Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:14:36PM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: Was: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/057578.html There has been frustration with our current 6 month development cadence. This is an attempt to explain those frustrations and propose a very rough

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:50:45AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 02/24/2015 07:48 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 02/24/2015 12:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: need to do more work

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

2015-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:49:29AM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jeremy, Couldn't find anything strong in the logs to back the reason for OOM. At the time OOM happens, mysqld and java processes have the most RAM

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-26 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:06:14AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 02/24/2015 12:27 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: I'm actually trying to judge it from the POV of users, not just developers. I find it pretty untenable that in the fast moving world of cloud, users have to wait as long as 6

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-25 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:31:58AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Robert Collins wrote: It's also worth noting that we were on a 3-month cycle at the start of OpenStack. That was dropped after a cataclysmic release that managed the feat of (a) not having anything significant done, and (b)

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] eventlet 0.17.3 is now fully Python 3 compatible

2015-04-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:57:01PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:58:57PM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Victor Stinner vstin...@redhat.com wrote: For the full list, see the wiki page:

Re: [openstack-dev] KVM Forum 2015 Call for Participation

2015-04-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
A friendly reminder that KVM Forum 2015 accepts proposal submissions until this coming Friday. Thanks on behalf of the KVM Forum 2015 Program Committee. Daniel On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:51:31AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova-docker] Status update

2015-05-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 02:57:08PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 9 May 2015 at 17:55, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: On the subject of extending the Nova API to accommodate special use cases of containers that are beyond the scope of the Nova API, I think we should resist

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Can we bump MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.2 in Liberty?

2015-05-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:23:25PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: The minimum required version of libvirt in the driver is 0.9.11 still [1]. We've been gating against 1.2.2 in Ubuntu Trusty 14.04 since Juno. The libvirt distro support matrix is here: [2] Can we safely assume the people

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Can we bump MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.2 in Liberty?

2015-05-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:23:25PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: The minimum required version of libvirt in the driver is 0.9.11 still [1]. We've been gating against 1.2.2 in Ubuntu Trusty 14.04 since Juno. The libvirt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Can we bump MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.2 in Liberty?

2015-05-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:23:25PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: The minimum required version of libvirt in the driver is 0.9.11 still [1]. We've been gating against 1.2.2 in Ubuntu Trusty 14.04 since Juno. The libvirt

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Unvalidated user input passed to functions

2015-05-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:41:20PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote: I was looking at the migrations api, and I noticed that the api passes the request query unchecked to get_migrations, where it ultimately ends up in a db query. I was curious and spent a couple of hours checking this morning. There

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Are we happy with libvirt-python = 1.2.0 ?

2015-05-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 02:45:06PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 15 May 2015 at 13:28, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:23:25PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: There are some

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Can we bump MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.2 in Liberty?

2015-05-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 05:27:35PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 15 May 2015 at 11:51, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:23:25PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: The minimum required version of libvirt in the driver is 0.9.11 still [1]. We've been gating

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova-docker] [magnum] [nova] Returning nova-docker to Nova Tree

2015-05-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:58:59PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: On 05/11/2015 03:51 PM, Adrian Otto wrote: I invite Nova and nova-docker team members to join us to discuss this topic, and give us your input. If the Magnum team is interested in helping to maintain it, why not just keep it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Can we bump MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.2 in Liberty?

2015-05-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 06:14:08PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 15 May 2015 at 17:41, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: Its tempting to say its scheduled for removal in N? So we have time to work out if thats possible. I think that at the start of each dev cycle, we look

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty

2015-04-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:16:25PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: On 04/10/2015 11:48 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: What I imagine, though, is that the _source_ of the plugging information could move from Nova to Neutron, so that future plugging-related code changes are a matter for Neutron rather than for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] why is evacuate marked as missing for libvirt?

2015-04-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 01:44:45PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: On 04/14/2015 12:22 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: This came up in IRC this morning, but the hypervisor support matrix is listing evacuate as 'missing' for the libvirt driver:

Re: [openstack-dev] [libvirt] [nova] The risk of hanging when shutdown instance.

2015-04-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:37:04AM +0800, zhang bo wrote: On 2015/3/31 4:36, Eric Blake wrote: On 03/30/2015 06:08 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: On 30.03.2015 11:28, zhang bo wrote: On 2015/3/28 18:06, Rui Chen wrote: snip/ The API virDomainShutdown's description is out of date,

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [nova] FFE for libvirt: proper monitoring of live migration progress

2015-04-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:57:40PM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +344 new lines of code for an exception patch? No way. Let's take time to consider the patch outside the very next release. Agreed, I think it needs a little more time to soak in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] Format of 'locations' data in image metadata ?

2015-05-20 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:43:07PM +0800, Zhi Yan Liu wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Zhi Yan Liu lzy@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:01:37AM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 19/05/15 17

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][libvirt] Serious problem of block migration of a hybrid instance (instance based on local disk and cinder volume attached)

2015-05-20 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:11:26PM +0800, Luo Gangyi wrote: Hi devs, I find a serious problem when I try to live migrate a hybrid instance (instance based on local disk and cinder volume attached) . In current nova, such operation is allowed. But I don't think libvirt can deal

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] libvirt: _do_quality_warnings and the hypervisor support matrix

2015-05-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:41:40PM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: The libvirt driver logs a warning if: hostarch not in (arch.I686, arch.X86_64)) The warning when I start the libvirt driver on system z (arch.S390X) will be: The libvirt driver is not tested on kvm/s390x by the OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] Format of 'locations' data in image metadata ?

2015-05-20 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:01:37AM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 19/05/15 17:19 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: In Nova we are attempting to model[1] the glance image metadata and properties using the Nova object model (now oslo.versionedobjects). The one item I'm stuck on understanding

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][libvirt] Understand why we lookup libvirt domains by instance name

2015-05-21 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:01:50PM -0700, Michael Still wrote: I note that we use instance.name to lookup the libvirt domain a bunch in the driver. I'm wondering why we don't just use instance.uuid all the time -- the code for that already exists. Is there a good reason to not move to always

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:46:07PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: So.. summarizing the various options again: Plan A Just drop stable point releases. (-) No more release notes (-) Lack of reference points to compare installations Plan B Push date-based tags across supported projects from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Release versioning proposal for Liberty

2015-06-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:26:03AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Daniel P. Berrange's message of 2015-06-03 14:28:01 +0100: On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 03:09:28PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: John Garbutt wrote: Given we are thinking Liberty is moving to semantic versioning,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Release versioning proposal for Liberty

2015-06-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:01:06PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote: Hi, (To be clear, this is a proposal to be discussed and not a decision.) The version number can help us communicate that: * you can consume a milestone release ** ... but the docs and translations may not be totally up to date

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Release versioning proposal for Liberty

2015-06-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 03:09:28PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: John Garbutt wrote: Given we are thinking Liberty is moving to semantic versioning, maybe it could look like this: * 12.0.1 (liberty-1) will have some features (hopefully), and will be a tag * 12.0.2.dev1 is the first commit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty Priorties for Nova

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 03:07:51PM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote: On 04/06/15 13:05, Neil Jerram wrote: Hi John, On 04/06/15 12:21, John Garbutt wrote: Hi, We had a great discussion at the summit around priorities: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-nova-liberty-priorities I have made a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FreeBSD host support, round 2

2015-06-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:52:39PM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: Hi, Few months ago I've started a discussion on FreeBSD host support for OpenStack. [1] At a result of discussion it was figured out that there are a number of limitations, mainly on the BHyVe (the FreeBSD hypervisor) side,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty Priorties for Nova

2015-06-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:48:36AM +0200, Andreas Scheuring wrote: Daniel, if I got it right, the vif script blueprint only is about plug/unplug operations and not about generating new xml representations for vif types. What if for a new vif type it's sufficient to have the get_config_*

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] proposal to send bulk hypervisor stats data in periodic notifications

2015-06-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:10:40AM -0500, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: On Sat, 2015-06-20 at 21:35 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: In general I would say that is an unsupported deployment scenario to have other random virt guests running on a nova compute node. On the other hand

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Formal shared VIF type library w/ objects plugins

2015-06-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
In response to the proposal to add a VIF plugin script to the VIF port binding data, I have put up a counter proposal which takes things a bit further and in slightly different direction, with a strong focus on object modelling. Superficially inspired by os-brick, I'm suggesting, we put create a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] proposal to send bulk hypervisor stats data in periodic notifications

2015-06-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:14:00AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 6/20/2015 3:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:50:53PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: Waking up from a rare nap opportunity on a Saturday, this is what was bothering me: The proposal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

2015-06-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:28:59AM +0100, Nikola Đipanov wrote: Hey Nova, I'll cut to the chase and keep this email short for brevity and clarity: Specs don't work! They do nothing to facilitate good design happening, if anything they prevent it. The process layered on top with only a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Keystone] The unbearable lightness of specs

2015-06-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:52:37AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: On 06/24/2015 06:28 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: Gerrit and our spec template are a horrible tool for discussing design. This is the heart of the problem. I think that a proper RFE description in the bug tracker is the best place

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Keystone] The unbearable lightness of specs

2015-06-25 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 06:30:06PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 17:25 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:52:37AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: On 06/24/2015 06:28 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: Gerrit and our spec template are a horrible tool

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] proposal to send bulk hypervisor stats data in periodic notifications

2015-06-20 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:50:53PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: Waking up from a rare nap opportunity on a Saturday, this is what was bothering me: The proposal in the etherpad assumes that we are just getting bulk host/domain/guest VM stats from the hypervisor and sending those in a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stuck on VIF plugin script?

2015-06-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:28:35AM +0100, neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote: ‎It seems like we're possibly stuck now on the VIF plugin script spec [1]; there being core comments in apparently conflicting directions. I wonder if it's still feasible for a version of this to land during Liberty? 

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

2015-06-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 04:46:57PM +, Michael Krotscheck wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:30 AM Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: There is the openstack-specs repo for cross-project specs: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-specs/ That'd be a good

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] modeling connection_info with a versioned object in os-brick

2015-06-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:40:02AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: This is a follow-on to the thread [1] asking about modeling the connection_info dict returned from the os-initialize_connection API. The more I think about modeling that in Nova, the more I think it should really be modeled in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:54:54PM +0200, Andreas Scheuring wrote: On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 09:30 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: It seems the main reason for your new proposal is to deal with the fact that on migration, you need to specify a different NIC name in the XML

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Plan to consolidate FS-style libvirt volume drivers under a common base class

2015-06-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:37:04AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 6/17/2015 4:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 04:21:16PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: The NFS, GlusterFS, SMBFS, and Quobyte libvirt volume drivers are all very similar. I want to extract a common

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Plan to consolidate FS-style libvirt volume drivers under a common base class

2015-06-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 04:21:16PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: The NFS, GlusterFS, SMBFS, and Quobyte libvirt volume drivers are all very similar. I want to extract a common base class that abstracts some of the common code and then let the sub-classes provide overrides where necessary.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Progressing/tracking work on libvirt / vif drivers

2015-06-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:44:24AM +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 29 May 2015 at 18:32, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote: Hi all, Per yesterday's IRC meeting [1], and discussion in Vancouver, Nova work is being somewhat driven by the etherpad at [2]. But this etherpad doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Progressing/tracking work on libvirt / vif drivers

2015-06-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:32:18PM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote: Hi all, Per yesterday's IRC meeting [1], and discussion in Vancouver, Nova work is being somewhat driven by the etherpad at [2]. But this etherpad doesn't have a section for libvirt / vif driver changes. The log at [1] briefly

[openstack-dev] [nova] correct API for getting image metadata for an instance ?

2015-05-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
As part of the work to object-ify the image metadata dicts, I'm looking at the current way the libvirt driver fetches image metadata for an instance, in cases where the compute manager hasn't already passed it into the virt driver API. I see 2 methods that libvirt uses to get the image metadata

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] correct API for getting image metadata for an instance ?

2015-05-28 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:55:59AM +0300, Feodor Tersin wrote: +1 But we should answer the following question before switching libvirt to utils.get_image_from_system_metadata. Some differences of utils.get_image_from_system_metadata from compute.utils.get_image_metadata are: 1) Instance

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] correct API for getting image metadata for an instance ?

2015-05-28 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:22:59PM +0300, Feodor Tersin wrote: I mean the case: - an image has long property AAA and non inheritable property BBB; - an instance based on the image stores truncated AAA and full BBB; - utils.get_image_from_system_metadata returns truncated AAA but not BBB; -

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] IRC meetings agenda is now driven from Gerrit !

2015-05-28 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:53:38PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, TL;DR: IRC meetings list now lives at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org ical file with meetings is now at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irc-meetings.ical This is very nice work indeed - must better than the wiki

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Network issue with libvirt-xen driver, iptables race

2015-07-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 03:02:54PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: Hi all, We have an issue with the driver libvirt-xen. When a guest is started by Nova, nova-network is going to do some network setup and call iptables-{save,restore}, and the Xen toolstack is going to setup the vif of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] schedule instance based on CPU frequency ?

2015-06-30 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:42:01PM +0800, ChangBo Guo wrote: CPU frequency is an import performance parameter, currently nova drivers just report cpu_info without frequency. we stored the compute node cpu_info in database with colum compute_nodes.cpu_info, we can add the frequency

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Network issue with libvirt-xen driver, iptables race

2015-07-03 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 03:55:37PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:45:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 03:02:54PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: Hi all, We have an issue with the driver libvirt-xen. When a guest is started by Nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Andreas Scheuring wrote: Hi Daniel, Neil and others, I was thinking about introducing libvirt-network as a new vif type to nova. It can be used when Neutron prepares a libvirt network for attaching guests. Would you see any general concerns with

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:02:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:54:54PM +0200, Andreas Scheuring wrote: On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 09:30 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: It seems the main reason for your new proposal is to deal with the fact that on migration

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][libvirt] Understand why we lookup libvirt domains by instance name

2015-05-21 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:34:20PM +1200, Xav Paice wrote: On 21/05/15 21:23, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:01:50PM -0700, Michael Still wrote: I note that we use instance.name to lookup the libvirt domain a bunch in the driver. I'm wondering why we don't just use

[openstack-dev] [nova][glance] Format of 'locations' data in image metadata ?

2015-05-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
In Nova we are attempting to model[1] the glance image metadata and properties using the Nova object model (now oslo.versionedobjects). The one item I'm stuck on understanding is the 'locations' field and more specifically the 'metadata' element in each location entry In the file

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Using depends-on for patches which require an approved spec

2015-05-26 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Michael Still wrote: Hey, it would be cool if devs posting changes for nova which depend on us approving their spec could use Depends-On to make sure their code doesn't land until the spec does. Does it actually bring any benefit ? Any change for

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Streamlining of config options in nova

2015-08-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 07:20:24PM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: Another thing which makes it hard to understand the impact of the config options is, that it's not clear how the interdependency to other config options is. As an example, the serial_console.base_url has a dependency to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we allow overcommit for a single VM?

2015-08-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:22:28PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: I tried bringing this up on the irc channel, but nobody took the bait. Hopefully this will generate some discussion. I just filed bug 1485631. Nikola suggested one way of handling it, but there are some complications that I

Re: [openstack-dev] Hyper-V 2008 R2 support

2015-08-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 02:34:19PM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote: Hi guys, Just a quick note on the Windows editions support matrix updates for the Nova Hyper-V driver and Neutron networking-hyperv ML2 agent: We are planning to drop legacy Windows Server / Hyper-V Server 2008 R2

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Streamlining of config options in nova

2015-07-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:48:15AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 05:55:36PM +0300, mhorban wrote: Hi all, During development process in nova I faced with an issue related with config options. Now we have lists of config options and registering options mixed

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Streamlining of config options in nova

2015-07-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 05:55:36PM +0300, mhorban wrote: Hi all, During development process in nova I faced with an issue related with config options. Now we have lists of config options and registering options mixed with source code in regular files. From one side it can be convenient: to

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Streamlining of config options in nova

2015-07-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:57:01AM -0500, Michael Still wrote: In fact, I did an example of what I thought it would look like already: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205154/ I welcome discussion on this, especially from people who couldn't make it to the mid-cycle. Its up to y'all if

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Streamlining of config options in nova

2015-07-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:56:41AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Daniel P. Berrange's message of 2015-07-24 09:48:15 +0100: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 05:55:36PM +0300, mhorban wrote: Hi all, During development process in nova I faced with an issue related with config

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Streamlining of config options in nova

2015-07-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:29:56PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-07-24 09:07:13 -0700: Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 05:55:36PM +0300, mhorban wrote: Hi all, During development process in nova I faced with an issue

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Device names supplied to the boot request

2015-07-21 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 08:12:18AM +0300, Feodor Tersin wrote: The third reason is that at least xen supports them.I know that vdr becomes /dev/xvdr, but:1) I believe the main aim of specifying device name is to easy distinguish among devices. A last char is enough for that. And xen supports

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [tc][all][osprofiler] OSprofiler is dead, long live OSprofiler

2015-11-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 02:57:37AM -0800, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Hi stackers, > > Intro > --- > > It's not a big secret that OpenStack is huge and complicated ecosystem of > different > services that are working together to implement OpenStack API. > > For example booting VM is going

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] hackathon day

2015-11-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:15:09AM +, Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services) wrote: > Hi > > I knew that people in China had a 3 days hackathon few months ago I was > thinking to have a similar thing in Europe. > My original idea was to propose to add an extra day after the mid-cycle but I > am

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [nova] Image Signature Verification

2015-11-13 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:30:53PM +, Poulos, Brianna L. wrote: > Hello, > > There has recently been additional discussion about the best way to handle > image signature verification in glance and nova [1]. There are two > options being discussed for the signature (the examples below using >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [nova] Image Signature Verification

2015-11-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:09:42PM -0300, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 13/11/15 09:35 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:30:53PM +, Poulos, Brianna L. wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>There has recently been additional discussion ab

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][policy] Exposing hypervisor details to users

2015-11-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:08:59PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hello all, > I came across [1] which is notionally an ironic bug in that horizon > presents > VM operations (like suspend) to users. Clearly these options don't make sense > to ironic which can be confusing. > > There is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Sylvain Bauza to nova-core

2015-11-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:32:00PM +, John Garbutt wrote: > Hi, > > I propose we add Sylvain Bauza[1] to nova-core. > > Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work, > including some quality reviews, particularly around the Scheduler. > > Please respond with comments,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Alex Xu to nova-core

2015-11-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:32:04PM +, John Garbutt wrote: > Hi, > > I propose we add Alex Xu[1] to nova-core. > > Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work, > including some quality reviews, particularly around the API. > > Please respond with comments, +1s, or

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][policy] Exposing hypervisor details to users

2015-11-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 07:09:59AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/06/2015 04:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > I think that exposing hypervisor_type is very much the *wrong* approach > > to this problem. The set of allowed actions varies based on mu

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka

2015-10-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 03:54:29PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 10/07/2015 03:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > >For suspended instances, the scenario is really the same as with completely > >offline instances. The only extra step is that you need to migrate the saved &

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] naming N and O releases nowish

2015-10-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:57:59PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Sean Dague wrote: > > We're starting to make plans for the next cycle. Long term plans are > > getting made for details that would happen in one or two cycles. > > > > As we already have the locations for the N and O summits I

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] Reviews with a prio label?

2015-10-20 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:09:51PM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: > In ML post [1] I wondered if it would be possible to introduce a new > "prio" label in Gerrit which could help in focusing review efforts to > increase the throughput. With this new post I'd like to discuss if we > think this could

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Upgrade to Gerrit 2.11

2015-10-21 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:08:29PM -0700, Zaro wrote: > Hello All, > > The openstack-infra team would like to upgrade from our Gerrit 2.8 to > Gerrit 2.11. We are proposing to do the upgrade shortly after the > Mitaka summit. The main motivation behind the upgrade is to allow us > to take

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka

2015-10-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 11:43:52AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 10/06/2015 11:27 AM, Paul Carlton wrote: > > > > > >On 06/10/15 17:30, Chris Friesen wrote: > >>On 10/06/2015 08:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >>>On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:54:2

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka

2015-10-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:26:05AM +0100, Paul Carlton wrote: > I'd be happy to take this on in Mitaka Ok, first step would be to re-propose the old Kilo spec against Mitaka and we should be able to fast-approve it. > >>>So my reading of this is the issue could be addressed in Mitaka by >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] revisiting minimum libvirt version

2015-10-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:32:53AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > The following review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/171098 attempts to > raise the minimum libvirt version to 1.0.3. > > In May that was considered a no go - >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Min libvirt for Mitaka is 0.10.2 and suggest Nxxx uses 1.1.1

2015-10-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 07:17:09AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 10/07/2015 07:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:55:44AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > >> Isn't RHEL 7.1 just an update stream on RHEL 7.0? It seems a little > >> weird to kee

[openstack-dev] [nova] FYI: Updated Mitaka specs template

2015-10-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
FYI anyone who is pushing specs for review against Mitaka should be aware that yesterday we merged a change to the spec template. Specifically we have removed the "Project priority" section of the template, since it has been a source of much confusion, cannot be filled out until after the summit

[openstack-dev] [nova] Min libvirt for Mitaka is 0.10.2 and suggest Nxxx uses 1.1.1

2015-10-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
In the Liberty version of OpenStack we had a min libvirt of 0.9.11 and printed a warning on startup if you had < 0.10.2, to the effect that Mitaka will required 0.10.2 This mail is a reminder that we will[1] mandate libvirt >= 0.10.2 when Mitaka is released. Looking forward to the N

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Min libvirt for Mitaka is 0.10.2 and suggest Nxxx uses 1.1.1

2015-10-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:55:44AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 10/07/2015 06:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > In the Liberty version of OpenStack we had a min libvirt of 0.9.11 and > > printed a warning on startup if you had < 0.10.2, to the effect that > > Mit

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka

2015-10-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:27:12PM +0100, Paul Carlton wrote: > > > On 06/10/15 17:30, Chris Friesen wrote: > >On 10/06/2015 08:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >>On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:54:21PM +0100, Paul Carlton wrote: > >>>https://review.openstack.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Min libvirt for Mitaka is 0.10.2 and suggest Nxxx uses 1.1.1

2015-10-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 11:46:58AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > In the Liberty version of OpenStack we had a min libvirt of 0.9.11 and > printed a warning on startup if you had < 0.10.2, to the effect that > Mitaka will required 0.10.2 > > This mail is a reminder that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Min libvirt for Mitaka is 0.10.2 and suggest Nxxx uses 1.1.1

2015-10-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 11:13:12AM +, Tim Bell wrote: > > Although Red Hat is no longer supporting RHEL 6 after Icehouse, a number of > users such as GoDaddy and CERN are using Software Collections to run the > Python 2.7 code. Do you have any educated guess as to when you might switch to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka

2015-10-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:54:21PM +0100, Paul Carlton wrote: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85048/ was raised to address the > migration of instances that are not running but people did not warm to > the idea of bringing a stopped/suspended instance to a paused state to > migrate it. Is

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] naming N and O releases nowish

2015-10-07 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 07:47:31AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > We're starting to make plans for the next cycle. Long term plans are > getting made for details that would happen in one or two cycles. > > As we already have the locations for the N and O summits I think we > should do the naming

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] testing for setting the admin password via the libvirt driver

2015-08-28 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 09:14:33AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: Support to change the admin password on an instance via the libvirt driver landed in liberty [1] but the hypervisor support matrix wasn't updated [2]. There is a version restriction in the driver that it won't work unless you're

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] What is the no_device flag for in block device mapping?

2015-09-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 05:32:29PM +, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm wondering what the "no_device" flag is used for in the block device > mappings. I had a dig around in the code but couldn't figure out why it > is there. The name suggests an obvious meaning, but I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][SR-IOV] Hardware changes and shifting PCI addresses

2015-09-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:34:31PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 09/10/2015 05:23 PM, Brent Eagles wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I was recently informed of a situation that came up when an engineer > >added an SR-IOV nic to a compute node that was hosting some guests that > >had VFs attached. Unfortunately,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][SR-IOV] Hardware changes and shifting PCI addresses

2015-09-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 06:53:06PM -0230, Brent Eagles wrote: > Hi, > > I was recently informed of a situation that came up when an engineer > added an SR-IOV nic to a compute node that was hosting some guests that > had VFs attached. Unfortunately, adding the card shuffled the PCI > addresses

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-30 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:10:43AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/30/2015 07:29 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > > Sean, > > > > openstack client supports Cinder API v2 since Liberty. What it the right > > way ti fix grenade? > > Here's the thing. > > With this change: Rally doesn't work,

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [nova] live migration in Mitaka

2015-10-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 04:38:30PM -0400, Mathieu Gagné wrote: > On 2015-10-02 4:18 PM, Pavel Boldin wrote: > > > > You have to pass device names from /dev/, e.g., if a VM has > > ephemeral disk > > attached at /dev/vdb you need to pass in 'vdb'. Format expected by > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka

2015-09-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 01:48:17PM +0100, Paul Carlton wrote: > > > On 22/09/15 16:44, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:29:46AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > >>>>There is also work on post-copy migration in QEMU. Normally with live > >&

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

2015-09-25 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:05:09AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > git tools such as git log and git show indent the commit message in > their output, so you don't actually have the full 79/80 character width > to work with. That's where the 72 comes from. It is also commonly done because so that

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >