Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

On 08/14/2014 02:55 AM, Boring, Walter wrote: Hey guys, I wanted to pose a nomination for Cinder core. Xing Yang. She has been active in the cinder community for many releases and has worked on several drivers as well as other features for cinder itself. She has been doing an

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] weekly meeting

I also like the idea of alternating each week. Eric On 12/17/2013 01:40 AM, Mike Perez wrote: I agree with Qin here that alternating might be a good option. I'm not opposed to being present to both meetings though. -Mike Perez On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Qin Zhao

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Stability Hack-a-thon

On 02/03/2014 04:11 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 01/02/14 00:06 -0800, Mike Perez wrote: Folks, I would love to get people together who are interested in Cinder stability to really dedicate a few days. This is not for additional features, but rather finishing what we already have and really

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Refactor ISCSIDriver to support other iSCSI transports besides TCP

On 03/25/2014 11:07 AM, Shlomi Sasson wrote: I am not sure what will be the right approach to handle this, I already have the code, should I open a bug or blueprint to track this issue? Best Regards, Shlomi A blueprint around this would be appreciated. I have had similar thoughts

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] About storing volume format info for filesystem-based drivers

On 06/23/2014 11:07 AM, Trump.Zhang wrote: Hi, all: Currently, there are several filesystem-based drivers in Cinder, such as nfs, glusterfs, etc. Multiple format of volume other than raw can be potentially supported in these drivers, such as qcow2, raw, sparse, etc. However,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] The future of the integrated release

On 08/07/2014 09:55 AM, John Griffith wrote: ​Seems everybody that's been around a while has noticed issues this release and have talked about it, thanks Thierry for putting it together so well and kicking off the ML thread here. I'd agree with everything that you stated, I've also floated

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] XXXFSDriver: Query on usage of load_shares_config in ensure_shares_mounted

On 04/11/2014 10:55 AM, Eric Harney wrote: On 04/11/2014 07:54 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: Hi, I am using the nfs and glusterfs driver as reference here. I see that load_shares_config is called everytime via _ensure_shares_mounted which I feel is incorrect mainly because

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] cinder is broken until someone fixes the forking code

On 03/11/2015 03:37 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On 11:49 Wed 11 Mar , Walter A. Boring IV wrote: We have this patch in review currently. I think this one should 'fix' it no? Please review. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163551/ Looks like it to

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Rebranded Volume Drivers

On 06/03/2015 01:59 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: There are a couple of cases [1][2] I'm seeing where new Cinder volume drivers for Liberty are rebranding other volume drivers. This involves inheriting off another volume

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Some Changes to Cinder Core

On 05/22/2015 07:34 PM, Mike Perez wrote: This is long overdue, but it gives me great pleasure to nominate Sean McGinnis for Cinder core. Cinder core, please reply with a +1 for approval. This will be left open until May 29th. Assuming there are no objections, this will go forward after

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

On 08/13/2015 03:13 PM, Mike Perez wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Cinder core, please reply with a +1 for approval. This will be left open until August 19th. Assuming there are no objections, this will go forward after voting is closed. +1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Implementation of ABC MetaClasses

On 07/20/2015 07:16 AM, Marc Koderer wrote: Hello Cinder, Instead of reverting nearly everything what was done (and is currently ongoing). I would strongly suggest to simply reduce the number of the classes stepwise. This makes sense, and this was the general plan as I recall -- to

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] RemoteFS drivers refactoring: move code, which works with images to separate classes

On 10/28/2015 03:18 PM, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: > Hello! > > Can we discuss this on the summit? > > As I promised, I've written a blueprint for this change: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237094/ > I assume we can talk about this at the Cinder contributors meetup on Friday. > > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] RemoteFS drivers refactoring: move code, which works with images to separate classes

On 10/13/2015 02:57 PM, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: > Hello, > > RemoteFS drivers combine 2 logical tasks. The first one is how to mount > a filesystem and select proper share for a new or existing volume. The > second one: how to deal with an image files in given directory (mount > point) (create,

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade][cinder] Updates of rootwrap filters

On 08/26/2015 09:57 AM, Dulko, Michal wrote: Hi, Recently when working on a simple bug [1] I've run into a need to change rootwrap filters rules for a few commands. After sending fix to Gerrit [2] it turns out that when testing the upgraded cloud grenade haven't copied my updated

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On 09/15/2015 01:00 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > I'm currently trying to work around an issue where activating LVM > snapshots created through cinder takes potentially a long time. > (Linearly related to the amount of data that differs between the > original volume and the snapshot.) On one system

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On 09/16/2015 04:25 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > On 16 Sep 2015 20:42, "yang, xing" <xing.y...@emc.com> wrote: > >> On 9/16/15, 1:20 PM, "Eric Harney" <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> This sounds like a good idea, I'm just not sure how to st

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

ropriate for them. This sounds like a good idea, I'm just not sure how to structure it yet without creating a very confusing set of config options. > On 9/15/15, 1:38 PM, "Eric Harney" <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 09/15/2015 01:00 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: >&

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On 09/17/2015 05:00 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > On 16 September 2015 at 23:43, Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Currently, at least some options set in [DEFAULT] don't apply to >> per-driver sections, and require you to set them in the d

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] snapshot and cloning for NFS backend

On 09/29/2015 09:05 AM, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Author of specs is Eric Harney, If he is ok with it then I will submit the > patch for moving specs to Mitaka. > > Thank you, > > Abhishek Kekane > I saw that go by, thanks. Note that while the work o

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] NFS mount as cinder user instead of root

On 10/02/2015 05:48 AM, Francesc Pinyol Margalef wrote: > Hi, > In a previous message in general openstack list I reported a problem > when trying to mount an NFS volume from a Fujitsu Eternus DX > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2015-July/013578.html > > The issue is that this

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On 09/18/2015 03:33 PM, John Griffith wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 09/18/2015 01:01 PM, John Griffith wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Chris Friesen < >> chris.frie...@windriver.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On 09/18/2015 01:01 PM, John Griffith wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Chris Friesen <chris.frie...@windriver.com> > wrote: > >> On 09/18/2015 06:57 AM, Eric Harney wrote: >> >>> On 09/17/2015 06:06 PM, John Griffith wrote: >>> >&

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] How to make a mock effactive for all method of a testclass

On 09/23/2015 04:06 AM, liuxinguo wrote: > Hi, > > In a.py we have a function: > def _change_file_mode(filepath): > utils.execute('chmod', '600', filepath, run_as_root=True) > > In test_xxx.py, there is a testclass: > class DriverTestCase(test.TestCase): > def test_a(self) > ... >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] should we use fsync when writing iscsi config file?

On 09/25/2015 02:30 PM, Mitsuhiro Tanino wrote: > On 09/22/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >> On 23 September 2015 at 09:52, Chris Friesen >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I recently had an issue with one file out of a dozen or so in >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM snapshot performance issue -- why isn't thin provisioning the default?

On 09/17/2015 06:06 PM, John Griffith wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 09/17/2015 05:00 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: >>> On 16 September 2015 at 23:43, Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Deprecating ConfKeyManager (fixed-key key manager)

On 01/04/2016 10:46 AM, Farr, Kaitlin M. wrote: >> The fixed key manager is useful for easy testing (we're using it in the >> gate in places where barbican isn't available). Is there anything >> equivalent with Catellan? >> >> -Sean >> >> -- >> Sean Dague >> http://dague.net > > There is

Re: [openstack-dev] Spam of patches

On 01/12/2016 09:32 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12 2016, Amrith Kumar wrote: > >> My question to the ML is this, should stylistic changes of this kind be >> handled >> in a consistent way across all projects, maybe with a hacking rule and some >> discussion on the ML first? After all,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Patrick East to Cinder Core

On 01/29/2016 07:04 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Patrick has been a strong contributor to Cinder over the last few releases, > both with great code submissions and useful reviews. He also participates > regularly on IRC helping answer questions and providing valuable feedback. > > I would like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Does the OpenStack community(or Cinder team) allow one driver to call another driver's public method?

On 03/18/2016 10:01 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:05:34AM +, liuxinguo wrote: >> Hi Cinder team, >> >> We are going to implement storage-assisted volume migrate in our driver >> between different backend storage array or even different array of different >> vendors.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposal: changes to our current testing process

; [12] > https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally-jobs/cinder.yaml#L516 > > Regards, > Ivan Kolodyazhny, > http://blog.e0ne.info/ > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 03/02/2016 09:36 AM, Ivan Kolodyaz

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposal: changes to our current testing process

On 03/06/2016 09:35 PM, John Griffith wrote: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Jay S. Bryant > wrote: > >> Ivan, >> >> I agree that our testing needs improvement. Thanks for starting this >> thread. >> >> With regards to adding a hacking check for tests that run

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposal: changes to our current testing process

gt; http://blog.e0ne.info/ > So the second part of my question is, is writing a Rally job to prove out that code a reasonable task? How hard is that to do and what does it look like? > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 03

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposal: changes to our current testing process

On 03/02/2016 06:25 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi Team, > > Here are my thoughts and proposals how to make Cinder testing process > better. I won't cover "3rd party CI's" topic here. I will share my opinion > about current and feature jobs. > > > Unit-tests > >- Long-running tests. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] A friendly reminder about reviews

On 05/11/2016 05:16 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to kindly ask you to pay a bit more attention to the following > areas: > > * Specs: we don' reviews specs as well as code:(. TBH, my specs reviews > count > is very low too. > * os-brick and

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] A friendly reminder about reviews

And for completeness, I'd also like to mention that there is this nice dashboard: http://status.openstack.org/reviews/#cinder __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Michał Dulko to Cinder Core

On 05/03/2016 02:16 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I would like to nominate Michał Dulko to the Cinder core team. Michał's > contributions with both code reviews [0] and code contributions [1] have > been significant for some time now. > > His persistence with versioned objects has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Scott D'Angelo to Cinder core

On 06/27/2016 01:27 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > I would like to nominate Scott D'Angelo to core. Scott has been very > involved in the project for a long time now and is always ready to help > folks out on IRC. His contributions [1] have been very valuable and he > is a thorough reviewer [2]. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][liberty] [cinder] is stable liberty broken?

On 07/07/2016 02:41 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote: > Hi, >I am backporting https://review.openstack.org/#/c/333749/ > >to stable/liberty and failed in gating job, then I submitted > another > doc change

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Volume Drivers unit tests

On 07/21/2016 05:26 PM, Knight, Clinton wrote: > Nate, you have to press Ctrl-C to see the in-progress test, that’s why you > don’t > see it in the logs. The bug report shows this and points to the patch where > it > appeared to begin. https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1578986 > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

On 08/15/2016 04:48 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Sean Dague wrote: >> On 08/12/2016 01:10 PM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: >>> I believe there is a compromise that we could implement in Cinder that >>> enables us to have a deprecation >>> of unsupported drivers that aren't meeting the Cinder driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][cinder][nova] zip for raw Disk Format

On 10/05/2016 05:46 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote: > > From [1] we support a few common and vendor specific disk format, as use > raw image sometimes will be very big and do we have existing any method to > consider zip the raw disk so the disk space might be saved as an option to > offer to end user and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

remy. It wasn't a CI issue that caused the removal. >> IIRC, Red Hat decided to focus on Ceph as the platform for Cinder >> storage. >> >> > Just confirming Sean's recollection, Eric Harney from Redhat was pretty > much the sole maintainer of the Gluster code in Cinder and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][qa][glance] some recent tempest problems

On 06/19/2017 09:22 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 6/16/2017 8:58 AM, Eric Harney wrote: >> I'm not convinced yet that this failure is purely Ceph-specific, at a >> quick look. >> >> I think what happens here is, unshelve performs an asynchronous delete >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] How to provide additional options to NFS backend?

On 05/25/2017 05:51 AM, Jiri Suchomel wrote: > Hi, > it seems to me that the way of adding extra NFS options to the cinder > backend is somewhat confusing. > > 1. There is nfs_mount_options in cinder config file [1] > > 2. Then I can put my options to the nfs_shares_config file - that > it

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Target classes in Cinder

On 06/02/2017 03:47 PM, John Griffith wrote: > Hey Everyone, > > So quite a while back we introduced a new model for dealing with target > management in the drivers (ie initialize_connection, ensure_export etc). > > Just to summarize a bit: The original model was that all of the target >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][qa][glance] some recent tempest problems

On 06/16/2017 10:21 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > I don't think merging tests that are showing failures, then blacklisting > them, is the right approach. And as Eric points out, this isn't > necessarily just a failure with Ceph. There is a legitimate logical > issue with what this particular test

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][qa][glance] some recent tempest problems

On 06/15/2017 10:51 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:43 AM, wrote: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471352/ may be an example > > If this is case which is ceph related, i think we already discussed > these kind of cases, where functionality

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder][ceph] should Tempest tests the backend specific feature?

On 05/02/2017 01:42 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > In Cinder, there are many features/APIs which are backend specific and > will return 405 or 501 if same is not implemented on any backend [1]. > If such tests are implemented in Tempest, then it will break some gate > where that backend job is

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Cinder][third-party][ci] Tintri Cinder CI failure

On 09/28/2017 12:22 PM, Apoorva Deshpande wrote: > It appears that Cinder started using NFS locks around Sept 19th. That > resulted in our CI failures as we don't support it. Tempest tests succeeded > when we added a nolock option in the NFS configuration[1]. > > Can someone provide more

[openstack-dev] [infra][requirements][cinder] Handling requirements for driverfixes branches

Hi all, I'm trying to sort out how to run unit tests on Cinder driverfixes branches. These branches are similar to stable branches, but live longer (and have a different set of rules for what changes are appropriate). In order for unit tests to work on these branches, requirements need to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] RBD multi-attach

On 04/12/2018 10:25 PM, 李俊波 wrote: > Hello Nova, Cinder developers, > > > > I would like to ask you a question concerns a Cinder patch [1]. > > > > In this patch, it mentioned that RBD features were incompatible with > multi-attach, which disabled multi-attach for RBD. I would like to know

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about use nfs driver to backup the volume snapshot

to Eric Harney as he implemented that code. Jay create_volume_from_snapshot is implemented in the NFS driver. It is in the remotefs code that the NFS driver inherits from. But, I'm not sure I understand what's being asked here -- how is this related to using NFS as the backup backend

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][glance][osc][sdk] Image Encryption for OpenStack (proposal)

On 9/27/18 1:36 PM, Markus Hentsch wrote: Dear OpenStack developers, we would like to propose the introduction of an encrypted image format in OpenStack. We already created a basic implementation involving Nova, Cinder, OSC and Glance, which we'd like to contribute. We originally created a