Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Refactoring into common library and kuryr-libnetwork + Nested_VMs

Vikas, Thanks for starting this. Where would you classify the Segmentation (VLANID etc) allocation engine. Currently, the libnetwork plugin is tied to the api and talks to Neutron, how would libnetwork and api part interact? Fawad Khaliq On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Vikas Choudhary

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] roles of kuryr server in server/agent mode

will be capable to doing the options you mentioned above. Hope that clarifies it. Thanks, Fawad Khaliq On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Vikas Choudhary <choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Fawad, > > While I was going through nested-containers-spec > <https://github.com/openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][kuryr] Nested containers networking

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hi Hongbin, > > Thank you for starting this thread. > The person that is going to work on this integration is Fawad (CC'ed) and > hopefully others will help > him (We have another person from Huawei that showed intrest in

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tc] Neutron stadium evolution from Austin

Armando has submitted the proposal on Gerrit [1]. Let's take the discussion there. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312199/7 Fawad Khaliq On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Doug Wiegley <doug...@parksidesoftware.com> wrote: > Were we looking at the same etherpad? I think the ‘

[openstack-dev] [neutron][tc] Neutron stadium evolution from Austin

/or API extensions to non-open solutions." Thanks, Fawad Khaliq __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Changing the Neutron default security group rules

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > >> Second, would it be acceptable to make this operator configurable? This >> would mean users could receive different default filtering as they moved

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] Voting for new core reviewers

+1 to both. Great to see the core team growing. Fawad Khaliq On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Anil Rao <anil@gigamon.com> wrote: > Both Takashi and Soichi have been involved with the project for a while > now and have made significant contributions in terms of code and reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Changing the Neutron default security group rules

Thanks for brining this up. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > Hi, > > I know this has come up in the past, but some folks in the infra channel > brought up the topic of changing the default security groups to allow all > traffic. > > They had a few reasons

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum][Kuryr] Kuryr-Magnum integration (nested containers)

Folks, A friendly reminder to review the updated spec [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269039/ Thank you, Fawad Khaliq On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote: > Folks, > > Thanks for the reviews. The spec [1] has been updated after the la

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Now part of OpenStack big-tent

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Just wanted to update you that Kuryr [1] was officially accepted yesterday > as a > big tent project. > Great news and congrats everyone! > We are currently facing some interesting challenges and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum][Kuryr] Kuryr-Magnum integration (nested containers)

Folks, Thanks for the reviews. The spec [1] has been updated after the latest feedback. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269039/ Thanks, Fawad Khaliq On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > The spec [1] for Mangum-Ku

[openstack-dev] [Magnum][Kuryr] Kuryr-Magnum integration (nested containers)

Hi folks, The spec [1] for Mangum-Kuryr integration is out and has already gone through good discussion and updates. Please take out some time to review, we would like to converge on the design soon. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269039/5 Thanks, Fawad Khaliq

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Integrating physical appliance into virtual infrastructure

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam < vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > L2GW seems like a good option for bridging/linking /integrating physical > appliances which does not support overlay technology (say VXLAN) natively. > > > > In my case the physical appliance

[openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] l2 gateway in OpenStack

works. [1] https://github.com/openstack/networking-l2gw [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHQRAKvOr-U [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74Wfr4myf5k Thanks, Fawad Khaliq __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleO][Neutron] Appropriate location for networking-* pythonclient extensions

Hi Steve, Thanks a lot for the detailed response. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:26:13AM +0500, Fawad Khaliq wrote: > >Hi Triple-O folks, > >I am trying to understand how the notion of ove

[openstack-dev] [tripleO][Neutron] Appropriate location for networking-* pythonclient extensions

/openstack/networking-l2gw/tree/master/networking_l2gw/l2gatewayclient [4] https://github.com/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/tree/master/networking_bgpvpn/neutronclient Thanks a lot, Fawad Khaliq __ OpenStack Development Ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IRC Meeting - Monday (2/1) 1500 UTC (#openstack-meeting-4)

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > > Hello All, > > We are going to have an IRC Meeting tomorrow (2/1) at 1500 UTC > in #openstack-meeting-4 > > The meeting agenda can be seen here [1]. > We are going to focus most of the meeting on the Kubernetes-Kuryr >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] New Container Networking Model - Kubernetes, Kuryr, and Neutron

Great. Looking forward to it. For everyone's benefit, here's the link [1] to CNI spec. [1] https://github.com/appc/cni/blob/master/SPEC.md Fawad Khaliq On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi <m...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > We are going to discuss CNI, the Containe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

Gary, Thanks for sending the email about the breakage. +1 to the deprecation warning. Fawad Khaliq On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote: > Hi, > The commit > https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5d53dfb8d64186b5b1d2f356fbff8f222e15d1b2

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Neutron] dashboard repository for neutron subprojects

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Are there no comment after I added more detail? > No inputs from both horizon and neutron side. > > Although Horizon team is tackling to address some problems around > horizon plugin mechanism > such as translations,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How to make deb and rpm packages for a networking-* project?

There is one example [1] in review and may be incomplete but might help. It only adds the scripts to build. Publishing part is different. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248239/ Fawad Khaliq On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:15 AM, P. Ramanjaneya Reddy <ramanji...@gmail.com > wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QA] New testing guidelines

Very useful information. Thanks, Assaf. Fawad Khaliq On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Assaf Muller <amul...@redhat.com> wrote: > Today we merged [1] which adds content to the Neutron testing guidelines: > > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/devref/development.environme

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] Tap-as-a-service API

Excellent. I will take a look. Thanks for taking care of this! Fawad Khaliq On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote: > > Thanks Yamamoto. Yes, agree i

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing the OpenStack Health Dashboard

Very cool! Thanks. Fawad Khaliq On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > As some people may have seen already we've been working on creating a test > results dashboard up and running to visualize the state of t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][TaaS] Query regarding TaaS API

Hi Reedip, I believe TaaS API will go through a round of reviews when the spec is introduced. It will be good to discuss these points there. Fawad Khaliq On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:45 PM, reedip banerjee <reedi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Members of Neutron-TaaS community, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][all] when can we drop XML support in neutronclient? Now?

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi, > > python-neutronclient still has XML support of Neutron API. > I would like to discuss when we drop XML support in neutronclient. > > Neutron API XML suppoort was marked as deprecated in Icehouse and Juno > and was

[openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] Tap-as-a-service API

Folks, Any plan to revive this [1] so we can discuss and finalize the use cases and APIs. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/ Thanks, Fawad Khaliq __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Neutron] dashboard repository for neutron subprojects

Hi Akihiro, Great initiative. On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi, > > Neutron has now various subprojects and some of them would like to > implement Horizon supports. Most of them are additional features. > I would like to start the discussion where

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Neutron] dashboard repository for neutron subprojects

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 24 November 2015 at 21:46, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Neutron has now various subprojects and some of them would like to >> implement Horizon supports. Most of them are additional

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Groups OVS conntrack support

r team) wanted insight into the plans for this support. Thanks for the note and link to the bug. I think we are all set to take the discussions further. Fawad > Kuba > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1461000 > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 7:0

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Groups OVS conntrack support

] https://www.rdoproject.org/networking/networking-in-too-much-detail/ Fawad Khaliq On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Tapio Tallgren <tapiotallg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for the stupid question, but how will I use the connection tracking > in security groups? Is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] proposal: dedicated tunnel for carrying mirrored traffic

unchpad.net/neutron/+spec/port-mirroring Can we please restore this [1] and have the reviews complete. I believe there is a lot of interest in this and we will need to consider multiple use case scenarios. This [1] will be the best place to capture and discuss. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] proposal: dedicated tunnel for carrying mirrored traffic

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Li Ma wrote: > It is suggested that you can issue a RFE request for it. [1] We can > discuss with it and track the progress in the launchpad. > > By the way, I'm very interested in it. I discussed a another problem > with Huawei neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Groups OVS conntrack support

the person name, Miguel will sure update shortly. > Great. Thanks! > > Gal. > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> Is there a plan to add conntrack support to the security groups for the >> OVS dri

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ThirdPartyCI] Running third party CI on networking-foo projects

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote: > > Thanks a lot, Yamamoto. > > > > kakuma, I am assuming if you were able to set it up for a ofagent rep

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ThirdPartyCI] Running third party CI on networking-foo projects

Hi kakuma, No worries and thanks a lot for the help. Seems like the process is similar to the one we followed for the setting up the CI with Neutron. Wanted confirmation and you helped. Thanks, Fawad Khaliq On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 6:22 PM, fumihiko kakuma <kak...@valinux.co.jp> wrote:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Groups OVS conntrack support

Folks, Is there a plan to add conntrack support to the security groups for the OVS driver in Mitaka cycle? My understanding is that it is being actively worked on for networking-ovn but no concrete plan for support in the OVS Neutron driver yet. Thanks, Fawad Khaliq

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] weekly meeting

mirroring and that serves use cases where services like IPS are deployed and incorporated. Do you happen to have a blueprint proposed with the original API demonstrated that we can iterate over and add the use cases and adjust the API accordingly to take further for review? Thanks, Fawad Khaliq

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ThirdPartyCI] Running third party CI on networking-foo projects

Thanks a lot, Yamamoto. kakuma, I am assuming if you were able to set it up for a ofagent repo, then it should have been the standard procedure documented here [1]. I reach out to infra for any help. [1] http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html Fawad Khaliq On Wed, Nov

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] external-network-connectivity

lized. > That's right. Sounds good. Thanks! > > > [1] > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kuryr/+spec/external-network-connectivity > > > Thanks > Vikas > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote: > >> Hi Vikas, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that > maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe > that in

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] external-network-connectivity

Hi Vikas, I suggest take a stab at creating a blueprint for this with details through Gerrit on top of this [1]. @Toni/Gal, would be great to have specs as part of Kuryr. I have added the directory with a template here [1] [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241935/ Thanks, Fawad Khaliq

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stepping Down from Neutron Core Responsibilities

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Edgar Magana wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > I have been part of this community from the very beginning when in Santa > Clara, CA back in 2011 a bunch of we crazy people decided to work on this > networking project. > Neutron has become is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Non-Candidacy

Kyle, You have done an exceptional job over the three cycles. Neutron has matured to a new level under your leadership. You will be missed. Enjoy your new free time! Fawad Khaliq On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: > I'm writing to let ever

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-neutronclient][neutron] sub-project client extensions

former as its much cleaner and aligns better with phase II. If former is the case, can we please enhance the devref to capture how the process will work for python-neutronclient. Thanks, Fawad Khaliq On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Amir Sadoughi amir.sadou...@rackspace.com wrote: I started down

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-neutronclient][neutron] sub-project client extensions

Thanks Mohankumar. Option #1 is exactly what I was looking for and that should work. Thanks a lot! Fawad Khaliq On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Mohankumar N mohankuma...@huawei.com wrote: Hi Fawad, If I understood your question correctly , here some ways to do [1] you want to extend

[openstack-dev] [python-neutronclient][neutron] sub-project client extensions

to keep the client side in the respective projects as well. [1] https://github.com/openstack/python-neutronclient/tree/master/neutronclient/neutron/v2_0 [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148318/16 Thanks, Fawad Khaliq

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] db migration for vendor extensions

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 02, 2015, Fawad Khaliq fa...@plumgrid.com wrote: After Neutron core and vendor code decomposition [1], it was decided to keep db migration scripts in Neutron repo. I was wondering if any of the networking

[openstack-dev] [neutron] db migration for vendor extensions

/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/kilo/core-vendor-decomposition.html Thanks, Fawad Khaliq __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http

Re: [openstack-dev] Interconnecting projects

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote: Check out: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/liberty/rbac-networks.html If I understand correctly, what Anik is probably asking for is way to connect two OpenStack projects together from a network

Re: [openstack-dev] Interconnecting projects

Great! A correction here: RBAC proposal does address some of the use cases on interconnecting tenants. Fawad Khaliq On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Anik anik...@yahoo.com wrote: That's exactly what I was asking for. Thanks Fawad. Regards, Anik 201-245-1569

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - Neutron social Monday night

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody! I got us a place for Monday night at 8pm. Here is the link: http://www.yelp.com/biz/yaggers-downtown-restaurant-and-sports-bar-vancouver Don't forget to show up, they are opening the restaurant just for

Re: [openstack-dev] Who is using nova-docker? (Re: [nova-docker] Status update)

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote: Good points, Dan and John. At this point it may be useful to see who is actually using nova-docker. Can folks who are using any version of nova-docker, please speak up with a short description of their use case? I am

[openstack-dev] [Infra][Neutron] request to mark plumgrid-ci back to voting

/ If it looks fine, Infra folks, can please back plumgrid-ci back to voting. I will be happy to answer to any further questions. [1] http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html [2] http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#permissions-on-your-third-party-system Thanks, Fawad Khaliq

Re: [openstack-dev] Changing the resources of a running vm instance

http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2.html#compute_server-actions Fawad Khaliq On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS abhishek.tal...@tcs.com wrote: Hi All, I am looking if we can change the resources of a running VM instance (i.e. cpu, ram, changing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Gabriel Bezerra gabri...@lsd.ufcg.edu.br wrote: Em 10.03.2015 14:34, Gabriel Bezerra escreveu: Em 10.03.2015 14:24, Carl Baldwin escreveu: Neutron currently does not enforce the uniqueness, or non-overlap, of subnet cidrs within the address scope for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] ML2 versus core plugin for OVN

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, A great discussion. I am not expert at OVN, hence, want to ask a question. The answer may make a case that it should probably be a ML2 driver as oppose to monolithic plugin. Say a customer want to deploy

Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Voting and ATC emails?

These are not the counts. These seem to be vote weights. Fawad Khaliq On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:53 AM, vishal yadav vishalcda...@gmail.com wrote: Can anyone tell why the voting counts for all the entries are same! (attached screenshot). Even though I voted for some entries, voting counts

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] authentication issues

I just happened to have a new setup with all services. Works for me. Fawad Khaliq On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, With the current master in devstack I am unable to create a neutron network. It looks like there is an issue with keystone. Anyone

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] PLUMgrid CI maintenance

Folks, PLUMgrid CI is down because of unforeseen hardware breakdown issues. We are working on getting it sorted out asap. I will respond to this thread when it's back up. Thanks, Fawad Khaliq __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Lightning talks during the Design Summit!

Lot's of interesting talks. Thank you Kyle. Voted and looking forward. Fawad Khaliq On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo mangel...@redhat.com wrote: Thank you very much, voted. - Original Message - On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Kyle Mestery mest

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] for help!

Hi Chengyong, I remember there is a blueprint[1] by Edgar Magana which talks about similar use cases but that still marked for discussion whether this belongs to Neutron or Heat. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/network-topologies-api Fawad Khaliq On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:26

[openstack-dev] [neutron][security-groups] Neutron default security groups

already. Please do share how do tackle these issues? Thanks, Fawad Khaliq ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][security-groups] Neutron default security groups

Hi Boahua, Thanks for sharing your thoughts. The issues seen are not related to access, they are all related to API layer, so having ALLOW all etc does not fix/workaround the problems I mentioned. Please do share if you have something more to add. Fawad Khaliq On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:28 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Rotating the weekly Neutron meeting

like it! +1 Fawad Khaliq On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:58 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com wrote: On 13/08/14 17:05, Kyle Mestery wrote: Per this week's Neutron meeting [1], it was decided that offering a rotating meeting slot for the weekly Neutron meeting would be a good thing

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Update on third party CI in Neutron

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: 1. PLUMgrid 1. Not saving enough logs All Jenkins slaves were just updated to upload all required logs. PLUMgrid CI should be good now. Thanks, Fawad Khaliq

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Trouble with Devstack

the investigation yet but this may help you move past this issue for now. Thanks, Fawad Khaliq On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Trevor Vardeman trevor.varde...@rackspace.com wrote: I'm running Ubuntu 14.04, and rather suddenly I'm unable to run ./stack.sh successfully. Brandon, who is also

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Is vendor CI tests pass mandatory to merging fixes upstream...

Hi Narasimhan, You can find information about third party CIs and their owners in DriverLog [1]. They should be the point of contact. [1] http://stackalytics.com/report/driverlog Thanks, Fawad Khaliq On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote: On Wed, May 21

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

+1 at lunch tomorrow On May 15, 2014 12:31 PM, Hoban, Adrian adrian.ho...@intel.com wrote: +1 for lunch tomorrow -Original Message- From: Chris Wright [mailto:chr...@sous-sol.org] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:06 AM To: Steve Gordon; CARVER, PAUL; Stephen Wong; Alan Kavanagh Cc:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Core API refactoring

Hi Mandeep, You can find discussion/details in the etherpad link[1]. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refactoring-the-neutron-core Thanks, Fawad Khaliq (m) +1 408.966.2214 On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Mandeep Dhami dh...@noironetworks.comwrote: Hi: I am not at the conference

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Changing subnet tenant_id

to the instance of a subnet of tenant for whom the tenant_id is specified). Thanks, Fawad Khaliq (m) +1 408.966.2214 On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:54 AM, André Aranha andre.f.ara...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I was checking networks in Neutron and in the API (http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

+1 excellent idea! Fawad Khaliq (m) +1 408.966.2214 On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi folks I'm +1 for Review Hour on IRC because it shorten communication round trip time. As Akihiro said, it won't solve everything, but we can improve it Best Nachi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron Mid-Cycle Meeting

+1 to Sean Fawad Khaliq (m) +1 408.966.2214 On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: I just want to quickly caution about having these meetings in person since not everyone will be able to attend - the summits are probably where we will have