Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:47:15AM +0100, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Friday, 2 December 2016 14:42:31 CET Matt Riedemann wrote: > > But like we recently talked about the stable team meetings, we don't > > really need to be in a separate -alt room for those when we have the > > channel and anyone

[openstack-dev] [infra][diskimage-builder] containers, Containers, CONTAINERS!

Did my click bait work? :) So, over the holiday break I had some time to hack on diskimage-builder and create a new (container) element. I opted to call it ubuntu-rootfs. The basic idea, is the most minimal debootstrap chroot for ubuntu. Everything in, we can get a 42MB tarball of

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][diskimage-builder] containers, Containers, CONTAINERS!

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 09:48:31AM +0100, Andre Florath wrote: > Hello Paul, > > thank you very much for your contribution - it is very appreciated. > > You addressed a topic with your patch set that was IMHO not in a wide > focus: generating images for containers. The ideas in the patches are

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:17:42AM -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Kurilin > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: December 21, 2016 at 10:13:09 > To: 

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:53:35PM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:35 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > > > > > > On 21 Mar 2017, at 15:34, Alex Schultz wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:45 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > >>> I've been following

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 08:24:52AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:53:35PM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:35 PM, John Dicki

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] initial discussion for a new periodic pipeline

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:40:39PM -0400, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] container jobs are unstable

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 03:08:57PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:07:24PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:56:59AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@red

Re: [openstack-dev] ARA - Ansible Run Analysis: Would you like to help ?

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:42:34PM -0400, David Moreau Simard wrote: > Hi openstack-dev, > > There's this project I'm passionate that I want to tell you about: ARA [1]. > So, what's ARA ? > > ARA is an Ansible callback plugin that you can set up anywhere you run > Ansible today. > The next time

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] container jobs are unstable

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:56:59AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > > On 23/03/17 16:24 +0100, Martin André wrote: > > >> > > >> On Wed, Mar

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] container jobs are unstable

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:07:24PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:56:59AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Flavio Per

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] initial discussion for a new periodic pipeline

4 hours, priority shouldn't matter as you are the only jobs running on tripleo-test-cloud-rh2, resulting in faster promotions. This also make sense, as packaging is done in RDO, and you are triggering Centos CI things as a result. > Thanks > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Paul Belanger <

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:23:09AM +0100, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 03/15/2017 12:05 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > So just fyi, this has been talked about before (but prob in context of > > zookeeper or various other pluggable config backends). > > > > Some links: > > > > -

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:41:16AM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > > * How does reloading work (does it)? > > No. There is nothing that we can do in oslo that will make services > magically reload configuration. It's

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] initial discussion for a new periodic pipeline

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:42:32PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 03/13/2017 02:29 PM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > > Hi, all > > > > I submitted a change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443964/ > > but seems like it reached a point which requires an additional discussion. > > > > I had a few

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 13)

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:28:15PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 01:08:26PM +0200, Attila Darazs wrote: > >> If the topics below interest you and you want to contribut

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 13)

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 01:08:26PM +0200, Attila Darazs wrote: > If the topics below interest you and you want to contribute to the > discussion, feel free to join the next meeting: > > Time: Thursdays, 14:30-15:30 UTC > Place: https://bluejeans.com/4113567798/ > > Full minutes:

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][docker] registry-1.docker.io to reverse proxy cache

On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 12:15:49PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > In an effort to help projects depending on docker infrastructure, we've setup > a > reverse proxy cache for http://registry-1.docker.io. Please see the > instructions in 453811[1] on how to config

[openstack-dev] [infra] Stop enabling EPEL mirror by default

Greetings, Recently we've been running into some issues keeping our EPEL mirror properly sync'd. We are working to fix this, however we'd also like to do the following: Stop enabling EPEL mirror by default https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453222/ For the most part, we enable EPEL for our

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Stop enabling EPEL mirror by default

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 01:02:59PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > Recently we've been running into some issues keeping our EPEL mirror properly > sync'd. We are working to fix this, however we'd also like to do the > following: > > Stop enabling EPEL mirror

[openstack-dev] [all][infra] Upcoming changes to nodepool images

Greetings, As you have likely seen over the last few days, openstack-infra has slowly started making some changes to our nodepool images we use for jobs. With the help of cmurphy, we've started removing the puppet dependency from the images. For the most part, this should be seamless for your

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] container jobs are unstable

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:01:08AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 03:08:57PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > > To be fair, we discussed this on IRC yesterday, everyone agreed infra > > supported docker cache/registry was a great idea, but you said there w

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][infra] does someone cares about Jenkins? I stopped.

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:00:26AM -0500, Clay Gerrard wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > In fact, the openstack-infra team does mirror a > > lot of things today > > > I bumped into this the other d

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][infra] Any idea why patch is not gating

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:44:59PM +, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > When we recheck https://review.openstack.org/#/c/388157/ or any patch that > depends on this one, they just hang. Any idea why? > Thanks > Gary After looking at the zuul debug.log, it appears to be because 439565[1] had an

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] introducing python-tripleo-helper

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:28:31PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > TL/DR: > > > > - use Python to do drive TripleO deployment > > - RPM based > > - used to be a bit specific, closer to upstream now

Re: [openstack-dev] [picasso] First meeting on 7th of March

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:41:24PM +, Derek Schultz wrote: > Hi Emilien, > > Thanks for the feedback! I'm aware that IRC is the standard for OpenStack > folks, but at this current stage it's just easier to hold the discussion in > Slack as Picasso ties into the IronFunctions open source

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][infra] does someone cares about Jenkins? I stopped.

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:13:07AM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > I am working on some improvements for Kolla. Part of that work is > sending patches for review. > > Once patch is set for review.openstack.org there is a set of Jenkins > jobs started to make sure that patch does not break

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] merging code from a github repo to an openstack existing repo: how ?

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:31:34AM -0500, Thomas Morin wrote: > Hi, > > A bit of context to make my question clearer: openstack/networking-bagpipe > relies on bagpipe-bgp which is not an openstack project although done by the > same people, and we would see a significant benefit in moving the

[openstack-dev] [infra][docker] registry-1.docker.io to reverse proxy cache

Greetings, In an effort to help projects depending on docker infrastructure, we've setup a reverse proxy cache for http://registry-1.docker.io. Please see the instructions in 453811[1] on how to configure dockerd to use them. While testing, I did run into an issue with docker 17.04 so suggest

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Stop enabling EPEL mirror by default

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 06:48:52PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 01:02:59PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > Recently we've been running into some issues keeping our EPEL mirror > > properly > > sync'd. We are working to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][packaging][deb] retiring Packaging Deb project

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:09:59AM -0400, Allison Randal wrote: > Hi all, > > The Debian OpenStack packagers are gathered at the annual Debian > developer event, and discussing the future of OpenStack packaging for > Debian. There's general agreement that we'd like to go ahead and package > Pike,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] critical situation with CI / upgrade jobs

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:06:20PM -0400, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > So far, we're having 3 critical issues, that we all need to address as > > soon as we can. > > > > Problem #1: Upgrade jobs timeout from Newton to

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][infra] Help needed! high gate failure rate

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 07:22:42PM +0530, Rabi Mishra wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Rabi Mishra wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > > > >> On 08/10/2017 06:18 PM, Rico Lin wrote: > >> > We're facing a high

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][puppet] Hold off on approving patches until further notice

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:32:25PM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 07:03:32AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> FYI, > >> > >> The gates are hosed for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][puppet] Hold off on approving patches until further notice

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 07:03:32AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > FYI, > > The gates are hosed for a variety of reasons[0][1] and we can't get > critical patches merged. Please hold off on rechecking or approving > anything new until further notice. We're hoping to get some of the > fixes for

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][devstack] DIB builds after mysql.qcow2 removal

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 07:22:34PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote: > Hi, > > The removal of the mysql.qcow2 image [1] had a flow-on effect noticed > first by Paul in [2] that the tools/image_list.sh "sanity" check was > not updated, leading to DIB builds failing in a most unhelpful way as > it tries to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] An experiment with Ansible

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 06:21:22PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > Following up on the previous thread: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-July/119405.html > > I wanted to share some work I did around the prototype I mentioned > there. I spent a couple days exploring this

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] An experiment with Ansible

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:06:00PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:52 PM, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at

[openstack-dev] [all] Removal of puppet and ruby from nodepool images

Greetings, We, openstack-infra, are on our final steps of removing puppet (and ruby) from our images jobs run in nodepool. At this point, I think we are confident we shouldn't break any projects however I wanted to send this email just to keep everybody up to date. If you do depend on puppet or

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Running openstack-ansible-tests functional job in the ARA gate ?

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 05:25:26PM -0400, David Moreau Simard wrote: > Hi! > > I'm trying to run the openstack-ansible-tests func jobs in the ARA > check gate but it's not working. > I'm probably missing something obvious and someone can hopefully point it out > ! > > This review [1] landed

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][deployment][helm][kolla][openstack-ansible] paunch - a library/tool for yaml driven docker configuration

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:53:17PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > [adding more tags to make sure folks can see this thread] > > What we would like to hear from Deployment projects (Kolla, OSA, Helm, etc) > is: > > 1) Is there any overlap with some ongoing efforts? > 2) Would you be interested

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Removal of puppet and ruby from nodepool images

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:17:03PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > We, openstack-infra, are on our final steps of removing puppet (and ruby) from > our images jobs run in nodepool. At this point, I think we are confident we > shouldn't break any projects however I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][qa] Enabling elastic-recheck for tripleo job

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 03:28:13PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 10:34:59AM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > I've just pushed up a change to puppet-elas

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][qa] Enabling elastic-recheck for tripleo job

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 10:34:59AM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I've just pushed up a change to puppet-elastic_recheck[1] to update the jobs > > regex for elastic-recheck to start tracking trip

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][qa] Enabling elastic-recheck for tripleo job

Greetings, I've just pushed up a change to puppet-elastic_recheck[1] to update the jobs regex for elastic-recheck to start tracking tripleo. What this means, is now the elasticRecheck bot will start leaving comments on reviews once it matches a failure in knows about. The goal here is to better

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] tripleo periodic jobs moving to RDO's software factory and RDO Cloud

obs will move. The move > will depend on tenant resource allocation and how easily the periodic jobs > can be modified. This email is to inform the group that changes are being > planned to the tripleo periodic workflow and allow time for comment and > preparation. > > Completed

Re: [openstack-dev] diskimage builder works for trusty but not for xenial

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 08:44:45AM +0200, Ignazio Cassano wrote: > Hi all, > today I am creating openstack images with disk-image-create. > It works fine for centos and ubuntu trusty. > With xenial I got the following error: > > * Connection #0 to host cloud-images.ubuntu.com left intact >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][infra][release][security][stable][kolla][loci][tripleo][docker][kubernetes] do we want to be publishing binary container images?

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 02:11:18PM +, Sam Yaple wrote: > I would like to bring up a subject that hasn't really been discussed in > this thread yet, forgive me if I missed an email mentioning this. > > What I personally would like to see is a publishing infrastructure to allow > pushing built

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][infra][puppet][stable] Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/puppet-nova failed

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:53:32AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from jenkins's message of 2017-05-22 10:49:09 +: > > Build failed. > > > > - puppet-nova-tarball > > http://logs.openstack.org/89/89c58e7958b448364cb0290c1879116f49749a68/release/puppet-nova-tarball/fe9daf7/ > > :

[openstack-dev] [infra] Removal of git-review from DIB images

Greetings, Does your project use git-review on our zuul worker nodes? If so, this post is for you. For a long time we have installed git-review on to our worker nodes that are used by jobs. This also installs additional python dependencies: Successfully installed argparse-1.4.0

Re: [openstack-dev] Update re: debian packages?

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 08:30:46AM -0500, Andrew Bogott wrote: > I've just noticed that, as predicted, Mirantis has switched off their > Openstack package repos (e.g. http://liberty-jessie.pkgs.mirantis.com/). > Are there any updates about a replacement repo, or a newly-reconstituted >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][infra][release][security][stable][kolla][loci][tripleo][docker][kubernetes] do we want to be publishing binary container images?

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 09:34:44AM -0700, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > >> Issue with that is > >> > >> 1. Apache served is harder to use because we want to follow docker API > >> and we'd have to reimplement it > > > > No, the idea is apache is transparent, for now we have been using proxypass > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][infra][release][security][stable][kolla][loci][tripleo][docker][kubernetes] do we want to be publishing binary container images?

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 06:57:04AM -0700, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > On 16 May 2017 at 06:22, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-05-16 14:08:07 +0200: > >> Flavio Percoco wrote: > >> > From a release perspective, as Doug mentioned,

Re: [openstack-dev] [forum] Future of Stackalytics

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:11:18PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-08 09:22:48 -0400 (-0400), Paul Belanger wrote: > [...] > > We also have another issue where we loose access to gerrit and our apache > > process pins CPU to 100%, these might also be low hangin

Re: [openstack-dev] [forum] Future of Stackalytics

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:55:57PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-05-17 16:16:30 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: > [...] > > we need help with completing the migration to infra. If interested > > you can reach out to fungi (Infra team PTL) nor mrmartin (who > > currently helps with

[openstack-dev] [all][infra] Missing OpenSSL headers (fatal error: openssl/opensslv.h: No such file or directory)

Greetings, If your project is seeing the following errors, this likely means you do not have libssl development headers included in your bindep.txt file. To fix this you can add the following to your local bindep.txt file: libssl-dev [platform:dpkg] openssl-devel [platform:rpm] This will

[openstack-dev] [infra][deb-packaging] Stop using track-upstream for deb projects

Greetings, I'd like to propose we stop using track-upstream for project-config on deb-packaging projects. It seems there is no active development on these projects currently and by using track-upstream we currently wasting both CI resources and HDD space keeping their projects in sync with there

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] TripleO OVB check gates to move to third party

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 02:11:53PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 06/13/2017 12:28 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:12:08AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 06/12/2017 06:19 PM, Ronelle Landy wrote: > > &

Re: [openstack-dev] how to set default security group rules?

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 05:20:03AM -0700, Kevin Benton wrote: > This was an intentional decision. One of the goals of OpenStack is to > provide consistency across different clouds and configurable defaults for > new tenants default rules hurts consistency. > > If I write a script to boot up a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Moving away from "big tent" terminology

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 03:56:30PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-15 11:48:42 -0400 (-0400), Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > We took that tradeoff before and have suffered as a result. I'd say > > it's the cost of getting a project under governance. > > Well, sort of. We took the slightly

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] TripleO OVB check gates to move to third party

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:12:08AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 06/12/2017 06:19 PM, Ronelle Landy wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > TripleO OVB check gates are managed by upstream Zuul and executed on > > nodes provided by test cloud RH1. RDO Cloud is now available as a test > > cloud to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment] [oslo] [ansible] [tripleo] [kolla] [helm] Configuration management with etcd / confd

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 04:52:25PM +, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:30 AM Britt Houser (bhouser) > wrote: > > > How does confd run inside the container? Does this mean we’d need some > > kind of systemd in every container which would spawn both confd

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Removal of puppet and ruby from nodepool images

On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 12:11:14PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 09:59:01AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:39:00PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:17:03PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Removal of puppet and ruby from nodepool images

On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 09:59:01AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:39:00PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:17:03PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > We, openstack-infra, are on our fina

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Removal of puppet and ruby from nodepool images

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:39:00PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:17:03PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > We, openstack-infra, are on our final steps of removing puppet (and ruby) > > from > > our images jobs run in

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Why do we apt-get install NEW files/debs/general at job time ?

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 02:31:20PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-09-22 15:04:43 +0200 (+0200), Attila Fazekas wrote: > > "if DevStack gets custom images prepped to make its jobs > > run faster, won't Triple-O, Kolla, et cetera want the same and where > > do we draw that line?). " > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:26:09AM +0800, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Let's not forget the epic fail earlier on the "contribution.rst fix" that > almost melt down the community CI system. > > For any companies that are doing what Matt mentioned, please be aware that > the dev community of the country

Re: [openstack-dev] Update on Zuul v3 Migration - and what to do about issues

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:39:17PM +0900, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to run jobs with Zuul v3 in my local environment.[1] > I prepared a sample job that runs sleep command on zuul's host. > This job doesn't use Nodepool. [2] > > As a result, Zuul v3 submitted "SUCCESS" to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for all candidates in TC election: What will you do if you don't win?

On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 08:15:51AM -0400, Amrith Kumar wrote: > Full disclosure, I'm running for election as well. I intend to also > provide an answer to the question I pose here, one that I've posed > before on #openstack-tc in an office hours session. > > Question 1: > > "There are M open

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for candidates: How do you think we can make our community more inclusive?

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 02:45:28PM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > Some of you, TC candidates, expressed concerns about diversity and > inclusiveness > (or inclusivity, depending on your taste) in your candidacy. I believe this > is a > broad, and some times ill-used, topic so,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 01:38:03PM -0500, Ed Leafe wrote: > In the past year or so, has there been anything that made you think “I wish > the TC would do something about that!” ? If so, what was it, and what would > you have wanted the TC to do about it? > > -- Ed Leafe > No, I've been happy

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:42:46PM -0700, Clay Gerrard wrote: > I like a representative democracy. It mostly means I get a say in which > other people I have to trust to think deeply about issues which effect me > and make decisions which I agree (more or less) are of benefit to the > social

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:51:10PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > (Reminder: we are in the TC election campaigning period, and we all have the > opportunity to question the candidates. The campaigning period ends on > Saturday, so make with the questions.) > > > In my head, I have a mental picture

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][QA][group-based-policy][zaqar][packaging_deb][fuel][networking-*] Marking <= mitaka EOL

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:26:46AM -0400, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:56:07PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > So, for fuel we have stable/7.0 etc - what are the plans for these? Can > > we retire them as well? > > > > Those are even older AFAIK, > > As discussed on IRC,

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] pypi publishing

On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 05:02:00AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > Hi, > > Any idea why latest packages are not being published to pypi. > > Examples are: > > vmware-nsxlib 10.0.2 (latest stable/ocata) > > vmware-nsxlib 11.0.1 (latest

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] critical situation with CI / upgrade jobs

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:43:07AM +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Steve Baker wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Emilien Macchi > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > Problem #3: from Ocata to Pike: all container

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI design session at the PTG

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:42:45AM -0400, David Moreau Simard wrote: > Hi, > > (cc whom I would at least like to attend) > > The PTG would be a great opportunity to talk about CI design/layout > and how we see things moving forward in TripleO with Zuul v3, upstream > and in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Pike final release - blockers & priorities

On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 10:23:15PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Here are the priorities and blockers so we can release final Pike. > > If you have any question, or think I missed something, or have any > > comment,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Gate is broken - Do not approve any patch until further notice

gt; 4) We should use pip instead of git for delorean > >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1708832 > >> > >> > >> Until further notice from Alex or myself, please do not approve any patch. > > > > The 4 problems have been mitigated. > >

[openstack-dev] [tc][election] TC candidacy

project allows for the ability to see what is great about OpenStack and what could use improvements. I believe you get out of something what you put into it, so here I am adding my name of the list. Good luck to all, Paul Belanger

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:25:03AM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Bogdan Dobrelya's message of 2017-11-14 17:08:31 +0100: > > >> The concept, in general, is to create a new set of cores from these > > >> groups, and use 3rd party CI to validate patches. There are lots of > > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] Removal of packages from bindep-fallback

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 07:55:07PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-11-16 06:59, Ian Wienand wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Some time ago we started the process of moving towards projects being > > more explicit about thier binary dependencies using bindep [1] > > > > To facilitate the

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc][infra][stable] we are ready to restore stable/mitaka for openstack-manuals

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 05:40:26PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-11-20 17:32, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > As we agreed in the new documentation retention policy spec [1], I need > > to restore the stable/mitaka branch for the openstack/openstack-manuals > > repository and then trigger a

Re: [openstack-dev] Removing internet access from unit test gates

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 04:41:13PM +, Mooney, Sean K wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 3:05 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] Removal of packages from bindep-fallback

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 04:59:01PM +1100, Ian Wienand wrote: > Hello, > > Some time ago we started the process of moving towards projects being > more explicit about thier binary dependencies using bindep [1] > > To facilitate the transition, we created a "fallback" set of > dependencies [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] Keystone Team Update - Week of 4 December 2017

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:58:05PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-12-08 18:48:56 +0100 (+0100), Colleen Murphy wrote: > [...] > > The major hindrance to keystone using Storyboard is its lack of > > support for private bugs, which is a requirement given that > > keystone is a VMT-managed

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 49

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:28:53PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-12-07 17:08:55 + (+), Graham Hayes wrote: > [...] > > It is worth remembering that this is a completely separate project to > > OpenStack, with its own governance. They are free not to use our tooling > > (and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo gate is blocked - please read

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 12:47:10PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-06-15 23:15:01 -0700 (-0700), Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] > > ## Dockerhub proxy issue > > Infra using wrong image layer object storage proxy for Dockerhub: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575787/ > > Huge thanks to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][python3][tc][infra] Python 3.6

On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 04:48:00PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 05/06/18 16:38, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-06-05 15:55:49 -0400: > > > We've talked a bit about migrating to Python 3, but (unless I missed it) > > > not a lot about which version of Python

[openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit server replacement scheduled for May 2nd 2018

Hello from Infra. Today is the day for scheduled maintenance of gerrit, we'll be allocating 2 hours for the outage but don't expect it to take that long. During this time you will not be able to access gerrit. If you have any questions, or would like to follow along, please join us in

[openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit server replacement finished

Hello from Infra. Gerrit maintenance has concluded successfully and running happily on Ubuntu Xenial. We were able to save and restore the queues from zuul, but as always be sure to check your patches as a recheck maybe be required. If you have any questions or comments, please reach out to us

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] final stages of python 3 transition

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:27:31AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 04:54:46PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > It's time to talk about the next steps in our migration from python > > 2 to python 3. > > > > [...] > > > > 2. Change (or duplicate) all functional test jobs to

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:37:21AM +, Jens Harbott wrote: > 2018-03-26 22:51 GMT+00:00 Jimmy Mcarthur : > > Hi everyone, > > > > We recently made the tough decision, in conjunction with the dedicated > > volunteers that run TryStack, to end the service as of March 29, 2018.

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Broken repo on devstack-plugin-container for Fedora

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Daniel Mellado wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Since today, when I try to install devstack-plugin-container plugin over > fedora. It complains in here [1] about not being able to sync the cache > for the repo with the following error [2]. > > This is affecting

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI'ing ceph-ansible against TripleO scenarios

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 04:22:56PM -0800, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Is there any plans to run TripleO CI jobs in ceph-ansible? > I know the project is on github but thanks to zuulv3 we can now easily > configure ceph-ansible to run Ci jobs in OpenStack Infra. > > It would be really great to

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][neutron][octavia][horizon][networking-l2gw] Renaming tox_venvlist in Zuul v3 run-tempest

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 05:13:28PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > The Zuul v3 tox jobs use "tox_envlist" to name the tox environment to > use, the tempest run-tempest role used "tox_venvlist" with an extra "v" > in it. This lead to some confusion and a wrong fix, so let's be > consistent across

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptl][goals][storyboard] tracking the rocky goals with storyboard

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:11:40PM -0800, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Since we are discussing goals for the Rocky cycle, I would like to > > propose a change to the way we track progress on the goals. > > > > We've

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [all] project pipeline definition should stay in project-config or project side ?

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:05:34PM +0900, gmann wrote: > Hi Infra Team, > > I have 1 quick question on zuulv3 jobs and their migration part. From > zuulv3 doc [1], it is clear about migrating the job definition and use > those among cross repo pipeline etc. > > But I did not find clear

[openstack-dev] Release Naming for S - time to suggest a name!

Hey everybody, Once again, it is time for us to pick a name for our "S" release. Since the associated Summit will be in Berlin, the Geographic Location has been chosen as "Berlin" (State). Nominations are now open. Please add suitable names to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rdo cloud tenant reach 100 stacks

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:20:34PM +0100, Arx Cruz wrote: > Just an update, we cleaned up the stacks with more than 10 hours, jobs > should be working properly now. > > Kind regards, > Arx Cruz > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Arx Cruz wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We

<    1   2   3   >