+1
On 25/09/18 16:47, Eduardo Gonzalez wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Chason Chan to the kolla-ansible core team.
Chason is been working on addition of Vitrage roles, rework VpnaaS
service, maintaining
documentation as well as fixing many bugs.
Voting will be open for 14 days (until
+1. Will always have good memories of when Steve was getting the project
off the ground. Thanks Steve for doing a great job of building the
community around Kolla, and for all your help in general!
Best of luck,
-Paul
On 08/08/18 12:23, Eduardo Gonzalez wrote:
Steve,
Is sad to see you
Hi James,
Sorry to hear about the lack of participation. I for one am guilty of
not taking part, there just seems to be never enough time in the day to
cram in all the moving parts that a project like OpenStack requires.
That being said, this effort is definitely one of the most important to
chu...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Paul Bourke mailto:paul.bou...@oracle.com>> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At the weekly meeting a week or two ago, we mentioned removing
some old /
> unused images from Kolla in the interest of kee
Hi all,
At the weekly meeting a week or two ago, we mentioned removing some old
/ unused images from Kolla in the interest of keeping the gate run times
down, as well as general code hygiene.
The images I've determined that are either no longer relevant, or were
simply never made use of in
+1
On 31/05/18 18:02, Borne Mace wrote:
Greetings all,
I would like to propose the addition of Steve Noyes to the kolla-cli
core reviewer team. Consider this nomination as my personal +1.
Steve has a long history with the kolla-cli and should be considered its
co-creator as probably half
Hi all,
Here are the slide decks for these sessions. The project update should
be available shortly on YouTube also.
https://www.slideshare.net/PaulBourke1/kolla-onboarding-vancouver-2018
https://www.slideshare.net/PaulBourke1/kolla-project-update-vancouver-2018
Thanks,
-Paul
On 5/11/18, 5:35 AM, "Paul Bourke" <paul.bou...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Sandhya,
Thanks for starting this thread. I've moved it to the mailing list so
the discussion can be available to anyone else who is interested, I hope
you don't mind.
If
be part of the
kolla-ansible repo or should they be out-of-tree?
It is hard to have this type of discussion on IRC so I started this email
thread.
Thanks,
Sandhya
On 5/10/18, 5:59 AM, "Paul Bourke (pbourke) (Code Review)"
<rev...@openstack.org> wrote:
Paul Bourke (pbourke
+1, always great working with Mark :)
On 26/04/18 16:31, Jeffrey Zhang wrote:
Kolla core reviewer team,
It is my pleasure to nominate
mgoddard for kolla core team.
Mark has been working both upstream and downstream with kolla and
kolla-ansible for over two years, building bare metal
+1
On 18/04/18 02:51, Jeffrey Zhang wrote:
Since many of the contributors in the kolla-kubernetes project are moved
to other things. And there is no active contributor for months. On the
other hand, there is another comparable project, openstack-helm, in the
community. For less confusion
Hi all,
This mail is to serve as a follow on to the discussion during
yesterday's team meeting[4], which was regarding the desire to move
start scripts out of the kolla images [0]. There's a few factors at
play, and it may well be best left to discuss in person at the summit in
May, but
+1
Thanks Jeffrey for taking the time to investigate.
On 28/03/18 16:47, Jeffrey Zhang wrote:
There are two projects to solve the issue that run OpenStack on
Kubernetes, OpenStack-helm, and kolla-kubernetes. Them both
leverage helm tool for orchestration. There is some different perspective
at
+1
On 12/03/18 02:06, Jeffrey Zhang wrote:
Kolla core reviewer team,
It is my pleasure to nominate caoyuan for kolla core team.
caoyuan's output is fantastic over the last cycle. And he is the most
active non-core contributor on Kolla project for last 180 days[1]. He
focuses on
Hi all,
Here's my summary of the various topics we discussed during the PTG.
There were one or two I had to step out for but hopefully this serves as
an overall recap. Please refer to the main etherpad[0] for more details
and links to the session specific pads.
build.py script refactor
, Paul Bourke wrote:
Hey Kolla,
Hope you're all enjoying Dublin so far :) Some have expressed interest
in getting together for a team meal, how does Thursday sound? Please
reply to this with +1/-1 and I can see about booking something.
Cheers,
-Paul
Hey Kolla,
Hope you're all enjoying Dublin so far :) Some have expressed interest
in getting together for a team meal, how does Thursday sound? Please
reply to this with +1/-1 and I can see about booking something.
Cheers,
-Paul
On 05/02/18 10:25, Christian Berendt wrote:
Hello Paul.
On 5. Feb 2018, at 11:12, Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com> wrote:
This does not mean I don't have a vision for Kolla - no project is perfect
Regardless of that, I would be interested in your visions. What specifically do
yo
Hello all,
I've been involved with Kolla since it's early stages around Liberty,
where we saw it evolve through multiple iterations of image formats,
orchestration methods and patterns into the project we know and love.
From my perspective the community is one of the best things about
On 30/01/18 12:54, Simon Leinen wrote:
The perceived downside of (2) - or a perceived advantage of (1) - is
that in an ideal world, (1) isolates us from the arcane configuration
file details that the crazy devs of individual services come up with.
In practice, it turns out that (a) those files
ir in playbooks. Currently, the merge_config is a more
better solutions.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to revisit our policy of not templating everything in
kolla-ansible's template files. This is a policy that was set in
Hi all,
I'd like to revisit our policy of not templating everything in
kolla-ansible's template files. This is a policy that was set in place
very early on in kolla-ansible's development, but I'm concerned we
haven't been very consistent with it. This leads to confusion for
contributors and
Apologies if this has been asked before. It seems as of late (I think
since the roll out of zuul v3, I can't seem to view job outputs directly
in my browser. E.g. when I click link[0], I have to download
'job-output.txt.gz', unzip it, rename the extension to '.html', and
finally open it in a
From my understanding it would be a cleanup operation - which to be
honest, would be very much welcomed. I recently did a little work with
Castellan to integrate it with Murano and found the auth code to be very
messy, and flat out broken in some cases. If it's possible to let the
barbican
I think this came up before at one stage. My position is I don't see the
need to ansible-ise small shell scripts. init-runonce is currently just
an easy to understand sequence of openstack commands provided to help
people test/demo their setups. Unless we want to make it more than that,
i.e.
+1
On 02/11/17 15:58, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
It's my great pleasure to start another voting for core team addition!
Everyone knows hrw, thanks to him Kolla now runs on both Power and ARM!
Voting will be open for 14 days (until 16th of Nov).
Consider this mail my +1 vote
Regards,
Michal
I had the following bookmark:
status:open is:mergeable (project:openstack/kolla OR
project:openstack/kolla-ansible) NOT label:Code-Review>=-2,self NOT
owner:pauldbourke NOT age:1month branch:master
Which basically means, find changes that are:
* open
* in kolla or kolla-ansible
* not
Hi,
Would those of us at the PTG like to agree on a time to meet for an
informal Murano chat? Does Friday suit?
Regards,
-Paul
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
Hi,
This usually means your ceph mons have failed to cluster correctly. The
osd bootstrap calls 'ceph quorum_status' to ensure a successful quorum
before proceeding. If the mons are blocked or otherwise unavailable this
command can time out which is likely what you're seeing. Make sure the
Because its a series of key value pairs:
https://github.com/openstack/kolla-ansible/blob/master/ansible/group_vars/all.yml#L96-L105
Is there another type you feel would fit better?
On 11/07/17 05:22, Margin Hu wrote:
Hi Guys:
I want to set docker_common_options parameter but find its type is
+1, thanks Surya for all your work
On 14/06/17 16:46, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
Hello,
With great pleasure I'm kicking off another core voting to
kolla-ansible and kolla teams:) this one is about spsurya. Voting will
be open for 2 weeks (till 28th Jun).
Consider this mail my +1 vote, you know
Hi Stan,
Thanks for your input on this.
I'm finding the problem with doing the encryption/decryption on the
engine side only is that at this point it is too late - the object model
has already been written into the database at the API layer. I can't
think how we can change this without
deploy murano with or without it.
As for the way to convey this, I believe metadata attributes were
designed to answer use-cases like this one. see
https://docs.openstack.org/developer/murano/appdev-guide/murano_pl/metadata.html for
more info.
Regards, Kirill
Le 25 мая 2017 г. à 18:49, Paul
Hi all,
I've been looking at a blueprint[0] logged for Murano which involves
encrypting parts of the object model stored in the database that may
contain passwords or sensitive information.
I wanted to see if people had any thoughts or preferences on how this
should be done. On the face of
:08 PM, Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com
<mailto:paul.bou...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hi Felipe / Murano community,
I was wondering how would people feel about revising the time for
the Murano weekly meeting?
Personally the current time is difficult for me to attend as it
Hi Felipe / Murano community,
I was wondering how would people feel about revising the time for the
Murano weekly meeting?
Personally the current time is difficult for me to attend as it falls at
the end of a work day, I also have some colleagues that would like to
attend but can't at the
+1 of course from myself. Good job Bertrand.
On 02/05/17 16:30, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
Hello,
It's my pleasure to start another core reviewer vote. Today it's
Bertrand (blallau). Consider this mail my +1 vote. Members of
kolla-ansible and kolla core team, please cast your votes:) Voting
I'm wondering if moving to using docker labels is a better way of
solving the various issue being raised here.
We can maintain a tag for each of master/ocata/newton/etc, and on each
image have a LABEL with info such as 'pbr of service/pbr of kolla/link
to CI of build/etc'. I believe this
with contract on each dict entry. If you don't
get contract violation exception, you can be sure that the list contains
list of dicts with appropriate keys/values rather than list of strings
or anything else
Sincerely yours,
Stan Lagun
Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis
<mailto
Hi Stan,
I had a quick(hopefully) question about MuranoPL that I hope you might
be able to help with, Felipe had mentioned you are very knowledgeable in
this area. If you don't have time please disregard!
I'm working on a patch for the Murano core library to make volume
attachment info
Looks really cool Mark, congrats on the release!
-Paul
On 30/03/17 09:46, Mark Goddard wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to announce Kayobe[1], a project that we at StackHPC have been
working on recently as we help to build out a performance prototyping
platform for the SKA telescope[2].
Kayobe is an open
+1
On 08/03/17 08:29, Jeffrey Zhang wrote:
+1 from me
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Michał Jastrzębski > wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to start voting to include Duong (duonghq) in Kolla and
Kolla-ansible core teams. Voting will be open for 2
Two initial ideas:
We could create a specific ansible task to rotate the keys, and document
that operator should set up a cron job on the deployment node to run
this periodically.
We could also look at making use of VRRP (keepalived). Potentially the
cron job could run on every controller,
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the summary, useful for those of us not at the PTG.
I'm a little confused on the final outcome, it sounds like most of what
you've written is currently the case.
Besides a more user friendly deploy guide appearing under
against the kolla repository.
Please have a look if you have time.
Thanks,
-Paul
On 24/01/17 12:06, Paul Bourke wrote:
Hi Kolla,
Does anyone know the current status of docs refactor? I believe there
was someone looking into it (apologies can't remember their name).
If not, I'd like to propose
Hi Hiroki,
To my knowledge it's not possible to change the target repository for an
open patch. What we've done so far is to abandon the in progress one,
cherry-pick to the correct repository and start a new review (adding the
original author as a co-author of course).
Hope that helps,
ating it, might be worth
reaching out to people from Ansible for more info.
On 25/01/17 00:01, Mooney, Sean K wrote:
-Original Message-----
From: Paul Bourke [mailto:paul.bou...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 11:49 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage ques
Hi Kolla,
Does anyone know the current status of docs refactor? I believe there
was someone looking into it (apologies can't remember their name).
If not, I'd like to propose a vote for some immediate changes that can
improve things.
Regards,
-Paul
Ah, I think you may be misreading what Sean is saying there. What he
means is kolla-ansible provides the bare minimum config templates to
make the service work. To template every possible config option would be
too much of a maintenance burden on the project.
Of course, users will want to
Hi Kris,
Thanks for the feedback, I think everyone involved in kolla-ansible
should take the time to read through it, as it definitely highlights
some areas that we need to improve.
There's a lot of questions here, so I haven't gone into too much detail
on any specific one; my hope is that
This actually seems really useful, thanks Christian.
On 15/12/16 11:35, Christian Berendt wrote:
Hello everybody.
Based on the dashboard which is used for the Nova project I have created one
for Kolla. The dashboard gets updated hourly.
http://kolla.betacloud.io/bugs-dashboard.html
Right now I try to attack the bug list whenever I get time, admittedly
it's not a regular activity though. I actually wasn't aware kolla and
kolla-ansible had separate bug trackers, so far I've just been following
the kolla one so this is good to know.
One issue I have is the fact that a
While I would be interested to know how many people actually do use
COPY_ONCE, I think if I was in charge of a production deployment I would
use COPY_ONCE.
On 01/12/16 02:27, Jeffrey Zhang wrote:
Kolla has a config_strategy option during deployment. it supports
COPY_ONCE and
COPY_ALWAYS.
+1
On 29/11/16 16:21, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
Hello team!
I'd like to propose to add zhubingbing to kolla (and kolla-ansible)
core teams. He did great job reviewing code during last couple of
months.
Consider this proposal +1 from me, voting will be open for 1 week
(until Dec 6) or if we
There is some concerns internally around Ansible fact gathering, and how
it relates to adding / removing individual nodes in Kolla. As I've spent
a fair bit of time in this area I decided to send some info around both
for anyone confused about this in the future and also to tease out any
ways
Propose all docs stay under the kolla namespace
(http://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla).
Steve mentioned that we should try to keep all components (e.g. mailing
list tags) under the same umbrella which I agree with.
On 21/11/16 08:05, Jeffrey Zhang wrote:
After the split, we have two
If I'm understanding the requirement correctly, we want to know which
version of an OpenStack component is installed in an image? If so why
not just run something like:
# docker run kolla/oraclelinux-source-keystone:3.0.0 pip show keystone
Name: keystone
Version: 10.0.0.0rc2.dev290
[...]
Or
Seen as both repos stem from the same codebase, we should be able to
just cherry-pick changes as usual. If a fix comprises of a change to
both kolla and kolla-ansible, it will just mean two cherry-picks. Will
need to wait till the relevant pieces are removed from both repos to
confirm this but
Hi Darragh / git-upstream community,
I've been looking at a way to easily view a log of what commits made
since the last upstream import when managing a branch with git-upstream.
Right now this can be hard to do - something like 'git log
upstream/master..HEAD' shows a lot of duplicate commits
+1
On 17/11/16 07:18, Martin André wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
Hello,
In light of recent events (kolla-kubernetes becoming thriving project,
kolla-ansible being split) I feel we need to change of core reviewer
election process.
Seems good so far, thanks Michal / Steve. Cores don't forget to add
openstack/kolla-ansible to your watched projects in Gerrit :)
I assume we just -2 any Ansible related patches currently open against
the openstack/kolla project with instructions on how to resubmit.
Also has it been
Thanks for the reminder Andreas, patchset here:
https://review.openstack.org/397672
On 15/11/16 10:29, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 2016-11-15 11:10, Paul Bourke wrote:
Given the window for this vote is now closed and I saw no minus ones
I'll assume this has passed. TrivialFix is now optional
of removing the requirement for TrivialFix.
As per our standard policy, the voting window is open for 7 days
beginning November 3^rd , and finishing (in 7 days) on November 11^th .
Regards
-steve
*From: *Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com>
*Reply-To: *"OpenStack
Reminder Kolla, today is the deadline for feedback on this! Personally I
think it could use a few tweaks so please don't forget to take a look.
Link: http://tinyurl.com/OSmascot
On 21/10/16 21:58, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Forgot kolla tag in subject.
From: Steven Dake
Hi Joshua,
Thanks for sharing your workflow, interesting to see.
To answer your question, there is a 1:1 relationship between Kolla and
OpenStack releases. As Kevin outlined, you may get lucky, currently in
Oracle we deploy OpenStack Mitaka with Kolla Newton and for the most
part it works
Hi Jeremy,
> All I ask is that if the Kolla team wants to differentiate itself
> from the review requirements of most OpenStack projects, please make
We have no desire to do this, that's not what is being discussed here.
On the contrary we're looking to reduce the barrier to entry for
Kolleagues,
How do people feel above removing the requirement of having TrivialFix
in commit messages where a bug/bp is not required?
I'm seeing a lot of valid and important commits being held up because of
this, in my opinion, unnecessary requirement. It also causes friction
for new
Tagging kolla
On 29/09/16 16:22, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
Agree with Christian, this is our internal wiring. As long as we
provide automated upgrade procedure which will seamlessly migrate from
heka to alternative we want, we should be good without deprecation per
se.
Cheers,
Michal
On 29
If it's the case Benedict or noone else is interested in continuing
Debian, I can reverse my vote. Though it seems I'll be outvoted anyway ;)
On 20/09/16 10:21, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com> wrote:
-1 for deprecating
-1 for deprecating Debian.
As I mentioned in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369183/, Debian
support was added incrementally by Benedikt Trefzer as recently as June.
So it's reasonable to believe there is at least one active user of Debian.
I would like to try get some input from him on
+1
On 19/09/16 18:40, Jeffrey Zhang wrote:
Kolla core reviewer team,
Kolla supports multiple Linux distros now, including
* Ubuntu
* CentOS
* RHEL
* Fedora
* Debian
* OracleLinux
But only Ubuntu, CentOS, and OracleLinux are widely used and we have
robust gate to ensure the quality.
For
c) Split the repository shortly after tagging 3.0.0 – creating a
kolla-ansible deliverable for Ocata.
On 15/09/16 07:12, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Core Reviewers:
The facts:
We have roughly 250 bugs in rc2. Of those, I suspect over half can just
be closed out as dupes, fixed,
+1
On 08/09/16 03:59, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Kolla core reviewer team,
It is my pleasure to nominate Christian Berendt for the Kolla core team.
Christian’s output over the last cycle has been fantastic – cracking the
top 10 reviewer list for the full cycle. His 30 day stats [1]
Hi Kolla,
We have been experiencing a long running issue with Kolla that I have
brought up briefly a few times, but not made too much noise about.
I'm taking the time to write about it in the hopes that a) as a
community we may be able to solve it, and b) if other operators start
sdake kindly took the time to explain the release process. Logs are
here:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-kolla/%23openstack-kolla.2016-09-01.log.html#t2016-09-01T09:06:49
On 30/08/16 20:31, Christian Berendt wrote:
On 30 Aug 2016, at 12:42, Paul Bourke <paul.
Kolla,
Do people feel we still want to require a bug-id in the commit message
for features, when reno notes are present? My understanding is that till
now we've required people to add bugs for non trivial features in order
to track them as part of releases. Does/should reno supersede this?
Kolla,
There seems to be a lot of confusion and thrashing on the customisation
patches regarding the footer blocks.
To help this I have documented the scheme at
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/361253/2/doc/CONTRIBUTING.rst.
Please review this and respond with questions if it doesn't make
+1
On 23/08/16 21:45, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Kolla core reviewers,
I am nominating Dave Walker for the Kolla core reviewer team. His 30
day review stats [1] place him in the middle of the pack for reviewers
and his 60 day stats[2] are about equivalent. Dave participates heavily
in IRC
In my experience operators prefer a dedicated user (kolla:kolla), though
I can't see any major problem with your root:kolla approach.
On 23/08/16 14:40, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
On 8/23/16, 1:04 AM, "duon...@vn.fujitsu.com" wrote:
Hi S.Dake,
Hello Kollish,
+1
On 19/08/16 00:15, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
+1
On 18 August 2016 at 18:09, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Kolla Core Review Team:
I am nominating Eduardo for the core reviewer team. His reviews are
fantastic, as I'm sure most of you have seen after looking over the
sets of data after each deploy scenario.
-Paul
On 16/08/16 12:57, Paul Bourke wrote:
Kollagues,
Can we get an update from the APAC / US reps?
The last I heard we were having trouble getting guests spawned on an
external network so they could be accessible by Rally. There's been
various people
is short. If someone could summarise(looking at
Jeffrey / inc0 ;)) what's been happening that will allow us to make a
decision on how to progress.
Cheers,
-Paul
On 05/08/16 17:48, Paul Bourke wrote:
Hi Kolla,
Thought it will be helpful to send a status mail once we hit checkpoints
in the osic
Update Aug 9th:
We are on scenario two: 3 control, 20 storage, 100 compute with Ceph.
Notes are now being collected in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352101/ along with tempest/rally results.
-Paul
On 05/08/16 17:48, Paul Bourke wrote:
Hi Kolla,
Thought it will be helpful to send
I can do this for EMEA
-Paul
On 05/08/16 17:11, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Typo is subject tag – please see inside :)
From: Steven Dake >
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Hi Kolla,
Thought it will be helpful to send a status mail once we hit checkpoints
in the osic cluster work, so people can keep up to speed without having
to trawl IRC.
Reference: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-N-midcycle-osic
Work began on the cluster Wed Aug 3rd, item 1) from the
For those starting work on the OSIC cluster, I was having some trouble
installing the F5 VPN browser plugin, not to mention it's no good if
wanting to access the cluster remotely.
In the spirit of Kolla here's a Dockerfile I knocked up to run the VPN
client in a container:
Zhijiang,
You will see lines relating to the base image each time you build,
however, they should be cached so will add almost no additional time to
the build.
-Paul
On 21/07/16 09:48, hu.zhiji...@zte.com.cn wrote:
Hi,
When I use the following command to build keystone image, I saw
Hi Steve,
+1 to applying. I'll volunteer for the backport team also.
-Paul
On 18/07/16 13:07, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Hey Koalians,
I'd like us to consider applying for the stable follows policy tag.
Full details are here:
system and qemu-utils
ii qemu-utils1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.2~cloud0
amd64QEMU utilities
Thanks,
-Paul
On 14/07/16 17:34, Paul Bourke wrote:
Hi Matt,
Here is the failure from nova_compute on trying to start an instance:
2016-07-13 18:04:12.634378 | 2016-07-13
Hi Matt,
Here is the failure from nova_compute on trying to start an instance:
2016-07-13 18:04:12.634378 | 2016-07-13 18:01:34.560 1 ERROR
oslo_service.service [req-0d77b2c1-43c8-41de-b57f-8aaa974b9807 - - - -
-] Error starting thread.
2016-07-13 18:04:12.634410 | 2016-07-13 18:01:34.560 1
Sounds reasonable +1
On 12/07/16 15:32, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
Hey guys,
Since our project matured, we decided that we should have a discussion
regarding our spec process.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-N-midcycle-specs
Currently we do specs for most critical things, and they
Hi David,
I agree with this completely. Gates continue to be a problem for Kolla,
reasons why have been discussed in the past but at least for me it's not
clear what the key issues are.
I've added this item to agenda for todays IRC meeting (16:00 UTC -
+1
On 08/06/16 13:54, Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap) wrote:
Dear Kollagues,
Some time ago we discussed the requirement of alternating meeting
times for Kolla weekly meeting due to major contributors from
kolla-mesos were not able to attend weekly meeting at UTC 1600 and we
implemented alternate
Michal,
I'd be interested in helping with this. Keep us updated!
-Paul
On 03/06/16 17:58, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
Hello Kollagues,
Some of you might know that I submitted request for 130 nodes out of
osic cluster for testing Kolla. We just got accepted. Time window will
be 3 weeks between
fyi
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Kilo version of Kolla
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 16:01:59 +
From: Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com>
To: Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com>, POLAKU, CHANDRA <cp6...@att.com>
CC: VENKATSUBRAMANIAM, SHRINATH <sv3
+1 thanks for all the work Mauricio
On 17/05/16 20:00, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Hello core reviewers,
I am proposing Mauricio (mlima on irc) for the core review team. He has
done a fantastic job reviewing appearing in the middle of the pack for
90 days [1] and appearing as #2 in 45 days
I have a debug job open atm to try and investigate this:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300988/
If anyone is handy with strace here is a run with the output:
http://logs.openstack.org/88/300988/6/check/gate-kolla-dsvm-deploy-centos-binary/726c3b1/console.html
On 09/05/16 18:23, Hui Kang
TL;DR keep globals.yml to a minimum, customise configs via
host_vars/group_vars
It seems right now the "best" approach may be to tokenise variables as
required. This is the approach we currently use in Oracle. There are two
other approaches I can think of available to us:
1) The overwrite
Having read through the full thread I'm still in support of separate
repos. I think the explanations Jeff Peeler and Adam Young have put
forward summarise my thoughts very well.
One of the main arguments I seem to be hearing for a single repo is Git
tooling which I don't think is a good one;
I've said in the past I'm not a fan of nitpicking docs. That said, I
feel it's important for spelling and grammar to be correct. The
quickstart guide is the first point of contact for many people to the
project, and rightly or wrongly it will give an overall impression of
the quality of the
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo