Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] out-of-tree plugin for Mech driver/L2 and vif_driver

2014-12-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:05:28PM +0100, Maxime Leroy wrote: On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 01:21:36PM +0900, Ryu Ishimoto wrote: On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] anyway to pep8 check on a specified file

2014-12-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 05:04:59PM +0800, Chen CH Ji wrote: tox -e pep8 usually takes several minutes on my test server, actually I only changes one file and I knew something might wrong there anyway to only check that file? Thanks a lot Use ./run_tests.sh -8 That will only check pep8

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] bridge name generator for vif plugging

2014-12-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:15:56AM +0100, Ian Wells wrote: Hey Ryota, A better way of describing it would be that the bridge name is, at present, generated in *both* Nova *and* Neutron, and the VIF type semantics define how it's calculated. I think you're right that in both cases it would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] out-of-tree plugin for Mech driver/L2 and vif_driver

2014-12-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:36:59AM +, Neil Jerram wrote: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com writes: Failing that though, I could see a way to accomplish a similar thing without a Neutron launched agent. If one of the VIF type binding parameters were the name of a script, we could

Re: [openstack-dev] [libvirt][vpnaas] IRC Meeting Clash

2014-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:05:44AM +, Matthew Gilliard wrote: Hello, At the moment, both Libvirt [1] and VPNaaS [2] are down as having meetings in #openstack-meeting-3 at 1500UTC on Tuesdays. Of course, there can be only one - and it looks as if the VPN meeting is the one that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Providing instance's guest OS with data (ssh keys, root password, hostname)

2014-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 05:11:57PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: Hello, If I understood correctly, there are 3 ways to provide guest OS with some data (SSH keys, for example): 1. mount guest root fs on host (with libguestfs) and copy data there. 2. config drive and cloud-init 3. nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Providing instance's guest OS with data (ssh keys, root password, hostname)

2014-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 05:34:19PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: On Friday 19 December 2014 14:17:34 Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 05:11:57PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: Hello, If I understood correctly, there are 3 ways to provide guest OS with some data (SSH

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][neutron][security] Rootwrap on root-intensive nodes

2015-02-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:52:12PM +0100, Philipp Marek wrote: Here are my 2¢. (1) we could get our act together and audit and fix those filter definitions. Remove superfluous usage of root rights, make use of advanced filters for where we actually need them. We have been

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][neutron][security] Rootwrap on root-intensive nodes

2015-02-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:38:16PM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote: If I'm reading that correctly, it does not help with the filtering issues at all, since it needs exactly the same kind of filter. Daniel explained the concept far better than I. Yep, the only thing rootwrap daemon mode does is to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][neutron][security] Rootwrap on root-intensive nodes

2015-02-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:05:16PM +0100, Philipp Marek wrote: (4) I think that ultimately we need to ditch rootwrap and provide a proper privilege separated, formal RPC mechanism for each project. ... we should have a nova-compute-worker daemon running as root, that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][neutron][security] Rootwrap on root-intensive nodes

2015-02-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:10:06AM -0800, James E. Blair wrote: Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org writes: You make a good point when you mention traditional distro here. I would argue that containers are slightly changing the rules of the don't-run-as-root game. Solution (2) aligns

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Logging interactions of libvirt + QEMU in Nova

2015-02-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:15:18AM -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Daniel, Kashyap, One question that came up on IRC was, how/where to configure say a directory where core dumps from qemu would end up. Sean was seeing a scenario where he noticed a core dump from qemu in dmesg/syslog and was

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Logging interactions of libvirt + QEMU in Nova

2015-02-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:57:56AM -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Daniel, The last tip on this page possibly? http://wiki.stoney-cloud.org/wiki/Debugging_Qemu Note that tip is not merely affecting QEMU processes - the recommended change is affecting core dumps for everything on the entire

[openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] RFC: ensuring live migration ends

2015-01-30 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
In working on a recent Nova migration bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1414065 I had cause to refactor the way the nova libvirt driver monitors live migration completion/failure/progress. This refactor has opened the door for doing more intelligent active management of the live

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] RFC: ensuring live migration ends

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:21:31PM -0500, Andrew Laski wrote: On 02/02/2015 11:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:19:45AM -0500, Andrew Laski wrote: On 02/02/2015 05:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 11:20:08AM -0800, Noel Burton-Krahn wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack Foundation] Finding people to work on the EC2 API in Nova

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:45:53PM +0300, Alexandre Levine wrote: Daniel, On 2/2/15 12:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 07:57:08PM +, Tim Bell wrote: Alex, Many thanks for the constructive approach. I've added an item to the list for the Ops meetup

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack Foundation] Finding people to work on the EC2 API in Nova

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 07:57:08PM +, Tim Bell wrote: Alex, Many thanks for the constructive approach. I've added an item to the list for the Ops meetup in March to see who would be interested to help. As discussed on the change, it is likely that there would need to be some

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] RFC: ensuring live migration ends

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:24:20AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: On 31 January 2015 at 05:47, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: In working on a recent Nova migration bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1414065 I had cause to refactor the way the nova libvirt driver

Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation of in tree EC2 API in Nova for Kilo release

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 04:38:44PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 1/30/2015 3:16 PM, Soren Hansen wrote: As I've said a couple of times in the past, I think the architecturally sound approach is to keep this inside Nova. The two main reasons are: * Having multiple frontend API's

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] RFC: ensuring live migration ends

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 03:55:23AM +0100, Vladik Romanovsky wrote: - Original Message - From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org Sent: Friday, 30 January, 2015 11:47:16 AM Subject: [openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] RFC: ensuring live migration ends

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 11:20:08AM -0800, Noel Burton-Krahn wrote: Thanks for bringing this up, Daniel. I don't think it makes sense to have a timeout on live migration, but operators should be able to cancel it, just like any other unbounded long-running process. For example, there's no

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][libvirt] RFC: ensuring live migration ends

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 03:03:45PM -0700, David Medberry wrote: I'll second much of what Rob said: API that indicated how many live-migrations (l-m) were going would be good. API that told you what progress (and start time) a given l-m had made would be great. API to cancel a given l-m would

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] RFC: ensuring live migration ends

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:19:45AM -0500, Andrew Laski wrote: On 02/02/2015 05:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 11:20:08AM -0800, Noel Burton-Krahn wrote: Thanks for bringing this up, Daniel. I don't think it makes sense to have a timeout on live migration

Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation of in tree EC2 API in Nova for Kilo release

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:44:24AM -0800, Dan Smith wrote: I'm with Daniel on that one. We shouldn't deprecate until we are 100% sure that the replacement is up to the task and that strategy is solid. My problem with this is: If there wasn't a stackforge project, what would we do? Nova's

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Logging interactions of libvirt + QEMU in Nova

2015-02-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: Heya, I noticed a ping (but couldn't respond in time) on #openstack-nova IRC about turning on logging in libvirt to capture Nova failures. This was discussed on this list previously by Daniel Berrange, just spelling it out

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][neutron][security] Rootwrap on root-intensive nodes

2015-02-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:58:03AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: The first one is performance -- each call would spawn a Python interpreter which would then call the system command. This was fine when there were just a few calls here and there, not so much when it's called a hundred times in a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Hypervisor support matrix now in GIT

2015-02-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:22:08AM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 2/5/2015 4:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:40:46AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 02/05/2015 11:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: This is a message to alert everyone to the fact that the old

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Hypervisor support matrix now in GIT

2015-02-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:24:24AM -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Team Nova, This is a message to alert everyone to the fact that the old hypervisor support matrix on the wiki[1], should really be considered

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] stuck patches at the nova IRC meeting

2015-02-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote: May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase to propose items, then work through them 1 by 1. Or, we take items one by one according

[openstack-dev] [nova] Hypervisor support matrix now in GIT

2015-02-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
Hi Team Nova, This is a message to alert everyone to the fact that the old hypervisor support matrix on the wiki[1], should really be considered obsolete. The canonical location for it going forward will be http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/support-matrix.html That URL shows current

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] memory reporting for huge pages

2015-02-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:35:55PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: As part of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/virt-driver-large-pages; we have introduced the ability to specify based on flavor/image that we want to use huge pages. Is there a way to query the number of huge pages

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception Request

2015-02-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:55:42AM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 2/6/2015 7:28 AM, Silvan Kaiser wrote: Hello! I am requesting a feature freeze exception for Kilo-2 milestone regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110722/ . This change adds support for using the Quobyte Storage

Re: [openstack-dev] libvirt memory ballooning [nova]

2015-01-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:10:34AM +0530, Vikash Kumar wrote: All, There is blueprint for enabling libvirt memory ballooning https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-memory-ballooning in openstack nova. I think for Hyper-V , its already in place. Can we discuss about the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

2015-02-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:13:05AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 02/11/2015 05:52 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: ## Mailing List vs IRC Channel I get it, our mailing list is freaking busy, keeping up with it is hard and time consuming and that leads to lots of IRC discussions. I don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Compute-node-only installation fails

2015-02-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:32:31AM -0800, Clark Boylan wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2015, at 08:18 AM, Alexander Schmidt wrote: Hi Daniel, with your recent change[1] to error handling in stack.sh, compute node only installations via devstack fail because there is no database selected. A

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Compute-node-only installation fails

2015-02-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:18:35PM +0100, Alexander Schmidt wrote: Hi Daniel, with your recent change[1] to error handling in stack.sh, compute node only installations via devstack fail because there is no database selected. A database should not be required on compute nodes. Was this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

2015-02-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:29:19AM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Daniel P. Berrange's message of 2015-02-17 02:37:50 -0800: On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:14:39PM +0100, Stefano Maffulli wrote: ## Cores are *NOT* special At some point, for some reason that is unknown to me,

Re: [openstack-dev] The root-cause for IRC private channels (was Re: [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it)

2015-02-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:32:53AM -0800, Stefano Maffulli wrote: Changing the subject since Flavio's call for openness was broader than just private IRC channels. On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 10:37 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: If cases of bad community behaviour, such as use of passwd

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] issues with fakelibvirt in tests

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:32:10PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: Looking recently at the following failure - http://logs.openstack.org/04/154804/1/gate/gate-nova-python27/1fe94bf/console.html#_2015-02-12_15_02_19_593 It appears that the fakelibvirt fixture is potentially causing races in tests

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] issues with fakelibvirt in tests

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 01:17:55PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 02/12/2015 01:09 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:32:10PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: Looking recently at the following failure - http://logs.openstack.org/04/154804/1/gate/gate-nova-python27/1fe94bf

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] issues with fakelibvirt in tests

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:49:12AM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 2/12/2015 11:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote: Looking recently at the following failure - http://logs.openstack.org/04/154804/1/gate/gate-nova-python27/1fe94bf/console.html#_2015-02-12_15_02_19_593 It appears that the fakelibvirt

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception Request (libvirt vhostuser vif driver)

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:04:49AM +, Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw wrote: Hi, I would like to request FFE for vhostuser vif driver. 2 reviews : https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/libvirt-vif-vhost-user,n,z BP:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Libguestfs: possibility not to use it, even when installed ?

2015-02-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:23:52PM +0100, Raphael Glon wrote: Hi, This is about review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156633/ 1 line, can be controversial Its purpose is to add the possibility not to use libguestfs for data injection in nova, even when installed. Not discussing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] RFC: Increasing min libvirt to 1.0.6 for LXC driver ?

2015-02-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 04:31:21PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: On 02/13/2015 05:50 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 02/13/2015 09:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 08:49:26AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: On 02/13/2015 07:04 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Historically Nova has had

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Request Spec Freeze Exception (DRBD for Nova)

2015-02-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 03:06:34PM +0100, Philipp Marek wrote: Hi all, Nikola just told me that I need an FFE for the code as well. Here it is: please grant a FFE for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149244/ which is the code for the spec at

[openstack-dev] [nova] List of all Feature Freeze Exception requests

2015-02-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
The following page contains a list of (hopefully) all the feature freeze exception requests that have been made so far for Nova https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-ffe-requests Finding them all in the mailing list is not entirely easy, so if you have requested FFE please do make sure

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

2015-02-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:14:39PM +0100, Stefano Maffulli wrote: ## Cores are *NOT* special At some point, for some reason that is unknown to me, this message changed and the feeling of core's being some kind of superheros became a thing. It's gotten far enough to the point that I've

Re: [openstack-dev] Removal of copyright statements above the Apache 2.0 license header

2015-02-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:28:58AM +0100, Christian Berendt wrote: Is it safe to remove copyright statements above the Apache 2.0 license headers stated in a lot of files? We recenctly removed all @author tags and added a hacking check to not longer add @author tags in the future. Can we do

Re: [openstack-dev] Removal of copyright statements above the Apache 2.0 license header

2015-02-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:16:46PM +0100, Christian Berendt wrote: On 02/17/2015 12:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: In section 4.(c) the LICENSE text says (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The libvirt.cpu_mode and libvirt.cpu_model

2015-01-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:10:29PM +, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: Hi, Daniel I recently tried the libvirt.cpu_mode and libvirt.cpu_model when I was working on cpu_info related code and found bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1412994 . The reason is because with these two flags,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Requirements.txt and optional requirements

2015-01-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:12:29AM -0800, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/27/2015 12:18 AM, Silvan Kaiser wrote: Hello! Do dependencies required only in some contexts belong into requirements.txt? Yesterday we had a short discussion on #openstack-nova regarding how to handle optional

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt]How to customize cpu features in nova

2015-01-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 05:27:20PM +0800, CloudBeyond wrote: Dear Developers, Sorry for interrupting if i sent to wrong email group, but i got a problem on running Solaris 10 on icehouse openstack. I found it is need to disable CPU feature x2apic so that solaris 10 NIC could work in KVM as

Re: [openstack-dev] Why nova mounts FS for LXC container instead of libvirt?

2015-01-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 05:18:19PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: Hello, Libvirt can create loop or nbd device for LXC container and mount it by itself, for instance, you can add something like this to xml config: filesystem type='file' driver type='loop' format='raw'/ source

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Questions on pep8 F811 hacking check for microversion

2015-01-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 07:31:19AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/06/2015 06:25 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote: Based on nova-specs api-microversions.rst we support following function definition format, but it violate the hacking rule pep8 F811 because duplicate function definition we should use #noqa

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][NFV][qa][Telco] Testing NUMA, CPU pinning and large pages

2015-01-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:47:19PM +0100, Marc Koderer wrote: Hi Vladik, I added the [Telco] tag. see below.. Am 12.01.2015 um 03:02 schrieb Vladik Romanovsky vladik.romanov...@enovance.com: Hi everyone, Following Steve Gordon's email [1], regarding CI for NUMA, SR-IOV, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova]Why nova mounts FS for LXC container instead of libvirt?

2015-01-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:28:53PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: On 01/05/2015 02:30 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 05:18:19PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: Hello, Libvirt can create loop or nbd device for LXC container and mount it by itself, for instance, you can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

2015-01-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:32:23PM +, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: I think the major benefits of this defined audience are: 1) One does not need to express themselves in a way that is for public. ( Misunderstandings can be corrected on the fly if needed. ) There is no need to explain to anyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

2015-01-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 08:27:58AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/13/2015 08:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Kuvaja, Erno wrote: [...] 1) One does not need to express themselves in a way that is for public. ( Misunderstandings can be corrected on the fly if needed. ) There is no need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]nova not work with eventlet 0.16.0

2015-01-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 07:39:59AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/14/2015 04:08 AM, Dr. Jens Rosenboom wrote: Am 14/01/15 um 05:17 schrieb Adam Gandelman: So eventlet 0.16.x has started hitting slaves and breaking stable branches (its not like we weren't warned :\ )

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception Request

2015-02-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:47:29AM -0500, Solly Ross wrote: Hi, I would like to request a feature freeze exception for the Websockify security proxy framework blueprint [1]. The blueprint introduces a framework for defining security drivers for the connections between the websocket proxy

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception request for Add the Nova libvirt StorPool attachment driver.

2015-02-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:52:38PM +0200, Peter Penchev wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:28:27PM +0200, Peter Penchev wrote: Hi, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for the change: https

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception request

2015-02-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:55:54AM +0200, Eduard Matei wrote: Hi, I would like to request a FFE for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134134/ It is a change that allows a driver to use type file instead of block for local volumes. It was blocked because at that time there was no use for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception Request for Quiesce boot from volume instances

2015-02-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:20:04PM +, Tomoki Sekiyama wrote: Hello, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for the change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138795/ . This patch makes live volume-boot instance snapshots consistent by quiescing instances before snapshotting.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception Request (Use libvirt storage pools)

2015-02-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 05:29:33PM -0500, Solly Ross wrote: Hi, I would like to request a non-priority feature freeze exception for the Use libvirt storage pools blueprint [1]. The blueprint introduces a new image backed type that uses libvirt storage pools, and is designed to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception Request - bp/libvirt-kvm-systemz

2015-02-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 05:15:26PM +0100, Andreas Maier wrote: Hello, I would like to ask for the following feature freeze exceptions in Nova. The patch sets below are all part of this blueprint: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception request for Add the Nova libvirt StorPool attachment driver.

2015-02-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:28:27PM +0200, Peter Penchev wrote: Hi, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for the change: https://review.openstack.org/140733/ It's a small, self-contained driver for attaching StorPool-backed Cinder volumes to existing Nova virtual machines. It

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Flavor extra-spec and image metadata documentation

2015-02-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:23:54AM +0100, Pasquale Porreca wrote: Hello I am working on a little patch that introduce a new flavor extra-spec and image metadata key-value pair https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153607/ I am wondering how an openstack admin can be aware that a specific value

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

2015-02-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:55:18AM +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings all, During the last two cycles, I've had the feeling that some of the things I love the most about this community are degrading and moving to a state that I personally disagree with. With the hope of seeing these

Re: [openstack-dev] Feature Freeze Exception for hyper-v unit tests refactoring

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:18:49PM +, Claudiu Belu wrote: Hello. I would like to request a FFE for the Hyper-V unit tests refactoring blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/hyper-v-test-refactoring The point of the blueprint was to get rid of the ancient

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception for Add config drive support for PCS containers

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:28:49PM +0300, aburluka wrote: Hello, I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for the change [1] This change implements configuration drive support in Parallels containers. It does not change existing Nova behaviour. It's a last patch in parallels series,

[openstack-dev] RFC: Increasing min libvirt to 1.0.6 for LXC driver ?

2015-02-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
Historically Nova has had a bunch of code which mounted images on the host OS using qemu-nbd before passing them to libvirt to setup the LXC container. Since 1.0.6, libvirt is able todo this itself and it would simplify the codepaths in Nova if we can rely on that In general, without use of user

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Block migrations and Cinder volumes

2015-02-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 01:39:21PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: On 19 June 2014 at 20:38, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:09:33PM -0700, Rafi Khardalian wrote: I am concerned about how block migration functions when Cinder volumes are attached

Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Voting and ATC emails?

2015-02-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 02:34:26PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-02-15 07:00:53 + (+), Gary Kotton wrote: Yes, I think that they go out in batches. It would be best to check with Stefano if you have any issues. Also a reminder, you need to be the owner of a change in Gerrit

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature Freeze Exception for Add config drive support for PCS containers

2015-02-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 02:53:08PM +0300, aburluka wrote: Hi, There are some questions about FFE policy that are not obvious for me as a newbie. Last version of my change was submitted at February, 11th, and has not been changed since that date. That change has +2 from Daniel and +1 from

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Hypervisor support matrix now in GIT

2015-02-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:40:46AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 02/05/2015 11:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: This is a message to alert everyone to the fact that the old hypervisor support matrix on the wiki[1], should really be considered obsolete [...] In that case, I suggest

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] deleting the pylint test job

2015-01-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:52:07PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: The pylint test job has been broken for weeks, no one seemed to care. While waiting for other tests to return today I looked into it and figured out the fix. However, because of nova objects pylint is progressively less and less

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]nova not work with eventlet 0.16.0

2015-01-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:21:10AM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: Odd...eventlet 0.16.0 was released on 12/30 and the eventlet.util import is still in the libvirt host module, but this isn't blowing up in the Jenkins runs, so what's different? There isn't a version cap on eventlet in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]nova not work with eventlet 0.16.0

2015-01-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:36:38PM +0100, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: On 01/06/2015 05:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:21:10AM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: Odd...eventlet 0.16.0 was released on 12/30 and the eventlet.util import is still in the libvirt host module

[openstack-dev] KVM Forum 2015 Call for Participation

2015-03-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
= KVM Forum 2015: Call For Participation August 19-21, 2015 - Sheraton Seattle - Seattle, WA (All submissions must be received before midnight May 1, 2015) = KVM is an

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Block migrations and Cinder volumes

2015-03-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:33:26AM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote: Interesting bug. I think I agree with you that there isn't a good solution currently for instances that have a mix of shared and not-shared storage. I'm curious what Daniel meant by saying that marking the disk shareable is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Block migrations and Cinder volumes

2015-03-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 01:33:26PM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:09:33PM -0700, Rafi Khardalian wrote: I am concerned about how block migration functions when Cinder volumes

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Block migrations and Cinder volumes

2015-03-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:59:19AM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:33:26AM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote: Interesting bug. I think I agree with you that there isn't a good solution

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Do No Evil

2015-03-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 11:19:10PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 03/08/2015 06:34 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: With apologies for derailing the question, but would you care to tell us what evil you're planning on doing? I find it's always best

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] pci stats format and functional tests

2015-03-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:39:23PM +, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: Hi All, I know Yunhong Jiang and Daniel Berrange have been involved in the following, but I thought it worth sending to the list for visibility. While writing code to convert the resource tracker to use the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nitpicking in code reviews

2015-03-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:07:30AM -0500, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 11/03/15 15:06 -1000, John Bresnahan wrote: FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy enough thing to get right and speaks to the quality standard to which the product is held even in commit messages

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] A question about libvirt cpu mode=none configuration

2015-03-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:18:15AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: On 03/13/2015 07:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 08:42:25AM -0400, Steve Gordon wrote: - Original Message - From: park jianlong...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] A question about libvirt cpu mode=none configuration

2015-03-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 08:42:25AM -0400, Steve Gordon wrote: - Original Message - From: park jianlong...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org hello Nova By default, nova libvirt driver configuration

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova compute will delete all your instances if you change its hostname

2015-02-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:57:53AM -0800, Dan Smith wrote: Note that in the above case the libvirt driver changed the hypervisor identifier despite the fact that the hypervisor had not changed, only its communication endpoint. I'd argue they're one and the same, and that's just fine. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova compute will delete all your instances if you change its hostname

2015-02-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:24:36PM +, Matthew Booth wrote: Gary Kotton originally posted this bug against the VMware driver: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1419785 I posted a proposed patch to fix this here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158269/1 However, Dan Smith

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] The None and 'none' for CONF.libvirt.cpu_mode

2015-03-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:52:06PM +, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: Hi, Daniel I'm a bit confused of the None/'none' for CONF.libvirt.cpu_mode. Per my understanding, None means there is no configuration provided and libvirt will select the default value based on the virt_type, none means

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] The None and 'none' for CONF.libvirt.cpu_mode

2015-03-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:24:53PM +, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: Daniel, thanks for your clarification. Another related question is, what will be the guest's real cpu model is the cpu_model is None? This is about a reported regression at The guest CPU will be unspecified - it will be some

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

2015-02-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:51:34AM +1100, Michael Still wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: Does it make sense to purge old stuff regularly so we have a better overview? Or maybe we should chart a distribution of age of proposed

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Libguestfs: possibility not to use it, even when installed ?

2015-02-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Raphael Glon wrote: On 02/23/2015 11:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: The alternative Nova implementation is*not* using fuse, it is using real mounts on the host FS. This is not a potential issue, it is an*actual* issue. There have been bugs in Linux

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Libguestfs: possibility not to use it, even when installed ?

2015-02-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:08:31AM +0100, Raphael Glon wrote: On 02/19/2015 12:45 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:23:52PM +0100, Raphael Glon wrote: I entcountered a similar case more recently on powerkvm 2.1.0 (defect with the libguestfs) What's the actual bug?

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Libguestfs: possibility not to use it, even when installed ?

2015-02-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:54:40AM +0100, Raphael Glon wrote: On 02/23/2015 11:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Fedora 19 is end of life so not really relevant any more as a target. powerkvm 2.1.x is not eol Well Fedora 19 is end of life, so if powerkvm is using Fedora 19, then it is running

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Outcome of the nova FFE meeting for Kilo

2015-02-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:47:20PM +0100, Nikola Đipanov wrote: On 02/20/2015 11:33 PM, Sourabh Patwardhan (sopatwar) wrote: Nova core reviewers, May I request an FFE for Cisco VIF driver: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157616/ This is a small isolated change similar to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Shared storage support

2015-02-25 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:08:32PM +, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, There is an issue with the statistics reported when a nova compute driver has shared storage attached. That is, there may be more than one compute node reporting on the shared storage. A patch has been posted -

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Request non-priority feature freeze exception for VIF_TYPE_TAP

2015-02-25 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:46:05AM +, Neil Jerram wrote: Although we are past the non-priority deadline, I have been encouraged to request this late exception for Project Calico's spec and code adding VIF_TYPE_TAP to Nova. I'm afraid you're also past the freeze exception request deadline.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Outcome of the nova FFE meeting for Kilo

2015-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:24:01PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: Here's another thought: is the big-bang integrated 6-month fixed release cycle useful any more? Can we talk about using more of a moving train model that doesn't have these long freeze cycles? At least for some of the projects, I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker, it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on providing more resources to the teams impacted

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >