Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

John, I spent the drive to the Minneapolis Airport thinking about this chain of e-mails. Hope these thoughts help ... On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 07:55 -0600, John Griffith wrote: On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][FFE] request for exceptions in xiv_ds8k driver

Alon, Thanks, I have added your request to the etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-cinder-approved-ffes and it will undergo review. Thanks, Jay On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 21:55 +0300, Alon Marx wrote: Hi, Please consider the following code changes as Feature Freeze Exceptions.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] 2 weeks in the bug tracker

On 09/21/2014 07:37 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/19/2014 8:13 AM, Sean Dague wrote: I've spent the better part of the last 2 weeks in the Nova bug tracker to try to turn it into something that doesn't cause people to run away screaming. I don't remember exactly where we started at open bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Not seeking another term as PTL

John, Thank you for being welcoming to me when I started with Cinder during Havana and for all the mentoring and encouragement you have given since then. I think the fact that Cinder is such a great group to work with has a lot to owe to your leadership and guidance. Thank you! I look

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] weekly meeting

John, I am flexible. I am fine with trying to move the time to 04:00 or 05:00 UTC or we can alternate. The one concern with alternation is that it may lead to confusion and less attendance, but I am certainly open to trying it. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for dd disk i/o performance blueprint of cinder.

There is already an option that can be set in cinder.conf using 'volume_clear=none' Is there a reason that that option is not sufficient? Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter ExpertCinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN Telephone: (507

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards

Sean and John, I would be happy to help out with this for Cinder. Let me know how I can help. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter ExpertCinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507) 253-6410 TIE Line: 553-4270

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Stability Hack-a-thon

Mike, Great idea! I can participate remotely. Let me know how I can be of the best help! Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter ExpertCinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507) 253-6410 TIE Line: 553-4270 E

Re: [openstack-dev] Grizzly volume quotas

Pat, I see the same behavior on an Icehouse level install. So, I think you may have found a bug. I would open the bug to python-novaclient to start with, but it may end up coming back to Cinder. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter ExpertCinder Core Member Department 7YLA

Re: [openstack-dev] Grizzly volume quotas

Joe, Ah! So, those aren't for Cinder Volume but for nova-volume. Ok, so there isn't really a bug then. Sorry for speaking too quickly. Thanks for the info! Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter ExpertCinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] lazy translation is breaking Heat

. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter ExpertCinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507) 253-6410 TIE Line: 553-4270 E-Mail: jsbry...@us.ibm.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Some questions about Rest API and log messages translation

Response marked with below. Jay From: Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 02/19/2014 09:22 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Some questions about Rest API and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Nova]Do you think volume force delete operation should not apply to the volume being used?

I would agree. I don't think that Cinder should/could be able to act upon Nova's state for the VM. Force-delete is really in place as a backup to clean-up after certain failures in Cinder. Other mechanisms are in place to handle issues in Nova. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to move from Freenode to OFTC

From: Brian Cline br...@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 03/04/2014 12:29 PM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to move from Freenode to OFTC On 03/04/2014 05:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: James E. Blair wrote: Freenode has been having a rough

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: Oslo: i18n Message improvements

signature.asc deleted by Jay S Bryant/Rochester/IBM] ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Sean, I really feel like this is being made into a bigger deal than it needs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: Oslo: i18n Message improvements

-dev All, Thanks for taking the time to consider/discuss this. Some good lessons learned on this end. Look forward to getting this in early in Juno. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter ExpertCinder Core Member___ OpenStack-dev mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py

From: Brant Knudson b...@acm.org To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 03/14/2014 10:26 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Duncan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py

From: Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 03/14/2014 11:49 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py On 14 March 2014 16:10, Jay S Bryant

Re: [openstack-dev] Duplicate code for processing REST APIs

From: Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 03/14/2014 11:56 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] Duplicate code for processing REST APIs On 13 March 2014 21:13, Roman

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py

From: Brant Knudson b...@acm.org To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 03/14/2014 02:21 PM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Jay S

Re: [openstack-dev] does exception need localize or not?

thoughts on the subject! Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter ExpertCinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507) 253-6410 TIE Line: 553-4270 E-Mail: jsbry...@us.ibm.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

as a result through websites like Stackalytics (http://stackalytics.com/) . Highlighting the sponsors of individual commits seems unnecessary. That's my two cents. Jay S. Bryant Linux Developer - OpenStack Enterprise Edition Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

. The point of OpenStack is to have a collaborative community. Some people bring better spelling and grammar to the table than others as a contribution. Jay S. Bryant Linux Developer - OpenStack Enterprise Edition Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN

Re: [openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

good commit message structure. When combined with FlySpell many of the simple mistakes can be avoided. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter ExpertCinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507

Re: [openstack-dev] Log / error message format best practices standards

Boden, Thanks for bringing this up: On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 12:14 -0400, boden wrote: We were recently having a discussion over here in trove regarding a standardized format to use for log and error messages - obviously consistency is ideal (within and across projects). As this discussion

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][specs] Please stop doing specs for any changes in projects

John, So you have said a few times that the specs are a learning process. What do you feel with have learned thus far using specs? I think you had the hope that it would help organize targeting blueprints and not missing things for a release. Do you feel that is working? I would like to hear

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] recheck no bug and comment

I agree that there are cases where a bug is overkill and it would be nice to add a note showing I did put some thought into doing the recheck no bug. Just my two cents. On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 17:07 +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: On 16/07/14 14:48, Steve Martinelli wrote: What are the benefits of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][specs] Please stop doing specs for any changes in projects

Thanks Duncan and also Dolph, I should have made the question broader. :-) On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 13:22 +0100, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 16 July 2014 03:57, Jay S. Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: John, So you have said a few times that the specs are a learning process. What do

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] gettextutils enable_lazy not working

Mike, Thanks for pointing this out. I thought I had gotten all of these and this supports the need for the hacking check I will work on. We also hit errors like this on our internal CI due to a bad merge. Anyway, I am on top of this. Will fix asap. Jay On Sun, 2014-07-20 at 15:49 -0700,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] cinder querying nova-api

Abbass, There has been discussion around this in the past. As it would be a significant feature you should open a spec for it. Do a 'git clone https://github.com/openstack/cinder-specs. There are directions in there for actually submitting the spec. Thanks! Jay On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 09:01

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Integrated with iSCSI target Question

Johnson, I am not sure what you mean by 'attach volume manually'. Do you mean when you do a 'nova volume-attach'? If so, then, yes, the process will use the appropriate iscsi_helper and iscsi_ip_address to configure the attachment. Does that answer your question? Jay On Mon, 2014-07-21 at

Re: [openstack-dev] Mentor program?

Josh, I agree that the mailing list is a hard place to provide such guidance and direction. I find mailing lists intimidating. Had taken me some time to be comfortable submitting here. After my response to this note the other day I was pinged internally via our messaging client asking for some

[openstack-dev] [cinder] proposal of definitions/processes for cinder-spec

All, I have gotten questions from our driver developers asking for details regarding the move to using cinder-specs for proposing Blueprints. I brought this topic up in today's Cinder Weekly Meeting, but the meeting was lightly attended so we decided to move the discussion here. I am going to

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] proposal of definitions/processes for cinder-spec

On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 15:11 -0700, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: On 04/23/2014 05:09 PM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: All, I have gotten questions from our driver developers asking for details regarding the move to using cinder-specs for proposing Blueprints. I brought this topic up in today's

[openstack-dev] [cinder][globalization] Need input on how to proceed .

All, I am looking for feedback on how to complete implementation of i18n support for Cinder. I need to open a new BluePrint for Juno as soon as the cinder-specs process is available. In the mean time I would like to start working on this and need feedback on the scope I should undertake with

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][globalization] Need input on how to proceed .

needs to be dependent, but we could work it out that way if you feel that is important. Let me know what you think. Thanks! On 27 April 2014 00:20, Jay S. Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: All, I am looking for feedback on how to complete implementation of i18n support for Cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] About store faults info for volumes

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 10:20 -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On 06:49 Wed 30 Apr , Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote: Hi stackers: I found when a instance status become error, I will see the detailed fault info at times when I show the detail of Instance. And it is very convenient for me

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][globalization] Need input on how to proceed .

, then great, makes review and merge even easier. Thanks On 28 April 2014 17:03, Jay S. Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: Duncan, Thanks for the response. Have some additional thoughts, in-line, below: On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 12:15 +0100, Duncan Thomas wrote: Two separate patches

Re: [openstack-dev] Commit the cinder Driver

Mardan, Note, you will also need to follow the new Cinder Specs process for Juno BluePrints. You can find details here: [1] Jay [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2014/cinder.2014-05-28-16.00.log.html#l-437 On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 18:48 +0530, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote: Missed

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] adding James Carey to oslo-i18n-core

On 09/26/2014 06:46 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/25/2014 11:04 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: +1. He's on the short list of people who actually understand how all that lazy translation stuff works. :-) -Ben On 09/23/2014 04:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: James Carey (jecarey) from IBM has done the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [All?] Status vs State

Good questions! Jay, I have a request for some clarification in-line. On 10/01/2014 01:37 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: Hi Akihiro! IMO, this is precisely where having an API standards working group can help to make the user experience of our public APIs less frustrating. Such a working group

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [All?] Status vs State

On 10/02/2014 11:14 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 10/02/2014 11:23 AM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: As I re-read this I think maybe you have answered my question but want to be clear. You feel that 'State' is the only term that should be used. Based on the definitions above, that would make sense

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] The right (and the wrong) way of handling module imports in oslo-incubator

On 11/14/2014 03:31 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 14/11/14 09:14, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 13/11/14 23:25 +, Amrith Kumar wrote: At the suggestion of Doug Hellmann, and relative to a conversation with him and Flavio at Summit. Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone Using the Open Solaris ZFS Driver?

Drew, I would say that it would be good to open a Blueprint for this and push the code up for review. Even if you don't have CI ready yet you can post results of a driver cert test [1] and we can start reviewing the code while you work on finishing up the process of getting your CI running.

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] mid-cycle meet-up planning ...

All, For those of you that weren't able to make the Kilo meet-up in Paris I wanted to send out a note regarding Cinder's Kilo mid-cycle meet-up. IBM has offered to host it in, warm, sunny, Austin, Texas. The planned dates are January 27, 28 and 29, 2015. I have put together an etherpad

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] New config options, no default change

On 12/02/2014 02:31 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: What is the text that should be included in the commit messages to make sure that it is picked up for release notes? I'm not sure anyone tracks commit messages to create release notes. Let's use existing DocImpact tag, I'll add check for this in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Exception proposals for 2014.2.1

On 12/02/2014 07:22 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: Hi all, here are exception proposal I have collected when preparing for the 2014.2.1 release, stable-maint members please have a look! General: cap Oslo and client library versions - sync from openstack/requirements stable/juno, would be good to

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Exception proposals for 2014.2.1

On 12/03/2014 01:17 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: 2014-12-02 17:15 GMT+01:00 Jay S. Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net: Cinder https://review.openstack.org/137537 - small change and limited to the VMWare driver +1 I think this is fine to make an exception for. one more Cinder exception proposal

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Exception proposals for 2014.2.1

On 12/04/2014 05:01 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: 2014-12-04 23:00 GMT+01:00 Jay S. Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net: Finally was able to get the master version through the gate and cherry-picked it here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139194/ That one has made it through the check. So

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone knows whether there is freezing day of spec approval?

Dave, My apologies. We have not yet set a day that we are freezing BP/Spec approval for Cinder. We had a deadline in November for new drivers being proposed but haven't frozen other proposals yet. I mixed things up with Nova's 12/18 cutoff. Not sure when we will be cutting off BPs for

Re: [openstack-dev] [3rd-party-ci] Cinder CI and CI accounts

John and Ramy, Thanks for the feedback. So, we will create an IBM Storage CI Check account and slowly deprecate the multiple accounts as we consolidate the hardware. Jay On 12/23/2014 08:11 PM, Asselin, Ramy wrote: I agree with John. Option 4: one ci account for all drivers. The only

[openstack-dev] [cinder] More Details for Mid-Cycle meetup:

All, I have updated the mid-cycle meetup etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-kilo-midcycle-meetup) with more details with regards to finding the right building on the IBM site and have also added my cell phone number to the notes. Please don't hesitate to call or text me with

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Volume Replication and Migration bug triage ...

All, In discussion with Mike Perez earlier this week the following bugs were highlighted in Volume Migration and Volume Replication. IBM is focusing on investigating and resolving these bugs. I will be putting out updates as we progress towards resolution of these issues. Replication:

[openstack-dev] [cinder] organizing tempest test development for volume replication

All, One of the concerns raised with regards to volume migration was the lack of tempest testing for the functionality. Since they I have had some interest indicated in helping this effort. So, to get things started I have created an etherpad to track development of such test cases and to

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Etherpad for volume replication created ...

All, Several members of the Cinder team and I were discussing the current state of volume replication while trying to figure out the best way to resolve bug 1383524 [1]. The outcome of the discussion was a decision to hold off on integrating volume replication support for additional

[openstack-dev] [stable-maint] acceptable changes for stable/icehouse

All, We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to stable/icehouse for Cinder. The cores were discussing what was ok to put into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to whether we were at the point of only accepting security changes. Appreciate advice on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

I think what we discussed was that existing drivers were supposed to have something working by the end of k-2, or at least have something close to working. For new drivers they had to have 3rd party CI working by the end of Kilo. Duncan, correct me if I am wrong. Jay On 01/10/2015 04:52 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] dropping namespace packages

Ihar, I agree that we should do something to enforce using the appropriate namespace so that we don't have the wrong usage sneak in. I haven't gotten any rules written yet. Have had to attend to a family commitment the last few days. Hope that I can tackle the namspace changes next week.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Etherpad for the Cinder midcycle meetup

Mike, Thanks for putting this out there again. A reminder, if you are planning to attend, please update the etherpad so that I can get an accurate number in attendance and get all the security details set up. Thank you! Jay On 01/10/2015 04:00 PM, Mike Perez wrote: The meetup will be in

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Swift object-updater and container-updater

Minwoo, It is important to understand that Icehouse has gone into a security fixes only mode. It is too late in the stable process to be making notable changes for anything other than security issues. The patch for the fork bomb like problem in object-auditor is in Icehouse:

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Swift object-updater and container-updater

Minwoo, The cherry-picks for the contain-updater and object-updater back to stable/juno are now available for review: https://review.openstack.org/146211 and https://review.openstack.org/134082 Jay On 01/08/2015 09:21 AM, Minwoo Bae wrote: Hi, to whom it may concern: Jay Bryant and I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Feature Freeze Exception Request - bp/linux-systemz

Mike, A FFE for this has been submitted to Nova and is being sponsored by Matt Riedemann: [1] Assuming that goes through soon, can we please re-address? Thanks! Jay [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg45430.html On 02/09/2015 12:23 PM, Mike Perez wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [sdk] Proposal to achieve consistency in client side sorting

Steven, Thank you for continuing to pursue this. Adding this functionality and having it consistent will be a good thing. The plan for Cinder looks good to me and is consistent with Mike and Duncan's input. I look forward to seeing patches for Cinder. Jay On 01/06/2015 10:03 AM, Steven

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver?

Mike, Looks like this removal may have been a mistake. We should readdress. Jay On 03/20/2015 05:59 AM, Erlon Cruz wrote: I agree with John (comment on the mentioned patchset). Also, I expected one change removing all drivers that does not report on CI. There's one of us (HUSDriver) that

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] K3 Feature Freeze Exception request for bp/nfs-backup

All, I will sponsor this. Patch just needs to be rebased. Jay On 03/11/2015 10:20 AM, Tom Barron wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I hereby solicit a feature freeze exception for the NFS backup review [1]. Although only about 140 lines of non-test code, this review

Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation warnings considered harmful?

Duncan, If you see any of these coming out of Cinder (not oslo) please get a bug to me. I think I have them all removed but need to know if I have missed anything. Thanks! Jay On 03/12/2015 04:24 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: ubuntu@devstack-multiattach:~/devstack$ cinder-manage db sync

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] not running for PTL for liberty cycle

+1000 You have done a great job Doug! Thank you for your leadership! Jay On 04/03/2015 08:11 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 03/04/15 08:50 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Team, I have decided not to run for PTL for Oslo for the next cycle. Serving as PTL for the last three releases has been a

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Current Status of IBM 3rd Party CI Testing ...

Anita, My apologies. The original communication on the issue came from Mike via the mailing list so I was attempting to continue the public discussion here. I will make sure to not do this in the future. Jay On 04/06/2015 03:19 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 04/06/2015 04:03 PM, Jay S. Bryant

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Current Status of IBM 3rd Party CI Testing ...

All, I just wanted to provide an update on 3rd Party CI Testing for IBM's drivers. It was noted late last month that not all of IBM's drivers were running the required 304 test cases. That issue has been resolved for all 3rd Party CI's except for DS8k. The maintainer of that system has

Re: [openstack-dev] cinder[stable/juno] Fix the eqlx driver to retry on ssh timeout(Backport)

Rajini, This is a relatively small change. Mike, what do you think about granting an Exception for this? Jay On 04/06/2015 04:33 PM, rajini_...@dell.com wrote: *Dell - Internal Use - Confidential * Hi Can we have a freeze exception on this CR pl? https://review.openstack.org/154123

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [Cinder] FFE for Clear migration_status from a destination volume if migration fails

Mitsuhiro, I had already put a +2 on this, so I am agreeable to an FFE. Mike or John, what are your thoughts? Jay On 04/06/2015 06:27 PM, Mitsuhiro Tanino wrote: Hello, I would like to get a FFE for patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161328/. This patch fixes the volume migration

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Rebranded Volume Drivers

On 06/03/2015 02:53 PM, Eric Harney wrote: On 06/03/2015 01:59 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: There are a couple of cases [1][2] I'm seeing where new Cinder volume drivers for Liberty are rebranding other volume drivers. This

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Thanks to all the folks on the plane tour to glaciers

Vincent, So sorry you were not feeling well during the tour. Those things happen though...No worries. We were glad to get the e-mail letting us know that you were ok and feeling better! Glad that you could join us on the trip and see the Alpine lake and get pictures with us. I will send

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

Congratulations! Welcome Gorka! Jay On 08/19/2015 12:01 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 12:13 Aug 13, Mike Perez wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Midcycle Sprint Summary

Great summary. We covered a lot of ground. Thanks Mike! On 08/17/2015 10:53 AM, Mike Perez wrote: A *summary* of the Cinder midcycle sprint, in attempt to keep your attention. Full meeting notes available [1]. Image Caching = Glance Cinder backend store + Cinder Image Caching are

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

+1 He has been doing good reviews and shown a sustained commitment. Well done! Jay On 08/13/2015 02:13 PM, Mike Perez wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] I have a question about openstack cinder zonemanager driver.

Danny is correct. You cannot have two different Zone Manager drivers configured for one volume process. Jay On 08/13/2015 11:00 AM, Daniel Wilson wrote: I am fairly certain you cannot currently use two different FC switch zone drivers in one cinder.conf. In this case it looks like you would

[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Would anyone from Nova Core be able to join the Cinder mid-cycle meetup?

All, I had the opportunity to chat with John Garbutt when he was here in Rochester for the Nova mid-cycle meet-up. We discussed the fact that there was much to be gained by improving the communication between the Cinder and Nova teams. With that idea in mind, it was suggested that the

[openstack-dev] [cinder] meeting place for event Monday night in Tokyo ...

All, As has been our custom during previous summits, the Cinder team would will be getting together for dinner and drinks on Monday night (11/26) at the Tokyo Summit. Not sure where the evening will take us, but we are planning to meet by registration at the Convention Center. Looking at

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] meeting place for event Monday night in Tokyo ...

On 10/21/2015 04:00 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 10/21/2015 04:54 PM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: All, As has been our custom during previous summits, the Cinder team would will be getting together for dinner and drinks on Monday night (11/26) at the Tokyo Summit. Not sure where the evening will take

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

Mike, We were enabled to do some great things under your leadership. Cinder has greatly benefited from your time as a PTL. Thanks for all you have done! Jay On 09/14/2015 11:15 AM, Mike Perez wrote: Hello all, I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran was for

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Late Liberty patches should now be unblocked ...

All, Now that Mitaka is open I have done my best to go through and remove all the -2's that I had given to block Liberty patches that needed to wait for Mitaka. If you have a patch that I missed please ping me on IRC. Happy Mitaka merging! Thanks, Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Custom fields for versioned objects

Sean, Just an FYI that I have created a work item for my team to start working this. So, watch for patches from Slade, Kendall, Ryan, Jacob and I to get this implemented. Thanks, Jay On 12/15/2015 10:31 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:46:02PM +0100, Micha?? Dulko

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Austin Summit Panel on Generation of Sample Configuration Option Files

Ben, Please see my in-line responses ... On 01/04/2016 05:43 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 01/04/2016 03:50 PM, Kendall J Nelson wrote: Hello, In brainstorming ideas for talks at the upcoming summit, I thought about some of the things I had worked on for Cinder and what could still be improved.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Scott D'Angelo to Cinder core

+2 Well deserved! Scott has been a great resource to the project! On 06/27/2016 12:27 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: I would like to nominate Scott D'Angelo to core. Scott has been very involved in the project for a long time now and is always ready to help folks out on IRC. His contributions [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] adding a new /v3 endpoint for api-microversions

On 02/20/2016 04:42 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 20 Feb 2016 00:21, "Walter A. Boring IV" > wrote: > Not that I'm adding much to this conversation that hasn't been said already, but I am pro v2 API, purely because of how painful and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Newton Midcycle Planning

Sean, Thanks for getting the discussion started. I think R-14 might be a little tricky leading up to the 4th of July weekend. It seems like R-17 is coming awful quick but could be done. That or R-11 would be my second vote then. We have had successful meet-ups in Rochester ... yes, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposal: changes to our current testing process

Ivan, I agree that our testing needs improvement. Thanks for starting this thread. With regards to adding a hacking check for tests that run too long ... are you thinking that we would have a timer that checks or long running jobs or something that checks for long sleeps in the testing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] The way to get traces of compiling fails when cinder service restarts

Jun-ha, Do you have 'verbose = true' and 'debug = true' set in /etc/cinder/cinder.conf ? If not, try setting those options and restarting your services. Jay On 04/28/2016 01:20 AM, 박준하 wrote: Hi all, I’m a beginner of Openstack. I tried to modified some sources in Cinder directories for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Michał Dulko to Cinder Core

Sorry for the slow response here ... +1 Michal, Thank you for all you have contributed recently. Welcome to the team! Jay On 05/03/2016 01:16 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: Hey everyone, I would like to nominate Michał Dulko to the Cinder core team. Michał's contributions with both code reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Support phase clarification

On 2/7/2017 11:41 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: Just looking for clarification on our support phase timing now with the shorter release cycle for Ocata. According to our published support phase schedule [1], each phase is in 6 month increments from the release date. In the past, this had lined up

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Support phase clarification

On 2/9/2017 6:09 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:41:26PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-02-09 11:24:46 -0600 (-0600), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] Thanks both. The original question still stands though. Are we rolling over support phases at the 6 month boundary as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Project mascot available

On 2/14/2017 5:28 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 08:24 Feb 14, Walter Boring wrote: How does Horse translate to Cinder block? I don't get it. Our original Cinder block made a lot of sense, considering the name of the project. This is...just an odd horse for no particular reason. As I remember

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Improving Vendor Driver Discoverability

On 01/13/2017 10:29 PM, Mike Perez wrote: Hello all, In the spirit of recent Technical Committee discussions I would like to bring focus on how we're doing vendor driver discoverability. Today we're doing this with the OpenStack Foundation marketplace [1] which is powered by the driverlog

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Improving Vendor Driver Discoverability

On 01/16/2017 12:19 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: On Jan 16, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Jay S. Bryant <jsbry...@electronicjungle.net> wrote: On 01/13/2017 10:29 PM, Mike Perez wrote: The way validation works is completely up to the project team. In my research as shown in the Summit ether

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Improving Vendor Driver Discoverability

Mike, Similar the evil driver support matrix that Cinder has had forever [1]. So, there is a precedent and this looks like it would be better than something that has to be manually updated. No initial objections. :-) Jay [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderSupportMatrix On

[openstack-dev] The State of the NFS Driver ...

All, I wanted to follow up on the e-mail thread [1] on Cloning support in the NFS driver. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the plan for the NFS driver going forward as I see it. First, I am aware that the driver has gone quite some time without care and feeding. For a number of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][cinder] Clone feature toggle not in clone tests

Ben, Thank you very much for the history on the driver here. This was all news to me. It helps me to understand why cloning was listed as supported but was no longer implemented. Also explains why the simpler 'cp' based solution hasn't been implemented. I was wondering why that hadn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] The State of the NFS Driver ...

On 08/30/2016 08:50 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/30/2016 10:50 AM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: All, I wanted to follow up on the e-mail thread [1] on Cloning support in the NFS driver. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the plan for the NFS driver going forward as I see it. First, I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] FFE request for RBD replication

+1 from me. It is making good progress and is low risk. -Jay On 09/09/2016 02:32 PM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: Hi, As some of you may know, Jon Bernard (jbernard on IRC) has been working on the RBD v2.1 replication implementation [1] for a while, and we would like to request a Feature Freeze

  1   2   3   >