On 10/16/2017 09:09 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
> In a recent conversation on #openstack-tc where we bemoaned the ills
> of Stackalytics and related management-by-objectives to Heisenberg's
> uncertainty principle, the conversation (on 10-03, for example) veered
> towards why people were interested
Sending out a gentle reminder to vote for time slots that work for you
[0]. We'll keep the poll open for a few more days, or until we reach
quorum. Thanks!
[0] https://beta.doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu
On 10/11/2017 01:48 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> Oh - one note about the doodle [0].
Oh - one note about the doodle [0]. All proposed times are in UTC, so
just keep that in mind when selecting your availability.
Thanks!
[0] https://beta.doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu
On 10/11/2017 01:44 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> In today's policy meeting we went through and started prepp
for upgrading the account.
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/analyzing-other-policy-systems
[1] https://doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu
On 10/09/2017 04:23 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> I've put a scheduling session on the books for the next policy meeting
> [0][1]. Advertising it here since
This sounds like something that was discussed during the PTG. The oslo
team was exploring ways to implement this, which would be consumable to
keystonemiddleware as a library [0].
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo-ptg-queens
On 10/11/2017 07:43 AM, pnkk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have our API
://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Keystone_Policy_Meeting
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-policy-meeting
On 10/05/2017 02:24 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com
> <mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com>> wrot
Hey all,
The following was done during office hours this week:
Bug #1698455 in OpenStack Identity (keystone): "Install and configure in
Installation Guide: Populate the Identity service database step fails on
CentOS7"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1698455
Triaged and tagged
Bug
Hey all,
It was mentioned in today's keystone meeting [0] that it would be useful
to go through AWS IAM (or even GKE) as a group. With all the recent
policy discussions and work, it seems useful to get our eyes on another
system. The idea would be to spend time using a video conference/screen
Hey all,
According to our burndown chart [0], just over half the projects have
started implementing the goal [1]. I've been proposing patches for some
of the projects in the not-started column. Most patches I've been
working on would benefit from a review from someone more experienced
with the
+1,000 to all of what Steve said. It's still tough for me to wrap my
head around all the client/library work you shouldered. Your experience,
perspective, and insight will certainly be missed.
Thanks for being an awesome member of this community and best of luck on
the new gig, they're lucky to
Office hours was a little slow this week. Most people seem to be getting
back in the groove from the PTG. No bugs were closed during this week's
office hours.
FWIW - I plan to go through and start cleaning up v2.0 bugs there are no
longer relevant now that v2.0 is being removed. This will be a
++ it'd be great to come up with some sort of pattern here that other
projects can follow if they need to implement the same thing. Some sort
of consistency would be great when/if we start seeing more http_check
adoption.
On 09/29/2017 07:56 AM, ruan...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> We are
On 09/27/2017 06:38 AM, Bhor, Dinesh wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
> There are four solutions to fix the below bug:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystoneauth/+bug/1638978
>
>
>
> 1) Carry a copy of mask_password() method to keystoneauth from
> oslo_utils [1]:
>
> *Pros:*
>
> A. keystoneauth
Hey all,
In the weekly meeting on Tuesday, we talked about possible forum
sessions for Sydney. I proposed the following based on the etherpad [0].
* Keystone User & Operator Feedback [1]
* Application Credentials Feedback [2]
* RBAC/Policy Roadmap Feedback [3]
We decided to omit the last
Hey all,
I went through the Trello board for all our Queens work and updated all
cards that needed "fleshing out". Each should have an accurate
description of the work, why it's needed, and a checklist if applicable.
If a card still doesn't make sense, please ping me or add the "needs
fleshing
On Sep 22, 2017 07:59, "Matt Riedemann" wrote:
On 9/22/2017 9:50 AM, Rajath Agasthya (rajagast) wrote:
> On 9/21/17, 10:19 PM, "Jeremy Freudberg"
> wrote:
>
> 3) Delay spin-up of resource-intensive/long-running CI jobs until after
> some
>
Hey all,
I won't be available to run the policy meeting tomorrow. It doesn't look
like there is anything posted to the agenda yet [0]. If someone feels
like hosting it, please feel free to do so. I'll catch the scroll back
afterwords.
Thanks,
Lance
[0]
I should have read this thread before starting a new one [0]. The query
bits sound somewhat similar to what I experienced with a script to
generate a burndown chart, but querying a topic instead.
[0]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-September/122315.html
On 09/19/2017
Hey all,
The upgrade to Gerrit 2.13.9 affected a script I was using to generate
the burndown chart by querying the REST api. I've pushed a fix [0] and
it should be working again in case you weren't seeing your project being
reflected in the burndown [1]. Let me know if you have any additional
Hey all,
The schedule [0] has been updated with room information for the
policy-in-code effort. We'll be in Grays Peak on Level 3 on Monday and
Tuesday to help projects with the Queens goal [1].
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/policy-queens-ptg
[1]
Looks like we'll be in Telluride B, Atrium Level. I've updated the room
information in the etherpad [0].
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-queens-ptg
On 08/24/2017 02:25 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> I've worked the topics into a schedule [0]. Monday and Tuesday are
> pretty g
Looks like the Baremetal/VM SIG (#compute) will meet in Ballroom B,
Banquet Level. I've updated the etherpad with the room information [0].
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/queens-PTG-vmbm
On 09/07/2017 10:01 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> I spoke with John a bit today in IRC and we h
around in the morning, pending the Application
Credentials discussion.
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/queens-PTG-vmbm
On 09/05/2017 09:15 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> Thanks! That should work. We have a couple things set up with the
> baremetal/VM SIG [0] during that time, but I don't
know it's a bit
late, but I'd like to have the schedule pretty well set by the weekend.
Thanks!
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/queens-PTG-vmbm
On 08/24/2017 03:34 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Keystone has a few cross-project topics we'd like to share with a wider
>
Hey all,
I reused some of Doug's doc-migration tooling to create a burndown chart
specifically for policy work in Queens [0][1]. As some of you might
know, I've attempted to update projects that are not impacted by the
goal [2]. Another reminder that we will be having two sessions dedicated
to
you still have conflicts :-)
>
> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo-ptg-queens
>
> 2017-09-02 6:16 GMT+08:00 Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Thanks for the schedule! I should be somewhat available Monday afternoon
>> for the policy deprecation discussion
On 09/04/2017 11:06 AM, Ronan-Alexandre Cherrueau wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Recently in the Inria's Discovery initiative[1], we got in touch with
> CockroachLabs guys with an idea: make Keystone supports CockorachDB. So
> we give it a try and you can find a very first result on our GitHub[2].
> The
anks for your kind response!!
>
>
>
> Can you please help me with the process to authenticate the created
> users directly against keystone ??
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Vamsi krishna
>
>
>
> *From:*Lance Bragstad [mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:*
Thanks for the schedule! I should be somewhat available Monday afternoon
for the policy deprecation discussion. The only conflict that might come
up for me is with the Baremetal/VM group [0]. Keystone has a few topics
to iron out there, but I'm not exactly sure when that group plans to
talk about
It looks like the users exist in keystone. Are you able to authenticate
directly against keystone and see if that works?
On 09/01/2017 06:22 AM, A Vamsikrishna wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> *Setup details: *
>
>
>
> ubuntu-16.04.2-server-amd64
>
> Docker version 1.12.6
>
> Installed keystone in
Now that Pike is out the door (big thanks to everyone for helping!),
I've create the deprecated-as-of-queen [0] and removed-as-of-queens [1]
blueprints. Feel free to use them as needed now that Queens is underway.
Thanks!
[0]
Hi all,
Keystone has a few cross-project topics we'd like to share with a wider
group, like the Baremetal/VM SIG. As a result, I attempted to dust off
some of the Baremetal/VM sessions [0][1] from Boston and port the
popular topics over to the etherpad for the PTG [2]. Maybe it will kick
start
of the Etherpad as a
champion, moderator, or scribe (see definitions in the main schedule).
Let me know if you see any issues or conflicts.
Thanks,
Lance
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-queens-ptg
On 07/27/2017 12:21 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> I've added a section to the etherpad
Today we realized we're going to need to cut a new release candidate due
to some confusion around release notes. Particularly the ones for Pike.
We spent the majority of office hours fixing and reviewing those
patches. Full logs from office hours can be found here [0]. Thanks for
all the quick
Hey all,
Office hours was pretty focused today. We spent the majority of the time
discussing and merging fixes we need for RC2. In addition to that we
discussed plans for the PTG as well as the schedule. Full details can be
found in the logs [0].
Thanks,
Lance
[0]
I made the announcement in today's keystone meeting [0] that the current
reviewers have decided to add Kristi Nikolla (knikolla) to the team.
Kristi has been an extremely valuable asset to the team over the last
couple of releases. He especially stepped up to the plate during Pike.
He provides
During RC, Morgan's made quite a bit of progress on a bug found by the
gate [0]. Part of the solution led to another patch that removes the
ability to configure anything but sql for keystone's resource backend
(`keystone.conf [resource] driver`). The reasoning behind this is that
there were FK
/1702211
[3] fail tempest run --regex
tempest.api.identity.admin.v3.test_users.UsersV3TestJSON.test_password_history_not_enforced_in_admin_reset
On 08/11/2017 06:26 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks
working on a fix and we've targeted bug 1702211 to
rc2. I'll keep an eye out for the translations patch and make sure that
lands before we cut the next release candidate.
On 08/11/2017 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Lance Bragstad wrote:
>> We rolled out rc1 last night [0], but missed
Help if you actually attach the link you want to send [0].
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1702211
On 08/11/2017 11:26 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Morgan Fainberg
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Felipe
More context on the patch Morgan is working on can be found in the bug
report [0].
[0]
On 08/11/2017 11:26 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Morgan Fainberg
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Felipe Monteiro
>>
We rolled out rc1 last night [0], but missed a couple important
documentation patches and release notes [1]. I'll propose rc2 as soon as
those merge. I've also created a new official bug tag,
pike-backport-potential. Please feel free to use the tag if you're doing
bug triage and find something you
I proposed a patch to remove the deprecation [0].
[0] https://review.openstack.org/492694
On 06/28/2017 09:33 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> Cool - I'm glad this is generating discussion. I personally don't see
> a whole lot of maintenance costs with `keystone-manage
> domain_config_u
Hi all,
Today we had good focus on RC1 bugs. We spent most of the keystone
meeting and all of office hours discussing or reviewing fixes. Full logs
can be found at the bottom of the note [0]. Here's a summary of what we
accomplished:
Bug #1674676 in OpenStack Identity (keystone): "The URL
ote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>> On 08/04/2017 03:45 PM, Kristi Nikolla wrote:
>>> Therefore the call which now returns a 403 in master, returned a 2xx in
>>> Ocata. So we would be fixing something which is broken on master rather
>>> than
gt;>
>> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 03:35:38PM -0400, William M Edmonds wrote:
>>> Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com> wrote on 08/04/2017 02:37:40 PM:
>>>> Properly fixing this would result in a 403 -> 204 status code, which
>>>> requires an AP
*
Hi all,
**
I'd like to formally communicate my desire to continue serving as the
keystone PTL for the upcoming Queen’s release. Despite some turbulence
throughout the Pike development cycle, keystone has managed to make
progress on some long standing issues. Even though the pace of
Keystone had a bug reported [0] recently (that we are targeting to
pike-rc1) that exposes an inconsistency in the API based on
configuration. The happy path is as follows:
- a deployment is configured to store projects (controlled by the
resource backend) and users (controlled by the identity
One of the community goals for Queens is to move all policy into code
and document it [0]. I'd like to make myself available to work with
projects face-to-face if they need help at the PTG. In order to
successfully plan that, we need to have an estimate of how many projects
are interested in
I couldn't agree more with what others have already said. It's been
awesome to see positive things come out of close communication between
deployment projects and other project teams. I look forward to seeing
the pattern and precedence continue!
On 07/31/2017 12:59 PM, Amy Marrich wrote:
> Andy,
A lot of the team is focused on getting pike-rc1 out the door and
reviews. The agenda is also empty. Let's cancel today and pick up next
week or shortly before the PTG to organize our policy sessions there.
Thanks,
Lance
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey all,
Here is a condensed report of what was accomplished during office hours
today. Most activity focused on reviewing fixes in flight. Full log can
be found in IRC [0].
Bug #1635389 in OpenStack Identity (keystone):
"keystone.contrib.ec2.controllers.Ec2Controller is untested"
I was cleaning up a few documentation things for keystone and noticed an
issue with how the configuration reference was rendering. It turns out
the oslo.policy library needed a few tweaks to the show-policy directive
along with some changes to keystone that allowed us to properly render
all
, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've started an etherpad [0] for us to collect topics and ideas for the
> PTG in September. I hope to follow the same planning format as last
> time. Everyone has the opportunity to add topics to the agenda and after
> some time we'll gr
Hey all,
There isn't anything on the agenda for today's policy meeting [0] and I
know several members of the team are wrapping things up for pike-3. As a
result, I'm canceling the policy meeting today and we can reconvene next
week after the dust settles.
Thanks,
Lance
[0]
Hey all,
Nearly all of today's activity in office hours consisted of bug triage.
We now have a list of target bugs for rc1 [0]. Full logs can be found
below [1]. The following is a summary of what was accomplished:
Bug #1669080 in OpenStack Identity (keystone): ""openstack role create"
should
/openstack-dev/2017-July/120012.html
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486223/
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Happy Thursday,
>
> We just released keystoneauth 3.0.0 [0], which contains a bunch of
> built-in functionality to handle ve
rged yet
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486231/
>
>
> Thansk,
> Dims
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com>
> wr
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote:
> On 07/22/2017 07:14 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>
>> After a little head scratching and a Pantera playlist later, we ended up
>> figuring out the main causes. The failures can be found in the gate
-keystonemiddleware-python27-ubuntu-xenial/7c079da/testr_results.html.gz
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/keystoneauth/blob/5715035f42780d8979d458e9f7e3c625962b2749/keystoneauth1/discover.py#L947
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486231/1
On 07/21/2017 04:43 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> The pa
The patch to blacklist version 3.0.0 is working through the moment [0].
We also have a WIP patch proposed to handled the cases exposed by
keystonemiddleware [1].
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486223/
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486231/
On 07/21/2017 03:58 PM, Lance Bragstad
:00 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> I started noticing some trivial changes failing in the
> keystonemiddleware gate [0]. The failures are in tests that use the
> keystoneauth1 library (8 tests are failing by my count), which we
> released a new version of yesterday [1]. I've prop
I started noticing some trivial changes failing in the
keystonemiddleware gate [0]. The failures are in tests that use the
keystoneauth1 library (8 tests are failing by my count), which we
released a new version of yesterday [1]. I've proposed a patch to
blacklist keystoneauth1 3.0.0 from
Happy Thursday,
We just released keystoneauth 3.0.0 [0], which contains a bunch of
built-in functionality to handle version discovery so that you don't
have to! Check out the documentation for all the details [1].
Big thanks to Eric and Monty for tackling this work, along with all the
folks who
On 07/19/2017 09:27 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 12:18 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>> On 18/07/17 10:55, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Would Keystone folks be happy to allow persistent credentials once
>>>> we have a way to
Hi all,
This is a day late, but here is the summary for what we worked on during
office hours yesterday. The full log can be found below [0].
Bug #1689888 in OpenStack Identity (keystone): "/v3/users is
unproportionally slow"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1689888
participants:
68
participants: gagehugo, kaerie
Reproposed patch in review
For what it's worth, I also apparently thought office hours occurred on
the 7th when it was actually on the 11th.
On 07/11/2017 08:35 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> This is a summary of what was worked on today
On 07/18/2017 08:21 AM, Andy McCrae wrote:
>
>
>
> The branches have now been retired, thanks to Joshua Hesketh!
>
>
> Thanks Josh, Andreas, Tony, and the rest of the Infra crew for sorting
> this out.
++ thanks all!
>
> Andy
>
>
>
On 07/17/2017 10:12 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Zane Bitter <zbit...@redhat.com
> <mailto:zbit...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> So the application credentials spec has merged - huge thanks to
> Monty and the Ke
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> So the application credentials spec has merged - huge thanks to Monty and
> the Keystone team for getting this done:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450415/
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/specs/
Hi all,
I wanted to send a friendly reminder that feature freeze for keystone
will be in R-5 [0], which is the end of next week. That leaves just
under 10 business days for feature work (8 considering the time to get
through the gate). Of the specifications we've committed to for Pike,
the
All the patches in the original note have merged for both stable/ocata
and stable/newton. Existing patches to both branches are being recheck
and rebased.
On 07/13/2017 06:04 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> Oh - the original issues with the stable branches were reported here:
>
&
Oh - the original issues with the stable branches were reported here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1704148
On 07/13/2017 06:00 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> Colleen found out today while doing a backport that both of our stable
> branches are broken. After doing some digging, it
Colleen found out today while doing a backport that both of our stable
branches are broken. After doing some digging, it looks like bug 1687593
is the culprit [0]. The fix to that bug merged in master and the author
added some nicely written functional tests using the
keystone-tempest-plugin. The
On 07/12/2017 09:17 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> 2017-07-12 10:35 GMT+09:00 Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com>:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> This is a summary of what was worked on today during office hours. Full logs
>> of the meeting can be found below:
>>
>
Hi all,
I'd like to reach out and get ahead of the curve now that we established
the community goals for Queens. If you have any questions about the
policy-in-code work [0] and how it pertains to your project, please
don't hesitate to ping me in #openstack-dev. Once pike starts winding
down, I'll
On 07/11/2017 09:28 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So this email is relevant to my interests as an operator. =)
Glad to hear it!
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com
> <mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
Hey all,
This is a summary of what was worked on today during office hours. Full
logs of the meeting can be found below:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/office_hours/2017/office_hours.2017-07-11-19.00.log.html
*The future of the templated catalog backend
*
Some issues were uncovered,
#L331
On 07/05/2017 04:28 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com
> <mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Keystone has a script to perform some bootstrapping operations
> [0]. It'
Hey all,
Just a quick reminder that today we will be holding office hours after
the keystone meeting [0]. See you there!
Thanks,
Lance
[0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Keystone_Team_Meeting
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Based on the comments and opinions in the original thread, I think a fix
for this is justified. I wouldn't mind running this by the TC to double
check that nothing has changed from the first time we had to fix this
issue though.
On 07/11/2017 06:03 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Long
Hi all,
Keystone has a script to perform some bootstrapping operations [0]. It's
not really tested and its purpose has been superseded by using the
`keystone-manage bootstrap` command. Based on codesearch, only
openstack/rpm-packaging references the script [1].
Is anyone opposed to the
Hey all,
I've started an etherpad [0] for us to collect topics and ideas for the
PTG in September. I hope to follow the same planning format as last
time. Everyone has the opportunity to add topics to the agenda and after
some time we'll group related topics and start building a formal schedule.
On 06/30/2017 04:38 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Mike Perez wrote:
>> [...]
>> What do people think before we bikeshed on the name? Would having a
>> champion volunteer to each goal to help?
> It feels like most agree that having champions would help. Do we have
> any volunteer for the
Hey all,
Given the empty agenda [0] and the holiday, we will cancel the policy
meeting this week. We'll pick up again next week.
Thanks
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-policy-meeting
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Keystone's stable/newton gate is broken [0] [1]. The TL;DR is that our
keystone_tempest_plugin is validating federated mappings before updating
the protocol [2]. The lack of validation was a bug [3] that was fixed in
Ocata, but the fix [4] was never backported.
Since stable/newton is in Phase II,
t;
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Lance Bragstad
>> <lbrags...@gmail.com <mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Keystone has deprecated the domain configuration upload
>>
On 06/28/2017 03:20 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
>
> On 06/28/2017 02:47 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/28/2017 02:29 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>>> I think everyone would benefit from a read-only role for keystone
>>> out of the box. Can we get this
On 06/28/2017 02:29 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> I think everyone would benefit from a read-only role for keystone out of the
> box. Can we get this into keystone rather then in the various distro's?
Yeah - I think that would be an awesome idea. John Garbutt had some good
work on this earlier in
d, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com
> <mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Keystone has deprecated the domain configuration upload capability
> provided through `keystone-manage`. We discussed it's removal in
Hey all,
I've created a new official tag, 'office-hours' [0]. If you're reviewing
or triaging bugs and come across one that would be a good fit for us to
tackle during office hours, please feel free to tag it. I was
maintaining lists locally, and I'm sure you were, too. This should help
reduce
Hi all,
Keystone has deprecated the domain configuration upload capability
provided through `keystone-manage`. We discussed it's removal in today's
meeting [0] and wanted to send a quick note to the operator list. The
ability to upload a domain config into keystone was done as a stop-gap
until
Hey all,
We recently merged the openstack-manuals admin-guide into keystone [0]
and there is a lot of duplication between the admin-guide and keystone's
"internal" operator-guide [1]. I've started proposing small patches to
consolidate the documentation from the operator-guide to the official
According to the poll results, office hours will be moved to Tuesday
19:00 - 22:00 UTC. We'll officially start tomorrow after the keystone
meeting.
Thanks for putting together and advertising the poll, Harry!
On 06/20/2017 02:30 PM, Harry Rybacki wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> We would like to
On 06/26/2017 08:58 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>> So, should we let teams to host IRC meetings in their own channels?
>
> Yes.
+1
>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I think the silo-ing concern is, at least recently, not relevant on
> two fronts: IRC was never a good
On 06/22/2017 12:57 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> In the community wide goals, we started as a group discussing goals at
> the OpenStack Forum. Then we brought those ideas to the mailing list
> to continue the discussion and include those that were not able to be
> at the forum. The
On 06/21/2017 11:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 6/21/2017 11:17 AM, Shamail Tahir wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez
>> > wrote:
>>
>> Shamail Tahir wrote:
>> > In the past, governance has helped (on
Domain support hasn't really been adopted across various OpenStack
projects, yet. Ocata was the first release where we had a v3-only
jenkins job set up for projects to run against (domains are a v3-only
concept in keystone and don't really exist in v2.0).
I think it would be great to push on some
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Morgan Fainberg
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> > Hi stackers,
> >
> > Intro
> >
> > Initially Rally was targeted for developers which means running it from
> > admin was OK.
> >
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2017-06-08 16:10:00 -0500:
> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 8,
201 - 300 of 496 matches
Mail list logo