The serviceBase and insertion spec has been up for review for a while. It
would be great if it can be reviewed and moved forward.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93128/
Thanks,
Kanzhe
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
in #openstack-meeting-alt sound?
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Kanzhe Jiang
MTS at BigSwitch
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Kanzhe Jiang
MTS at BigSwitch
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
with the blueprint.
Cheers,
main(i){putchar((5852758((i-1)/2)*8)-!(1i)*'\r')^89main(++i);}
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Kanzhe Jiang
MTS
Hi Carlos,
This is Kanzhe. We discussed your port-based SFC on the Neutron advanced
service IRC.
I would like to reach out to you to discuss a bit more.
As you know, Neutron port is a logic abstraction for network interfaces
with a MAC and IP address. However, network services could be used at
, but it can be virtually any service type and service
implementation. Sure users wouldn't get all the fancy APIs OpenStack
providers instantiate and configure services.
--
Kanzhe Jiang
MTS at BigSwitch
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
Hi Mohammad,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Kanzhe
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com wrote:
We have started looking at how the Neutron advanced services being defined
and developed right now can be used within the Neutron policy framework we
are
I am interested too. UTC-8.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Gary Duan garyd...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in the discussion. UTC-8.
Gary
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Mandeep Dhami
dh...@noironetworks.comwrote:
I would be interested as well (UTC-8).
Regards,
Mandeep
