anyone read this? comments?
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Gregory Lebovitz
wrote:
> Summary from IRC chat 10/14/2014 on weekly meeting [1] [2]
>
> Topic: Declarative Language for Congress —> Enactor/Enforcer
>
> Question: Shall we specify a declarative language for co
+1, summary?
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Igor Cardoso wrote:
> Hello Sumit.
> Unfortunately I could not go to the round table meeting, sorry for the
> absence.
> Did you talk about traffic steering? Is there some place or etherpad with
> a summary of what was discussed/outlined?
>
> Cheers,
I'd be happy to donate a Go To Meeting for the session, if desired. Not
sure if / how it is better than Google Hangout. I know we can get GTM's for
100's of participants. Not sure how many Google Hangout can support, with
something like slide sharing occuring. Anyway, let me know if you'd like me
t
Wow, that's fantastic!!
Do share a few details.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> Since most folks are either freshly back from traveling, in the midst
> of returning, or perhaps even with a new baby, we'll be skipping this
> week's meeting. We'll resume next week at our no
I'm just a lurker, so pls don't optimize for me. FWIW, here's my reply, in
order of pref:
wed 1600 UTC
wed 1800 UTC
wed 1700 UTC
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote:
> Hi LBaaS (and others),
>
> We’ve been talking about possibly re-schedulng the LBaaS meeting to a time
> to is l
30d19ee3e4d
>>
>>
>> Topic: GBP Design Session
>>
>> Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2014
>>
>> Time: 12:15 pm, Europe Time (Amsterdam, GMT+01:00)
>>
>> Meeting Number: 205 658 563
>>
>> Meeting Password: gbp
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014
Hey all,
I'm participating remotely this session. Any plan for audio stream of
Tuesday's session? I'll happily offer a GoToMeeting, if needed.
Would someone be willing to scribe discussion in #openstack-gbp channel?
--
Open industry-related email from
Gregory M. Lebovitz
__
Summary from IRC chat 10/14/2014 on weekly meeting [1] [2]
Topic: Declarative Language for Congress —> Enactor/Enforcer
Question: Shall we specify a declarative language for communicating policy
configured in Congress to enactors / enforcement systems
Hypothesis (derived at conclusion of discus
As committed last week, I've provided review comments in the draft
peer-review process [1].
Hopefully we can discuss a bit in today's 2pm PDT Neutron weekly, and more
at Summit.
Hope it helps.
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-peer-review
--
Open communities related email from
