Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] security group OVO change

; Thanks and sorry for inconveniences, > Ihar > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The commit https://review.openstack.org/284738 has broken decomposed plugins > > (those that extend security groups and rules).

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] security group OVO change

day, June 19, 2017 at 10:01 AM To: OpenStack List Cc: "isaku.yamah...@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] security group OVO change Do you mean the callback event for AFTER_CREATE is missing the rules when it's for default security groups? On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 4:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] tempest failures when deploying neutron-server in wsgi with apache

+1 From: Kevin Benton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, June 19, 2017 at 10:33 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] tempest failures when deploying neutron-server in wsgi with apache Thanks. Maybe this would be a good opportunity to just have people start putting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Allow passing security groups when attaching interfaces?

Hi, When you attach an interface there are a number of options: 1. Pass a existing port 2. Pass a network In the second case a new port will be created and by default that will have the default security group. You could try the first option by attaching the security group to the port Thanks Gary

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

Hi, Will this also be moving to eol - https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/mitaka/global-requirements.txt? Thanks Gary On 7/10/17, 9:23 AM, "Andreas Jaeger" wrote: On 2017-07-07 17:37, Doug Szumski wrote: > >> On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh wrote: >>> Hi a

[openstack-dev] [infra] Gerrit slow

Hi, Gerrit is very slow at the moment. Is anyone else hitting this issue? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe ht

[openstack-dev] [neutron][l2-gateway] Added Ricardo Noriega to the core team

Hi, Over the last few months Ricardo Noriega has been making many contributions to the project and has actually helped get it to the stage where it’s a lot healthier than before ☺. I am adding him to the core team. Congratulations! A luta continua Gary

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cleaning up inactive meetbot channels

FYI - https://review.openstack.org/486887 We should be using #openstack-neutron instead. On 7/20/17, 8:46 PM, "Graham Hayes" wrote: On 19/07/17 20:24, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > For those who are unaware, Freenode doesn't allow any one user to > /join more than 120 channels concurrentl

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Error when running quickstart.sh

Hi, When I do this on a virtual host I get the following error: Sunday 06 August 2017 08:22:04 -0700 (0:00:02.641) 0:06:45.482 * failed: [127.0.0.2] (item={u'flavor': u'control', u'virtualbmc_port': 6230, u'name': u'control_0'}) => {"failed": true, "item": {"flavor": "control", "n

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Error when running quickstart.sh

Sorry, my bad, when setting the guest to have vmkernel6Guest it works. From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 6:40 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Error when running quickstart.sh Hi, When I do this on a virtual host I get the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] pike

Hi, I will do this. Thanks Gary On 8/8/17, 4:47 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote: hi, who is planning to make stable/pike for networking-l2gw? __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questi

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Should we continue providing FQDNs for instance hostnames?

Hi, Your patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480616/ requires that neutron expose the ‘DNS Integration’ extension be support by neutron and the relevant networking plugin. If it does not then will be a gression and things will not work. In addition to this that is per network and not global s

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Should we continue providing FQDNs for instance hostnames?

On 9/4/17, 3:47 PM, "Stephen Finucane" wrote: On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 11:51 +0000, Gary Kotton wrote: > On 9/4/17, 11:18 AM, "Stephen Finucane" wrote: > > Nova has a feature whereby it will provide instance host names that cloud- > > init c

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

One thing that we could consider is adding ‘topy’ [i] to our gating. [i] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/topy On 9/23/17, 2:47 AM, "Michael Johnson" wrote: A recent extreme example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/494981/1/specs/version0.8/active_passive_loadbalancer.rst I woul

[openstack-dev] [infra] pypi publishing

Hi, Any idea why latest packages are not being published to pypi. Examples are: vmware-nsxlib 10.0.2 (latest stable/ocata) vmware-nsxlib 11.0.1 (latest stable/pike) vmware-nsxlib 11.1.0 (latest queens) Did we miss a configuration that we needed to do in the infra projects? Thanks Gary ___

[openstack-dev] [infra] Zull retry limit

Hi, It seems like all patches are hitting this issue – “RETRY_LIMIT in 5m 35s”. Any idea? Is this specific to vmware-nsx or all projects? Did we miss doing an update for zuulv3? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing Lis

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Zull retry limit

at, Sep 30, 2017, at 11:23 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > It seems like all patches are hitting this issue – “RETRY_LIMIT in 5m > 35s”. Any idea? Is this specific to vmware-nsx or all projects? > Did we miss doing an update for zuulv3? > This is specific to

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Zull retry limit

Thanks! On 10/1/17, 8:23 PM, "Clark Boylan" wrote: On Sun, Oct 1, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Is this an example of the solution that you are proposing - > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508775/. I also read that we should > create

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] pypi publishing

On 10/1/17, 9:40 PM, "Paul Belanger" wrote: On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 05:02:00AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > Hi, > > Any idea why latest packages are not being published to pypi. > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Update on Zuul v3 Migration - and what to do about issues

We have patches stuck for hours – only info is: http://zuulv3.openstack.org/static/stream.html?uuid=128746a70c1843d7a94e887120ba381c&logfile=console.log At the moment we are unable to do anything On 10/3/17, 3:36 PM, "Boden Russell" wrote: On 10/3/17 5:17 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > D

Re: [openstack-dev] Security of Meta-Data

Hi, You can configure the metadata service to be secure. You just need to make sure that nova is configured correctly. FYI - https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/conf/agent/metadata/config.py#L68 Thanks Gary On 10/4/17, 7:01 AM, "Joshua Harlow" wrote: I would treat the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] Zuul v3 rollout, the sequel

Hi, At the moment the neutron, neutron-lib and many of the decomposed projects are still failing with the v3. Does this mean that we are broken from the 11th? For the decomposed projects we have a work around to help address this in the short term – need to increase timeout and need a flag from Z

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Debug tool

Hi, Out of interest is anyone using this tool? If so can you please let us know. This was marked as deprecated in about 18months ago in favor of a tool that was an idea that never actually materialized. Thanks Gary __ OpenSta

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] any flow-charts ?

Hi, Please see https://docs.openstack.org/security-guide/networking/architecture.html for a starting point. Thanks Gary From: Guru Desai Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Saturday, November 25, 2017 at 1:00 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] any flow-charts ? Hello All, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Propose Slawek Kaplonski for Neutron core

+1 Welcome to the team! From: Miguel Lavalle Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 9:21 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Propose Slawek Kaplonski for Neutron core Hi Neutron Team, I want to nominate Slawek Kaplonski (irc: slaweq) to Neutron co

Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][neutron][gap-09]: No state for subnets

Hi, Can you please elaborate more about the subnet state? FYI - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/APIv2-specification#Subnet Thanks Gary From: "Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 3:13 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [opens

[openstack-dev] [neutron][neutron-dynamic-routing] Floating IP create is broken

Hi, The patch 088e317cd2dd8488feb29a4fa6600227d1810479 has broken floating IP creation. This breaks the dynamic routing gating. I have opened a bug and have posted a patch to address. Thanks Gary __

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stepping down from core

Armando, wishing you the best in the future. Forza Juve! From: Hirofumi Ichihara Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 12:28 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stepping down from core Hi Armando, It's been a great pleasure working with you. We

[openstack-dev] [infra] Gerrit issues

Hi, Anyone else experience problems accessing gerrit? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug deputy report

Hi, Things have been relatively quiet. There are two bugs: 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1743480 - I think that we can leverage tags here so that should address the issue. Would be interesting to know what others thing. 2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1743552 - patch in re

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Jakub Libosvar for testingcore

+1 On 7/22/16, 9:49 PM, "Brandon Logan" wrote: +1 On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 09:19 -0500, Darek Śmigiel wrote: > I’m not a core, so treat this as +0 but I think Jakub will be good > addition to core team. > > > So +1 >

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] Python 3 support

Hi, This morning I discovered that the project does not have python 3 support. This was due to the fact that it broke the vmware-nsx unit tests. I have started to kick the wheels with the python 3 support: 1. Project infra - https://review.openstack.org/346701 (currently non-voting) 2.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] weird behavior of neutron create port with extra dhcp option

Hi, This also seems related - https://review.openstack.org/345717 and https://review.openstack.org/345720 Thanks Gary On 7/30/16, 12:49 AM, "Moshe Levi" wrote: Hi, I encounter a weird behavior with neutron create port command. I am using neutron master. When I run this neut

[openstack-dev] [neutron][ipam] CI failing

Hi, Has anyone else seen the issue at https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1615403 . This happens quite often since the upgrade of the deafutl value last week. Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usa

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][heat] Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

Hi, At the moment it is still not clear to me the upgrade process from V1 to V2. The migration script https://review.openstack.org/#/c/289595/ has yet to be approved. Does this support all drivers or is this just the default reference implementation driver? Are there people still using V1? Than

[openstack-dev] [neutron][ipam] max_fixed_ips_per_port

Hi, In commit 37277cf4168260d5fa97f20e0b64a2efe2d989ad [i] and commit fc661571765054ff09e41aa6c7fc32f80fd0a98d [ii] this variable was marked as deprecated. A number of neutron plugins make use of this to ensure that only one IP address can be configured per port per subnet. There are cases where

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ipam] max_fixed_ips_per_port

overkill. From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 2:36 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ipam] max_fixed_ips_per_port Hi, In commit 37277cf4168260d5fa97f20e0b64a2efe2d989ad [i] and commit fc661571765054ff09e41aa6c7fc32f80fd0a98d [ii

[openstack-dev] [neutron][trunk] objects within transactions

Hi, It is unclear what our policy is with objects. My understanding is that an object should handle all of the database interaction. Is that not one of the benefits of the objects? I posted https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365459 and it has a number of interesting comments – the main is that dri

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][trunk] objects within transactions

Thanks! On 9/5/16, 6:20 PM, "Jakub Libosvar" wrote: On 05/09/16 16:45, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > > It is unclear what our policy is with objects. My understanding is that > an object should handle all of the database interaction. Is that not one

[openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic-routing] Broken unit tests

Hi, Can cores please look at https://review.openstack.org/543208. We are currently blocked on master and stable/queens with this. Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][neutron-lbaas][octavia] Announcing the deprecation of neutron-lbaas and neutron-lbaas-dashboard

Hi, I have a number of issues with this: 1. I do not think that we should mark this as deprecated until we have a clear and working migration patch. Let me give an example. Say I have a user who is using Pike or Queens and has N LBaaS load balancers up and running. What if we upgrade to T and th

[openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] stable/queens tripleo issues

Hi, At the moment the stable/queens branch is broken due to the tripleo CI test failing [i]. Does anyone have any hints here on what we should look at? I am not sure if this is with ansible/centos… Thanks Gary [i] http://logs.openstack.org/88/543188/2/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario004-multin

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][l2gw] stable/queens tripleo issues

table/queens, sorry for that. I propose to disable TripleO jobs in stable/queens for l2gw project: https://review.openstack.org/546059 Hopefully that helps! Cheers, On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, At the moment the stable/queens branch is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sdk] Proposal to migrate neutronclient python bindings to OpenStack SDK

One of the concerns here is that the openstack client does not enable one to configure extensions that are not part of the core reference architecture. So any external third part that tries to have any etension added will not be able to leverage the openstack client. This is a major pain point.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sdk] Proposal to migrate neutronclient python bindings to OpenStack SDK

ey are things we would like to avoid. If you and/or boden are interested in implementing so-called "generic network resource" commands in Neutron OSC plugin, I can help the effort (as it speed up neutron CLI deprecation). Akihiro 2018-02-26 13:39 GMT+00:00

[openstack-dev] [requirements][neutron] Depending on pypi versions

Hi, The change https://github.com/openstack/requirements/commit/35653e8c5044bff1059f50a82b6065176eea has created some issues with decomposed neutron plugins. Let me try and give an example to explain. Say for example a patch landed in neutron master that exposed feature X. Now if a decompos

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][neutron] Depending on pypi versions

he global-requirements constraints file, I think it is worth adding a comment in (test-)requirements.txt that the OpenStack CI is overriding the version and uses git. -Thomas Gary Kotton, 2018-03-19 11:25: Hi, The change https://github.com/openstack/requirements/commit/35653e8c5044bff1059f50a82b6

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][neutron] Depending on pypi versions

Thanks!! Will check if it now On 3/19/18, 3:15 PM, "Andreas Jaeger" wrote: On 2018-03-19 14:01, Gary Kotton wrote: > The issue is that since the change below - > https://review.openstack.org/553045 - we are not picking up the latest > neutron master code.

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][neutron] Depending on pypi versions

The change will need to be in all of the decomposed projects - http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=install_cmd%20-U&i=nope&files=&repos= Good catch! On 3/19/18, 3:18 PM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: Thanks!! Will check if it now On 3/19/18, 3:15 PM, "Andreas Jaeg

[openstack-dev] [requirements][l2gw] Latest requirements

Hi, We have a problem with the l2gw tags. The requirements file indicates that we should be pulling in >=12.0.0 and in fact its pulling networking_l2gw-2016.1.0 Please see http://207.189.188.190/logs/neutron/554292/4/tempest-api-vmware-tvd-t/logs/stack.sh.log.txt.gz#_2018-03-22_08_56_03_905 Thank

Re: [openstack-dev] Adding Brian Haley to the Neutron Drivers team

+1 From: Miguel Lavalle Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 6:26 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] Adding Brian Haley to the Neutron Drivers team Hi Neutrinos, As we all know, the Neutron Drivers team plays a crucial role in helping the community to evolve

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VMware NSX CI - no longer running?

Hi, Here is an example where the CI has run on a recent patch - yesterday - https://review.openstack.org/557256 Thanks Gary On 3/29/18, 1:04 PM, "melanie witt" wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:44:52 +0300, Radoslav Gerganov wrote: > On 28.03.2018 19:07, melanie witt wrote: >> We were

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [OVN] Tempest API / Scenario tests and OVN metadata

Hi, There are some tempest tests that check realization of resources on the networking platform and connectivity. Here things are challenging as each networking platform may be more restrictive than the upstream ML2 plugin. My thinking here is that we should leverage the tempest plugins for each

[openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon][l2gw] Unable to create a floating IP

Hi, From Queens onwards we have a issue with horizon and L2GW. We are unable to create a floating IP. This does not occur when using the CLI only via horizon. The error received is ‘Error: User does not have admin privileges: Cannot GET resource for non admin tenant. Neutron server returns reque

[openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

Hi, It seems like ther RYU import is breaking the project: 2018-04-15 08:41:34.654681 | ubuntu-xenial | b'--- import errors ---\nFailed to import test module: neut

[openstack-dev] [devstack][infra] pip vs psutil

Hi, The gate is currently broken with https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763966. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561427/ Can unblock us in the short term. Any other ideas? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

this is caused by the recent pip change and pip no longer cannot import pip from code. The right solution seems to bump the minimum version of ryu. Thought? http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-March/128939.html Akihiro 2018/04/15 午後6:06 "Gary Kotton" mailto:gkot...@

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][infra] pip vs psutil

ix grenade failures? It looks that e.g. all grenade jobs in neutron are broken currently :/ > Wiadomość napisana przez Gary Kotton w dniu 15.04.2018, o godz. 13:32: > > Hi, > The gate is currently broken with https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763966. https://review.op

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

Please see https://review.openstack.org/561443 On 4/16/18, 2:31 AM, "IWAMOTO Toshihiro" wrote: On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 21:02:42 +0900, Gary Kotton wrote: > > [1 ] > [1.1 ] > Hi, > That sounds reasonable. I wonder if the RYU folk can ch

[openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Hi, We have seen that a number of stable projects that the sphinx docs is broken. The gate job returns ‘retry limit’. An example of the error is http://logs.openstack.org/22/561522/1/check/build-openstack-sphinx-docs/cd99af8/job-output.txt.gz Does anyone have any idea how to address this? Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx][ovn] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Hi, OVN too. Things were working on the 12th of April and something has changed since then. Thanks Gary From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 at 1:49 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx] Stable/queens build

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx][ovn] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Hi, Here is an example - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560893/ Thanks Gary From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 at 2:28 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx][ovn] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Maybe we should consider unblocking the stable versions at the moment and then enabling us to address in each project. On 4/16/18, 5:34 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: On 2018-04-16 10:49:17 + (+0000), Gary Kotton wrote: > We have seen that a number of stable projects th

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] How to take over a project?

Hi, You either need one of the ono core team or the neutron release team to add you. FYI - https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1001,members Thanks Gary From: Sangho Shin Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 5:01 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [opens

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy update

Hi, A few minor bugs opened and one critical one - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1771293 Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy

Hi, An urgent matter has come up this week. If possible, can someone please replace me. Sorry Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy

anyone can cover my currently assigned week. Thanks, - James Anziano - Original message - From: Gary Kotton To: OpenStack List Cc: Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy Date: Thu, May 17, 2018 1:59 AM Hi, An urgent matter has come up this week. If possible, can someone please

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] NeutronLibImpact: Adoption of db *_FIELD_SIZE constants from neutron-lib

Ok, makes sense. Lets continue as you proposed. On 11/27/16, 10:44 PM, "Henry Gessau" wrote: Gary Kotton wrote: > Would it be worth considering have the three patches: > https://review.openstack.org/399891, https://review.openstack.org/398113 > and https://r

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] broken linuxbridge gate

Thanks for catching this. I have taken the liberty to approve the reverts and hopefully this will get the gate back to normal. Thanks Gary From: "Armando M." Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 1:46 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] broken linu

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Remove deprecated utility method - camelize

Hi, This method is now supported by neutron-lib. The patch [1] remove this from neutron. Thanks Gary [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403690 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: ope

[openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] Use ExtensionDescriptor from neutron-lib

Hi, Patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398113/ has landed. This plugins using tap-as-a-service. Can someone please approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398143 Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not fo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] Use ExtensionDescriptor from neutron-lib

b-ubuntu-xenial/754a735/console.html#_2016-12-06_03_43_02_555084> | The test run didn't actually run any tests 2016-12-06 03:43:02.844792<http://logs.openstack.org/76/406576/10/gate/gate-vmware-nsx-python27-db-ubuntu-xenial/754a735/console.html#_2016-12-06_03_43_02_844792> | Can someone fr

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] New extensions for HAProxy driver based LBaaSv2

Hi, I think that there is a move to Octavia. I suggest reaching out to that community and see how these changes can be added. Sounds like a nice addition Thanks Gary From: zhi Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 11:06 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [neut

[openstack-dev] [all] stable/mitaka CI failures (ImportError: No module named vine.five)

Hi, Stable/mitaka is broken [1]. Any idea how to resolve this. Do the requiremets need to pin a specific oslo.messaging version? Thanks Gary [1] File "/home/jenkins/workspace/gate-vmware-nsx-python27-db-ubuntu-trusty/.tox/py27/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mock/mock.py", line 1305, in pa

Re: [openstack-dev] New comer to Openstack.

Welcome aboard. Please see http://www.openstack.org/. A lot of the projects have developer guidelines. Maybe start there… From: akula nagaraj reddy Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 8:36 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] New comer to Openstack. Hi All,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Abhishek Raut as neutronclient core

+1 From: Kevin Benton Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 4:56 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Abhishek Raut as neutronclient core

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

+1 From: "Armando M." Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Friday, December 16, 2016 at 1:14 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt Hi neutrinos, Miguel Lavalle has been driving the project forward consistently and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 From: "Armando M." Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Friday, December 16, 2016 at 1:58 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs Hi neutrinos, I would like to propose Ryan and Nate as the go-to fellows for service-related

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Using neutron lib plugin constants

Hi, Please note the following two patches: 1. https://review.openstack.org/414902 - use CORE from neutron lib 2. https://review.openstack.org/394164 - use L3 (previous known as L3_ROUTER_NAT) Please note that the above will be removed from neutron/plugins/common

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Using neutron lib plugin constants

ease take a look at that. Happy holidays Gary From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, December 26, 2016 at 3:37 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Using neutron lib plugin constants Hi, Please note the following two patches: 1. https://review.openstack.or

[openstack-dev] [All] Python routes

Hi, It appears that the version 2.3.1 is no longer around. Any idea? Do we need to upgrade to 2.4.0? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Python routes

Please see https://review.openstack.org/415947 Happy new year! From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 10:14 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [All] Python routes Hi, It appears that the version 2.3.1 is no longer around. Any idea? Do we need

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] project specific question for the next user survey

Hi, Are there any questions related to Terraform? Is this affecting Heat in some way or form? Or just an alternative? Thanks Gary From: Rabi Mishra Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, January 2, 2017 at 6:18 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] project specific question for

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Timeout issue

Hi, Maybe someone can help or give me some pointers. On horizon I am trying to attach a network interface to a router. When I do this I get the following error on horizon: “Danger: There was an error submitting the form. Please try again.” When I refresh the page I see that the operation has com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] - LBaaS and IPv6

Hi, If the load balancer supports IPv6 then this should be supported. Thanks Gary From: Alex Stafeyev Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Sunday, January 8, 2017 at 2:07 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] - LBaaS and IPv6 Hi, Does lbaas support LB in ipv6 network? tnx -- Ale

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Gerrit performance time

Hi, It takes forever to access gerrit. Anyone else hitting this issue? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http:

[openstack-dev] [neutron] decomposed plugins broken

Hi, The l3 patch - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/417604/ has broken the decomposed plugins. We need to look at addressing this. We will fix the code, just a heads up to all other projects. Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Developme

[openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] VMware nsxlib 0.7.0

Hi, At the moment we have a number of bugs in the plugin that are addressed by the patches here. Could we please get this approved so that the Ocata version will be ina state that we can release it. This is blocking us for certain uses cases. Thanks Gary __

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] VMware nsxlib 0.7.0

Hi, At the moment we are the only consuming project. This is blocking us at the moment. How do you suggest moving this forwards? Could we remove the upper constraints? Thanks Gary On 1/31/17, 6:48 PM, "Matthew Thode" wrote: On 01/31/2017 10:40 AM, Gary Kotton wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

Hi, Yes, I will go and do this. Thanks Gary On 2/6/17, 4:05 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote: hi, is anyone going to cut ocata release/branch for networking-l2gw? __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

Done - https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack/networking-l2gw.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable/ocata A luta continua On 2/6/17, 8:51 AM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: Hi, Yes, I will go and do this. Thanks Gary On 2/6/17, 4:05 AM, "Takashi Y

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [stadium] subprojects on independent release cycle

Regarding vmware-nsx we are planning to cut a version in the coming days. Thanks Gary On 2/8/17, 8:51 PM, "Isaku Yamahata" wrote: Regarding to networking-odl, we're going to cut stable/ocata branch around Feb 11. After a while testing, the release will be done to avoid much delay

[openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] Stable/Ocata Version

Hi, When will this repo have a stable/ocata branch? Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.o

[openstack-dev] [neutron][ovo] port bindings

Hi, We have encountered a few issues with the Port object. This makes use of the ml2 database model. Mono lithic plugins do not populate the information and this can lead to breakages. My understanding is that plugin specific objects should be in the directory: neutron/objects/plugins. I am wond

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Team photo

What is the dress code ☺ From: "Das, Anindita" Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, February 20, 2017 at 5:16 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Team photo +1 From: Kevin Benton Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Fri

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Neutron team social in Atlanta on Thursday

+1 On 2/20/17, 12:17 AM, "Daniel Alvarez" wrote: +1 Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 19 feb 2017, a las 11:45, Isaku Yamahata escribió: > > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:18:41AM -0800, > Kevin Benton wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm o

[openstack-dev] Pycharm license

Hi, I understand that the community has an option to get licenses. Anyone have any information regarding this. Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@list

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy report week August 27 - September 2

Thanks for the update. I have taken the baton from the 2nd. Thankfully last few days have been quite. A luta continua From: Hirofumi Ichihara Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, September 3, 2018 at 11:54 AM To: OpenStack List Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy report week August

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug status

Hi, It has been a relatively quiet week and not many issues opened. There are a few bugs with IPv6 subnets. Most have missing information and I have asked the reporters for some extra information. Not any blockers are issues that are concerning. Wishing everyone a productive PTG. Thanks Gary ___

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Core status

Hi, I have recently transitioned to a new role where I will be working on other parts of OpenStack. Sadly I do not have the necessary cycles to maintain my core responsibilities in the neutron community. Nonetheless I will continue to be involved. Thanks Gary

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >