Hi all,
I would also vote for (A) with 1500 UTC which is 23:00 in Beijing time
-:)
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Mohammad Hanif mha...@brocade.com wrote:
Hi all,
I would also vote for (C) with 1600 UTC or later. This will hopefully
increase more participation from the Pacific
AttributeError:
_oslo_messaging_localcontext_9bb7d928d1a042e085f354eb118e98a0
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015, at 07:19 AM, Joshua Zhang wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thank you very much for your reply. I don't have any codes, so no any
: no such option: policy_file
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015, at 04:29 AM, Joshua Zhang wrote:
Hi Stacker,
A question about oslo.config, maybe a very silly question. but pls
tell
me if you know, thanks in advance
Hi Stacker,
A question about oslo.config, maybe a very silly question. but pls tell
me if you know, thanks in advance.
I know oslo has removed 'olso' namespace, oslo.config has been changed
to oslo_config, it also retains backwards compat.
I found I can run openstack successfully, but
长波，
你对oslo比较熟，能帮我看看这个问题吗，
https://answers.launchpad.net/oslo.config/+question/261550
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:13 PM, ChangBo Guo glongw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ALL,
I have been working on bug 1414432 [1] recently, I would like do more
discussion before further work.
I'm talking
I'm sorry, my mistake due to my negligence, pls ignore my above reply.
sorry.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Joshua Zhang joshua.zh...@canonical.com
wrote:
长波，
你对oslo比较熟，能帮我看看这个问题吗，
https://answers.launchpad.net/oslo.config/+question/261550
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:13 PM, ChangBo
pls note that actually this patch doesn't have minumum kernel requirement
because it only uses 'mount --bind' and 'net namespace', not use 'mount
namespace'. ('mount --bind' is since linux 2.4, 'net namespace' is since
Linux 3.0, 'mount namespace' is since Linux 3.8).
so I think sanity checks for
+1
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
wrote:
The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in
Hi Thomas,
I worked out a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100791/ based
on the latest strongSwan configurations, it can work. but the neutron-spec
is still on review, see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101457/
Can someone help review and approve that spec, thanks.
On Mon, Oct
