On 09/04/2014 04:17 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Announcing Gertty 1.0.0
Gertty is a console-based interface to the Gerrit Code Review system.
If that doesn't sound interesting to you, then just skip right on to
the next message. This mailing list gets a lot of traffic, and it's
going to take
On 09/05/2014 06:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
While reviewing this zookeeper service group fix in Nova -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102639/ it was exposed that the
zookeeper tests aren't running in infra.
The crux of the issue is that zookeeper python modules are C extensions.
So you have to
Hi!
I've decided that as I have problems with OpenStack while using it in
the service of Infra, I'm going to just start spamming the list.
Please make something like this:
neutron security-group-create default --allow-every-damn-thing
Right now, to make security groups get the hell out of
Hey all!
A few of quick notes about PyPI mirrors and the gate.
Firstly - today we just rolled out per-cloud-region mirrors. Hopefully
this eliminate issues we have from time to time with connections to PyPI
timing out. We have a selector script running on node creation, so nodes
in, say,
On 09/03/2014 08:37 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
As you all know, there has recently been several very active discussions
around how to improve assorted aspects of our development process. One idea
that was brought up is to come up with a list of cycle goals/project
priorities for Kilo [0].
To that
On 09/08/2014 11:59 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Hi all,
I just wanted to get some feedback on a change that I think will make the docs
building process more understood,
Currently there is a script @
On 09/05/2014 07:21 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 09/05/2014 06:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
While reviewing this zookeeper service group fix in Nova -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102639/ it was exposed that the
zookeeper tests aren't running in infra.
The crux of the issue is that zookeeper
On 09/08/2014 04:11 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
Hi TripleO community,
I would be really interested by helping to bring Puppet elements support
in TripleO.
So far I've seen this work:
https://github.com/agroup/tripleo-puppet-elements/tree/puppet_dev_heat
which is a very good bootstrap but really
On 09/04/2014 01:30 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-04 00:08:47 -0700:
Greetings,
Last Tuesday the TC held the first graduation review for Zaqar. During
the meeting some concerns arose. I've listed those concerns below with
some comments hoping that it
On 09/09/2014 07:04 PM, Samuel Merritt wrote:
On 9/9/14, 4:47 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Samuel Merritt s...@swiftstack.com
wrote:
On 9/9/14, 12:03 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
[snip]
So which is it? Because it sounds like to me it's a thing that actually
On 09/10/2014 10:29 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 09/05/2014 12:36 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
How can the average deployer know whether a stackforge is
a. An early prototype which has completed (such as some of the
early LBaaS packages)
b. A project which has lost its initial steam and
On 09/17/2014 04:42 PM, Rochelle.RochelleGrober wrote:
TL;DR: I consider the poor state of log consistency a major
impediment for more widespread adoption of OpenStack and would like
to volunteer to own this cross-functional process to begin to unify
and standardize logging messages and
On 09/17/2014 03:09 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Earlier today we discovered a problem with the way pbr is generating
dev version numbers for commits following tags using alpha
pre-version suffixes [1]. Basically what’s happening is a commit
following a tag like 1.3.0.0a3 is coming out as a
Hey all,
I've recently been thinking a lot about Sean's Layers stuff. So I wrote
a blog post which Jim Blair and Devananda were kind enough to help me edit.
http://inaugust.com/post/108
Enjoy.
Monty
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 09/17/2014 08:48 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
On Sep 17, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Jay Faulkner j...@jvf.cc wrote:
Comments inline.
-Original Message-
From: Monty Taylor [mailto:mord...@inaugust.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 7:34 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 09/17/2014 10:44 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 September 2014 19:37
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Expand resource name allowed
characters
Had to laugh about the PILE OF POO
Hey,
Not to name names, but some of our client libs do this:
client.Client(API_VERSION, os_username, ... )
I'm pretty sure they got the idea from python-glanceclient, so I blame
Brian Waldon, since he left us for CoreOS.
PLEASE STOP DOING THIS - IT CAUSES BABIES TO CRY. MORE.
As a
except exc.Unauthorized:
raise exc.CommandError(Invalid OpenStack credentials.)
except exc.AuthorizationFailure:
raise exc.CommandError(Unable to authorize user)
This is pervasive enough that both of those exceptions come from
openstack.common.
Anyone?
On 09/19/2014 03:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
I've recently been thinking a lot about Sean's Layers stuff. So I wrote
a blog post which Jim Blair and Devananda were kind enough to help me edit.
http://inaugust.com/post/108
Hey Monty,
As you can imagine, I read
On 09/19/2014 10:14 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
On Sep 19, 2014, at 5:46 AM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Thierry Carrez
thie...@openstack.org wrote: Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Great writeup. I think there are some great concrete
On 09/19/2014 10:50 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:14 AM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
On Sep 19, 2014, at 5:46 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Vishvananda
NO when necessary for
the sake of the entire project. Jeez, now I'm sounding all enterprisey.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
except exc.Unauthorized:
raise exc.CommandError(Invalid OpenStack credentials.)
except
On 09/19/2014 03:42 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 19/09/14 14:34, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-19 02:37:08 -0700:
On 09/18/2014 11:51 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 18/09/2014 7:11 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/22/2014 08:58 AM, Matthew Booth wrote:
If you missed the inaugural OpenStack Bootstrapping Hour, it's here:
http://youtu.be/jCWtLoSEfmw . I think this is a fantastic idea and big
thanks to Sean, Jay and Dan for doing this. I liked the format, the
informal style and the content.
On 09/21/2014 10:57 PM, Nader Lahouti wrote:
Thanks Kevin for bring it up in the ML, I was looking for a guideline or
any document to clarify issues on this subject.
I was told, even using keystone API in neutron is not permitted.
I recognize that I'm potentially without context for neutron
On 09/22/2014 10:58 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 10:32 -0700, Armando M. wrote:
What about:
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/test-requirements.txt#L12
Pulling in ordereddict doesn't do anything if your code doesn't use it
when OrderedDict isn't in
On 12/11/2013 03:51 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 12/10/2013 05:57 PM, Paul McMillan wrote:
+1 on Tatiana Mazur, she's been doing a bunch of good work lately.
I'm fine with me being removed from core provided you have someone else
qualified to address security issues as they come up. My
On 12/12/2013 04:49 PM, Ilya Shakhat wrote:
Hello everyone!
Stackalytics team is happy to announce the release of version 0.4. This
release is completely dedicated to different types of reports. We added
highly demanded top reviewers chart acknowledged as an essential tool
for finding
On 01/02/2014 12:48 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Hey all!
This morning, we experienced our first systemic breakage of the gate of
2014! There are a few reasons for this, which are related to pip and
virtualenv making new releases. The new releases do WONDERFUL things and
are more secure
On 01/03/2014 03:10 AM, Maxime Vidori wrote:
Someone said Grunt?
Actually - funny story - we're currently working through some use of
grunt and friends for storyboard, and as a result of that I've been
learning about how it all hangs together. From what I can tell, I think
the path to directly
On 01/11/2014 09:56 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
As someone that's done a decent amount of hacking on
status.html/status.js, I think we're getting to a level of complexity on
our JS status pages that we should probably stop doing this all inline
(probably should have stopped a while ago).
I'd like to
On 01/13/2014 05:05 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 01/12/2014 09:56 PM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
If all you're looking for is a javascript-based in-browser templating
system, then handlebars is a fine choice. I'm not certain on how complex
status.html/status.js is, however if you expect it to grow
On 01/15/2014 07:59 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
Some months back, there was discussion to move Ironic to use Alembic
instead of SqlAlchemy. At that time, I was much more interested in
getting the framework together than I was in restructuring our database
migrations, and what we
On 01/03/2014 09:46 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
Occasionally it becomes clear that a part of the project infrastructure
has its own community interested in it. Such is the case with
devstack-gate, which is the nexus of infra and openstack. Not only does
it interact with infrastructure systems
On 01/24/2014 05:32 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
Solum Core Reviewers,
I propose the following changes to solum-core:
+asalkeld
+noorul
-mordred
Thanks very much to mordred for helping me to bootstrap the reviewer team.
Please reply with your votes.
+1
My pleasure - you guys seem like you're
On 02/03/2014 11:45 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if this has been already discussed (traffic is high in this list).
I've just checked, and our global-requirements.txt still has:
WebOb=1.2.3,1.3
Problem: both Sid and Trusty have version 1.3.
What package is holding the newer version of
On 02/02/2014 08:33 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 07:13 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
Just noticed this at the end of a successful run:
http://logs.openstack.org/15/63215/13/check/check-tempest-dsvm-full/2636cae/console.html#_2014-02-02_12_02_44_422
It looks like the merge of
On 01/29/2014 11:10 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On Monday, January 27, 2014 7:17:27 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On 25 Jan 2014, at 16:51 , Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On 1/24/2014 3:41 PM, Peter Pouliot wrote:
Hello OpenStack Community,
I am excited at this
On 02/05/2014 10:38 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/06/2014 06:31 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 02/05/2014 02:31 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
In the TC we have been going through
On 01/27/2014 11:02 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: 24 January 2014 21:09
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] bp proposal: discovery of peer instances
through metadata service
Excerpts from Justin Santa
Hey all!
There are a bunch of patches adding:
[wheel]
universal = 1
to setup.cfg:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:wheel-publish,n,z
I wanted to follow up on what the deal is with them, and what I think we
should do about them.
universal means that a wheel can be made
I'd like to say I think this is excellent. Not that things broke ... But that
a) we're consuming from infra but not dying and b) we're producing a vector of
feedback on OpenStack that we did not have as a community before.
On Feb 25, 2014 1:08 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
Hey all!
You may or may not have noticed that there's been a backlog with new
project creation in infra. There are some specific issues with our
automation that are causing this, and we've got a plan in place to fix
them. Until we do, which is targeted to be done by the end of March,
we're
Sorry for the top post. I was asked to look at this thread and toss in
my €0.02 but I do not believe I could possibly read this whole thread -
I'm too jet lagged. So...
As a current large-scale production consumer of the API, I don't care at
all as long as python-novaclient keeps working at
On 03/12/2014 05:00 AM, Adam Nelson wrote:
I see that horizon doesn't use Travis CI
Is that a political decision?
No. It's a technical one. I'm not sure if you know, but OpenStack runs a
pretty massive and amazing CI system.
If not, would there be resistance to adding a minimal
I agree.
Solly - in addition to potentially 'adopting' noVNC - or as a parallel
train of thought ...
As we started working on storyboard in infra, we've started using the
bower tool for html/javascript packaging - and we have some ability to
cache the output of that pretty easily. Would you
Will do!
On Mar 13, 2014 10:13 AM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote:
@Monty: having a packaging system sounds like a good idea. Send us a pull
request on github.com/kanaka/noVNC.
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original Message -
From: Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
On 03/18/2014 04:25 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
If you set 'version' in setup.cfg, pbr's behaviour will not change at all.
If you do not set 'version' in setup.cfg then:
- for tagged commits, pbr's behaviour will not change at all.
- for untagged commits, pbr will
Ianal, but I know there are some lawyers out there who are concerned that the
mechanism of attachment is vague. If there is an issue (I'm not saying there
is) I don't think mongodb's view is relevant, as they are quite likely to be
bought by someone, say Oracle, who might not share and would
On 03/20/2014 01:30 AM, Radcliffe, Mark wrote:
The problem with AGPL is that the scope is very uncertain and the
determination of the consequences are very fact intensive. I was the
chair of the User Committee in developing the GPLv3 and I am therefor
quite familiar with the legal issues. The
On 03/20/2014 05:31 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:54 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo majop...@redhat.com
mailto:majop...@redhat.com wrote:
An advance on the changes that it's requiring to have a
py-c++ compiled rootwrap as a
On 03/20/2014 07:40 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
I'd also like to thank the team and the overall community. The team
for its hard work during the last cycle and the community for being there
and providing such important feedback in this process.
+1, thanks again everyone for participating in the
On 03/24/2014 10:07 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 03/24/2014 12:34 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
So recently we started this experiment with the compute and qa programs
to try using Gerrit to review blueprints. Launchpad is deficient in
this area, and while we hope Storyboard will deal with it
I agree - it's not a viral license, and we're not shipping it anyway.
I'm going to go back to the original thing:
Recently we have been discussing the topic of Javascript linters for
Horizon and Tuskar-UI with Radomir, and he told me that JSLint and
JSHint can not be integrated into the test
On 04/02/2014 11:05 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
On 04/02/2014 07:36 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote:
On my phone so I can't follow this up more now, but it looks like
JSHint is already used.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41087/
That commit has since been reverted and JSHint removed from
All hail the Mooball release.
Now we just have to find a city that's in a state or country with a
placename of Mooball - that shouldn't be too hard ...
On 04/02/2014 08:20 PM, Qiming Teng wrote:
Let's vote for the K, L, M release names now. :)
Thanks, Steve.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at
Hey all!
Currently, nodepool does not work against the two TripleO clouds (well,
I'm trying against the grizzly POC cloud first) So far, the problems
have been combinations of bugs/assumptions in nodepool, along with at
least one actual config issue in the TripleO cloud.
I thought I'd share info
/2013 02:27 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Hey all!
Currently, nodepool does not work against the two TripleO clouds (well,
I'm trying against the grizzly POC cloud first) So far, the problems
have been combinations of bugs/assumptions in nodepool, along with at
least one actual config issue
On 10/14/2013 09:39 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
That is, we're now deploying a trunk KVM based OpenStack using heat +
nova baremetal on a continuous basis into the test rack we have *and*
there are users setup on it for any TripleO ATC that want's an
account, and networking is setup: you can
On 10/15/2013 08:36 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:54 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different
sides. This is a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple
further and extend our circle of trust.
When
On 10/16/2013 07:40 AM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote:
All,
There was a plan to use pypi's 'ordereddict' in Icehouse, to
replace how we're currently providing that functionality.
However, there are no ordereddict packages for Debian/Ubuntu
and there are no plans to provide them. (See
On 10/17/2013 08:57 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Robert for this quick reply.
On 10/17/2013 07:31 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Hey Thomas, this is good information to know about.
It seems like all these issues could be bug reports?
My intention was to first warn the list, as it
On 10/19/2013 04:52 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2013-10-18 23:01:50 -0700:
Hi there,
TroveClient just got rejected by Debian FTP masters. Reply from Luke
Faraone is below.
In general, I would strongly advise that a clean COPYRIGHT-HOLDER file
is
On 10/19/2013 05:49 AM, Michael Still wrote:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
I suggest that we just put Copyright headers back in the source files.
That will make Debian's licensecheck work fairly automatically. A single
file that tries to do exactly
On 10/19/2013 08:29 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/19/2013 08:22 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 10/19/2013 04:52 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2013-10-18 23:01:50 -0700:
Hi there,
TroveClient just got rejected by Debian FTP masters. Reply from Luke
Faraone
On 10/21/2013 10:44 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Mark McLoughlin's message of 2013-10-21 13:45:21 -0700:
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 10:28 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-10-20 02:25:43 -0700:
On 20 October 2013 02:35, Monty Taylor mord
On 10/23/2013 03:03 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
OpenStack,
OpenStack has emerged as the preferred choice for open cloud software
worldwide. We use it to power our cloud, and we love it. We’re proud to
be a part of growing its capabilities to address more needs every
day. When we ask customers,
On 10/24/2013 08:38 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
Since the beginning of OpenStack we have had vim modelines all over the
codebase, but after seeing this
patch https://review.opeenstack.org/#/c/50891/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50891/ I took a further look into vim
modelines and think we
On 10/24/2013 05:19 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
Because I am a grumpy old man I have just -2'ed
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39685/ and I wanted to explain my
rationale. Mostly I am hoping for a consensus to form -- if I am
On 10/25/2013 09:22 AM, Dmitry Mescheryakov wrote:
Hello Travis,
We didn't researched Savanna on bare metal, though we considered it some
time ago. I know little of bare metal provisioning, so I am rather
unsure what problems you might experience.
My main concern are images: does bare
Hey all!
We're adding a little bit of code to pbr to make the auto-generated
ChangeLog files a bit more useful. Currently, they are just the git
changelog, which is kinda useless. So we wrote this:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52367/
which produces output like this:
On 10/26/2013 04:38 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
So nova has a massive .mailmap that maps multiple addresses for one
person together. I'm wondering if a) it's still needed, and b) if it
is, should we push it into all the repositories - e.g. have a single
global copy and an automated job to push
On 10/30/2013 10:42 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
So, recently we've had quite a long thread in gerrit regarding locking
in Heat:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49440/
In the patch, there are two distributed lock drivers. One uses SQL,
and suffers from all the problems you might imagine a
-requirements.t
xt#L29
https://kazoo.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
-Josh
On 10/31/13 7:43 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 10/30/2013 10:42 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
So, recently we've had quite a long thread in gerrit regarding locking
in Heat:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49440
options. It's entirely possible I misread the conversation of
course...
On 10/31/13 10:17 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Sigh.
Yay We've added more competing methods of complexity!!!
Seriously. We now think that rabbit and zookeeper and mysql are ALL
needed?
Joshua Harlow
On 10/31/2013 04:06 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
Hi all,
It saddens me to say that for a mix of reasons I have decided to
abdicate my position as PTL for Horizon. If anything, the reasons are
all good ones overall, I just have to make the right decision for
both myself and the project.
In
On 10/31/2013 04:15 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote:
On 10/31/2013 07:05 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
[...]
If we want to grow the committer base and help people to become
better reviewers, taking the time to
On 10/31/2013 04:38 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
Ironic has reached a point where it is capable of being added to
integration tests and the gate pipeline. Does that mean we /should/ add
it? I think so, and I'd like to know what others think, but let me be
more specific about
On 11/12/2013 02:33 PM, David Kranz wrote:
On 11/12/2013 01:36 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-11-12 10:01:06 -0800:
During the freeze phase of Havana we got a ton of new contributors
coming on board to Tempest, which was super cool. However it meant we
had
are going to use.
Monty Taylor said the following in one of the comments for review [1]:
Setting a version here enrolls solum in managing its version in a
pre-release versioning manner, such that non-tagged versions will
indicated that they are leading up to 0.0.1. If that's the model solum
On 11/13/2013 08:08 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 14 November 2013 13:59, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
This is an area where we actually have consensus in our docs (have had
for a while), the reviewer was being consistent with them, and it feels
like you are reopening that for personal
On 11/01/2013 02:21 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
- Original Message -
I was blindly assuming we want to pull in eventlet support, with the
implicit understanding that we will be doing some form of timeslicing and
async io bound waiting in the API... but would like to hear others
On 11/15/2013 12:24 PM, Bartosz Górski wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Each of the two engines will be able to create resources in both regions.
We do not need to add anything in the heat client.
Right now when you want to create a new stack (using heat client or
directly API) you need to provide:
-
On 11/15/2013 04:13 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Le 14/11/2013 20:46, Clint Byrum a écrit :
Now, choose which city will grow faster and produce more innovation.
The problem is larger than only innovation, it is also making sure the
Stackforge projects are also a starting point for
On 11/14/2013 02:46 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2013-11-14 05:12:55 -0800:
Hi everyone,
I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the
openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and
November well on its way to pass
On 11/14/2013 07:54 PM, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
On 11/14/2013 5:12 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the
openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and
November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of
On 11/15/2013 05:06 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Wow, lots of different opinions! let's try to summarize:
Arguments in favor of splitting openstack-dev / stackforge-dev
* People can easily filter out all non-openstack discussions
* Traffic would drop by about 25%
* Removes confusion as to
On 11/15/2013 12:08 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Adrian Otto wrote:
If OpenStack starts a culture of exclusion instead of inclusion, that would
start a dangerous trend that sets the wrong tone. It would quickly reach the
point where new projects like mine would simply not come here. We would
On 11/13/2013 10:49 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
[...] Proposed Incubation requirements
Once something becomes an
integrated
On 11/17/2013 08:46 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
The gating for the stable version is broken when the running the neutron
gate. Locally this works but the gate has problem. All of the services
are up and running correctly. There are some exceptions with the
ceilometer service but that is not
On 11/16/2013 11:26 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
I think responding to this is worth breaking my vacation email embargo.
Although I seem to remember a certain PTL whose vacation we waited for the
last time we did core proposals...
I think we need to put post summit vacation week on ttx's
On 11/17/2013 03:56 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Given that sqla-migration is now in stackforge, it would be a really
good idea to go down the path that wsme and pecan are going and run a
devstack job to make sure they don't break the rest of OpenStack. It
will definitely help on feeling confident
On 11/18/2013 02:28 PM, Stuart Fox wrote:
Hey all
Not having been at the summit (maybe the next one), could somebody give a
really short explanation as to why it needs to be a separate service?
It sounds like it should fit within the Nova area. It is, after all, just
another hypervisor
On 11/21/2013 01:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Mark Washenberger wrote:
[...]
In order to mitigate that risk, I think it would make a lot of sense to
have a place to stage and carefully consider all the breaking changes we
want to make. I also would like to have that place be somewhere in
On 11/22/2013 06:55 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 22 November 2013 22:31, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert
On 11/22/2013 09:57 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I don't understand why branches would be needed here *if* the breaking
changes don't impact any
On 11/22/2013 11:34 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
I have updated the language pack (name subject to change) blueprint
with the outcomes from the face2face meetings, and drafted a
specification that captures the discussion so far. The spec is
centered around the core idea of transitioning base
On 11/20/2013 07:04 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
I know it was brought up on the list a number of times, but...
If we're talking about storing commit ids for each module and writing
some shell scripts for that, isn't it a chance to reconsider using git
submodules?
No. They're too complex.
On 11/22/2013 01:02 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:02:02PM +0100, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:33:22PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
On 20 November 2013 08:02, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
Currently the Nova libvirt driver is
On 11/18/2013 09:26 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/18/2013 09:10 PM, Stuart Fox wrote:
Hey *
Does ironic fall under the Compute banner? If so, the statement needs a
little tweek.
No.
On 2013-11-18 5:55 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
[1]
1 - 100 of 787 matches
Mail list logo
