Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] tools for creating new releases

On 08/08/2017 03:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: We realized recently that we haven't publicized some of the tools in the releases repository very well. One tool that will be useful this week as you prepare your release candidates is the 'new-release' command, which edits a deliverable file to add a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL Voting is now open

On 08/10/2017 02:01 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote: Hello Again! Elections are underway and will remain open for you to cast your vote until Aug 16th, 2017 23:45 UTC. We are having elections for Ironic and Documentation. By the way, why do I receive a poll, given that I'm one of candidates? :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][I18n][OpenStackClient][Quality Assurance][Security][Telemetry][ec2-api][heat][horizon][ironic][kuryr][magnum][manila][monasca][murano][neutron][octavia][senlin][solu

Hi Tony! I hope to finish releasing Ironic stuff next week. We still have a few critical things to land. On 08/10/2017 07:46 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi All, In an effort to qualify which projects are likley to be affected if when we open the requirements repo I generated a list of all

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Countdown to Pike final

Hi team! I would like to finish our releases, or at least the most of them, by the middle of next week to leave some time for stabilization and to avoid problems with the requirements repo branching. We have released ironic-lib, ironic-ui, sushy and the clients already. Now we need to figure

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Forming our plans around Ansible

On 07/12/2017 04:18 AM, Steve Baker wrote: On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:47 AM, James Slagle > wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Steve Baker > wrote: > > > On Tue,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Let's use Ansible to deploy OpenStack services on Kubernetes

On 07/14/2017 06:16 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: https://xkcd.com/927/ I don't think adopting helm as a dependency adds more complexity then writing more new k8s object deployment tooling? I don't know much about the containerization work, and I don't have a big say in TripleO, but that's the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] releasing tripleoclient final (pike)

On 07/25/2017 05:48 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Hi! Hi! This week is pike-3 milestone and also final release for clients, which means we're going to cut a stable/pike branch for python-tripleoclient. It will be done by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486657/ before Wednesday EOD - please

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Results of the Pike-3 priorities clean-up

Hi team! We cleaned up our priorities on the last meeting. Here are things that we are still pushing for (roughly from top to bottom): * Generic boot-from-volume * Rolling upgrades and grenade-partial * Reference architecture guide * Driver composition reform follow-up * OSC default API

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Heads-up: classic drivers future (please read if you maintain a driver)

Hi all! With the driver composition implemented in Ocata and polished in Pike, we would like to eventually get rid of the old-style drivers. I believe the new hardware types are much easier to understand, create and use. We have landed a spec laying down the deprecation plan [1]. In essence,

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Soft feature freeze proposal

Hi team! As discussed on the IRC meeting, I would like to propose a soft feature freeze for ironic, starting with Aug 1st. I hope this proposal will help us better concentrate on the priorities and finally be able to finish most of the things we've committed to. Between this day and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][keystone] internal endpoints vs sanity

These questions are to the operators, and should be asked on openstack-operators IMO (maybe with tuning the overall tone to be a bit less aggressive). On 07/24/2017 10:23 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote: Thanks for your answer. The real question is do we agree in the internalULR usage what suggested

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] another ironic-stable-maint update proposal

Hi all! I'd like to propose another round of changes to the ironic-stable-maint group [0]: 1. Add Julia Kreger (TheJulia) to the group. Julia is one of the top reviewers in Ironic, and she is quite active on stable branches as well [1]. 2. Remove Jim Rollenhagen (sigh..) as he no longer

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] ironic-stable-maint update proposal

Hi all! I'd like to propose the following changes to the ironic-stable-maint group [0]: 1. Add Ruby Loo (rloo) to the group. Ruby does not need introduction in the Ironic community, she has been with the project for really long time and is well known for her high-quality and thorough reviews.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Resigning as a core reviewer

I'm really sad to hear it :( You've been a source of incredibly valuable opinions, and overall a great team member! I wish you the very best of luck in whatever you're up for right now. Please let us know if you ever plan to come back - you'll be very welcome. Thanks for everything! On

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Goodbye ironic o/

Thanks Mario, it was a pleasure to work with you! You did help us a lot during this (unfortunately short) time as an Ironic core. As it usually is, you're welcome to be fast-forwarded back in the team, if the stars align for you to get back to ironic. Good luck with your new assignments! On

[openstack-dev] [ironic] summary of the virtual meetup

Hi all! We had a virtual meetup on Tuesday, he's a short summary. Detailed notes are here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-virtual-meetup We went over the priorities list to figure out what changes have to be made to accommodate the recent team changes. Four priorities found new

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

On 04/22/2017 12:02 AM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: Hello Ironic team, Thanks for your comments on the last round. Here is the latest Pixie Boots mascot (in every variation) ready for your downloading pleasure. We’ll also be updating these to a public repo and to openstack.org/project-mascots,

Re: [openstack-dev] Project Navigator Updates - Feedback Request

Quick question, sorry for top-posting. How does it represent projects that have several API services, like Baremetal or Telemetry? On 03/24/2017 05:57 PM, Lauren Sell wrote: Hi everyone, We’ve been talking for some time about updating the project navigator, and we have a draft ready to share

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Dmitry Tantsur candidacy for Bare Metal (Ironic) PTL

of our wonderful team :) -- Dmitry Tantsur __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] support for various glance image reference formats - do we need them all?

Hi! Thanks for raising this. On 08/07/2017 02:47 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: Hi all, currently our GlanceImageService seems to support several ways of defining a reference to glance image: 1) simple image UUID [0] 2) image UUID prefixed with 'glance://' protocol [1] (well, actually

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] heads up: custom resource classes, bare metal scheduling and you

Hi all! There have been some talks about $subj recently, but I've just realized that not everyone is still aware of it. So, this is a heads up about recent changes in nova scheduling of bare metal instances. If you only use standalone deployments, you can ignore it. If you run a 3rd party CI,

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Team dinner at the PTG?

Hi folks! We're trying to organize an informal team meeting at some place, probably with burgers and beer, in Denver. Note that it won't be sponsored. Please vote in the Doodle https://doodle.com/poll/nvavg9ab9ebq2e4v about the days you're available. If you're local, we need you help

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] OpenStack moving both too fast and too slow at the same time

On 05/09/2017 07:59 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Matt Riedemann wrote: On 5/8/2017 1:10 PM, Octave J. Orgeron wrote: I do agree that scalability and high-availability are definitely issues for OpenStack when you dig deeper into the sub-components. There is a lot of re-inventing of the wheel when

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] demo: node auto-discovery with one power button click

Hi all! While people are enjoying the Forum, I also have something to show. I've got a lot of questions about auto-discovery, so I've recorded a demo of it using TripleO Ocata: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJkDxxjL3NQ. Please let me know what you think! Dmitry

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Proposal to change the timing of Feature Freeze

On 05/17/2017 05:34 PM, Chris Jones wrote: Hey folks I have a fairly simple proposal to make - I'd like to suggest that Feature Freeze move to being much earlier in the release cycle (no earlier than M.1 and no later than M.2 would be my preference). I welcome projects to experiment with

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] How to slice the week to minimize conflicts

Hi Thierry, thanks for raising it. I think it's very important to discuss indeed. On 05/18/2017 11:27 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, For the PTG events we have a number of rooms available for 5 days, of which we need to make the best usage. We also want to keep it simple and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Ironic-UI review requirements - single core reviews

On 05/15/2017 09:10 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: All, In our new reality, in order to maximize velocity, I propose that we loosen the review requirements for ironic-ui to allow faster iteration. To this end, I suggest we move ironic-ui to using a single core reviewer for code approval, along the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] demo: node auto-discovery with one power button click

On 05/11/2017 07:28 PM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: On 11.5.2017 16:56, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! While people are enjoying the Forum, I also have something to show. I've got a lot of questions about auto-discovery, so I've recorded a demo of it using TripleO Ocata: https://www.youtube.com

[openstack-dev] [ironic] the driver composition and breaking changes to the supported interfaces

Hi folks! I want to raise something we haven't apparently thought about when working on the driver composition reform. For example, an iRMC patch [0] replaces 'pxe' boot with 'irmc-pxe'. This is the correct thing to do in this case. They're extending the PXE boot, and need a new class and a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Goodbye^W See you later

Sigh. Jim, you're on of the brightest people I've ever worked with. The project will definitely have hard time recovering from the loss, and so will I personally. Thank you for your great patches, discussions, for your leadership during your times as a PTL. I heartily wish you the very best

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic] Hardware provisioning testing for Ocata

On 06/08/2017 02:21 PM, Justin Kilpatrick wrote: Morning everyone, I've been working on a performance testing tool for TripleO hardware provisioning operations off and on for about a year now and I've been using it to try and collect more detailed data about how TripleO performs in scale and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Moving away from "big tent" terminology

On 06/19/2017 05:42 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: On Jun 15, 2017, at 5:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote: [...] I think those are all fine. The other term that popped into my head was "Friends of OpenStack" as a way to describe the openstack-hosted efforts that

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] [dib] RFC: moving/transitioning the ironic-agent element to the ironic-python-agent tree

As no objections were recorded, I'm proceeding with the plan. Governance change for ironic-python-agent-builder: https://review.openstack.org/476900. On 05/22/2017 04:59 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 05/22/2017 03:10 PM, Sam Betts (sambetts) wrote: I would like to suggest that we create a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Missing answers on Pike release goals

Not an offender, apparently, but lemme throw some less optimistic views here. On 05/23/2017 12:40 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: OK, I'll bite, being one of the until-last-week offenders... On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: As part of release management we

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] why is glance image service code so complex?

On 05/23/2017 05:52 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: Hi all, I've started to dig through the part of Ironic code that deals with glance and I am confused by some things: 1) Glance image service classes have methods to create, update and delete images. What's the use case behind them? Is

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 05/24/2017 12:10 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments were positive. We need to solidify how the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 05/24/2017 02:30 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 05/24/2017 12:10 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xmOdT6uZ5XqViActr5sBOaz_mEgjKSCY7NEWcAEcT-A/pubhtml?gid=397241312=true Let me know what you think. If you're scheduled on the Wed-Fri

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

On 05/24/2017 05:57 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On 05/24/2017 10:13 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-05-24 08:28:56 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] In ATL the Cinder room was very large, to the point that it was actually a little difficult hearing some people for some of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSC][ironic][mogan] Can we share the same keyword 'baremetal'?

On 05/25/2017 10:20 AM, Zhenguo Niu wrote: hi all, Hi! I'm from the Mogan team, we chose the same keyward 'baremetal' when implementing a OSC plugin [1]. As we think the baremetal command is representative of a baremetal resource, not a service, so it makes sense for different projects to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using keystone right - catalog, endpoints, tokens and noauth

On 05/24/2017 11:46 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: Hi all, There are several problems or inefficiencies in how we are dealing with auth to other services. Although it became much better in Newton, some things are still to be improved and I like to discuss how to tackle those and my ideas for

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] [dib] RFC: moving/transitioning the ironic-agent element to the ironic-python-agent tree

Hi all! Some time ago we discussed moving ironic-agent element that is used to build IPA to IPA tree itself. It got stuck, and I'd like to restart the discussion. The reason for this move is to make the DIB element in question one of *official* ways to build IPA. This includes gating on both

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc][ptls][all] Documentation publishing future

On 05/22/2017 11:39 AM, Alexandra Settle wrote: Hi everyone, The documentation team are rapidly losing key contributors and core reviewers. We are not alone, this is happening across the board. It is making things harder, but not impossible. Since our inception in 2010, we’ve been climbing

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc][ptls][all] Documentation publishing future

On 05/22/2017 04:09 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-05-22 12:26:25 +0200: On 05/22/2017 11:39 AM, Alexandra Settle wrote: Hi everyone, The documentation team are rapidly losing key contributors and core reviewers. We are not alone, this is happening

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] [dib] RFC: moving/transitioning the ironic-agent element to the ironic-python-agent tree

, 13:40, "Dmitry Tantsur" <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote: Hi all! Some time ago we discussed moving ironic-agent element that is used to build IPA to IPA tree itself. It got stuck, and I'd like to restart the discussion. The reason for this move is to make

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSC][ironic][mogan] Can we share the same keyword 'baremetal'?

On 05/25/2017 11:38 AM, Zhenguo Niu wrote: On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com <mailto:dtant...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 05/25/2017 10:20 AM, Zhenguo Niu wrote: hi all, Hi! I'm from the Mogan team, we chose the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] overcloud containers patches todo

On 06/05/2017 10:55 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 05/06/17 10:29 +0200, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: Hi I think a "deep dive" about containers in TripleO and some helpful documentation would help a lot for valuable reviews of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Role updates

On 06/13/2017 12:00 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:55 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote: On 06/09/2017 05:24 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: Hey folks, I wanted to bring to your attention that we've merged the change[0] to add a basic set of roles that can be co

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Moving away from "big tent" terminology

On 06/15/2017 11:56 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: Just an immediate reaction: to me "OpenStack-Hosted projects" is not very distinct from "OpenStack projects". So with that terminology I think there will still be confusion (perhaps more). This was my reaction as well. For people who misunderstood

Re: [openstack-dev] [forum] Future of Stackalytics

On 06/11/2017 03:17 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 6/8/2017 12:57 AM, Adam Harwell wrote: As a core reviewer for LBaaS I actually find Stackalytics quite helpful for giving me a quick snapshot of contributions, and it lines up almost perfectly in my experience with what I see when I'm actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Role updates

On 06/09/2017 05:24 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: Hey folks, I wanted to bring to your attention that we've merged the change[0] to add a basic set of roles that can be combined to create your own roles_data.yaml as needed. With this change the roles_data.yaml and roles_data_undercloud.yaml files in

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] the driver composition and breaking changes to the supported interfaces

. But overall, I think it's great if ironic can provide a mechanism like the second one. But as you said, that is technically challenging. Regards TienDC -Original Message- From: Dmitry Tantsur [mailto:dtant...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 20:44 To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] ironic-stable-maint update proposal

With no objections recorded, I think we can make this change. Tony or someone with required ACL, could you please do it? On 04/27/2017 04:21 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! I'd like to propose the following changes to the ironic-stable-maint group [0]: 1. Add Ruby Loo (rloo) to the group

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Team photos

Hi all! Here are wonderful team photos from the PTG: serious - https://www.dropbox.com/s/9nz92cjm1sztqpl/ironic-team-serious.JPG?dl=0 funny - https://www.dropbox.com/s/ue4xcklvewhxdt2/ironic-team-funny.JPG?dl=0 Thanks Kendall for organizing it! Dmitry. P.S. I have to apologize to people who

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Queens priorities and release schedule (please read)

Hi all! This is an update to our processes based on what we discussed during the PTG. (1) Queens cycle priorities We realized that we took too much on ourselves during the Pike cycle. We also realized that it ended up with a (false) perception that the priorities list is our complete

[openstack-dev] [ironic] my notes from the PTG in Denver

Hi all! Here are my notes from the ironic (and a bit of nova) room in Denver. The same content in a nicely rendered form is on my blog: http://dtantsur.github.io/posts/ironic-ptg-denver-2017-1.html http://dtantsur.github.io/posts/ironic-ptg-denver-2017-2.html Here goes the raw rst-formatted

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

(top-posting, as it is not a direct response to a specific line) This is your friendly reminder that we're not quite near containerized ironic-inspector. The THT for it has probably never been tested at all, and the iptables magic we do may simply not be containers-compatible. Milan would

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][quickstart][rdo] shipping python-virtualbmc in Newton to allow undercloud upgrades from Newton to Queens

Hi! The only issue I can think of is python-pyghmi version. I think one in Newton is too old and has to be bumped to at least one in Ocata. But if you say you've deployed successfully, probably it was already bumped for some reason. On 10/04/2017 02:08 PM, Lee Yarwood wrote: Hello all, I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Proposing Shivanand Tendulker for ironic-core

> > > > +1 > > > > Regards > > Nisha > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Loo, Ruby <ruby@intel.com > <mailto:ruby@intel.com>&

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Sydney Forum Project Onboarding Rooms

Hi! I would like to request a room for Ironic. I won't be there, but Julia Kreger agreed to run the room. I hope to find more ironic people to be there :) On 10/05/2017 05:50 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Hello :) > > We have a little over 40 slots available so we

[openstack-dev] [ironic] summary of the ironic-inspector virtual sprint

Hi all, We've had a virtual sprint for ironic-inspector. Most of the time we were discussing the potential re-architecture of it. Please see https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/inspector-queens-virtual-ptg for notes and action items, and https://bluejeans.com/s/5yDpk for the recording. Dmitry

[openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic and traits

Hi all, I promised John to dump my thoughts on traits to the ML, so here we go :) I see two roles of traits (or kinds of traits) for bare metal: 1. traits that say what the node can do already (e.g. "the node is doing UEFI boot") 2. traits that say what the node can be *configured* to do (e.g.

[openstack-dev] [ironic] PTG schedule (preliminary version)

Hi all! We're close to finalizing our schedule, and the current version can be seen at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-queens-ptg. I've created four etherpads per block of topics for our notes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-queens-ptg-ongoing-work

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Add Mohammed Naser to cores

I think it's not unreasonable to give core rights to the PTL :) On 09/05/2017 05:42 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: Hey folks, I'm writing to ask that we add mnaser to the cores list for the puppet modules. He's been a user and contributor for some time and is also the new PTL. Let me know if there

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] tools for creating new releases

On 08/22/2017 02:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-08-22 11:38:10 +0200: On 08/22/2017 11:34 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 08/21/2017 09:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-08-21 11:21:59 -0400: Excerpts from

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Proposing Shivanand Tendulker for ironic-core

Hi all! I would like to propose Shivanand (stendulker) to the core team. His stats have been consistently high [1]. He has given a lot of insightful reviews recently, and his expertise in the iLO driver is also very valuable for the team. As usual, please respond with your comments and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Dell Ironic CI Migration

Hi! Thanks for letting us know. Next time please update the whiteboard with such information. I've updated it for you now, but I don't know the estimated end of downtime, could you please fill it in? On 09/29/2017 08:34 PM, rajini.kart...@dell.com wrote: Hi all Dell Ironic 3^rd party CI is

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][nova][ironic][mogan] Evaluate Mogan project

Hi! Thanks for raising this. I was interested in the project for some time, but I never got a chance to wrap my head around. I also have a few concerns - please see inline. On 09/25/2017 01:27 PM, Zhenguo Niu wrote: Hi folks, First of all, thanks for the audiences for Mogan project update

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers core cleanup and additions

We seem to be in agreement, so I'll apply these changes. Thanks all! On 08/22/2017 11:24 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! This email concerns the ironic-staging-drivers project which is outside of the official Ironic governance. Please ignore it if you don't care about this project. I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] tools for creating new releases

On 08/21/2017 09:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-08-21 11:21:59 -0400: Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-08-15 14:11:05 +0200: On 08/08/2017 03:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: We realized recently that we haven't publicized some of the tools

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] tools for creating new releases

On 08/22/2017 11:34 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 08/21/2017 09:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-08-21 11:21:59 -0400: Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-08-15 14:11:05 +0200: On 08/08/2017 03:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: We realized

[openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers core cleanup and additions

Hi all! This email concerns the ironic-staging-drivers project which is outside of the official Ironic governance. Please ignore it if you don't care about this project. I've checked the core [1] and the release [2] teams for the project, and I think they need an update based (see [3]). I

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [release] [stable] pike release

(adding the release and stable team just for their information) Thanks Julia and everyone for handling this situation while I was out. More comments inline. On 08/17/2017 07:13 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: Greetings everyone! As some of you may have noticed, we released ironic 9.0.0 today. But

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [release] [stable] pike release

On 08/21/2017 05:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Sam Betts (sambetts)'s message of 2017-08-21 10:01:35 +: Quick reply with my thoughts in-line. Sam On 21/08/2017, 10:13, "Dmitry Tantsur" <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote: (adding the release and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] PTG planning etherpad

/nvavg9ab9ebq2e4v. We will need some time to do the booking in advance. On 08/21/2017 08:00 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: A reminder that the PTG is coming :) We have only two Mondays left, and Sep 4th is apparently a holiday in the US. That means we have to more or less decide on the schedule next Monday

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Team dinner at the PTG?

And the final day is Monday, Sep 11th. See you there! :) On 08/23/2017 03:46 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi folks! We're trying to organize an informal team meeting at some place, probably with burgers and beer, in Denver. Note that it won't be sponsored. Please vote in the Doodle https

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] PTG planning etherpad

A reminder that the PTG is coming :) We have only two Mondays left, and Sep 4th is apparently a holiday in the US. That means we have to more or less decide on the schedule next Monday, Aug 28th. Please add your ideas by that time! On 07/28/2017 12:19 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic]are there any projects about monitoring nodes

Hi! What exactly monitoring would you expect? Health status, performance, etc? Ironic can collect IPMI sensor data and send it to ceilometer: https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/install/configure-ipmi.html#collecting-sensor-data. On 09/01/2017 08:53 AM, 王俊 wrote: Hi, We want

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [cinder] [ironic] PTG cross-platform meetup possibility

og.e0ne.info/ On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com <mailto:dtant...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi! I'm all for it. Monday sounds okay to me, though I'll have to manage some conflicts, of course. On 08/29/2017 05:56

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg][interop][refstack][all][ironic][cinder]RefStack and Interop WG PTG Agenda

On 09/01/2017 07:07 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: The RefStack and Interop WG teams will host a small work room on Monday and Tuesday at the PTG. We would like for projects interested in the interop guideline expansion to participate in guiding the development of future guidelines. The draft schedule

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [cinder] [ironic] PTG cross-platform meetup possibility

Hi! I'm all for it. Monday sounds okay to me, though I'll have to manage some conflicts, of course. On 08/29/2017 05:56 PM, Richard Wellum wrote: Hi Folks, Would there be some interest from Cinder and Ironic (and others of course) team members to have a quick session at the PTG with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic and traits

//review.openstack.org/507052 > <https://review.openstack.org/507052> > [3] > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/507052/4/specs/queens/approved/ironic-traits.rst@88 > > <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/507052/4/specs/queens/approved/ironic-traits.rst@88> &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic and traits

angout or videoconference to > discuss this? Unfortunately today and tomorrow I'm not able to do a hangout > but > I can do one on Wednesday any time of the day. > > Lemme know! > -jay > > On Oct 23, 2017 5:01 AM, "Dmitry Tantsur" <dtant...@redhat.com > <m

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Support for single OpenStack system supporting VM and Baremetal Instances simultaneously ?

Hi Greg! Answers inline. On 10/20/2017 09:25 PM, Waines, Greg wrote: > Hey, > > We are in the process of integrating OpenStack Ironic into our own OpenStack > Distribution. Nice to hear :) > > Is there support for a single OpenStack system supporting VM and Baremetal > Instances simultaneously

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic and traits

wrote: > Sorry for delay, took a week off before starting a new job. Comments > inline. > > On 10/16/2017 12:24 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I promised John to dump my thoughts on traits to the ML, so here we go :) >> >> I see two roles

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

On 11/10/2017 11:51 PM, John Dickinson wrote: On 7 Nov 2017, at 15:28, Erik McCormick wrote: Hello Ops folks, This morning at the Sydney Summit we had a very well attended and very productive session about how to go about keeping a selection of past releases available and

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On 11/14/2017 11:17 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2017-11-14 15:50:08 -0600: On 11/14/2017 02:10 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2017-11-14 14:01:58 -0600: On 11/14/2017 01:28 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: The quality

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On 11/14/2017 09:01 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 11/14/2017 01:28 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: The quality of backported fixes is expected to be a direct (and only?) interest of those new teams of new cores, coming from users and operators and vendors. I'm not assuming bad intentions, not at all

[openstack-dev] [ironic] moving the weekly meeting to our channel?

Hi all, Due to a technical issue we had to have our weekly meeting in our main channel this time. And we liked it :) I wonder if we should switch to it. Pros: * easier to find * no channel switching Cons: * potential conflicts with other meetings (already a problem, given how many rooms we

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [requirements] moving driver dependencies to global-requirements?

On 10/31/2017 12:11 AM, richard.pi...@dell.com wrote: From: Dmitry Tantsur [mailto:dtant...@redhat.com] Cons: 1. more work for both the requirements team and the vendor teams Please elaborate on the additional work you envision for the vendor teams. Any requirements updates with have

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [requirements] moving driver dependencies to global-requirements?

On 10/30/2017 11:28 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: On 17-10-30 20:48:37, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: The second seem to be better suited for per driver requirement handling and per HW type per function. Which option is easier to handle for container per dependency for the future? Thanks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [requirements] moving driver dependencies to global-requirements?

I don't think it affects containers directly. Depending on how you build containers you may have to do nothing (if you use package, for example) or update your pip install to do a different thing (or things). On 10/30/2017 09:48 PM, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: The second seem to be better

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] save the date: virtual midcycle on Nov 27th

Reminder: the call is today, in a bit more than 3 hours! This also means that we won't have a usual meeting today. On 11/20/2017 06:11 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 11/20/2017 05:49 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! The winning date for the midcycle is Nov 27th. The call will take up to 4

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dublin PTG format

On 11/27/2017 11:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, We are in the final step in the process of signing the contract with the PTG venue. We should be able to announce the location this week ! So it's time to start preparing. We'll have 5 days, like in Denver. One thing we'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-12, December 2-8

On 11/30/2017 02:40 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: Development Focus - The Queens-2 milestone deadline is December 7th. All projects with specific deadlines should be wrapping them up in time to submit the release request before the end of day on the 7th. General Information

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rename ovb jobs?

On 11/30/2017 08:11 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: A few months ago, we renamed ovb-updates to be tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024. The name is much longer but it describes better what it's doing. We know it's a job with one controller, one compute and one storage node,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] moving the weekly meeting to our channel? (spoiler: YES)

We had a voting on the Monday's meeting, and agreed to move the meeting. The meeting next Monday will happen in #openstack-ironic. On 11/20/2017 05:19 PM, Ruby Loo wrote: On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com <mailto:dtant...@redhat.com>> wrote:

[openstack-dev] [ironic] reminder about deadlines

Hi all! Half of the Queens cycle is behind us. I'd like to remind about a few deadlines and how they affect us: 1. Jan 18th is the non-client library release deadline. It affects ironic-lib and sushy. The latter has a few outstanding changes - please try to find some time to get them a bit

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Removing old baremetal commands from python-tripleoclient

On 12/15/2017 01:04 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 12/15/2017 04:49 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi All, In review I01837a9daf6f119292b5a2ffc361506925423f11 I updated ValidateInstackEnv to handle the case when then instackenv.json file needs to represent a node that deosn't require a pm_user

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Removing old baremetal commands from python-tripleoclient

On 12/15/2017 04:49 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi All, In review I01837a9daf6f119292b5a2ffc361506925423f11 I updated ValidateInstackEnv to handle the case when then instackenv.json file needs to represent a node that deosn't require a pm_user for IMPI to work. It turns out that I foudn that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

On 12/15/2017 11:00 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: - Original Message - On 12/14/2017 9:38 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: And the QE in me says that there are enough moving parts around for the integration testing (because CD yes, but the resources are limited) that a longer cycle with a longer

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >