Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:56:04AM -0700, Jay Pipes wrote: On 08/07/2014 02:12 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [. . .] Excellent sugestion. I've wondered multiple times that if we could dedicate a good chunk (or whole) of a specific release for heads down bug fixing/stabilization. As it has

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fair standards for all hypervisor drivers

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 08:05:26AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/11/2014 07:58 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/11/2014 05:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: There is work to add support for this in devestack already which I prefer since it makes it easy for developers to get an

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fair standards for all hypervisor drivers

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:54:37PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/12/2014 03:40 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [. . .] (Sorry for the late response, was off for a week.) So, effectively, you're trying to add a minimal Fedora image w/ virt-preview repo (as part of some post-install

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptls] The Czar system, or how to scale PTLs

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 02:33:27PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: [Snip some well articulated thoughts.] Enter the Czar system: each project should have a number of liaisons / official contacts / delegates that are fully responsible to cover one aspect of the project. We need to have Bugs

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] libvirt version_cap, a postmortem

On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 05:08:16PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey The libvirt version_cap debacle continues to come up in conversation and one perception of the whole thing appears to be: A controversial patch was ninjaed by three Red Hat nova-cores and then the same individuals

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:23:41PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Stefano Maffulli wrote: On 08/29/2014 11:17 AM, John Garbutt wrote: After moving to use ZNC, I find IRC works much better for me now, but I am still learning really. There! this sentence has two very important points worth

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest Bug triage

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 03:52:56PM -0400, David Kranz wrote: So we had a Bug Day this week and the results were a bit disappointing due to lack of participation. We went from 124 New bugs to 75. There were also many cases where bugs referred to logs that no longer existed. This suggests that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] What's holding nova development back?

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 06:29:53PM +1000, Michael Still wrote: I think bug days are a good idea. We've had them sporadically in the past, but never weekly. We stopped mostly because people stopped showing up. If we think we have critical mass again, or if it makes more sense to run one

Re: [openstack-dev] Disabling file injection *by default*

[CC'ed libguestfs author, Rich Jones] Heya, On 01/21/2014 07:59 AM, Robert Collins wrote: I was reminded of this while I cleaned up failed file injection nbd devices on ci-overcloud.tripleo.org :/ - what needs to happen for us to change the defaults around file injection so that it's

Re: [openstack-dev] Disabling file injection *by default*

On 01/22/2014 03:27 AM, Robert Collins wrote: On 22 January 2014 10:50, Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com wrote: [CC'ed libguestfs author, Rich Jones] Heya, On 01/21/2014 07:59 AM, Robert Collins wrote: I was reminded of this while I cleaned up failed file injection nbd devices on ci

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] nova-network in Icehouse and beyond

On 01/29/2014 11:34 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: [. . .] There's a bit of a bigger set of questions here, too ... Should nova-network *ever* go away? Or will there always just be a choice between the basic/legacy nova-network option, and the new fancy SDN-enabling Neutron option? Is the

Re: [openstack-dev] supported dependency versioning and testing

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:31:06AM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: Hi All, I discussion recently came up inside of nova about what it means supported version for a dependency means. in libvirt we gate on the minimal version that we support but for all python dependencies we gate on the highest

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova Bug Scrub meeting

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:07:59AM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 25 February 2014 02:35, Tracy Jones tjo...@vmware.com wrote: Hi all - i have set up the nova bug scrub meeting for Wednesdays at 1630 UTC in the #openstack-meeting-3 IRC channel The first meeting will be all about triaging

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] a question about instance snapshot

On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 02:29:04AM +, Liuji (Jeremy) wrote: Hi, all Current openstack seems not support to snapshot instance with memory and dev states. I searched the blueprint and found two relational blueprint like below. But these blueprint failed to get in the branch. [1]:

Re: [openstack-dev] devstack: Unable to restart rabbitmq-server

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 02:27:29PM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote: Hi List, It been few hours and I tried everything from ensuring /etc/hosts, /etc/hostname etc (per google results) and rabbitmq-server still doesn't start. I am using latest devstack as of today on F20 Below is the error

Re: [openstack-dev] no tap interface on compute node

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:31:50AM +0530, abhishek jain wrote: Hi I'm not able to get tap interface up on compute node when I boot VM from controller node onto compute node. Please help regarding this. For such usage questions, please post (with more verbose details including Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Swift][third-party] Most Third Party CI's failing

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 09:39:50PM -0700, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: Oppss...sorry wrong link... please use this http://paste.openstack.org/show/84073/. Just a friendly note -- pastebins usually expire, and if someone looks at the archives years later, there'll be nothing to look at. It's more

Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] neutron config not working

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:59:17PM -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: Before I get punted onto the operators list, I post this here because this is the default config and I'd expect the defaults to just work. Running devstack inside a VM with a single NIC configured and this in localrc:

Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] neutron config not working

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:36:02PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:59:17PM -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: [. . .] Examining my install log[2], I only see 3 ERRORs that looked legitimate: (1) A fatal error about 'yaml.h' header file not found

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] olso incubator logging issues

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:00:52AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: Every time I crack open a nova logs in detail, at least 2 new olso incubator log issues have been introduced. The current ones is clearly someone is over exploding arrays, as we're getting things like: 2014-06-29 13:36:41.403 19459

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] top gate bug is libvirt snapshot

On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 06:21:31PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 07/08/2014 06:12 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com mailto:mi...@stillhq.com wrote: The associated bug says this is probably a qemu bug, so I think we

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] top gate bug is libvirt snapshot

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 05:47:47PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 06:21:31PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 07/08/2014 06:12 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com mailto:mi...@stillhq.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fair standards for all hypervisor drivers

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:15:40PM +0200, Sean Dague wrote: [. . .] Anyway, discussion welcomed. My primary concern right now isn't actually where we set the bar, but that we set the same bar for everyone. As someone who tries to test Nova w/ upstream libvirt/QEMU, couple of points why I

Re: [openstack-dev] Problems with new Neutron service plugin

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:15:45AM +0200, Maciej Nabożny wrote: [Just a generic comment, not related to the extension code in question.] Yes, here is extension code: http://pastebin.com/btYQjwnr service plugin code: http://pastebin.com/ikKf80Fr Pastebins expire, it's useful to provide URLs

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 07:10:23AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: We seem to be unable to address some key issues in the software we produce, and part of it is due to strategic contributors (and core reviewers) being

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Consolidating efforts around Fedora/Centos gate job

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 03:43:40PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote: Hi, To summarize recent discussions, nobody is opposed in general to having Fedora / Centos included in the gate. However, it raises a number of big questions : which job(s) to run on Fedora, where does the quota for extra jobs

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Todo / Wish list management

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:10:01PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: In the QA program we've now got the qa-specs repository to help craft the details of a blueprint before someone implements it. However there are problems we know we need to solve, which we only have a more general thought on, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] pep8 issues and how to pep8 locally ?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 03:47:14PM +0530, Deepak Shetty wrote: Why is this not part of cinder or devstack dep and why isn't this auto installed ? I searched the HACKING and CONTRIBUTING docs.. none of them explain how to sanity check your code before posting it to gerrit ... yum search and pip

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] explanations on the current state of config file handling

On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:18:18AM -0500, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Some non insignificant number of devstack changes related to neutron seem to be neutron plugins having to do all kinds of manipulation of extra config files. The

Re: [openstack-dev] Xen and Libvirt.

[You seem to have (inadvertantly?) hijacked a different thread and started an unrelated topic. That said, see below.] On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:45:07AM -0400, Alvin Starr wrote: What is the status of Xen and libvirt under Openstack? This was recently discussed at the Nova Libvirt (sub team)

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] bug status and our 1st Bug Day for Juno

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:29:34AM +, Tracy Jones wrote: Hi Folks - I spoke with Michael at the summit about bug management for Juno. Other than tagging the untagged bugs each week, I'm try to do that (and some triage/root-cause analysis for libvirt/QEMU/KVM-based bugs and would like to

[openstack-dev] [Summit] Coordination between OpenStack lower layer virt stack (libvirt, QEMU/KVM)

I was discussing $subject on #openstack-nova, Nikola Dipanov suggested it's worthwhile to bring this up on the list. I was looking at http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/ and noticed there's no specific session (correct me if I'm wrong) that's targeted at coordination between OpenStack -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Summit] Coordination between OpenStack lower layer virt stack (libvirt, QEMU/KVM)

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:07:41PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:58:48PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: I was discussing $subject on #openstack-nova, Nikola Dipanov suggested it's worthwhile to bring this up on the list. I was looking at http

Re: [openstack-dev] Cross distribution talks on Friday

On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 09:13:21PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I was wondering if some distribution OpenStack package maintainers would be interested to have some cross-distribution discussion on Friday, during the contributors sessions. I'll be happy to discuss with Ubuntu people,

Re: [openstack-dev] Cross distribution talks on Friday

On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:45:24PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: On 11/01/2014 11:29 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 09:13:21PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I was wondering if some distribution OpenStack package maintainers would be interested to have some cross

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [neutron] local.conf for devstack using neutron on home network

On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:24:02PM +, Chris Dent wrote: I seem to be struggling to cook a neutron configuration for my little home network that doesn't end in a variety of failures (devstack errors out, floating ips are on an unexpected (and unrouted) network, etc). I recognize that

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [neutron] local.conf for devstack using neutron on home network

On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 02:48:49PM +, Chris Dent wrote: On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [I realize you intend to use physical machine for DevStack, still I thought I'd post this here.] Thanks for posting it. Each added datapoint will get us closer. FWIW, this[1

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Scale out bug-triage by making it easier for people to contribute

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:42:19AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Dolph Mathews wrote: As someone who has spent quite a bit of time triaging bugs, I'd be hugely in favor of this. I'd probably be willing to pitch in on additional projects, as well. Is there already tooling for this built

Re: [openstack-dev] Any experience with qed image format

On 08/05/2013 12:49 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hi all, I was looking into newer formats for images for qemu/KVM and noticed a new one called qed, http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/QED I don't see any active development of QED format. Has anyone in the openstack qemu/KVM users had any

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Communicating test plans

On 09/18/2013 03:37 PM, Martina Kollarova wrote: There is a lack of design documentation and specification in the blueprints, creating test plans is problematic and requires a lot of communication with the developers. I was wondering whether we could partially remedy this by creating a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] bug 1334398 and libvirt live snapshot support

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:12:24PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-12-08 11:45:36 +0100 (+0100), Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: As Dan Berrangé noted, it's nearly impossible to reproduce this issue independently outside of OpenStack Gating environment. I brought this up at the recently

Re: [openstack-dev] 'module' object has no attribute 'HVSpec'

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 04:37:47PM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Ragolu wrote: Hi All, I have integrated below CPU pinning patches to Nova As of now, CPU pinning works directly from Nova git (as you can see, most of the patches below are merged), you don't have to manually apply any patches.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Logging interactions of libvirt + QEMU in Nova

Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:27:34AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: Heya, I noticed a ping (but couldn't respond in time) on #openstack-nova IRC about turning on logging in libvirt

[openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Logging interactions of libvirt + QEMU in Nova

Heya, I noticed a ping (but couldn't respond in time) on #openstack-nova IRC about turning on logging in libvirt to capture Nova failures. This was discussed on this list previously by Daniel Berrange, just spelling it out here for reference and completness' sake. (1) To see the interactions

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][devstack][keystone] Devstack failures due to empty service catalogue

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:42:50AM +0100, Jakub Libosvar wrote: It is caused by using old python-openstackclient [1]. We should be using = 1.0.2 - fix is about to be merged [2]. Thanks Jakub for helping me debug this on the IRC yesterday! I hope these kind of backward incompatible changes can

Re: [openstack-dev] required libvirtd/qemu versions for numa support?

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 03:37:48PM -0800, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/26/2015 07:33 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: Hi, I'm interested in the recent work around NUMA support for guest instances (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/virt-driver-numa-placement), but I'm having some difficulty

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Flavor extra-spec and image metadata documentation

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:23:54AM +0100, Pasquale Porreca wrote: Hello I am working on a little patch that introduce a new flavor extra-spec and image metadata key-value pair https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153607/ I am wondering how an openstack admin can be aware that a specific value

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:53:24PM +0100, Nikola Đipanov wrote: + Inf for writing this Flavio! Absolutely! I never even knew such things existed in this community. Only some observations below. [. . .] ## Mailing List vs IRC Channel I get it, our mailing list is freaking busy,

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] authentication issues

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:54:30AM +, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, With the current master in devstack I am unable to create a neutron network. It looks like there is an issue with keystone. Anyone else hit this? Thanks Gary Hmm, I don't see any such issue here, I'm using:

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Using DevStack for multi-node setup

On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 08:20:48AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/03/2015 04:41 PM, Danny Choi (dannchoi) wrote: Hi, I’m using DevStack to deploy OpenStack on a multi-node setup: Controller, Network, Compute as 3 separate nodes Since the Controller node is stacked first, during

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Specific Juno version

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:41:53PM +0200, Eduard Matei wrote: Hi Ihar, This is the error i see in c-vol screen: 2015-03-03 18:39:34.060 DEBUG taskflow.engines.action_engine.runner [req-87db2771-5c25-4c9b-a3bc-f7a504468315 4af0a30fe2c14deb9f9cf341a97daa9f 1fbab1e235ff414abf249c741fb3c6c9]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:54:31AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker, it is just a sign that the project

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:02:36PM -0800, Mark Atwood wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, at 04:28, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: Along with the below, if push comes to shove, OpenStack Foundation could probably try a milder variant (obviously, not all activities can be categorized as 'critical path

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] bug expiration

On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:32:44AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote: I just spent a chunk of the morning purging out some really old Incomplete bugs because about 9 months ago we disabled the auto expiration bit in launchpad -

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] eventlet 0.17.3 is now fully Python 3 compatible

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:58:57PM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Victor Stinner vstin...@redhat.com wrote: For the full list, see the wiki page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3#Core_OpenStack_projects Thanks for updating the wiki page that is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: periodic developer newsletter?

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 07:22:24PM +, Nikhil Komawar wrote: This is a really nice idea. Idea is indeed nice, but I have to fully agree with all of what Theirry says. I feel the same, that we can offload some I personally don't feel it's about offloading to some hypothetical person

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Can we bump MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.2 in Liberty?

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:23:25PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: The minimum required version of libvirt in the driver is 0.9.11 still [1]. We've been gating against 1.2.2 in Ubuntu Trusty 14.04 since Juno. The libvirt distro support matrix is here: [2] Can we safely assume the people

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova-docker] Status update

On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 04:55:47PM +, Adrian Otto wrote: I will also mention that it’s natural to be allergic to the idea of nested virtualization. We all know that creating multiple levels of hardware virtualization leads to bad performance outcomes. This seems to paint an overly bleak

Re: [openstack-dev] VM migration between two data centers

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 04:05:20PM +0530, Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS wrote: Hi Folks, I have created two data centers and I am using OpenStack as the management platform for them. So now my question is it is possible to migrate VM instances from one data center to the other. Please ask such

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Regarding deleting snapshot when instance is OFF

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:31:40PM +0530, Deepak Shetty wrote: Hi, Cinder w/ GlusterFS backend is hitting the below error as part of test_volume_boot_pattern tempest testcase [Meta comment: Since main components that are triggering this errors are Cinder with GlusterFS, adding Cinder tag

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Follow up actions from the Summit: please help

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:47:31AM +0100, John Garbutt wrote: Hi, So in the interests of filling up your inbox yet further... We have lots of etherpads from the summit: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Liberty/Etherpads#Nova I have extracted all the action items here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 02:51:38PM +0100, Nikola Đipanov wrote: On 06/24/2015 02:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: [. . .] I agree completely. The nicely rendered feature docs which is a byproduct of the specs process in gerrit is a great part of it. So when someone is trying to use a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 04:09:16PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 02:51:38PM +0100, Nikola Đipanov wrote: On 06/24/2015 02:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: [. . .] I agree completely. The nicely rendered feature docs which is a byproduct of the specs process

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:02:27AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 6/24/2015 9:09 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 02:51:38PM +0100, Nikola Đipanov wrote: On 06/24/2015 02:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: [. . .] This is one of the _baffling_ aspects -- that a so-called

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Need volunteers for tempest bug triage

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 03:52:02PM +0300, Yaroslav Lobankov wrote: Hi everyone, Is it possible for other people (not only core reviewers) to participate in bug triage? I would like to help in doing this. Absolutely. There's no such silly rule that only core reviwers can do bug triage. While

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:55:12PM +0100, Markus Zoeller wrote: > Kashyap Chamarthy <kcham...@redhat.com> wrote on 11/06/2015 06:37:08 PM: > > > From: Kashyap Chamarthy <kcham...@redhat.com> > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for us

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Change from Mitaka: Expected UNIX signal to generate Guru Meditation (error) Reports

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:11:31AM +0900, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Matt, > > 0.6.0 and 0.7.0 were released for Mitaka! not Liberty. Though yes, because > of not having pins any library we release for Mitaka will end up being used > with Liberty as well. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:54:59PM +0100, Markus Zoeller wrote: > Hey folks, > > below is the first report of bug stats I intend to post weekly. > We discussed it shortly during the Mitaka summit that this report > could be useful to keep the attention of the open bugs at a certain > level. Let

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] live migration sub-team meeting

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:18:38PM +, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: > Hi all, > > Live migration was confirmed as a Nova priority for the Mitaka cycle > and a sub-team section can be found on the priorities tracking page > [1]. > > Most team members expressed they would like a regular IRC

[openstack-dev] [nova] Change from Mitaka: Expected UNIX signal to generate Guru Meditation (error) Reports

Background -- Oslo Guru Meditation (error) Reports (GMR)[*] are a useful debugging mechanism that allows one to capture the current state of a Nova process/executable (e.g. `nova-compute`, `nova-api`, etc). The way to generate the error report is to supply the 'User-defined signal',

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:25:12AM +, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: > > > Please respond to this post if you have an interest in this and what > > you would like to see done. Include anything you are already > > getting on with so we get a clear picture. > > Thank you to those who replied

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] live migration in Mitaka

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 06:20:31AM +, Koniszewski, Pawel wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Mathieu Gagné [mailto:mga...@internap.com] > > Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 7:24 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) [. . .] > > >> I have taken the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:09:04PM -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: [. . .] > > I think this is all superfluous however and we should simply encourage > > people to not wait until the last minute. Waiting to see who is > > running/what the field looks like isn't as important as standing up > > and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][infra] Getting a bleeding edge libvirt gate job running

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 06:46:58AM +1100, Ian Wienand wrote: > On 11/18/2015 06:10 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > This > >was a trigger to see if we can create a gate job which utilizes the > >latest, bleeding edge, version of libvirt to test such features. > > >* Is already someone working on

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] VIR_MIGRATE_NON_SHARED_INC works more like full copy in block migration ?

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 06:07:33PM +0800, Luo Gangyi wrote: > Hi devs, > > > Do you test the difference between within and without > VIR_MIGRATE_NON_SHARED_INC ? > > > When I add VIR_MIGRATE_NON_SHARED_INC in block_migration_flags in > nova, nova block migration behaves more like a full copy

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] [nova] live migration, libvirt 1.3, and the gate

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:59:17PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: Thanks for the summary, Sean. [...] > It turns out it works fine because libvirt *actually* seems to take the > data from cpu_map.xml and do a translation to what it believes qemu will > understand. On these systems apparently this

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] [nova] live migration, libvirt 1.3, and the gate

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:55:47AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 05/26/2016 05:38 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 05:42:04PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> So, in short, the central issue seems to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] [nova] live migration, libvirt 1.3, and the gate

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 05:42:04PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [...] > So, in short, the central issue seems to be this: the custom 'gate64' > model is not being trasnalted by libvirt into a model that QEMU can > recognize. An update: Upstream libvirt points out that t

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] A primer on data structures used by Nova to represent block devices

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:48:18PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote: > The purpose of this mail is to share what I have learned about the various > data structures used by Nova for representing block devices. I compiled > this for my own use, but I hope it might be useful for others, and that > other

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Stabilization cycles: Elaborating on the idea to move it forward

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:37:00PM +0100, Markus Zoeller wrote: > Flavio Percoco wrote on 01/21/2016 09:13:02 AM: [...] First, positive remark(s): Thanks for writing this up. FWIW, I support the notion of having milestones focusing on stability, as opposed to explicitly

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][infra] Ability to run newer QEMU in Gate jobs

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:25:00AM +, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:11:35PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > We'll almost certainly need to be able to test QEMU 2.6 in the N > > release cycle, since that'll (hopefully) include support for TLS > > encrypted

[openstack-dev] [nova][infra] Ability to run newer QEMU in Gate jobs

Heya, Currently the live migration test job[1] is using relatively old version of QEMU (2.0 -- 2 years old, 17-APR-2014). And, libvirt 1.2.2 (released on 02-MAR-2014). For libvirt, I realize there's an in-progress thread[2] to get to a state to run a bleeding edge libvirt. How can we go about

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Update on live migration priority

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 04:21:27PM +, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: > This time with a tag in case anyone is filtering... Yep, I was filtering, and would've missed it without your tag. :-) > From: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) > Sent: 12 February 2016 16:16 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] working on bug reports; what blocks you?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 03:28:48PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 3/17/2016 11:41 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > >What are the various reasons which block you to work on bug reports? > >This question goes especially to the new contributors but also to the > >rest of us. For me, personally, it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Wishlist bugs == (trivial) blueprint?

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:59:32PM +, Tim Bell wrote: [...] > The bug process was very light weight for an operator who found > something they would like enhanced. It could be done through the web > and did not require git/gerrit knowledge. I went through the process > for a change: > > -

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] Results of the TC Election

On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:14:33PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] > Long term I'd like to remove the summit pass perk (or no longer link > it to "one commit"). Agreed. FWIW, I recall discussing this in the hallways of the Paris Summit, and suggesting something like 3-5 commits and someway

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] working on bug reports; what blocks you?

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 07:01:34PM +0100, Markus Zoeller wrote: > Kashyap Chamarthy <kcham...@redhat.com> wrote on 03/18/2016 07:28:09 AM: [...] > > Writing a thoughtful report is hard and time-taking. > > Yeah, and I assume that's the reason many bug reports lack that

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] - suggested development workflow without ./rejoin-stack.sh ?

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 03:10:56PM -0700, Kevin Benton wrote: > This patch removed the ./rejoin-stack.sh script: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291453/ > > I relied on this heavily in my development VM which sees lots of restarts > because of various things (VM becomes unresponsive in load

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] libvirt/qemu source install plugin.

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:25:46PM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: > On 20.07.2016 22:38, Mooney, Sean K wrote: > > Hi > > I recently had the need to test a feature (vhost-user reconnect) > > that was commit to the qemu source tree a few weeks ago. As there > > has been no release since then I needed

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][nova][infra] Voting gates

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:19:39PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 7/14/2016 11:34 AM, Paul Bourke wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > > > Here is the failure from nova_compute on trying to start an instance: [...] > > 2016-07-13 18:04:12.634968 | 2016-07-13 18:01:34.560 1 ERROR > > oslo_service.service

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][infra][ci] bulk repeating a test job on a single review in parallel ?

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:44:36PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [Snip description of some nice debugging.] > I'd really love it if there was > > 1. the ability to request checking of just specific jobs eg > > "recheck gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-full" Yes, this would really be

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][infra][ci] bulk repeating a test job on a single review in parallel ?

On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 02:35:34PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-07-01 15:39:10 +0200 (+0200), Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > [Snip description of some nice debugging.] > > > > > I'd really love it if there was > > > > > > 1. the ability to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:29:22PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Since danpb hasn't been around I've sort of forgotten about this, but we > should talk about bumping the minimum required libvirt version in nova. > > Currently it's 1.2.1 and the next was set to 1.2.9. > > On master we're gating

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bug team meeting

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 03:41:04PM -0700, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > I should add that I also expressed interest in taking over the Bug Czar > role. I've been actively involved with the bugs team since Markus > revived it earlier this year. I've run meetings when he was unavailable > and also

[openstack-dev] [nova] [libvirt] Debugging blockRebase() - "active block copy not ready for pivot"

TL;DR - >From the debug analysis of the log below, and discussion with Eric Blake of upstream QEMU / libvirt resulted in the below bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382165 -- virDomainGetBlockJobInfo: Adjust job reporting based on QEMU stats & the "ready" field

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [libvirt] Debugging blockRebase() - "active block copy not ready for pivot"

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:32:39AM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > TL;DR > - > > From the debug analysis of the log below, and discussion with Eric Blake > of upstream QEMU / libvirt resulted in the below bug report: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [libvirt] Debugging blockRebase() - "active block copy not ready for pivot"

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:29:41AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/06/2016 07:58 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:32:39AM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > >> TL;DR > >> - > >> > >> From the debug analysis of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [libvirt] Debugging blockRebase() - "active block copy not ready for pivot"

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:32:14PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 10/6/2016 7:58 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > - > > We expose the state of the copy job in the XML and forward the READY > > event f

[openstack-dev] [nova][stable/liberty] Backport impasse: "virt: set address space & CPU time limits when running qemu-img"

The said patch in question fixes a CVE[x] in stable/liberty. We currently have two options, both of them have caused an impasse with the Nova upstream / stable maintainers. We've had two-ish months to mull over this. I'd prefer to get this out of a limbo, & bring this to a logical conclusion.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][stable/liberty] Backport impasse: "virt: set address space & CPU time limits when running qemu-img"

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:57:26AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:48:49PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [...] > > The two options at hand: > > > > (1) Nova backport from master (that also adds a check for the presence > > of 'Pro

  1   2   >