > > > > I find this date mismatch especially intriguing, because the Foundation > > and member company s

Re: [openstack-dev] Stats on blueprint design info / creation times

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:18:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:53:25PM -0300, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Anne Gentle wrote: > > > - Less than 1 in 4 blueprints is created before the devel > > > period starts for a releas

Re: [openstack-dev] Stats on blueprint design info / creation times

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:20:08AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange > wrote: > > > In this thread about code review: > > > > > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-August/013701.html > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Interested in a mid-Icehouse-cycle Nova meet-up?

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:42:00PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > Greetings, > > Some OpenStack programs have started a nice trend of getting together in > the middle of the development cycle. These meetups can serve a number > of useful purposes: community building, ramping up new contributors,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Frustrations with review wait times (was: Requesting feedback on review 35759)

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:31:32AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > In general, how do we improve these stats? > > 1) Make sure we have a dedicated review team. > > This is something I spend time on regularly. I try to encourage those > on the team to regularly participate in reviews. For those t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Frustrations with review wait times

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:55:03AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 08/27/2013 10:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > I tend to focus the bulk of my review activity on the libvirt driver, > > since that's where most of my knowledge is. I've recently done some > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] live-snapshot/cloning of virtual machines

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:13:49PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 08/27/2013 12:04 PM, Tim Smith wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Russell Bryant > > wrote: > > > > > What about publishing the API as blacklisted by default? This way it > > > wo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Frustrations with review wait times

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:45:26PM +1000, Michael Still wrote: > [Concerns over review wait times in the nova project] > > I think that we're also seeing the fact that nova-core's are also > developers. nova-core members have the same feature freeze deadline, > and that means that to a certain ext

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Frustrations with review wait times

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:43:21AM +, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Why not a rotation though, I could see it beneficial to say have a > group of active developers code for say a release then those > developers rotate to a reviewer position only (and rotate again for > every release). This allows for

Re: [openstack-dev] New Nova hypervisor: Docker

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:00:50PM +1000, Michael Still wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Sam Alba wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We've been working hard during the last couple of weeks with some > > people. Brian Waldon helped a lot designing the Glance integration and > > driver testing. Dea

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Frustrations with review wait times

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:29:23PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: > On 28 August 2013 21:13, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:43:21AM +, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > >> For a big project like nova the workload could be spread out more > >> li

Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] Python dependencies: PyPI vs distro packages

On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:36:44PM -0300, Monty Taylor wrote: > > > On 08/06/2013 11:14 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > > On 7 August 2013 11:22, Jay Buffington wrote: > > > >> ln -s /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirtmod_qemu.so > >> $(VENV)/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ > >> > >> Why is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: hyper-v-remotefx

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:56:10AM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote: > The RemoteFX feature allows Hyper-V compute nodes to provide GPU acceleration > to instances by sharing the host's GPU resources. > > Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/hyper-v-remotefx > > This feature pro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: hyper-v-remotefx

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:22:27PM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote: > > On Sep 6, 2013, at 14:26 , "Daniel P. Berrange" > mailto:berra...@redhat.com>> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:56:10AM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote: >> The Remot

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: oslo-messaging

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 09:49:18AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 09/06/2013 08:30 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 10:59 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> Mark McLoughlin wrote: > >>> I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for the final (and > >>> admittedly the larg

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: utilization aware scheduling

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 01:07:49PM +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote: > On 06/09/13 11:28, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Wang, Shane wrote: > >> Hi core developers and everyone, > >> > >> Please allow me to make an FFE request for adding utilization aware > >> scheduling support in Havana. > >> > >> The blu

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] Reviews with a prio label?

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:09:51PM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: > In ML post [1] I wondered if it would be possible to introduce a new > "prio" label in Gerrit which could help in focusing review efforts to > increase the throughput. With this new post I'd like to discuss if we > think this could b

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:08:29PM -0700, Zaro wrote: > Hello All, > > The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to > Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly after the > Mitaka summit. The main motivation behind the upgrade is to allow us > to take advant

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][policy] Exposing hypervisor details to users

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:08:59PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hello all, > I came across [1] which is notionally an ironic bug in that horizon > presents > VM operations (like suspend) to users. Clearly these options don't make sense > to ironic which can be confusing. > > There is a horizo

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][policy] Exposing hypervisor details to users

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 07:09:59AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/06/2015 04:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > I think that exposing hypervisor_type is very much the *wrong* approach > > to this problem. The set of allowed actions varies based on much m

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Sylvain Bauza to nova-core

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:32:00PM +, John Garbutt wrote: > Hi, > > I propose we add Sylvain Bauza[1] to nova-core. > > Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work, > including some quality reviews, particularly around the Scheduler. > > Please respond with comments, +

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Alex Xu to nova-core

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:32:04PM +, John Garbutt wrote: > Hi, > > I propose we add Alex Xu[1] to nova-core. > > Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work, > including some quality reviews, particularly around the API. > > Please respond with comments, +1s, or objec

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [tc][all][osprofiler] OSprofiler is dead, long live OSprofiler

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 02:57:37AM -0800, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Hi stackers, > > Intro > --- > > It's not a big secret that OpenStack is huge and complicated ecosystem of > different > services that are working together to implement OpenStack API. > > For example booting VM is going throug

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] hackathon day

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:15:09AM +, Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services) wrote: > Hi > > I knew that people in China had a 3 days hackathon few months ago I was > thinking to have a similar thing in Europe. > My original idea was to propose to add an extra day after the mid-cycle but I > am

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [nova] Image Signature Verification

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:30:53PM +, Poulos, Brianna L. wrote: > Hello, > > There has recently been additional discussion about the best way to handle > image signature verification in glance and nova [1]. There are two > options being discussed for the signature (the examples below using >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [nova] Image Signature Verification

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:09:42PM -0300, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 13/11/15 09:35 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:30:53PM +, Poulos, Brianna L. wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>There has recently been additional discussion ab

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][infra] Getting a bleeding edge libvirt gate job running

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:18:28PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 03:32:45PM -0800, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On 11/17/2015 11:10 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > > >Background > > >== > > >The blueprint [1] wants to utilize the *virtlogd* logging deamon from > > >libvirt. Among

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Remove .mailmap files from OpenStack repos

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 07:28:03PM +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > Currently we have .mailmap files in the root of almost all OpenStack repos: > https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/.mailmap > https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/.mailmap > https://github.com/openstack/nova/b

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova]Move encryptors to os-brick

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:22:04AM +, Li, Xiaoyan wrote: > Hi all, > > To fix bug [1][2] in Cinder, Cinder needs to use nova/volume/encryptors[3] > to attach/detach encrypted volumes. > > To decrease the code duplication, I raised a BP[4] to move encryptors to > os-brick[5]. > > Once it is

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova]Move encryptors to os-brick

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:45:15PM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote: > Brick does not have to take over the decisions in order to be a useful > repository for the code. The motivation for this work is to avoid having > the dm setup code copied wholesale into cinder, where it becomes difficult > to keep i

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova]Move encryptors to os-brick

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > On 11/20/2015 01:19 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:45:15PM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote: > >>Brick does not have to take over the decisions in order to be a useful > >>r

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova]Move encryptors to os-brick

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:34:29AM -0800, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > On 11/20/2015 10:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:45:15PM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote: > >>Brick does not have to take over the decisions in order to be a useful > >>r

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Migration progress

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:36:32AM +, Paul Carlton wrote: > John > > At the live migration sub team meeting I undertook to look at the issue > of progress reporting. > > The use cases I'm envisaging are... > > As a user I want to know how much longer my instance will be migrating > for. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance]Upload encrypted volumes to images

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:45:55AM +, Li, Xiaoyan wrote: > Hi all, > More help about volume encryption is needed. > > About uploading encrypted volumes to image, there are three options: > 1. Glance only keeps non-encrypted images. So when uploading encrypted > volumes to image, cinder de-cry

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance]Upload encrypted volumes to images

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 07:05:05AM +0100, Philipp Marek wrote: > > About uploading encrypted volumes to image, there are three options: > > 1. Glance only keeps non-encrypted images. So when uploading encrypted > >volumes to image, cinder de-crypts the data and upload. > > 2. Glance maintain e

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [RFC] how to enable xbzrle compress for live migration

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:55:31PM +0800, 少合冯 wrote: > Hi all, > We want to support xbzrle compress for live migration. > > Now there are 3 options, > 1. add the enable flag in nova.conf. > such as a dedicated 'live_migration_compression=on|off" parameter in > nova.conf. > And nova simply

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [RFC] how to enable xbzrle compress for live migration

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 05:49:50PM +, Paul Carlton wrote: > Seems to me the prevailing view is that we should get live migration to > figure out the best setting for > itself where possible. There was discussion of being able have a default > policy setting that will allow > the operator to de

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [RFC] how to enable xbzrle compress for live migration

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 05:39:04PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:55:31PM +0800, 少合冯 wrote: > > 3. dynamically choose when to activate xbzrle compress for live migration. > > This is the best. > > xbzrle really wants to be used if th

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [RFC] how to enable xbzrle compress for live migration

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 07:37:50PM +0800, 少合冯 wrote: > 2015-11-27 2:19 GMT+08:00 Daniel P. Berrange : > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 05:39:04PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:55:31PM +0800, 少合冯 wrote: > > > > 3. dynamical

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [RFC] how to enable xbzrle compress for live migration

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:17:06PM +, Koniszewski, Pawel wrote: > > -Original Message- > > > > Doing this though, we still need a solution to the host OOM scenario > > > > problem. We can't simply check free RAM at start of migration and > > > > see if there's enough to spare for compre

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [RFC] how to enable xbzrle compress for live migration

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 01:01:15PM +, Koniszewski, Pawel wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 1:24 PM > > To: Koniszewski, Pawel > > Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Testing concerns around boot from UEFI spec

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:43:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > Can someone explain the licensing issue here? The Fedora comments make > this sound like this is something that's not likely to end up in distros. The EDK codebase contains a FAT driver which has a license that forbids reusing the code

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Thoughts on deprecating the legacy bdm v1 API support

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:48:02AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > In the live migration meeting today mdbooth and I were chatting about how > hard it is to follow the various BDM code through nova, because you have the > three block_device modules: > > * nova.block_device - dict that does some tra

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]Libvirt error code for failing volume in nova

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 07:57:17PM +, Radhakrishnan, Siva wrote: > Hi All! > Currently I am working on this bug > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1168011 which says we have to change > error message displayed when attaching a volume fails. Currently it catches > all operation errors t

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] [nova] live migration, libvirt 1.3, and the gate

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:59:17PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > The team working on live migration testing started with an experimental > job on Ubuntu 16.04 to try to be using the latest and greatest libvirt + > qemu under the assumption that a set of issues we were seeing are > solved. The short an

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] [nova] live migration, libvirt 1.3, and the gate

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:24:03AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 05/31/2016 05:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:59:17PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > >> The team working on live migration testing started with an experimental > >> job on Ubun

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] [nova] live migration, libvirt 1.3, and the gate

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:19:33AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 05/30/2016 06:25 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:55:47AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 05/26/2016 05:38 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > >>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 05:42:04PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrot

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] NUMA, huge pages, and scheduling

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 12:32:17PM +, Paul Michali wrote: > Hi! > > I've been playing with Liberty code a bit and had some questions that I'm > hoping Nova folks may be able to provide guidance on... > > If I set up a flavor with hw:mem_page_size=2048, and I'm creating (Cirros) > VMs with siz

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Using image metadata to sanity check supplied authentication data at nova 'create' or 'recreate' time?

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:37:25AM -0400, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:31:35AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Clif Houck wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > At Rackspace we're running into an interesting problem: Consider a user > > > wh

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] NUMA, huge pages, and scheduling

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:35:06PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 06/09/2016 05:15 AM, Paul Michali wrote: > > 1) On the host, I was seeing 32768 huge pages, of 2MB size. > > Please check the number of huge pages _per host numa node_. > > > 2) I changed mem_page_size from 1024 to 2048 in the fl

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][os-vif] Expanding vif capability for wiring trunk ports

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:31:13PM -0600, Carl Baldwin wrote: > Hi, > > You may or may not be aware of the vlan-aware-vms effort [1] in > Neutron. If not, there is a spec and a fair number of patches in > progress for this. Essentially, the goal is to allow a VM to connect > to multiple Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:06:50AM +, Wang, Shane wrote: > Hi, OpenStackers, > > As you know, Huawei, Intel and CESI are hosting the 4th China OpenStack Bug > Smash at Hangzhou, China. > The 1st China Bug Smash was at Shanghai, the 2nd was at Xi'an, and the 3rd > was at Chengdu. > > We are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][os-vif] Expanding vif capability for wiring trunk ports

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 02:08:30PM +0200, Armando M. wrote: > On 13 June 2016 at 10:35, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:31:13PM -0600, Carl Baldwin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > You may or may not be aware of the vlan-aware-v

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][os-vif] Expanding vif capability for wiring trunk ports

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:39:29AM -0400, Assaf Muller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Daniel P. Berrange > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:31:13PM -0600, Carl Baldwin wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> You may or may not be aware of the vlan-aware-

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Initial oslo.privsep conversion?

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:51:03AM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 08:24:34AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Tony Breeds > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:10:47PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > > > > > Agreed, but it's the wo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][os-vif] Expanding vif capability for wiring trunk ports

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:35:17PM +, Peters, Rawlin wrote: > That said, there are currently a couple of vif-plugging strategies > we could go with for wiring trunk ports for OVS, each of them > requiring varying levels of os-vif augmentation: > > Strategy 1) When Nova is plugging a trunk port,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][os-vif] Expanding vif capability for wiring trunk ports

strategy 2 also requires you to pass a second bridge name to nova/os-vif, unless I'm mis-understanding the description below. > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:35:17PM +, Peters, Rawlin wrote: > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][os-vif] Expanding vif capability for wiring trunk ports

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:35:57AM -0700, Kevin Benton wrote: > In strategy 2 we just pass 1 bridge name to Nova. That's the one that is > ensures is created and plumbs the VM to. Since it's not responsible for > patch ports it doesn't need to know anything about the other bridge. Ok, so we're alr

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] os-brick privsep failures and an upgrade strategy?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 07:49:54AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: [snip] > The crux of the problem is that os-brick 1.4 and privsep can't be used > without a config file change during the upgrade. Which violates our > policy, because it breaks rolling upgrades. os-vif support is going to face exactly

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] No middle-man - when does/will Nova directly connect iSCSI volumes?

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:59:39PM -0700, Preston L. Bannister wrote: > QEMU has the ability to directly connect to iSCSI volumes. Running the > iSCSI connections through the nova-compute host *seems* somewhat > inefficient. > > There is a spec/blueprint and implementation that landed in Kilo: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] libvirt driver: who should create the libvirt.xml file?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 05:47:57PM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: > White working on the change series to implement the virtlogd feature I > got feedback [1] to move code which creates parts of the libvirt.xml > file from the "driver" module into the "guest" module. I'm a bit > hesitant to do so as t

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] No middle-man - when does/will Nova directly connect iSCSI volumes?

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:09:44AM -0700, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > > volumes connected to QEMU instances eventually become directly connected? > > > Our long term goal is that 100% of all network storage will be connected > > to directly by QEMU. We already have the ability to partially do th

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][pci-passthrough] definitely specify VFIO driver as the host PCI driver for passthrough

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:27:57PM +0800, Chen Fan wrote: > hi all, > in openstack, we can use the pci passthrough feature now, refer to > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Pci_passthrough > but we can't definitely specify the host pci driver is LEGACY_KVM or > newer VFIO, > new V

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >