Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][cells] Should flavors in the API DB for cells v2 be soft-deletable?

On 7 January 2016 at 19:59, Matt Riedemann wrote: > There is a cells v2 change up for review [1] which creates the flavor tables > in the API DB. > > I noted that those table definitions include the soft-delete columns > (deleted and deleted_at), which at the YVR

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote: > Hi, all > > Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. > The new api defines migrations is a sub-collection of an instance. > GET v2.1/tenant_id/servers/server-id/migrations/migration-id > > I need to support the new cell API

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Xenplugin + Glance_v2 = Hate

On 4 January 2016 at 12:55, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/24/2015 08:51 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: >> Hello! As you may know there is a big initiative to adopt glance v2 api >> in Nova and the important part is making related changes in xenglugin. >> Unfortunately xenplugin doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal for new metrics-threshold-filter

On 7 January 2016 at 18:49, SURO wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have proposed a nova-spec[1] for a new scheduling filter based on >> metrics thresholds. This is slightly different than weighted metrics filter. >> The rationale and use-case is explained in detail in the spec[1].

[openstack-dev] [nova] No team meeting for the next two weeks

Hi, Given so many folks are out, no Nova meeting for the next two weeks: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova Happy holidays, for those on holiday over the next few weeks! Thanks, johnthetubaguy PS I am mostly out for the next two weeks, taking time to recover from this year. Email

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder: Low Priority Blueprint Review Day is Thursday 17th December 2015

On 15 December 2015 at 15:31, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: > To help with the review push on Thursday, I have created a list of the > blueprint reviews, that are approved, have Jenkins passing, and are > more than 50 days old. > > The list is a new section at t

[openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder: Low Priority Blueprint Review Day is Thursday 17th December 2015

To help with the review push on Thursday, I have created a list of the blueprint reviews, that are approved, have Jenkins passing, and are more than 50 days old. The list is a new section at the top of the regular etherpad we use to track the most important reviews:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Better tests for nova scheduler(esp. race conditions)?

On 15 December 2015 at 10:03, Nikola Đipanov wrote: > On 12/15/2015 03:33 AM, Cheng, Yingxin wrote: >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com] >>> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 11:11 PM >>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova Mitaka-1 Update and Nova Blueprint Freeze Exceptions

Hi, Here are a few reminders around the Mitaka release, and info about the blueprint freeze exception process. Dates - January 21st: Nova non-priority feature freeze (Thats the deadline for merging the code into master) December 8th and 9th: Virtual API document sprint

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] How to check changes waiting for review

On 3 December 2015 at 13:37, Esra Celik wrote: > > Hi, > > > I wonder how you follow changes waiting for review. openstack-docs offers a > Documentation Program Dashboard for this purpose. > > Inspired by that dashboard I prepared a link for Nova as well: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How were we going to remove soft delete again?

On 24 November 2015 at 16:36, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I know in Vancouver we talked about no more soft delete and in Mitaka lxsli > decoupled the nova models from the SoftDeleteMixin [1]. > > From what I remember, the idea is to not add the deleted column to new >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How were we going to remove soft delete again?

On 26 November 2015 at 12:10, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: > On 24 November 2015 at 16:36, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > wrote: >> I know in Vancouver we talked about no more soft delete and in Mitaka lxsli >> decoupled the nova mode

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [RFC] how to enable xbzrle compress for live migration

On 26 November 2015 at 15:55, 少合冯 wrote: > Hi all, > We want to support xbzrle compress for live migration. > > Now there are 3 options, > 1. add the enable flag in nova.conf. > such as a dedicated 'live_migration_compression=on|off" parameter in > nova.conf. > And

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]New Quota Subteam on Nova

On 26 November 2015 at 16:46, Raildo Mascena wrote: > Hi Markus, > > I totally agree with you, we'll add some effort to close bugs related to > quotas, but there is some bugs like "Quotas can be exceeded by making highly > parallel requests" that will not be easy to fix on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [RFC] how to enable xbzrle compress for live migration

On 26 November 2015 at 17:39, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:55:31PM +0800, 少合冯 wrote: >> Hi all, >> We want to support xbzrle compress for live migration. >> >> Now there are 3 options, >> 1. add the enable flag in nova.conf. >> such as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

; >> >>> Sent: November 23, 2015 17:03 >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On 11/23/15 at 08:54am, Ryan Rossiter wrote: >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >On 11/23/2015 5:33 AM, John Garbutt wrote: >>

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova meeting this Thursday

Hi, I just wanted to share my plan for Thursday's meeting. As it is thanksgiving in the US, I am assuming no US based people will attend. Given there are lots of non-US people around, and it is our "early" slot this week, I think we should still have the meeting. Even if it ends up being fairly

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Migration progress

On 23 November 2015 at 08:36, Paul Carlton wrote: > John > > At the live migration sub team meeting I undertook to look at the issue > of progress reporting. > > The use cases I'm envisaging are... > > As a user I want to know how much longer my instance will be migrating >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

On 20 November 2015 at 09:37, Balázs Gibizer wrote: >> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] >> Sent: November 19, 2015 23:29 >> On 11/19/2015 4:05 PM, Ryan Rossiter wrote: >> > Reading through [1] I started getting worries in the back of my head >>

[openstack-dev] [nova] Today, November 19 is Nova Spec Review Day

Hi all, A (late) reminder that today is Spec Review day: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Mitaka_Release_Schedule I encourage everyone to help review the specs we still have up for review. Any questions, as normal, chat in #openstack-nova in IRC. If you are busy today, or today as already

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Sylvain Bauza to nova-core

On 6 November 2015 at 15:32, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I propose we add Sylvain Bauza[1] to nova-core. > > Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work, > including some quality reviews, particularly around the Sched

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Alex Xu to nova-core

On 6 November 2015 at 15:32, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I propose we add Alex Xu[1] to nova-core. > > Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work, > including some quality reviews, particularly around the API. > > Ple

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api]

On 9 November 2015 at 06:29, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:30:19PM +0000, John Garbutt wrote: > >> Ideally, I would like us to fill out that pagination part first. > > It seems the person leading this within the API-WG is AWOL so

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

On 6 November 2015 at 21:39, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > I totally second that on the low-hanging-fruit tag! And I'm happy to help > with some of the triaging. I'm still pretty new to Nova so I'm not sure how > helpful I'll be but it seems like a good task for getting to know

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Adding a new feature in Kilo. Is it possible?

viewed at the next nova-meeting for possible approval, as per: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Process#How_do_I_get_my_blueprint_approved.3F Thanks, johnthetubaguy > On 4 November 2015 at 12:20, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: >> >> In terms of adding this

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][policy] Exposing hypervisor details to users

On 6 November 2015 at 14:09, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > On 11/06/2015 08:44 AM, Alex Xu wrote: >> >> >> 2015-11-06 20:59 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague <s...@dague.net >> <mailto:s...@dague.net>>: >> >> On 11/06/2015 07:28 AM, John

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [doc] How to support Microversions and Actions in Swagger Spec

On 6 November 2015 at 14:22, Anne Gentle wrote: > I'm pretty sure microversions are hard to document no matter what we do so > we just need to pick a way and move forward. > Here's what is in the spec: > For microversions, we'll need at least 2 copies of the

[openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Sylvain Bauza to nova-core

Hi, I propose we add Sylvain Bauza[1] to nova-core. Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work, including some quality reviews, particularly around the Scheduler. Please respond with comments, +1s, or objections within one week. Many thanks, John [1]

[openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Alex Xu to nova-core

Hi, I propose we add Alex Xu[1] to nova-core. Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work, including some quality reviews, particularly around the API. Please respond with comments, +1s, or objections within one week. Many thanks, John

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][bugs] Developers Guide: Who's mergingthat?

On 6 November 2015 at 13:38, Markus Zoeller wrote: > Jeremy Stanley wrote on 11/05/2015 07:11:37 PM: > >> From: Jeremy Stanley >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][policy] Exposing hypervisor details to users

On 6 November 2015 at 12:09, Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/06/2015 04:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:08:59PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> I came across [1] which is notionally an ironic bug in that horizon >>> presents >>> VM

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][policy] Exposing hypervisor details to users

On 6 November 2015 at 09:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:08:59PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: >> Hello all, >> I came across [1] which is notionally an ironic bug in that horizon >> presents >> VM operations (like suspend) to users. Clearly these

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Nova] Tempest Hypervisor Feature Tagging

On 5 November 2015 at 19:31, Rafael Folco wrote: > Is there any way to know what hypervisor features[1] were tested in a > Tempest run? > From what I’ve seen, currently there is no way to tell what tests cover what > features. > Looks like Tempest has UUID and service

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [doc] How to support Microversions and Actions in Swagger Spec

On 6 November 2015 at 03:31, Alex Xu wrote: > Hi, folks > > Nova API sub-team is working on the swagger generation. And there is PoC > https://review.openstack.org/233446 > > But before we are going to next step, I really hope we can get agreement > with how to support

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api]

On 6 November 2015 at 12:11, Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/06/2015 04:13 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: >> It makes sense to have a single point were response pagination is made >> in API processing, rather than scattering pagination across Nova REST >> controllers; unfortunately if I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Pagination in thre API

On 5 November 2015 at 09:46, Richard Jones wrote: > As a consumer of such APIs on the Horizon side, I'm all for consistency in > pagination, and more of it, so yes please! > > On 5 November 2015 at 13:24, Tony Breeds wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 05,

[openstack-dev] [nova] Mitaka Priorities and Deadlines

Hi, Here is a catch up on a few release details... For Nova specific deadlines and dates, please see: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Mitaka_Release_Schedule Please note: Dec 3: spec and blueprint freeze Jan 21: non-priority feature freeze The list of Mitaka priorities can be found here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On 4 November 2015 at 14:49, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 11/04/2015 09:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> >> On 11/04/2015 09:00 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: >>> >>> On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Hi stackers, Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On 4 November 2015 at 15:00, Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/04/2015 09:49 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: >> On 11/04/2015 09:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >>> On 11/04/2015 09:00 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Hi stackers, > > Usually such

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Adding a new feature in Kilo. Is it possible?

In terms of adding this into master, we can go for a spec-less blueprint in Nova. Reach out to me on IRC if I can help you through the process. Thanks, johnthetubaguy PS We are working on making this easier in the future, by using OS VIF Lib. On 4 November 2015 at 08:56, Michał Dubiel

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova][Neutron] 6WIND Networking CI - approval for posting comments

On 31 October 2015 at 23:06, Armando M. wrote: > On 30 October 2015 at 23:59, Matt Riedemann > wrote: >> On 10/30/2015 7:41 AM, Armando M. wrote: >>> On 30 October 2015 at 18:41, Francesco Santoro >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Migration state machine proposal.

On 22 October 2015 at 10:20, Nikola Đipanov wrote: > On 10/21/2015 10:17 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >> Question on some things seen in the below paste. >> >> What is with 'finished' -> 'reverted' and 'finished' -> 'confirmed'? >> >> Why does it jump over 'reverting' or

[openstack-dev] [nova] Next Nova meeting on November 4th 2015

Hi, Due to the summit, we decided the next meeting will be: November 4th 2015 2100 UTC, #openstack-meeting http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20151104T21 For more details, as usual, please see: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova As normal, any questions,

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova's Mitaka Release Schedule

Hi, I have put together a list of proposed Nova specific deadlines: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Mitaka_Release_Schedule We can go through what needs to change in that list during the summit, and in the nova IRC meeting following the summit. Thanks, johnthetubaguy PS Please note I have

[openstack-dev] [nova] Checking dates for the Mitaka Nova Midcycle

Hi, We have a few offers for midcycle dates. If you would like to attend, please let me know if: * the proposed date works for you * one of the proposed venues is a no go (budget or otherwise) http://doodle.com/poll/88sbzgcv28rww2n3 Thanks, johnthetubaguy PS If doodle doesn't work for you,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova-compute][nova][libvirt] Extending Nova-Compute for image prefetching

On 10 October 2015 at 09:35, Alberto Geniola wrote: > Hi Michael, > > and thank you for your answer. > > Indeed, what I want to do is to add methods to the ImageCache.py module > (listing, adding, deleting). So far, this module only takes care of image > deletion: this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Host maintenance mode proposal.

On 15 October 2015 at 10:08, Tang Chen wrote: > Hi all, > > I tried to implement a common host maintenance mode handling > in nova compute. > > BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/host-maintenance-mode > spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/228689/ >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova Design Summit Schedule

On 14 October 2015 at 15:59, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We have a draft schedule for the summit uploaded: > http://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/nova > > We generally picked the sessions where in person debate is needed. We > reje

[openstack-dev] [nova] Liberty and Nova Specs, Blueprints and Design Summit for Mitaka

Hi, A quick update on where we are at. Liberty - Its time to give RC1 an good test. We need to keep our eyes out for release blockers, using this tag: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=liberty-rc-potential We will need an new tag on or after 8th October, to include

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

On 28 September 2015 at 12:10, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/27/2015 08:43 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 20:43:23 +: >>> On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Mark

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Design Summit Topics for Nova

On 17 September 2015 at 15:23, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:40:28AM -0700, melanie witt wrote: > >> Today I was informed that google forms are blocked in China [1], so I wanted >> to mention it here so we can consider an alternate way to collect

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptl] Troubleshooting cross-project communications

On 18 September 2015 at 00:50, Mike Perez wrote: > On 16:16 Sep 16, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Anne Gentle wrote: >> > [...] >> > What are some of the problems with each layer? >> > >> > 1. weekly meeting: time zones, global reach, size of cross-project >> > concerns due to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka

On 18 September 2015 at 16:23, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:53:05AM +, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> There are various efforts going on around live migration at the moment: >> fixing up CI, bug fixes, additions to cover more

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-i18n] [nova][i18n] Is there any point in using _() inpython-novaclient?

On 18 September 2015 at 15:46, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > With the limited resources that the translation team has, we should not > translate the clients but concentrate on the openstackclient, as discussed > here: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

On 15 September 2015 at 18:22, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 09/15/2015 07:09 PM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: I've been looking into the existing task-based-upload that Doug mentions: can anyone clarify the following? On a default devstack install

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

On 14 September 2015 at 16:27, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Doug Hellmann wrote: >> [...] >> 1. Resolve the situation preventing the DefCore committee from >>including image upload capabilities in the tests used for trademark >>and interoperability validation. >> >> 2.

[openstack-dev] [nova] PTL Candidacy

Hi, I would like to continue as the Nova PTL for the Mitaka cycle, if you will have me. As per the new process, you can see my nomination form here: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/election/plain/candidates/mitaka/Nova/John_Garbutt.txt A quick summary of that... I have enjoyed serving

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [all] Updated String Freeze Guidelines

On 10 September 2015 at 20:37, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > John Garbutt wrote: >> [...] >> After yesterday's cross project meeting, and hanging out in >> #openstack-i18n I have come up with these updates to the String Freeze >> Guidelines: &

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Design Summit Topics for Nova

Hi, Its time to start thinking about what things you want to get discussed at the Design Summit, this is specifically the Nova developer design summit track. We have about 14 fishbowl sessions. To make it easier to know who submitted what, we are going to try out google forms for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API v2.1 reference documentation

On 9 September 2015 at 03:43, Anne Gentle wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi > wrote: >> >> Hi Melanie, >> >> 2015-09-09 8:00 GMT+09:00 melanie witt : >> > Hi All, >> > >> > With usage of v2.1

[openstack-dev] [nova] [all] Updated String Freeze Guidelines

Hi, I have had quite a few comments from folks about the string freeze being too strict. It was noted that: * users will prefer an untranslated log, over a silent failure * translators don't want existing strings changing while they are translating them * translators tooling can cope OK with

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack support for Amazon Concepts - was Re: cloud-init IPv6 support

On 7 September 2015 at 03:34, Sean M. Collins wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 04:25:43PM EDT, Kevin Benton wrote: >> So it's been pointed out that http://169.254.169.254/openstack is completed >> OpenStack invented. I don't quite understand how that's not violating the >>

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack support for Amazon Concepts - was Re: cloud-init IPv6 support

On 7 September 2015 at 01:02, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: >> On Sep 6, 2015, at 09:43, Monty Taylor wrote: >>> On 09/05/2015 06:19 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote: On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 04:20:23PM EDT, Kevin Benton wrote: Right, it depends on your

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Mitaka Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

On 4 September 2015 at 18:55, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >> On 09/04/2015 12:14 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> >Hi PTLs, >> > >> >Here is the proposed slot allocation for every "big tent" project team >> >at the

[openstack-dev] [all] Cross-Project meeting, Tue Sept 8th, 21:00 UTC

Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons and anyone else interested, We'll have a cross-project meeting tomorrow at 21:00 UTC, with the following agenda: * Review past action items * Team announcements (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) * Base feature deprecation policy [1] * Open discussion [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug importance

I have a feeling launchpad asked my to renew my membership of nova-bug recently, and said it would drop me form the list if I didn't do that. Not sure if thats intentional to keep the list fresh? Its the first I knew about it. Unsure, but that could be related? Thanks, John On 6 September 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [docs] Are cells still 'experimental'?

Cells v1 were marked as experimental because of the total lack of testing. Some of that has now been resolved, we have a check job that tests a subset of our functionality on cells. But honestly, given we plan to remove cells v1, and the limitations you will find using cells v1, its tempting to

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [nova] Image Prefetching – Precaching

On 19 August 2015 at 19:30, Alberto Geniola albertogeni...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, This is my first email to the OS developer forum, so forgive me if I misplaced the subject tags J. Welcome! For future posts, I hope this helps make it easier:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] contextlib.nested and Python3 failing

On 20 August 2015 at 01:42, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 19, 2015, at 16:51, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote: Ideas appreciated. Instead of using the nested context managers, a way I like is to decorate a nested function in the test and call it, for example: def

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we combine a set of minor microversion bump needed fix into one microversoin bump?

On 19 August 2015 at 20:37, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/19/2015 2:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/19/2015 1:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/19/2015 12:18 PM, Chen CH Ji wrote: In doing [1] [2], some suggestions raised that those kind of change need microversion

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] libvirt + LXC CI - where's the beef?

On 20 August 2015 at 03:08, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: After spending a few hours on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370590 I'm annoyed by the fact we don't yet have a CI system for testing libvirt + LXC. Bit thank you for raising this one. At the Juno midcycle in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

On Wednesday, August 12, 2015, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Gary Kotton wrote: On 8/12/15, 12:12 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: On 15:39 Aug 11, Gary Kotton wrote: On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: Are you

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Mitaka nova-specs is open?

On 12 August 2015 at 12:20, Alexis Lee alex...@hp.com wrote: Kekane, Abhishek said on Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 08:59:02AM +: I have submitted a nova-specs for liberty but as it is not approved I have moved it under liberty/backlog. Now mitaka specs directory is added in nova-specs. Should

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support

Apologies to go back in time in the tread, but I wanted to share some extra context... On 10 August 2015 at 16:17, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: I agree that the sub team(s) need to review more. The question is how do the team member feel like they are making progress? That is, do

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Thoughts on things that don't make freeze cutoffs

On 4 August 2015 at 21:23, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/4/2015 8:47 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote: On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:54:34PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: John Garbutt wrote: [...] Personally I find a mix of coding and reviewing good to keep a decent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Non-priority Feature Freeze is Tomorrow (July 30th)

On 31 July 2015 at 11:05, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 30 July 2015 at 09:56, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 29 July 2015 at 19:20, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: Hi, Tomorrow is: Non-priority Feature Freeze What does this mean? Well... * bug fixes

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Thoughts on things that don't make freeze cutoffs

On 3 August 2015 at 20:44, Jesse Cook jesse.c...@rackspace.com wrote: On 7/29/15, 2:13 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: We talked a bit about this at the nova mid-cycle last week but I can't say I completely remember all of the points made, since I feel like we talked

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Thoughts on things that don't make freeze cutoffs

On 29 July 2015 at 19:13, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: We talked a bit about this at the nova mid-cycle last week but I can't say I completely remember all of the points made, since I feel like we talked ourselves into a circle that got us back to more or less 'the current

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Non-priority Feature Freeze is Tomorrow (July 30th)

On 30 July 2015 at 09:56, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 29 July 2015 at 19:20, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: Hi, Tomorrow is: Non-priority Feature Freeze What does this mean? Well... * bug fixes: no impact, still free to merge * priority features: no impact, still

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Non-priority Feature Freeze is Tomorrow (July 30th)

On 29 July 2015 at 19:20, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: Hi, Tomorrow is: Non-priority Feature Freeze What does this mean? Well... * bug fixes: no impact, still free to merge * priority features: no impact, still free to merge * clean ups: sure we could merge those * non

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug Triage Day - Liberty

On 29 July 2015 at 17:13, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/29/2015 08:13 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: I'd like to spread the idea of doing a bug triage day on next Wednesday, August 5th. This is one of our special review days [1] and sets the ground for the following timeframe where

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Non-priority Feature Freeze is Tomorrow (July 30th)

Hi, Tomorrow is: Non-priority Feature Freeze What does this mean? Well... * bug fixes: no impact, still free to merge * priority features: no impact, still free to merge * clean ups: sure we could merge those * non-priority features (i.e. blueprints with a low priority), you are no longer free

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Cancel Nova API meeting this week

Sorry I forgot to send that to the ML myself, thanks for sending that out. The cancellation was 'announced' just after the last meeting, in the usual wiki page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova Please note the time for this week keeps on the same rotation, so its: July 30th 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Would anyone from Nova Core be able to join the Cinder mid-cycle meetup?

On 24 July 2015 at 22:49, Jay S. Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: All, I had the opportunity to chat with John Garbutt when he was here in Rochester for the Nova mid-cycle meet-up. We discussed the fact that there was much to be gained by improving the communication between

[openstack-dev] [all] Cross-Project meeting, Tue July 28th, 21:00 UTC

Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons and anyone else interested, We'll have a cross-project meeting today at 21:00 UTC. I have agreed to chair it this week. Here is the agenda: * Team announcements (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) * API Guidelines that are ready for final review [1] * Cross project

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Exposing provider networks in network_data.json

On 17 July 2015 at 11:23, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 07/16/2015 06:06 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote: On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:23:29PM PDT, Mathieu Gagné wrote: So it looks like there is a missing part in this feature. There should be a way to hide this information if the instance does

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal for an Experiment

On 15 July 2015 at 19:25, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 16 July 2015 at 02:18, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 ... What I'd like to investigate is replacing the current design of having the compute nodes communicating with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova]

On 14 July 2015 at 21:43, Cale Rath ctr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hi, I created a patch to fail on the proxy call to Neutron for used limits, found here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199604/ This patch was done because of this:

[openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder: July 16 is non-priority feature proposal freeze

Hi, Please note, the non-priority feature freeze is on: July 30 Blueprint assignees (as always, but especially now), please update your blueprint to: * NeedsCodeReview, once all your code ready for review * Implemented, once all your code has merged Not doing this, will force me to guess

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Friday July 10 is Nova's non-priority feature review bash day

On 10 July 2015 at 19:08, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 7/7/2015 12:35 PM, John Garbutt wrote: Hi, Friday is: non-priority feature review bash day https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Liberty_Release_Schedule#Dates_overview The idea is the whole nova community

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder: July 16 is non-priority feature proposal freeze

On 14 July 2015 at 18:40, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/14/2015 05:52 AM, John Garbutt wrote: Please note, the non-priority feature freeze is on: July 30 So technically both are correct, neither are complete, oops: https

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova Liberty Midcyle agenda

Hi, It would be great to start writing down ideas of what you want to discuss at the midcycle: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-nova-midcycle I have also added a draft agenda, but we will discuss and decide that details on the day, in the usual un-conference style. For more details

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

On 26 June 2015 at 11:19, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/25/2015 09:46 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com As someone who does a lot of spec reviews, I take +1s from the right people (not always nova-cores) to

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty-1 Spec Freeze (and the exception process)

Hi, Liberty-1 has been tagged and release, as such we have hit the promised Spec Freeze. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Liberty_Release_Schedule We discussed this at the nova-meeting yesterday, but here are more specifics on how we try to track this process. A) Liberty Priority Specs not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

Apologies to go back in time in this thread, but I feel like I should respond directly to this original email... On 24 June 2015 at 11:28, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: Hey Nova, I'll cut to the chase and keep this email short for brevity and clarity: Specs don't work! In many

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to properly detect and fence a compromised host (and why I dislike TrustedFilter)

On 24 June 2015 at 09:35, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Sylvain Bauza [mailto:sba...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 9:39 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to properly detect and fence a compromised host (and why I dislike TrustedFilter)

On 25 June 2015 at 14:09, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com wrote: -Original Message- From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:22 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

On 25 June 2015 at 09:49, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Maxim Nestratov wrote: 24.06.2015 20:21, Daniel P. Berrange пишет: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 04:46:57PM +, Michael Krotscheck wrote: First: Overhead - 1 week for vacation - 1 week for holidays. - 4 weeks for feature

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

On 25 June 2015 at 09:58, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Joe Gordon wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com mailto:e...@leafe.com wrote: [...] Other emails have touched on the biggest disconnect in the process: that an approved spec magically becomes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Keystone] The unbearable lightness of specs

On 25 June 2015 at 10:19, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 06:30:06PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 17:25 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:52:37AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: On 06/24/2015 06:28 AM, Nikola

<    1   2   3   4   5   >