Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][python3] advice needed with updating lib-forward-testing jobs

2018-06-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:41:41 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from Ghanshyam's message of 2018-06-15 09:04:35 +0900: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 06:17:34 +0900 Doug Hellmann > > wrote > > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-06-14

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][python3] advice needed with updating lib-forward-testing jobs

2018-06-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 04:01:45 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from corvus's message of 2018-06-15 08:46:40 -0700: > > Doug Hellmann writes: > > > > > Excerpts from Ghanshyam's message of 2018-06-15 09:04:35 +0900: > > > > >> Yes, It will not be set on LIBS_FROM_GIT as we

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][python3] advice needed with updating lib-forward-testing jobs

2018-06-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 22:04:38 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from Ghanshyam Mann's message of 2018-06-18 20:38:00 +0900: > > On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 04:01:45 +0900 Doug Hellmann > > wrote > > > Excerpts from corvus's message of 2018-06-15 08:46:40 -0700: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Questions about token scopes

2018-05-30 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > > > On 05/30/2018 08:47 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> I know the keystone team has been doing a lot of work on scoped tokens >> and Lance has been trying to roll that out to other projects (like nova). >> >> In Rocky the nova team is adding

Re: [openstack-dev] Questions about token scopes

2018-05-31 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: >> >> >> On 05/30/2018 08:47 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> I know the keystone team has been doing a lot of work on scoped tokens >>> and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] A culture change (nitpicking)

2018-05-29 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Thanks for making it formal process which really helps. I think most of the people usually does that but yes it is always helpful to be added as principles. I have gotten mix feedback on fixing other patches in past and when i got anger by author i try to leave comment for a day or two then fix

Re: [openstack-dev] Questions about token scopes

2018-06-01 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:24 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > > > On 05/31/2018 12:09 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: >> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: >>> >>> On 05/30/2018 08:47 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>>> I know the keystone team

[openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hello Everyone, In Queens cycle, community goal to split the Tempest Plugin has been completed [1] and i think almost all the projects have separate repo for tempest plugin [2]. Which means each tempest plugins are being separated from their project release model. Few projects have started

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:37:42 +0900 Dmitry Tantsur wrote > On 06/26/2018 11:18 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > In Queens cycle, community goal to split the Tempest Plugin has been > > completed [1] and i think almost all the

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:28:03 +0900 Luigi Toscano wrote > On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 11:18:52 CEST Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > In Queens cycle, community goal to split the Tempest Plugin has been > > completed [1] and i th

[openstack-dev] [qa]Canceling the today QA Office Hour

2018-06-20 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Most of the QA members are in Open Source Summit Japan, so we will skip the today office hour. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 23:12:30 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2018-06-26 09:52:09 -0400: > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:53:21AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from Andrea Frittoli's message of 2018-06-26 13:35:11 +0100: > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:19:17 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann wrote > ++ operator ML > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:17:33 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann > wrote > > > > > > > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 23:12:30 +0900 Doug Hellmann &g

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API Office Hour

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, From today, we will be hosting the office hour for Nova API discussions which will cover the Nova API priority and API Bug triage things. I have updated the information about agenda and time in wiki page [1]. All are welcome to join. We will continue this on every Wedneday 06.00 UTC

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 19:12:33 +0900 Dmitry Tantsur wrote > On 06/26/2018 11:57 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:37:42 +0900 Dmitry Tantsur > > wrote > > > On 06/26/2018 11:18

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
++ operator ML On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:17:33 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann wrote > > > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 23:12:30 +0900 Doug Hellmann > wrote > > Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2018-06-26 09:52:09 -0400: > > > On T

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
gmann > > And this will also allow them to release a version when their want. > > So I support making release of Tempest and Plugins, but do not support > a coordinated release. > > Regards, > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 06:18:52PM +0900, Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Proposing changes to 17UTC team meeting

2017-10-22 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
1 typo correction, All current meeting and office hours are on Thursday (not Tuesday). Week1: - *Thu* 9:00 UTC Office hours in #openstack-qa - *Thu* 17:00 UTC Meeting in #openstack-meeting Week2: - *Thu* 8:00 UTC Meeting in #openstack-meeting -gmann On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:43 AM, Andrea

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tempest][devstack][congress] tempest.config.CONF.service_available changed on Jan 2/3?

2018-01-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Chandan kumar wrote: > Hello Eric, > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 4:46 AM, Eric K wrote: >> Seems that sometime between 1/2 and 1/3 this year, >> tempest.config.CONF.service_available.aodh_plugin as well as >>

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Jan 11th at 8:00 UTC

2018-01-10 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hello everyone, Hope everyone is back from vacation. QA team is resuming the regular weekly meeting from today. OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday, Jan 11th at 8:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Clarifying testing recommendation for interop programs

2018-01-24 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Graham Hayes <g...@ham.ie> wrote: > > > On 19/01/18 03:28, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Colleen Murphy <coll...@gazlene.net> wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> We have governance re

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][infra] zuul job definitions overrides and the irrelevant-file attribute

2018-02-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 2:57 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Balázs Gibizer writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm getting more and more confused how the zuul job hierarchy works or >> is supposed to work. > > Hi! > > First, you (or others) may or may not have

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [all] project pipeline definition should stay in project-config or project side ?

2018-02-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:06 PM Paul Belanger wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:05:34PM +0900, gmann wrote: >> > Hi Infra Team, >> > >> > I have 1 quick question on zuulv3 jobs

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [all] project pipeline definition should stay in project-config or project side ?

2018-02-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:05:34PM +0900, gmann wrote: >> Hi Infra Team, >> >> I have 1 quick question on zuulv3 jobs and their migration part. From >> zuulv3 doc [1], it is clear about migrating the job definition

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [all] project pipeline definition should stay in project-config or project side ?

2018-02-14 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Balázs Gibizer <balazs.gibi...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:45 AM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: >> >> On 2018-02-14 01:28, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 201

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][infra] zuul job definitions overrides and the irrelevant-file attribute

2018-02-14 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:43 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:05 PM James E. Blair wrote: >> >> Andrea Frittoli writes: >> >> >> That has no irrelevant-files matches, and so matches everything.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] signing up as a bug tag owner

2018-02-17 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 7:40 AM, melanie witt wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2018, at 06:11, Balázs Gibizer >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On the weekly meeting melwitt suggested [1] to have people signed up for >> certain bug tags. I've already been trying to

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [all] QA Rocky PTG Planning

2018-02-20 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, As we are close to PTG, I have prepared the QA PTG Schedule - https://ethercalc.openstack.org/Rocky-PTG-QA-Schedule Detail of each sessions can be found in this etherpad - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-rocky-ptg We still have space for more sessions or topic if any of you would

[openstack-dev] [all] [QA] PTG QA Help Room on Monday-Tuesday: open discussion + stestr + tempest plugins

2018-02-20 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, As you might have notice about QA Help Rooms in mail thread[1], this is further announcement of the QA Help Room from Monday- Tuesday in Dublin PTG. QA team will be present in "Davin Suite" along with infra, stable, release and other horizontal team [2]. Main idea for conducting the

[openstack-dev] [QA] Queens Retrospective

2018-02-20 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, I have started an etherpad for a Queens cycle retrospective for QA - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-queens-retrospective This will be discussed in PTG on Wed 9.30-10.00 AM, so please add your feedback/comment before that. Everyone is welcome to add the feedback which help us to

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Feb 22nd at 8:00 UTC

2018-02-21 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hello everyone, Hope everyone is back from vacation. QA team is resuming the regular weekly meeting from today. OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday, Feb 22nd at 8:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here:

[openstack-dev] [all] [QA] [interop] [keystone] [glance] [cinder] [tc] [ptg] QA Sessions for related cross projects

2018-02-23 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, QA team is planning to discuss few topics in Dublin PTG which need discussion and attention from related projects. If you can plan or ask someone from your team to present your projects, it will be more productive discussions. I am listing 2 such topic: 1. "Interop test for adds-on

[openstack-dev] [QA][PTG] QA Dinner Night

2018-02-22 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, I'd like to propose a QA Dinner night for the people attending QA sessions at the Dublin PTG. I initiated a doodle vote [1] to choose the appropriate date. Please vote as per your availability. ..1 https://doodle.com/poll/t7phezrq25zrqzz3 -gmann

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] nova API meeting schedule

2018-06-19 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Thanks for response. We will go with options 2 which is to cancel the meeting and continue on nova channel. We will start API office hour on every Wednesday (27th June onwards) 06:00 UTC on #openstack-nova channel. I pushed the patch to free the current slot of API meeting[1] and will

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] keypair quota usage info for user

2018-07-30 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 04:21:53 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > On 7/27/2018 2:14 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> From checking the history and review discussion on [3], it seems that > >> it was like that from staring. key_pair quota is being counted when > >> actually creating

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API updates week 19-25

2018-07-25 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 23:53:18 +0900 Surya Seetharaman wrote > Hi! > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Ghanshyam Mann > wrote: > > 5. API Extensions merge work > - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/api-extensions-merge-rock

Re: [openstack-dev] Lots of slow tests timing out jobs

2018-07-25 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 22:22:24 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > On 7/25/2018 1:46 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > yeah, there are many tests taking too long time. I do not know the reason > > this time but last time we did audit for slow tests was mainly due to ss

[openstack-dev] [QA][PTL][Election] Quality Assurance PTL Candidacy for Stein

2018-07-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi Everyone, I would like to announce my candidacy to continue the Quality Assurance PTL role for Stein cycle. I have served as QA PTL in Rocky cycle and as first time being PTL role, it was great experience for me. I have been doing my best effort in Rocky and made sure that we continued

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] tempest-full-py3 rename means we now run that job on test-only changes

2018-08-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sun, 05 Aug 2018 06:44:26 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > I've reported a nova bug for this: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1785425 > > But I'm not sure what is the best way to fix it now with the zuul v3 > hotness. We had an irrelevant-files entry in

Re: [openstack-dev] Should we add a tempest-slow job?

2018-08-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:14:04 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > On 5/13/2018 9:06 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > >> +1 on idea. As of now slow marked tests are from nova, cinder and > >> neutron scenario tests and 2 API swift tests only [4]. I agree that >

[openstack-dev] [nova] API updates week 02-08

2018-08-09 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === What we discussed this week: - Discussed on granular policy spec to update that as default roles are present now. - Discussed keypair quota usage bug. and only doc update can be done for now.

Re: [openstack-dev] Stepping down as coordinator for the Outreachy internships

2018-08-08 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Thanks Victoria for such a great work and well coordinated. You have done remarkable work in internships program. -gmann On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:47:28 +0900 Victoria Martínez de la Cruz wrote > Hi all, > I'm reaching you out to let you know that I'll be stepping down as >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][api] strict schema validation and microversioning

2018-08-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 07:27:06 +0900 Monty Taylor wrote > On 08/07/2018 05:03 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > > Hi Cinder and API-SIG folks, > > > > During reviewing a horizon bug [0], I noticed the behavior of Cinder API > > 3.0 was changed. > > Cinder introduced more strict

[openstack-dev] [release][qa][devstack][all] Pre-Notifiaction for DevStack branch cut for Rocky

2018-08-15 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, We are in process of cutting the Rocky branch for Devstack[1]. As per process[2], we need to wait for minimum set of project (which needed branch) used by Devstack to be branched first. As dhellmann mentioned on patch, All of the cycle-with-milestone projects are branched and we are

[openstack-dev] [release][qa] QA Rocky release status

2018-08-16 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, QA has lot of sub-projects and this mail is to track their release status for Rocky cycle. I will be on vacation from coming Monday for next 2 weeks (visiting India) but will be online to complete the below IN-PROGRESS items and update the status here. IN-PROGRESS: 1.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][congress] tempest test conditioning on release version

2018-08-14 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 06:40:57 +0900 Eric K wrote > Anyone have an example handy of a tempest test conditioning on service > release version (because new features not available in past versions)? > Seems like it could get pretty messy and haphazard, so I'm curious to > see best

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][congress] help with tempest plugin jobs against stable/queens

2018-08-14 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:37:18 +0900 Eric K wrote > I'm adding jobs [1] to the tempest plugin to run tests against > congress stable/queens. The job output seems to show stable/queens > getting checked out [2], but I know the test is *not* run against > queens because it's using

[openstack-dev] [opensatck-dev][qa][barbican][novajoin][networking-fortinet][vmware-nsx] Dependency of Tempest changes

2018-08-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Tempest patch [1] removes the deprecated config option for volume v1 API and it has dependency on may plugins. I have proposed the patches to each plugins using that option [2] to stop using that option so that their gate will not be broken if Tempest patch merge. Also I have made

[openstack-dev] [releases][rocky][tempest-plugins][ptl] Reminder to tag the Tempest plugins for Rocky release

2018-08-12 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Rocky release is few weeks away and we all agreed to release Tempest plugin with cycle-with-intermediary. Detail discussion are in ML [1] in case you missed. This is reminder to tag your project tempest plugins for Rocky release. You should be able to find your plugins deliverable

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][rocky][tempest-plugins][ptl] Reminder to tag the Tempest plugins for Rocky release

2018-08-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:35:23 +0900 Dmitry Tantsur wrote > Hi, > > The plugins are branchless and should stay so. Let us not dive into this > madness > again please. > > Dmitry > > On 08/12/2018 10:41 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > Hi All

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][rocky][tempest-plugins][ptl] Reminder to tag the Tempest plugins for Rocky release

2018-08-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
hes also like Tempest does. That is one item for QA team to help plugins in stein. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-June/131810.html -gmann > > Doug > > > > > Dmitry > > > > On 08/12/2018 10:41 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > > Hi All,

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][rocky][tempest-plugins][ptl] Reminder to tag the Tempest plugins for Rocky release

2018-08-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
s should cover the stable branch testing with branchless repo" now i can add 2nd TODO also 2. "Release model & tagging clarification of Tempest Plugins". I do not know the best common place to add those doc but as start i can write those in Tempest doc and later we can refer/mov

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][qa] QA Rocky release status

2018-08-21 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:rocky-branch-devstack-grenade+(status:open+OR+status:merged) [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592277/ [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592276/ [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591804/ -gmann On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:55:12 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann wrote

[openstack-dev] [qa][patrole][neutron][policy] Neutron Policy Testing in OpenStack Patrole project

2018-08-22 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, This thread is to request the neutron team on review help for neutron policy testing in Patrole project. Folks who are not familiar with Patrole, below is the brief background & description of Patrole: - OpenStack Patrole is official project under QA umbrella

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [tempest] [patrole] Service client duplication between Tempest and Tempest plugins

2018-07-23 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 04:22:47 +0900 MONTEIRO, FELIPE C wrote > Hi, > > ** Intention ** > Intention is to expand Patrole testing to some service clients that already > exist in some Tempest plugins, for core services only. > > ** Background ** > Digging through

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [tempest] [patrole] Service client duplication between Tempest and Tempest plugins

2018-07-24 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:27:26 +0900 MONTEIRO, FELIPE C wrote > Please see comments inline. > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 04:22:47 +0900 MONTEIRO, FELIPE C > > wrote > > > Hi, > > > > > > ** Intention ** > > > Intention is to expand Patrole testing

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][neutron][qa] Should we add a tempest-slow job?

2018-07-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Ghanshyam Mann > wrote: > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Matt Riedemann > > wrote: > >> The tempest-full job used to run API and scenario tests concurrently, and > >> if > >> you go b

Re: [openstack-dev] Lots of slow tests timing out jobs

2018-07-25 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 05:15:53 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > While going through our uncategorized gate failures [1] I found that we > have a lot of jobs failing (161 in 7 days) due to the tempest run timing > out [2]. I originally thought it was just the networking scenario tests,

[openstack-dev] [nova] keypair quota usage info for user

2018-07-25 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, During today API office hour, we were discussing about keypair quota usage bug (newton) [1]. key_pair 'in_use' quota is always 0 even when request per user which is because it is being set as 0 always [2]. From checking the history and review discussion on [3], it seems that it was

[openstack-dev] [nova] API updates week 19-25

2018-07-25 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === What we discussed this week: - Discussion on priority BP and remaining reviews on those. - Discussed keypair quota usage bug. Planned Features : == Below are the API related

[openstack-dev] [nova]API update week 12-18

2018-07-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === What we discussed this week: - Discussion on priority BP and remaining reviews on those. - picked up 3 in-progress bug's patches and reviewed. Planned Features : == Below are the

[openstack-dev] [QA] Rocky Retrospective Etherpad

2018-09-05 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, I have started an etherpad for a Rocky cycle retrospective for QA - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-rocky-retrospective This will be discussed in PTG on Tuesday 9.30-10.00 AM, so please add your feedback/comment before that. Everyone is welcome to add the feedback which help us to

[openstack-dev] [QA] [all] QA Stein PTG Planning

2018-09-05 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, As we are close to PTG, I have prepared the QA Stein PTG Schedule - https://ethercalc.openstack.org/Stein-PTG-QA-Schedule Detail of each sessions can be found in this etherpad - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-stein-ptg This time we will have QA Help Hour for 1 day only which is

[openstack-dev] [qa] Canceling next week QA office hours due to PTG

2018-09-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, As many of the QA folks will be in PTG, I am canceling the QA office hours for next week. Same will be resumed after PTG on 20th Sept. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][CI][nova compute] Skipping non-compute-driver tests

2018-09-09 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, 08 Sep 2018 08:28:06 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > On 9/7/2018 10:25 AM, William M Edmonds wrote: > > The concern that I have with whitelisting in a given CI is that it has > > to be done independently in every compute driver CI. So while I agree > > that it won't be

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Team lunch at the PTG next week - ACTION NEEDED

2018-09-09 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
I am in for Wed lunch meeting. -gmann On Sat, 08 Sep 2018 07:30:53 +0900 Ildiko Vancsa wrote > Hi Training Team, > > As a couple of us will be at the PTG next week it would be great to get > together one of the days maybe for lunch. > > Wednesday would work the best for

[openstack-dev] [openstack-operator] [qa] [forum] [berlin] QA Brainstorming Topic ideas for Berlin 2018

2018-09-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, I have created the below etherpad to collect the forum ideas related to QA for Berlin Summit. Please write up your ideas with your irc name on etherpad. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/berlin-stein-forum-qa-brainstorming -gmann

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] TC Candidacy

2018-09-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
and consideration. - Ghanshyam Mann (gmann) * Review: http://stackalytics.com/?release=all=marks_id=ghanshyammann_type=all * Commit: http://stackalytics.com/?release=all=commits_id=ghanshyammann_type=all * Foundation Profile: https://www.openstack.org/community/members/profile/6461 * Website

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][CI][nova compute] Skipping non-compute-driver tests

2018-09-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 04:41:32 +0900 Eric Fried wrote > Jichen- > > That patch is not ever intended to merge; hope that was clear from the > start :) It was just a proving ground to demonstrate which tests still > pass when there's effectively no compute driver in play. >

[openstack-dev] [QA][PTG] QA Dinner Night

2018-09-10 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, I'd like to propose a QA Dinner night for the QA team at the Dublin PTG. I initiated a doodle vote [1] to choose Tuesday or Wednesday night. NOTE: Anyone engaged in QA activities (not necessary to be QA core) are welcome to join. [1] https://doodle.com/poll/68fudz937v22ghnv

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc] Opinion about 'PTL' tooling

2018-09-10 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:31:11 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from jean-phili...@evrard.me's message of 2018-09-10 13:15:02 +0200: > > Hello everyone, > > > > In my candidacy [1], I mentioned that the TC should provide more tools to > > help the PTLs at their duties, for

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [all] QA Stein PTG Planning

2018-09-10 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
]. Request all the Topic owner to fill the details on respective Etherpads well before the Topic Schedule. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-stein-ptg [2] https://ethercalc.openstack.org/Stein-PTG-QA-Schedule -gmann On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 17:34:27 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann wrote >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][congress] trouble setting tempest feature flag

2018-08-31 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:20:37 +0900 Eric K wrote > Ha. Turned out to be a simple mistake in hyphens vs underscores. Thanks for update and good to know it is resolved now. Sorry I could not checked this further due to PTO. -gmann > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 3:06 PM Eric K wrote:

[openstack-dev] [nova]API update week 28-4

2018-07-04 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === We have re-started the Nova API discussion in office hour. I have updated the wiki page for more information about office hours: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI What we discussed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [nova][api] Novaclient redirect endpoint https into http

2018-07-05 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:30:15 +0900 Alex Xu wrote > > > 2018-07-06 10:03 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu : > > > 2018-07-06 2:55 GMT+08:00 melanie witt : > +openstack-dev@ > > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:50:26 +, Bogdan Katynski wrote: > But, I can not use nova command, endpoint

[openstack-dev] [qa][ptg] Stein PTG Planning for QA

2018-07-11 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, As we are close to Stein PTG Denver, I have prepared the etherpad[1] to collect the PTG topic ideas for QA. Please start adding your item/topic you want to discuss in PTG or comment on proposed topics. Even you are not making to PTG physically, still add your topic which you want us

[openstack-dev] [nova]API update week 5-11

2018-07-11 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === We had more attendees in this week office hours. What we discussed this week: - Discussion on API related BP. Discussion points are embedded inline with BP weekly progress in next section. -

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Clarifying testing recommendation for interop programs

2018-01-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:22 PM, Graham Hayes wrote: > On 18/01/18 16:25, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Graham Hayes's message of 2018-01-18 15:33:12 +: > > > >> >> In the past the QA team agreed to accept trademark-related tests from >> all projects in the tempest

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Clarifying testing recommendation for interop programs

2018-01-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We have governance review under debate[1] that we need the community's help > on. > The debate is over what recommendation the TC should make to the Interop team > on where the tests it uses for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] PTL Election Season

2018-01-22 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:39 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 1/15/2018 11:04 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote: >> >> Election details: https://governance.openstack.org/election/ >> >> Please read the stipulations and timelines for candidates and electorate >> contained in this

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][PTG] QA Dinner Night

2018-09-11 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, We have finalized the place and time for QA dinner which is tomorrow night. Here are the details: Restaurant : Famous Dave's - https://goo.gl/maps/G7gjpsJUEV72 Wednesday night, 6:30 PM Meeting time at lobby: 6.15 PM -gmann On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:13:15 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Mar 8th at 8:00 UTC

2018-03-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hello everyone, Hope everyone is back to home after Dublin PTG. This is reminder for QA team meeting on Thursday, Mar 8th at 8:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [api-wg][api][neutron] How to handle invalid query parameters

2018-03-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Hongbin Lu wrote: > >> As a brief recap, we were discussing how Neutron API server should behave >> if invalid query parameters were inputted. Per my understanding, the general >> consensus is to make

[openstack-dev] [PTG] [Infra] [all] zuulv3 Job Template vs irrelevant files/branch var

2018-03-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Before PTG, we were discussing about Job Template and irrelevant files issues on multiple mailing thread [1]. Both things does not work as expected and it leads to run the jobs on irrelevant files also and on excluded branch. In Dublin PTG, during infra help hours on Tuesday, we had

[openstack-dev] [QA] [PTG] QA New Office Hours and no more meetings

2018-03-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, During Dublin PTG, QA team discussed on Office hours vs meetings and to have a consistent time for meeting or office hours [1]. Due to low attendance in current meetings, we decided to cancel all meetings and starting the office hours on same time every Thursday in both TZ (09:00 UTC and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI][QA][HA][Eris][LCOO] Validating HA on upstream

2018-03-15 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Adam Spiers <aspi...@suse.com> wrote: > Raoul Scarazzini <ra...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 15/03/2018 01:57, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: >>> >>> Thanks all for starting the collaboration on this which is long pending

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [First Contact][SIG] [PTG] Summary of Discussions

2018-03-14 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Thanks Zhipeng that helps and good idea. If new contributors find that they will have enough information to start. >From FirstContact SIG, we also maintain the Projects Liaisons to have contact person for that project we can redirect the new contributors. idea is to have multiple people from

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI][QA][HA][Eris][LCOO] Validating HA on upstream

2018-03-14 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Thanks all for starting the collaboration on this which is long pending things and we all want to have some start on this. Myself and SamP talked about it during OPS meetup in Tokyo and we talked about below draft plan- - Update the Spec - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443504/. which is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-09 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:34 AM, Rico Lin wrote: > >> >> Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project >> team? >> > For normal tempest tests, which owned and maintained by original projects. > I think there were discussions in that PTG QA

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-09 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-03-08 15:51:05 -0500: >> On 08/03/18 12:57, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> > Why would the repos be owned by anyone other than the original project >> > team? >> >> A few reasons I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:15 PM, Andrea Frittoli <andrea.fritt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Ghanshyam Mann <gm...@ghanshyammann.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> QA had discussion in Dublin PTG about interop adds-

[openstack-dev] [PTG][QA] QA PTG Rocky Summary

2018-03-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, First of all, thanks for joining Rocky PTG and making it really productive and successful. I am writing the QA PTG summary. Wwe started the 'owner' for each working item so that we have single point of contact to track those. That will help to make each priority item to complete on time.

[openstack-dev] [QA] [PTG] [Interop] [Designate] [Heat] [TC]: QA PTG Summary- Interop test for adds-on project

2018-03-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, QA had discussion in Dublin PTG about interop adds-on tests location. First of all thanks all (specially markvoelker, dhellmann, mugsie) for joining the sessions. and I am glad we conclude the things and agreed on solution. Discussion was carry forward from the ML discussion [1] and to

[openstack-dev] [qa] QA Office Hours 9:00 UTC is cancelled

2018-04-05 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Today QA Office Hours @9:00 UTC is canceled due to unavailability of members. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The createBackup API

2018-03-30 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > There is spec proposal to fix a bug of createBackup API with microversion. > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511825/) > > When rotation parameter is '0', the createBackup API just do a snapshot, and > then delete all the

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][qa] Changes to devstack LIBS_FROM_GIT

2018-04-02 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:21 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > I've proposed a change to devstack which slightly alters the > LIBS_FROM_GIT behavior. This shouldn't be a significant change for > those using legacy devstack jobs (but you may want to be aware of it). > It is

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral][tempest][congress] import or retain mistral tempest service client

2018-03-17 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Sorry for late response, i kept this mail unread but forgot to respond. reply inline. On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > > On 13 March 2018 at 18:51, Eric K wrote: >> >> Hi Mistral folks and others, >> >> I'm working

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Rocky spec review day

2018-03-21 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:33 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Eric Fried wrote: >> >> +1 for the-earlier-the-better, for the additional reason that, if we >> don't finish, we can do another one in time for spec freeze. >> > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][PTG] QA Dinner Night

2018-02-27 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Based on doodle vote, we finalize the QA Dinner on Wed night. I have not booked any restaurant yet so please suggest if you know any good place. ll put the time and meeting place soon. -gmann On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Ghanshyam Mann <gm...@ghanshyammann.com> wrote: &g

[openstack-dev] [QA][PTG] QA Team photo @12:00-12.10 PM Thursday

2018-02-27 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, QA team photo slot for PTG is scheduled on Thursday at 12.00. Please gather @5th floor reception before time, may be good to plan to meet @11.55 AM. See you all there!. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

<    1   2   3   4   >