Hi Paul,
On 06/14/16 10:27, Paul Michali wrote:
Certainly the ciphers and hashes could be enhanced for VPNaaS. This would
require converting the user selections into options for the underlying
device driver, modifying the neutron client (OSC) to allow entry of the new
selections, updating unit tests, and likely adding some validators to
reject these options on drivers that may not support them (e.g. if OpenSwan
doesn't support an option, you'll want to reject it).
I made some changes and got this working quiet quickly, would need some
polish.
There is not an active VPNaaS team any more, so, if this is something that
you'd like to see, you'll need to provide some sweat equity to make it
happen. There are still some people that can core review changes, but don't
expect much community support for VPNaaS at this time. In fact, I think the
plan is to archive/mothball/whatever VPNaaS in a few months (it's on double
secret probation :)), if there is no-one actively supporting it (I'll leave
to the PTL to define what "support" means - not sure what the
qualifications will be to maintain this project).
So I'm curious, does anybody actually use VPNaaS for anything ?
Thanks
Mark
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
