is and
the API is inconsistent in that regard, I might have some other hurdles
there but would at least like to get a POC going.
I guess I can do the POC before the question of blueprints/specs needs
to be answered...
[1] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1327406
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107552/21
On 8 August 2014 15:42, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This came up while reviewing the fix for bug 1327406 [1]. Basically
the os-networks API behaves differently depending on your backing
/listinfo/openstack-dev
Just thinking out loud, you could do something like a 2/3 majority vote
on the issue but that sounds too much like government, which is
generally terrible.
Otherwise maybe the PTL is the tie-breaker?
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
up with ways to
improve coordination.
Having mid-cycle meetups where only a subset of cores will attend doesn't
feel like an great way to improve the coordination between /all/ cores.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev
in logstash for some reason, which is odd.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1357652
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 8/17/2014 3:36 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
2014-08-17 22:25 GMT+02:00 Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
The other thing I thought was we could cap the version of
python-keystoneclient in stable/havana, would that be bad? stable/havana is
going to be end of life pretty soon anyway
flags being used aren't
defined in fakelibvirt:
https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/26504d71ceaecf22f135d8321769db801290c405
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org
since
it's kind of useless now anyway, right?
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Yeah:
https://review.openstack.org/#/projects/openstack/nova,dashboards/important-changes:review-inbox-dashboard
--
Thanks,
Matt
://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1357437
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 8/21/2014 11:37 AM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014, at 09:25 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 8/21/2014 10:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:14:33AM -0400, Solly Ross wrote:
(reply inline)
- Original Message -
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra
On 8/21/2014 12:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:23:12PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 8/21/2014 11:37 AM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014, at 09:25 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 8/21/2014 10:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014
, it
doesn't scale.
Maybe next time something like this comes up we get the PTLs to be the
ones assigning a person (Clark's Infra Czar?!?!) responsible for
coordinating these types of changes so they are ready.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev
] http://54.201.139.117/nova-bugs.html
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
in the elastic-recheck status
page now:
http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
generate_sample provides).
I think the docs team is also interested in seeing this happen...
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
] into a
released version of the library.
9/4 and feature freeze seems like a decent target date.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92390/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org
of oslo.db(Roman Podoliaka and Victor Sergeyev) are OK
with this.
Joe Gordon and Matt Riedemann are already signing up, so we need one
more vote from Core developer.
By the way a lot of core projects are using already oslo.db for a
while: keystone, cinder, glance, ceilometer, ironic, heat, neutron
list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
.
But as noted, there is also a feeling right now of focusing on Juno to
get that out the door before anyone starts getting distracted with
reviewing Kilo specs. And I suppose once Juno is finished no one is
going to want to talk about Kilo for awhile due to burnout.
--
Thanks,
Matt
still be the
default in the Tempest gate runs right?
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
and not a message?
Maybe I should just shut-up and email the openstack-i18n mailing list [2].
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118535/
[2] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack
On 8/29/2014 1:53 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 7/29/2014 4:12 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Nader Lahouti nader.laho...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Kyle,
I have a BP listed in
https
.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Thanks, that might be what's causing this timeout/gate failure in the
nova unit tests. [1]
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1357578
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
I think we're in dependency freeze or quickly approaching. What are the
plans from the Cinder team for doing a python-cinderclient release to
pick up any final features before Juno rc1?
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Yeah the IBM DB2 third party CI is run from a team in China and they've
been blocked for a few weeks now.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
/
[6]
https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.txt#L108
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
pinging a few projects
to do a final client release relatively soon. python-neutronclient has
a release this week and I think John was planning a python-cinderclient
release this week also.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 9/10/2014 11:08 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 9/9/2014 4:19 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
As we try to stabilize OpenStack Juno, many server projects need to get
out final client releases that expose new features
? Are there plans to remove that?
I don't really care either way, but need to know for code reviews.
One example: [1]
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108942/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
by top offenders as we have today?
There are times when the top bugs are infra issues (pip timeouts for
exapmle) so you have to scroll a ways before finding something for your
project (nova isn't the only one).
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
On 9/15/2014 12:57 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 9/10/2014 11:08 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 9/9/2014 4:19 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
As we try to stabilize OpenStack Juno, many server projects need to get
out
how much of a factor that would have here.
Is there anything else unique about those jobs from the MySQL ones?
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
On 9/18/2014 5:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/17/2014 11:50 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014, at 06:48 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014, at 06:37 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 9/17/2014 7:59 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
On 09/18/2014 09:49 AM, Clark Boylan wrote:
Recent
workers equal to number of CPUs / 2) and so far so good.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
reviews that I've already +2'ed).
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1357055
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 9/21/2014 7:56 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 9/10/2014 3:33 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 09/10/2014 02:13 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
As it stands, it seems that waiting for the RPC call to time out
blocks _report_state() from running again in report_interval seconds,
which delays
/DeprecationPlan
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
/compute/flavors.py#L57
(3:12:18 PM) mriedem: would think you could do the same for extra specs
I don't see any specific rules for extra_specs in the API docs or
validation happening in the code.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
in the works.
Here is a big one:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/compute-manager-objects
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
auditing formats like in
ceilometer which might be related to what you're looking for.
[1]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-October/016385.html
[2]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/support-standard-audit-formats
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/019931.html
[3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ElasticRecheck
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
-incubator git repository first. From there you sync the fix into
nova and cinder.
Peter,
FYI: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Syncing_Code_from_Incubator
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
/drivers.rst
I'm also not sure where the cinder team is with 3rd party CI
requiements, but you'll want to at least read this also:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-July/012557.html
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
/master/nova/network/manager.py#L399
[4]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/rpc-major-version-updates-icehouse
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
to make assumptions about what everyone
thinks here.
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/db2-database
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55572/
[3]
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/db/sqlalchemy/migrate_repo/versions/160_havana.py#L1335
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
The question came up in this patch [1], how do we deprecate and remove
keys in the notification payload? In this case I need to deprecate and
replace the 'instance_type' key with 'flavor' per the associated blueprint.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62430/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
On 12/18/2013 9:42 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
The question came up in this patch [1], how do we deprecate and remove
keys in the notification payload? In this case I need to deprecate and
replace the 'instance_type' key with 'flavor' per the associated blueprint.
[1] https
the FK, then the pre-req is to make
the target column non-nullable. Think of the instances.uuid column in
nova for example.
Unless anyone has a strong objection to this, I'll update the review
checklist wiki with these items.
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReviewChecklist
--
Thanks,
Matt
:27 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I've seen this come up a few times in reviews and was thinking we
should put something in the general review checklist wiki for it [1].
Basically I have three things I'd like to have in the list
On 12/18/2013 2:11 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 12:27:49 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev
within nova that this is the right way
to go before Gary spends a bunch of time on it - and I as the bp
sponsor spend a bunch of time reviewing it. :)
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova_VM_Diagnostics
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack
development on
the nova baremetal driver I'd hold off on implementing get_diagnostics
there for now.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
here also to say 'in IRC' to nix any
confusion about the mailing list.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReviewChecklist#Notes_for_Non-Core_Developers
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
.html
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GitCommitMessages#Including_external_references
Here is an example of a patch going through the gate now with UpgradeImpact:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62815/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev
as I can tell.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64725/4/
[2]
https://ssl.rcbops.com/turbo_hipster/logviewer/?q=/turbo_hipster/results/64/64725/4/check/gate-real-db-upgrade_nova_mysql_user_001/5186e53/user_001.log
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
which will be
synced to nova later.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65151/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
\-]+/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 1/7/2014 5:26 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 01/07/2014 06:20 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 1/2/2014 8:29 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
A lot of elastic recheck this fall has been based on the ad hoc needs of
the moment, in between diving down into the race bugs that were
uncovered by it. This week
schema
instead, but we have to learn more about how it works first.
I apologise for this mis-vote.
Michael
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 12/30/2013 6:21 AM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
The purpose of this email to is apologise for some incorrect
this or has something to add, I'll update the wiki.
[1]
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HypervisorSupportMatrix/DeprecationPlan#Specific_Requirements
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
On 1/8/2014 12:40 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 7:12 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I'd like to propose that we add another item to the list here [1]
that is basically related to what happens when the 3rd party CI job
votes
to post anything you're interested in
discussing.
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-icehouse-mid-cycle-meetup-items
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin
,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Nice work, this is great to see. Congratulations to the whole team
that worked on making this happen!
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
the scoring works with zuul? The problem I'm having is figuring out
why it failed. I looked at the compute logs but didn't find any errors.
Can someone help me figure out what went wrong here?
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69047/1
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
Seeing a few patches where vmware minesweeper is saying the build
failed, but looks like an infra issue? An example:
http://208.91.1.172/logs/nova/69046/1/console.txt
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
to Sean to provide a more executive-level summary if
one is needed. :)
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
/1258620
There are patches up for the two bugs, but they need some work.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On Monday, January 27, 2014 7:17:27 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On 25 Jan 2014, at 16:51 , Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 1/24/2014 3:41 PM, Peter Pouliot wrote:
Hello OpenStack Community,
I am excited at this opportunity to make the community aware that the
Hyper
,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Not to mention no api-ref docs for os-instance_usage_audit_log.
best,
Joe
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/43822/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
in the room was for doing the same thing again during
the Juno cycle. Dates and location TBD.
+1
Thanks,
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
On 2/18/2014 1:12 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 02/18/2014 12:36 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
4) We talked about Nova's integration with Neutron and made some good
progress. We came up with a blueprint (ideally for Icehouse) to improve
Nova-Neutron interaction.
There are two cases we need
it for
that driver?
[1]
http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-compute/2/content/PUT_os-hosts-v2_updateHost_v2__tenant_id__os-hosts__host_name__ext-os-hosts.html
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
with nova, e.g. bnemec or dims.
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReviewChecklist#Oslo_Syncing_Checklist
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73340/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 2/19/2014 4:05 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
The os-hosts OS API extension [1] showed up before I was working on the
project and I see that only the VMware and XenAPI drivers implement it,
but was wondering why the libvirt driver doesn't - either no one wants
it, or there is some technical
://review.openstack.org/#/c/43822/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
driver. I'm not aware of
anything in Tempest that allows automatically detecting virt
driver-specific APIs that we can test, like get_diagnostics.
XenServer CI and MineSweeper could run against these in Tempest
otherwise, we just don't have tests defined.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
FYI there is a bug for it too:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1283270
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
perspective, not internal
implementation).
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
forever?
--Dan
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 2/12/2014 1:57 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:32:39AM -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 1/17/2014 8:34 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:32:19AM -0500, David Kranz wrote:
On 01/16/2014 10:56 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
Hi everyone,
With some
On 2/25/2014 7:46 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 2/12/2014 1:57 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:32:39AM -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 1/17/2014 8:34 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:32:19AM -0500, David Kranz wrote:
On 01/16/2014 10:56 PM
/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
=21fcdad0f485437d010e5743626c63ab3acdaec5
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
trying to figure out why that's failing in devstack-gate-cleanup-host
though so any help there is appreciated. I'm assuming we missed
something in the job setup [2].
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77669/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77679/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
multiple releases.
Having said that, I'm not signing up for sponsoring this, sorry. :)
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
have tested that the changes in (2) and (3) work
when lazy translation is not enabled. Thus if a problem is found, the
two line change in (4) could be removed to get to the previous behavior.
I've been talking to Matt Riedemann and Dan Berrange about this.
Matt has agreed to be a sponsor
On 3/6/2014 8:08 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 3/6/2014 3:46 PM, James Carey wrote:
Please consider a FFE for i18n Message improvements:
BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/i18n-messages
The base enablement for lazy translation has already been sync'd
from oslo
with respect to
message translation. I have tested that the changes in (2) and (3) work
when lazy translation is not enabled. Thus if a problem is found, the two
line change in (4) could be removed to get to the previous behavior.
I've been talking to Matt Riedemann and Dan Berrange about this. Matt
1 - 100 of 2269 matches
Mail list logo
