[openstack-dev] [Neutron][tempest] Timestamp service extension breaks CI

Hi, The commit https://review.openstack.org/#q,4c2c983618ddb7a528c9005b0d7aaf5322bd198d,n,z causes the CI to fail. This is due to the fact that the port creation does not return the created_at and updated_at keys. The tempest test that the keys are the same. Please see [I] I posted patch https:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up: add description to resources breaks decomposed plugin

ering seems to be messed up on the association proxy that references the other table. On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:07 AM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: The tests that are failing are those where the security groups are being searched by the ‘description’. When running these tes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up: add description to resources breaks decomposed plugin

The tests that are failing are those where the security groups are being searched by the ‘description’. When running these tests individually they pass but when running all of the tests together they fail. From: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:ope

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up: add description to resources breaks decomposed plugin

Hi, The resent addition of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269887/ has broken our unit tests with random tests with listing of security groups – for example – test_list_security_groups Has anyone else also hit this issue? Thanks Gary __

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] PTL for Newton and beyond

+1 Gracias Dims! On 3/3/16, 2:26 PM, "Sean Dague" wrote: >On 03/03/2016 06:32 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> Team, >> >> It has been great working with you all as PTL for Oslo. Looks like the >> nominations open up next week for elections and am hoping more than >> one of you will step up f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Networking-vSphere] - changes in nova compute driver

Hi, I suggest that the guys who maintain this driver provide you the reasons why they maintain the Nova driver like this It is problematic and at times the driver can break as it is not in tree. Thanks Gary From: Monotosh Das mailto:monotosh@ericsson.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:op

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] discussion about core reviewer limitations by company

I think that IBM has a very interesting policy in that two IBM cores should not approve a patch posted by one of their colleagues (that is what Chris RIP used to tell me). It would be nice if the community would follow this policy. Thanks Gary From: "Armando M." mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> Reply-

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] next Team meeting cancelled (Feb-22)

Thanks for the update. Will there be an option of connecting remotely? Google chat? Webex? From: "Armando M." mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 2:32 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] How would nova microversion get-me-a-network in the API?

Yes, you could consider Neutron as a proxy for this. It creates the network, subnet, router… To be honest I think that we should maybe consider ofering a template that can be created by Neutron and then the template ID passed from Nova or wherever. This will enable an admin to pre cook a number

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] How would nova microversion get-me-a-network in the API?

On 2/14/16, 3:59 PM, "Ken'ichi Ohmichi" wrote: >2016-02-12 11:19 GMT-08:00 Andrew Laski : >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016, at 01:45 PM, John Garbutt wrote: >>> On 12 February 2016 at 18:17, Andrew Laski wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> >> Forgive me

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

At times I feel like it is the 80’s and we are witnessing the Heysel stadium disaster. My understanding from the whole thread and the patches in review for the stadium criteria is that accidents happen and the community is trying to prevent that. Honestly I am really on the fence here, but leani

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]{l2-gateway] is this project alive

teway] is this project alive On 12 January 2016 at 09:21, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Here is an example of a patch that was posted 5 weeks ago. - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254816/ That is a pretty long time for something that is trivial 5 weeks is bad but not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC

In Nova the alternate meetings were chaired by different people. I think that was very productive and fruitful. So it is certainly something worth considering. At the end of the day all of the meetings are logged and people can go over the logs and address issues that can and may concern them. A

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

> >Thanks, >doug > > >> On Jan 12, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> So Doug are you planning on moving all of the extensions and mixins to >>the Neutron lib? >> My understanding was that was not part of the scope, but maybe I missed >>tha

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]{l2-gateway] is this project alive

lk to the team. Thanks Swami From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 6:14 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]{l2-gateway] is this project alive Its like a desert out

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

for filing. Take a look at >http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/liberty/neutron-lib.html > , which is work in progress to address the same issue. At the end of that, no >one should be importing directly from neutron. > >Thanks, >doug > > >>

[openstack-dev] [Neutron]{l2-gateway] is this project alive

Its like a desert out here trying to get a review… __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

; >BR, >Dariusz (dasm) Smigiel > >> >> >> >> On 1/12/16, 11:52 AM, "Smigiel, Dariusz" wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >> Doug Wiegley wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> On Jan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC

Hi, I personally liked that fact that there were two times. It was reasonable to make an effort to stay up very late to attend the one and then have the privileged of the other being at a reasonable time. Now it is back to the crazy hours. Thanks Gary From: Hirofumi Ichihara mailto:ichihara.hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

On 1/12/16, 11:52 AM, "Smigiel, Dariusz" wrote: > > >> Doug Wiegley wrote: >> > >> > >> >> On Jan 11, 2016, at 2:42 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Sean M. Collins wrote: >> >> >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

I have posted https://review.openstack.org/265315 to try and help the decomposed plugins have a breather. In addition to this this may also break the aaS. Thanks Gary From: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

Hi, The commit https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5d53dfb8d64186b5b1d2f356fbff8f222e15d1b2 may break the decomposed plugins that make use of the method _get_tenant_id_for_create It would have been nice if there was a deprecation warning. Options: 1. Decomposed plugins fix this 2

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit performance

Things looks (and feel better now) Thanks and happy new year! On 12/29/15, 5:28 PM, "Andreas Jaeger" wrote: >FYI, the Infra team is looking into this right now, > >Andreas >-- > Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nür

[openstack-dev] Gerrit performance

Hi, I know it is holidays but gerrit response is so slow. If anyone from Infra is online please can you help. Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists

Re: [openstack-dev] neutron metadata-agent HA

agent HA It is as 'single' as active L3 router that is handling traffic at current point of time. [Gary] But if the l3 agent is up and running and the metadataproxy is not then all of the instances using that agent will not be able to get their metadata. On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:13

Re: [openstack-dev] neutron metadata-agent HA

On 12/12/15, 10:44 PM, "Assaf Muller" wrote: >The neutron metadata agent is stateless. It takes requests from the >metadata proxies running in the router namespaces and moves the >requests on to the nova server. If you're using HA routers, start the >neutron-metadata-agent on every machine t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting this Monday at 2100 UTC

Nice suggestion! From: "Armando M." mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, December 4, 2015 at 10:50 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting this Monday

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug deputy process

From: "Armando M." mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Saturday, December 5, 2015 at 1:27 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug deputy process On 4 December

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][neutron-*] Notice! pylint breakage

Should we not be updating this in the requirements project? From: Paul Michali mailto:p...@michali.net>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 4:50 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [open

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug update

= triaging brace = rbac ah! On Nov 20, 2015, at 12:41 PM, Armando M. mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 19 November 2015 at 23:10, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, There are a ton of old and ancient bugs that have not been trained. If you guys have some tim

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug update

nd what are new features etc. Just a thought. Thanks Gary From: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, November 20, 2015 at 9:10 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug update

Hi, There are a ton of old and ancient bugs that have not been trained. If you guys have some time then please go over them. In most cases some are not even bugs and are just questions. I have spent the last few days going over and training a few. Over the last two days a number of bugs related

Re: [openstack-dev] Last sync from oslo-incubator

On 11/13/15, 8:04 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: >Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-11-13 07:44:26 -0500: >> Hear Hear! Thierry. Many many thanks to everyone who made this possible. >> >> -- Dims > >Indeed, as Thierry said, it has truly been a group effort, spanning >many

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Preparing 2014.2.4 (Juno) WAS Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

On 11/13/15, 3:23 PM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: >On 10/11/15 16:11 +0100, Alan Pevec wrote: >>Hi, >> >>while we continue discussion about the future of stable branches in >>general and stable/juno in particular, I'd like to execute the current >>plan which was[1] >> >>2014.2.4 (eol) early Novembe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] ML2 don't call ipam driver remove_subnet function

Hi, This should be resolved with this path - https://review.openstack.org/239885 Good luck Gary From: thanh le giang mailto:legiangth...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 5:20 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Arbitrary JSON blobs in ipam db tables

I think that id we can move to a versioned object model model then it will be better. Having random json blobs passed around is going to cause problems. From: "Armando M." mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, November 4,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Alex Xu to nova-core

+1. Well deserved! On 11/8/15, 7:28 AM, "GHANSHYAM MANN" wrote: >I am not core but Big +1 for Alex. It will be great to have him in nova core. > >Thanks >ghanshyam > >On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:32 AM, John Garbutt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I propose we add Alex Xu[1] to nova-core. >> >> Over the la

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Mid-cycle meetup for Mitaka

Hi, In Nova the new black is the os-vif-lib (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-nova-os-vif-lib). It may be worthwhile seeing if we can maybe do something at the same time with the nova crew and then bash out the dirty details here. It would be far easier if everyone was in the same room.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

From: "mest...@mestery.com" mailto:mest...@mestery.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 7:09 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutro

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Infra] Neutron gate issues

Hi, At the moment the neutron gate is broken due to LBaaSv1 issues. This is meant to be deprecated in favor of LBaaSV2 (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239863). Is there any chance that we can get that approved? Thanks Gary _

Re: [openstack-dev] How we can find list of medium/low bugs for nova

Hi, In general the process is as follows: 1. Fix the bug in the trunk/master branch 2. If the bug meets stable back port criteria (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch), and it is approved in trunk, then do a cherry pick Thanks Gary From: chandraprakash mishra mailto:cpmishra...

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Social Meetup in Tokyo

+1 From: Kevin Benton mailto:blak...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 6:38 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Social Meetup in Tokyo Ho

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2 gateway project

Hi, Who will be creating the stable/liberty branch? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] AZ Support

2015-10-05 15:54 GMT+09:00 Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>>: Hi, Yes, you are correct. That patch is the culprit (my bad and once again humble apologies) Regarding the AZ support I think that we need to do the following: 1. Have this in a separate topic until it is complete. I ha

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] AZ Support

On 10/5/15, 3:21 AM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote: >> On 04 Oct 2015, at 19:21, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> Sorry, it is not a result of the AZ support (humble apologies) >> >> It is a result of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226362/ > >So you use DH

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] AZ Support

ailto:arma...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 8:18 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] AZ Support On 4 October 2015 at 10:00, Gary Kotto

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] AZ Support

Sorry, it is not a result of the AZ support (humble apologies) It is a result of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226362/ From: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 8:00 PM To: Op

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] AZ Support

penstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 7:34 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] AZ Support On 4 October 2015 at 09:19, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, It appears that

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Stable/liberty branches for decomposed plugins

Hi, When should we start to create a stable/liberty branch for the decomposed plugins? My understanding is that the plugin should be in line with Neutron. Changes in Neutron master (now Mitaka) may require plugin changes. Any ideas or thoughts on the matter? I am in favour of creating the stable

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] AZ Support

Hi, It appears that the addition has broken the vmware_nsx plugin (https://review.openstack.org/183369). We are still debugging. Would it be worthwhile considering adding this support as a feature branch and then when the entire feature is ready that we merge it to the tree. This will enable the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

+1 On 10/1/15, 10:56 AM, "Ghe Rivero" wrote: >If anyone disagrees with the commit format, please, go ahead and fix it >(It's >really easy using the gerrit web) For such cosmetic changes (and others >similars), we should not wait for the author to do it. Sometimes, for a >stupid >comma, and with

[openstack-dev] [all] gerri performance

Hi, Anyone else experiencing bad performance with gerri at the moment? Access files in a review takes ages. So now the review cycle will be months instead of week Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not fo

Re: [openstack-dev] New PyCharm License

Hi, Mine is garyk Thanks Gary From: Bharath Thiruveedula mailto:bharath.thiruveed...@imaginea.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 at 9:08 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Effective Neutron

Thanks for marking as WPI From: "Armando M." mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 6:20 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Effective Neu

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Non-Candidacy

Thanks! You did a great job. Looking back you made some very tough and healthy decisions. Neutron has a new lease on life! It is tradition that the exiting PTL buy drinks for the community :) From: "mest...@mestery.com" mailto:mest...@mestery.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug importance

n add yourself, so if you do not see yourself in that group, can you please add it and try? -- Dims On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, In the past I was able to set the importance of a bug. Now I am unable to do this? Has the policy

[openstack-dev] [nova] Bug importance

Hi, In the past I was able to set the importance of a bug. Now I am unable to do this? Has the policy changed? Can someone please clarify. If the policy has changed who is responsible for deciding the priority of a bug? Thanks Gary _

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware][qa] vmware nsx CI appears gone

Hi, We have an infra issue - seems related to https://review.openstack.org/190047 - we are investigating. Thanks Gary On 9/1/15, 5:58 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: >I haven't seen the vmware nsx CI reporting on anything in awhile but >don't see any outage events here: > >https://wiki.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] periodic task

On 8/31/15, 9:22 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: > > >On 8/27/2015 1:22 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> >> On 8/25/15, 2:43 PM, "Andrew Laski" wrote: >> >>> On 08/25/15 at 06:08pm, Gary Kotton wrote: >>>> >>>>

[openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] compute log files are flooded with unnecessary data

Hi, The commit https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/bcc002809894f39c84dca5c46034468ed0469c2b results in a ton of data in log files. An example is that a tempest runs is about 80G of data in the nova compute log file. This makes debugging issues terribly difficult. I have proposed a revert o

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] periodic task

On 8/25/15, 2:43 PM, "Andrew Laski" wrote: >On 08/25/15 at 06:08pm, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> >>On 8/25/15, 9:10 AM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>On 8/25/2015 10:03 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >>>> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] periodic task

On 8/25/15, 9:10 AM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: > > >On 8/25/2015 10:03 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> >> On 8/25/15, 7:04 AM, "Matt Riedemann" >>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 8/24/2015 9:32 PM, Gary Kotton wro

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] periodic task

On 8/25/15, 7:04 AM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: > > >On 8/24/2015 9:32 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> In item #2 below the reboot is down via the guest and not the nova >>api¹s :) >> >> From: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] periodic task

In item #2 below the reboot is down via the guest and not the nova api's :) From: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, August 24, 2015 at 7:18 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@li

[openstack-dev] [nova] periodic task

Hi, A couple of months ago I posted a patch for bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/1463688. The issue is as follows: the periodic task detects that the instance state does not match the state on the hypervisor and it shuts down the running VM. There are a number of ways that this may happen and I w

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vmware][stable] vmware-nsx has no releases

Hi, There are still a few extra stable back ports that we need to make. In addition to this I think that we should try and sync all of the etrnal projects for a common release. Thanks Gary From: "mest...@mestery.com" mailto:mest...@mestery.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack Li

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

Well, actually +2 as there are 2 nominations. :) From: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 5:23 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subje

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!

+1 From: Anna Kamyshnikova mailto:akamyshnik...@mirantis.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 5:14 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] I am pleased to pro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

On 8/12/15, 12:12 AM, "Mike Perez" wrote: >On 15:39 Aug 11, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> >> On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote: >> >> >Are you saying that *new functionality* was added to the stable/kilo >> >branch of *Neutr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote: >On 08/11/2015 10:57 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> On 8/11/15, 5:08 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-11 13:49:37 + (+), Gary Kotton wrote: >>>> This is a stable issue - please s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

On 8/11/15, 5:08 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: >On 2015-08-11 13:49:37 +0000 (+), Gary Kotton wrote: >> This is a stable issue - please see https://review.openstack.org/165750. >> This is required to support the plugin developed in Liberty. >[...] > >I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

healthy and prone to breakage. But this is what people have chosen as adding anything driver specific in Nova is likely to be blocked due to process. Thanks Gary On 8/10/15, 6:45 PM, "Kuvaja, Erno" wrote: >> -Original Message----- >> From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmwar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

On 8/10/15, 6:05 PM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: > > >On 8/10/15, 6:03 PM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: > >> >> >>On 8/10/15, 5:46 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>On 8/10/2015 9:17 AM, Gary Kotton wrot

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

On 8/10/15, 6:03 PM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: > > >On 8/10/15, 5:46 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: > >> >> >>On 8/10/2015 9:17 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I am not really sure what to say here. The code was in review for over

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

On 8/10/15, 5:46 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: > > >On 8/10/2015 9:17 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> I am not really sure what to say here. The code was in review for over 8 >> months. On a side note but related - we have a patch for a p

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

Sorry my bad. 7 months :) On 8/10/15, 5:17 PM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: >Hi, >I am not really sure what to say here. The code was in review for over 8 >months. On a side note but related - we have a patch for a plugin >developed in Liberty - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

t;> >> Even the refactoring is fairly clean it is major part of the >> metadata handler. >> >> It also changes the API (In the case of X-Metadata-Provider being >> present) which tends to be sacred on stable branches. >> >> >> >> The chang

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

which tends to be sacred on stable branches. The changes here does not actually fix any bug but just implements new functionality that missed kilo not even slightly but by months. Thus my -1 for merging these. - Erno From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05

[openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

Hi, In the Kilo cycle a Neutron driver was added for supporting the Vmware NSXv plugin. This required patches in Nova to enable the plugin to work with Nova. These patches finally landed yesterday. I have back ported them to stable/kilo as the Neutron driver is unable to work without these in st

[openstack-dev] [nova] FFE Request - VMware better display names

Hi, I would like to request a FFE for the following BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-better-display-names The code is self contained within the Vmware driver. It enables an vCenter admin to have better visibility of the OpenStack deployment. This is super useful for troubles

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] Jenkins jobs are not executed when setting up a new CI system.

The gate is under heavy load at the moment. Maybe in a day or two it will get back to usual… From: Tang Chen mailto:tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:57 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@li

[openstack-dev] [nova] ceph gate unstable

Hi, It seems like the gating is failing with cep tests: http://logs.openstack.org/29/199129/6/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph/bfe423d/logs/testr_results.html.gz Is anyone looking into this? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Developme

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Switching the bug status of ~200 bugs at once; Problem?

+1 On 7/10/15, 1:32 PM, "Sean Dague" wrote: >On 07/10/2015 04:09 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: >> I'd like to switch the status of ~200 bugs at once to adjust the >> bookkeeping in LaunchPad. This will concern "Confirmed" and "Triaged" >> bugs which have an assignee [1]. AFAIK they should be "In Pro

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Proposing Miguel Angel Ajo for the Control Plane core team

A huge +1 From: Kevin Benton mailto:blak...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, July 6, 2015 at 1:02 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Proposing Miguel Angel Ajo for the

[openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo-vmware] Core review team

Hi, Over time the team of people working in the project has changed and evolved. We would like to add the following people following their contributions for the project: * Eric Brown We would like to remove the following people as they are no longer working on the project and thank them fo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - breaking changes for plugins/drivers

One of the hidden costs of an external plugin that things break. This is something that happens to us at least once a week. We have been proactive in this by doing the following: 1. Running the decomposed plugin unit tests with every neutron change - this gives us an indication of which patc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

+1 On 6/27/15, 1:25 PM, "neil.jer...@metaswitch.com" wrote: >+1 also > > Original Message >From: Fox, Kevin M >Sent: Friday, 26 June 2015 21:15 >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Reply To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

We are not in a good way. The 'drivers' team is very small and just have a small handful of people approving these specs is a huge bottleneck. Taking into the fact that the core team is relatively small the cores will most probably not even get to reviewing the code when it is posted, so it will

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][neutron] Requirements validations

On 6/23/15, 12:52 PM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA256 > >On 06/23/2015 11:16 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, In the vmware_nsx project we have done the following: >> >> 1. In the test_requirements file we have

[openstack-dev] [infra][neutron] Requirements validations

Hi, In the vmware_nsx project we have done the following: 1. In the test_requirements file we have a link to the neutron master [1]. The purpose for this is that the master branch needs to be in sync with the neutron branch and all unit tests have to pass. So each time there is a change in n

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.vmware] Bump oslo.vmware to 1.0.0

works 3. We will make a few extra cleanups in Nova as there are some exceptions in the driver that are imported from oslo.vmware and they are specific for nova. So hopefully we can get concensus on the plan and move forwards. A luta continua Thanks Gary On 6/14/15, 5:34 PM, "Gary Kotton&qu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Ann Kamyshnikova for the API & DB core reviewer team

+1 From: Akihiro MOTOKI mailto:amot...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, June 12, 2015 at 8:20 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Ann Kamyshnikova for the AP

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing YAMAMOTO Takashi for the Control Plane core team

+1 From: Kevin Benton mailto:blak...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 9:15 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing YAMAMOTO Takashi for the Contro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Rossella Sblendido for the Control Plane core team

+1 On 6/13/15, 1:41 AM, "Carl Baldwin" wrote: >+1! > >On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: >> Hello! >> >> As the Lieutenant of the built-in control plane[1], I would like >>Rossella >> Sblendido to be a member of the control plane core reviewer team. >> >> Her review stats are

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.vmware] Bump oslo.vmware to 1.0.0

Hi, I agree with Vipin. Can we please address the exception handling. We already have the patches. Thanks Gary On 6/14/15, 12:41 PM, "Vipin Balachandran" wrote: >Dims, > >There are some problems with exception hierarchy which need to be fixed. > >-Original Message- >From: Davanum Sriniva

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit maintenance concluded

Thanks for doing this! On 6/13/15, 4:26 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: >Our maintenance has concluded successfully without incident and the >accompanying Gerrit outage was roughly an hour. > >We moved 57 repositories to new Git namespaces: > >stackforge/cookbook-openstack-bare-metal >->

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Brian Haley to Neutron L3 Core Reviewer Team

+1 On 6/10/15, 10:11 PM, "Carl Baldwin" wrote: >Folks, > >As the Neutron L3 Lieutenant [1] under the PTL, Kyle, I'd like to >propose Brian Haley as a member of the Neutron L3 core reviewer team. >Brian has been a long time contributor in Neutron showing expertise >particularly in IPv6, iptables,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Progressing/tracking work on libvirt / vif drivers

Hi, At the summit this was discussed in the nova sessions and there were a number of concerns regarding security etc. Thanks Gary From: Irena Berezovsky mailto:irenab@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 1:44 PM To: Op

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Assaf Muller for the Neutron Core Reviewer Team

+1 From: Oleg Bondarev mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 5:31 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Assaf Muller for the N

Re: [openstack-dev] oslo.vmware release 0.13.0 (liberty)

2015 at 1:52 PM, Joe Gordon mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Gary Kotton > mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I prefer the patched posted by Sabari. The patch has two changes: >> >> It f

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >