On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:47:42AM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Here are the etherpads from the summit[1].
I remember that in Taskflow's Fishbowl session we discussed not only
pause/yield option but abort/cancel for long running tasks as well, but
reviewing the Etherpad now I don
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 10:13:27PM +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This message is in relation with a bug on Quota deletion API that
> affects both Nova [1] and Cinder [2], so we should discuss together
> what's the desired solution as to be consistent in both proj
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:14:38AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> This is now happening weekly to me now, probably because I write too
> many patches touching almost all OpenStack projects once a cycle, and
> I'm really tired of that behavior, so PLEASE:
>
> *Stop sending Code-Revi
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 04:26:01PM +0800, ZhiQiang Fan wrote:
> not pyhton-novaclient only, all openstack project clients have fail gate
> for stable/icehouse and stable/juno
>
In some cases stable/icehouse doesn't fail (like in cinderclient), but
you are right, they are failing everywhere.
> sin
from infra be able to take a quick look?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Stuart
>
> [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1442682
>
> >Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:35:42 +0200
> >From: Gorka Eguileor
> >To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >Subjec
Hi all,
Currently all patches in Cinderclient are getting -1 from Jenkins
because gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-src-python-cinderclient-juno is
failing.
I opened a LP bug [1] on this, but basically the issue comes from Heat's
requirements cap on Cinderclient [2] to an upper bound of 1.1.1 when
curren
Hi all,
This message is in relation with a bug on Quota deletion API that
affects both Nova [1] and Cinder [2], so we should discuss together
what's the desired solution as to be consistent in both projects.
Currently Quota deletion API removes not only Quota limits, but also
Current Quota Usage
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 06:41:52AM +, liuxinguo wrote:
> Yes! There is a block at 80 port, and if you change it to 8088, for example
> :
> Change http://182.138.104.27/huawei-18000-iscsi-dsvm-tempest-full/70
> to http://182.138.104.27:8088/huawei-18000-iscsi-dsvm-tempest-full/70
> then it
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:58:37AM -0700, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:07:30AM -0500, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> > On 11/03/15 15:06 -1000, John Bresnahan wrote:
> > >FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy enough
> > >thing to get right and speaks to
there is a general agreement to go ahead with the plan, I will set
> that up with a Sphinx project framework to get us started.
>
> Comments?
>
> Doug
Gorka Eguileor.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not fo
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
