Thank you all for the prompt response. And I'm glad to see the progress on this
topic.
Basically, what I'm thinking is the local storage support for big data and
large scale computing is specially useful.
I'll monitor the meeting progress actively.
Duncan,
And I'm interested to know the details of this topic. Btw, if this Brick code
called by Cinder?
Thanks
Emma
From: Ivan Kolodyazhny e...@e0ne.infomailto:e...@e0ne.info
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Wednesday, 3 September, 2014 12:40 am
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Nova]Quest about Cinder Brick proposal
Hi all,
Emma,
thanks for raising this topic, I've added it for the next Cinder weekly meeting
[1].
Duncan,
I absolutely agree with you that if any code could be located in a one place,
it must be there.
I'm not sure which place is the best for Brick: oslo or stackforge. Let's
discuss it. I want to be a volunteer to make Brick as a separate library and
make OpenStack code better with re-using code as much, as possible.
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderMeetings#Next_meeting
Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny,
Software Engineer,
Mirantis Inc
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Duncan Thomas
duncan.tho...@gmail.commailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 September 2014 04:56, Emma Lin l...@vmware.commailto:l...@vmware.com
wrote:
Hi Gurus,
I saw the wiki page for Cinder Brick proposal for Havana, but I didn't see
any follow up on that idea. Is there any real progress on that idea?
As this proposal is to address the local storage issue, I'd like to know the
status, and to see if there is any task required for hypervisor provider.
Hi Emma
Brick didn't really evolve to cover the local storage case, so we've
not made much progress in that direction.
Local storage comes up fairly regularly, but solving all of the points
(availability, API behaviour completeness, performance, scheduling)
from a pure cinder PoV is a hard problem - i.e. making local storage
look like a normal cinder volume. Specs welcome, email me if you want
more details on the problems - there are certainly many people
interested in seeing the problem solved.
There is code in brick that could be used in nova as is to reduce
duplication and give a single place to fix bugs - nobody has yet taken
this work on as far as I know.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
