On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
just about update-failure-recovery, which is coming
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:42:52AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:56:04AM -0700, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/07/2014 02:12 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 07:10:23AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Thierry Carrez
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 05:05:04PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
I would prefer that you didn't merge this.
i.e. The project is better off without it.
I'm not quite sure how you make that translation, I would interpret -2 as
meaning the project would be better off without a change.
FWIW, I've
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 03:39:24PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
We held the inaugural Heat mid-cycle meetup in Raleigh, North Carolina this
week. There were a dozen folks in attendance, and I think everyone agreed
that it was a very successful event. Notes from the meetup are on the
Etherpad
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:55:14PM +0900, Yukinori Sagara wrote:
Hi.
I am trying Heat instance HA, using RDO Icehouse.
After instance boot, instance push own stats to heat alarm with
cfn-push-stats command.
But cfn-push-stats always failed with error '403
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 02:39:09PM +0530, Jyoti Ranjan wrote:
I am curious to know about Swift role here. Can you elaborate little bit
please?
I think Zane already covered it with We just want people to stop polling
us, because it's killing our performance.
Basically, if we provide the
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 07:54:41PM +0530, Jyoti Ranjan wrote:
I am little bit skeptical about using Swift for this use case because of
its eventual consistency issue. I am not sure Swift cluster is good to be
used for this kind of problem. Please note that Swift cluster may give you
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:41:29AM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 27/08/14 11:04, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 07:54:41PM +0530, Jyoti Ranjan wrote:
I am little bit skeptical about using Swift for this use case because of
its eventual consistency issue. I am not sure Swift
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:40:31AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-27 08:41:29 -0700:
On 27/08/14 11:04, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 07:54:41PM +0530, Jyoti Ranjan wrote:
I am little bit skeptical about using Swift for this use
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:45:59AM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/29/2014 05:15 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 29/08/14 14:27, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/26/2014 10:14 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
Steve Baker has started the process of moving Heat tests out of the
Tempest repository and into the Heat
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:56:34PM +1000, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Gauvain Pocentek
gauvain.pocen...@objectif-libre.com wrote:
Hi,
A bit of background: I'm working on the publication of the HOT resources
reference on docs.openstack.org.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:14:24PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
I hope the subject got your attention :).
This might be a side effect of my having too many cosmic rays, but its
been percolating for a bit.
tl;dr I think we should drop our 'needs 2x+2 to land' rule and instead
use 'needs
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:54:20PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-09-04 11:01:55 +0100 (+0100), Derek Higgins wrote:
[...]
How would people feel about turning [auto-abandon] back on?
A lot of reviewers (myself among them) feel auto-abandon was a
cold and emotionless way to provide
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:14:32AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
Going through the untriaged Nova bugs, and there are a few on a similar
pattern:
Nova operation in progress takes a while
Crosses keystone token expiration time
Timeout thrown
Operation fails
Terrible 500 error sent back to
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:37:14PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-09-10 09:57:17 +0100 (+0100), Steven Hardy wrote:
I can understand this argument, and perhaps an auto-abandon with a
long period like say a month for the submitter to address comments
and reset the clock would
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:44:01PM -0500, Jason Greathouse wrote:
I'm trying to find a way to create a set of servers and attach a new
volume to each server.
I first tried to use block_device_mapping but that requires an existing
snapshot or volume and the deployment would fail
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 08:46:45PM -0400, Jamie Lennox wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:55:49 AM
Subject: Re
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:06:01AM -0500, Jason Greathouse wrote:
My mistake about the mailing list, The openstack heat wiki page
(https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat) only lists the dev list. I will
make sure to ask future usage questions on the other one.
No worries, we should
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:43:22PM -0400, Jamie Lennox wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Friday, 12 September, 2014 12:21:52 AM
Subject
All,
Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat-Ironic integration, and
subsequent very detailed justification and discussion of why they may be
useful in this spec[2].
Back in Atlanta, I had some discussions with
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:15:21AM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
All,
Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat-Ironic integration
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:50:24AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-09-15 04:44:24 -0700:
All,
Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat-Ironic integration, and
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:51:43PM +, Jay Faulkner wrote:
Steven,
It's important to note that two of the blueprints you reference:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/drac-raid-mgmt
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/drac-hw-discovery
are both very unlikely to
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 03:34:28PM +1200, Steve Baker wrote:
On 16/09/14 03:24, Alexis Lee wrote:
For your amusement,
https://github.com/lxsli/heat-viz
This produces HTML which shows which StructuredDeployments (boxes)
depends_on each other (bold arrows). It also shows the
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 06:54:27PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 09/09/14 05:52, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi Sahdev,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:52:30AM -0400, Sahdev P Zala wrote:
Hello guys,
As you know, the heat-translator project was started early this year
with
an aim
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:34:04AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
On 10 December 2013 00:31, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some
recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted to start
Hi all,
I have some queries about what the future of the ec2tokens API is for
keystone, context as we're looking to move Heat from a horrible mixture of
v2/v3 keystone to just v3, currently I'm not sure we can:
- The v3/credentials API allows ec2tokens to be stored (if you
create the
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:25:49AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
On 10 December 2013 11:04, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
So it's a gross mischaracterisation to imply that a democratic process
aided by some [crude] stats has been reduced to name shame, and a
rather offensive one
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:45:11AM +0200, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
Hi all,
I am fixing assertions in unittests now (initially
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1259023). I've seen that Clint have
split this bug into three separate bugs, one per assertion misuse type. As
these changes
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:12:17AM -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/09/2013 05:34 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
I have some queries about what the future of the ec2tokens API is for
keystone, context
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 08:20:09AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
Current Gate Length: 12hrs*, 41 deep
(top of gate entered 12hrs ago)
It's been an *exciting* week this week. For people not paying attention
we had 2 external events which made things terrible earlier in the week.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:59:19AM +, Sebastian Porombka wrote:
Hi Folks.
I’m currently trying to understand the openstack mechanics in detail (e.g. to
fix various ec2 api shortcomings) and reached heat. I tried to add heat to
our on-premise installation and failed to try the
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:37:05AM +0100, Yolanda Robla wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I just wanted to raise a new feature proposal request we are
interested in. We are interested in sending additional API calls in
headers, in each openstack component.
A sample
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:41:52PM +0100, Yolanda Robla wrote:
We mostly want that to be able to send distro information into
Openstack, to be able to collect stats about it.
Here is the blueprint for it:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-s-server-app-banner-updates
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:21:46PM +1300, Steve Baker wrote:
I would like to nominate Bartosz Górski to be a heat-core reviewer. His
reviews to date have been valuable and his other contributions to the
project have shown a sound understanding of how heat works.
Here is his review history:
Hi Winson,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 08:41:16PM +, Chan, Winson C wrote:
Does anybody know if this blueprint is being actively work on?
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/windows-instances If this is not
active, can I take ownership of this blueprint? My team wants to add
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:23:05PM +0200, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
Hi all,
we have an approved blueprint that concerns reducing number of ignored PEP8
and openstack/hacking style checks for heat (
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/reduce-flake8-ignored-rules).
I've been already
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:54:34AM +1000, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 22/01/14 12:21 +, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:23:05PM +0200, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
Hi all,
we have an approved blueprint that concerns reducing number of ignored PEP8
and openstack/hacking style
Hi all,
I've recently been working on migrating the heat internal interfaces to use
the keystone v3 API exclusively[1].
This work has mostly been going well, but I've hit a couple of issues which
I wanted to discuss, so we agree the most appropriate workarounds:
1. keystoneclient v3
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:38:40AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote:
I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core.
His reviews are valuable and prolific, his code contributions have
demonstrated a good knowledge of heat internals, and he has endured a
sound hazing to get multi-engine into
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:37:27PM +0400, Stan Lagun wrote:
Hi Everyone,
While looking through Heat templates generation code in Murano I've
realized it has a major design flaw: there is no isolation between Heat
resources generated by different apps.
Can you define the requirement for
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:47:43AM -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
For purposes of supporting multiple backends for Identity (multiple LDAP, mix
of LDAP and SQL, federation, etc) Keystone is planning to increase the
maximum size of the USER_ID field from an upper limit of 64 to an upper limit
Hi all,
As some of you know, I've been working on the instance-users blueprint[1].
This blueprint implementation requires three new items to be added to the
heat.conf, or some resources (those which create keystone users) will not
work:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73978/
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:06:16PM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-03-04 09:39:21 -0800:
Hi all,
As some of you know, I've been working on the instance-users blueprint[1].
This blueprint implementation requires three new items to be added to the
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:53:03AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
We're at Freeze, so I want to pick up and understand where we currently
stand with both Neutron and Heat actually getting tested fully in the gate.
First Neutron -
Hi all,
We've not quite managed to land the last few patches for instance-users
in time for FF:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/instance-users
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/heat+branch:master+topic:bug/1089261,n,z
This is due to a combination of
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 05:05:46AM +, Hiroyuki Eguchi wrote:
I'm envisioning a stored userdata feature.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/stored-userdata
Currently, OpenStack allow user to execute script or send configuration file
when creating a instance by using --user-data
Hi Keith Clint,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 05:05:21AM +, Keith Bray wrote:
I want to echo Clint's responses... We do run close to Heat master here at
Rackspace, and we'd be happy to set up a non-voting job to notify when a
review would break Heat on our cloud if that would be beneficial.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 07:04:32AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/04/2014 12:39 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
As some of you know, I've been working on the instance-users blueprint[1].
This blueprint implementation requires three new items to be added to the
heat.conf, or some
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 11:23:28AM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
Hi folks,
There are two problems we should address regarding the growth and
change to the HOT specification.
First our +2/+A process for normal changes doesn't totally make
sense for hot_spec.rst. We generally have some
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:30:50AM +0200, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 06/04/2014 22:32
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Managing changes to the Hot
Specification (hot_spec.rst)
On 07/04/14 06:23, Steven
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 10:22:15PM -0400, Michael Elder wrote:
If Keystone is configured with an external identity provider (LDAP,
OpenID, etc), how does the creation of a new user per resource affect that
external identity source?
My understanding is that it should be possible to configure
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:24:00AM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/28/2014 03:01 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in swift,
ceilometer, tripleO and horizon.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 03:01:30PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in
swift, ceilometer, tripleO and horizon.
I just created a session for Heat:
http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/247
Historically Heat sessions have been quite
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:53:45AM +0400, Stan Lagun wrote:
Hello,
I’m one of the engineer working on Murano project. Recently we started a
discussion about Murano and Heat Software orchestration and I want to
continue this discussion with more technical details.
Thanks, we're certainly
The Heat team holds a weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting, see
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda for more details
The next meeting is on Wed Oct 9th at 2000 UTC
Current topics for discussion:
* Review last week's actions
* RC2 bug status
*
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:21:12PM -0400, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 10/15/2013 06:48:53 PM:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 10/15/2013 06:51 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:13:45PM +1300, Steve Baker wrote:
On 10/18/2013 01:54 AM, Mitsuru Kanabuchi wrote:
Hello Mr. Clint,
Thank you for your comment and prioritization.
I'm glad to discuss you who feel same issue.
I took the liberty of targeting your blueprint at icehouse. If you
Hi all,
Starting a thread to discuss $subject, as requested in:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51558/
First a bit of background. I wrote a keystoneclient patch, and ayoung
stated he'd like it tested via tempest before he'd ack it:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48462/
So I spoke to
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:48:08PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
So v3 keystone API is one thing, but I'm a little concerned with
moving the client testing to Tempest haphazardly. If we are testing
the API surface on the servers, the clients should be able to
correctly test all of this via a mock
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 07:45:33AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/19/2013 04:46 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:48:08PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
So v3 keystone API is one thing, but I'm a little concerned with
moving the client testing to Tempest haphazardly. If we
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 08:14:03AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/21/2013 05:19 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
snip
Definitely agree we should have plenty of end-to-end tests in the
gate, it's the reason we've got the scenario tests, to do exactly
this kind of through testing.
Ok, it seems like
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 02:45:01PM -0400, Lakshminaraya Renganarayana wrote:
snip
The prototype is implemented in Python and Ruby is used for chef
interception.
Where can we find the code?
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:23:20PM -0400, Lakshminaraya Renganarayana wrote:
A few us at IBM studied Steve Baker's proposal on HOT Software
Configuration. Overall the proposed constructs and syntax are great -- we
really like the clean syntax and concise specification of components. We
would
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:37:15AM -0700, Edgar Magana wrote:
Heat Developers,
I am one of the core developers for Neutron who is lately working on the
concept of Network Topologies. I want to discuss with you if the
following blueprint will make sense to have in heat or neutron code:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:33:40PM +, Randall Burt wrote:
On Oct 28, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:23:20PM -0400, Lakshminaraya Renganarayana wrote:
A few us at IBM studied Steve Baker's proposal on HOT Software
Configuration
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:07:08AM -0400, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 10/28/2013 06:47:50 AM:
On 27/10/13 16:37, Edgar Magana wrote:
Heat Developers,
I am one of the core developers for Neutron who is lately working on
the
concept of Network
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:12:54PM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
Please have a vote +1/-1
+1
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:19:13PM -0700, Edgar Magana wrote:
Hello Folks,
Thank you Zane, Steven and Clint for you input.
Our main goal in this BP is to provide networking users such as Heat (we
consider it as a neutron user) a better and consolidated network building
block in terms of
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:48:45PM -0400, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 10/28/2013 04:24:30 PM:
On 10/29/2013 02:53 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
...
Can anyone provide me with a clear argument for what the fundamental
differences actually are?
...
Since
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:34:44PM -0700, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
I believe we had a discussion about difference between declarative approach
and workflows. A component approach is consistent with declarative format
as all actions\operations are hidden inside the service. If you want to
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:50:59PM +0100, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 28/10/13 14:53, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:23:20PM -0400, Lakshminaraya Renganarayana wrote:
A few us at IBM studied Steve Baker's proposal on HOT Software
Configuration. Overall the proposed constructs
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:45:57AM +0200, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote:
If a line of code is complex enough to not fit 80 symbols I'd suggest
simplifying the algorithm. Btw, some of displays can be turned for 90˚ so
this might be a way to go with graphical IDEs :)
Agreed, I think Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:30:32PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 15:37 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
This is a bit of a social norms thread
I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a while now,
and I get the occasional push-back. I think this falls
Hi all,
So firstly, if you're an XML guru, I apologize, the questions below are
probably really basic, I always prefer JSON or YAML, because every time I
deal with XML, I get a week-long-headache ;)
So I'm writing Tempest API tests for the keystone OS-TRUST extension, as
was previously requested
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:40:46PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
snip
I think it is safe to say that the trusts API is broken in XML. I
added the following test:
diff --git a/keystone/tests/test_v3_auth.py b/keystone/tests/test_v3_auth.py
index c0e191b..6a0c10c 100644
---
Hi all,
I've been digging into our DB API code, aiming to align it more closely
with the recommendations in the oslo.db docs.
https://github.com/openstack/oslo-incubator/blob/master/openstack/common/db/sqlalchemy/session.py#L35
However, I'm confused by the references to model_query in the docs,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:22:57AM +, Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata
Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo) wrote:
snip
Thanks Steve Baker for the information. I am also waiting to hear from Steve
Hardy, if keystone trust system will fix the nova flavors admin privileges
issue.
So, basically, no.
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:36:49PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
I've been thinking about review queues recently (since here at the
summit everyone is talking about reviews! :)).
One thing that struck me today was that Gerrit makes it easier to
review the newest changes first, rather than the
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:04:04AM -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote:
I guarantee there's a few things I'm forgetting, but this is my collection
of things we discussed at the summit and determined to be good things to
pursue during the icehouse timeframe. The contents represent a high level
mix of
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:20:02AM -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
Looking to start a wider discussion, prompted by:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54651/
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:16:19AM +0100, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 14/11/13 19:58, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On 14/11/13 18:51, Randall Burt wrote:
Perhaps, but I also miss important information as a legitimate
caller as
to whether or not my scaling action
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 01:41:22PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
So while I have been on vacation, I've been thinking about Solum and Heat.
And I have some lingering questions in my mind that make me question
whether a new server project is actually necessary at all, and
whether we really should
All,
So, lately we've been seeing more patches posted proposing added
functionality to Heat (the API and template syntax) related to
development of UI functionality.
This makes me both happy (because folks want to use Heat!) and sad (because
it's evident there are several proprietary UI's being
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 03:04:12PM +0100, Ladislav Smola wrote:
Hello,
seems too big to do the inline comments, so just a few notes here:
If we truly want to have Templates portable, it would mean to have
the 'metadata' somehow standardised, right?
Otherwise if every UI will add their own
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:17:56PM +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/11/13 12:47 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Morgan Fainberg m...@metacloud.com
wrote:
In all honesty it
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 08:17:59AM -0600, Anne Gentle wrote:
Hi Steve,
There was a long thread about dropping project ID/tenant ID from the URL at
http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/c2wi2uwdsye32z7f
Looking back through it, it looks like nova v3 has it removed
Hi all,
Recently we've been skirting around the issue of an API version bump in
various reviews, so I thought I'd start a thread where we can discuss the
way forward.
My view is that we probably should look at creating a v2 API during
Icehouse, but we need to discuss what changes make sense, and
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 06:02:27PM +0100, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 27/11/13 16:27, Steven Hardy wrote:
I've raised this BP:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/v2api
And started a WIP wiki page where we can all work on refining what changes
need to be made:
https
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:11:37PM +, ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe) wrote:
Hey,
I really liked the v2 Heat API (as proposed in Create a new v2 Heat
APIhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/v2api) and I think it makes
a lot of sense.
One of the proposed changes is to Remove
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:38:03AM +1100, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 05/12/13 17:00 +, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:11:37PM +, ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe) wrote:
Hey,
I really liked the v2 Heat API (as proposed in Create a new v2 Heat
APIhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net
Hi all,
So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some
recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted to start
a discussion where we can agree and communicate our expectations related to
nomination for heat-core membership (becuase we do need more
Hi all,
So, I stumbled accross an issue while fixing up some tests, which is that
AFAICS since Icehouse we continually revalidate every property every time
they are accessed:
https://github.com/openstack/heat/blob/stable/havana/heat/engine/properties.py#L716
This means that, for example, we
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:04:15AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Russell Bryant wrote:
On 06/17/2014 08:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 01:12:45PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
On 17/06/14 12:36, Sean Dague wrote:
It could go in the commit message:
TrivialFix
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:21:14PM +, Randall Burt wrote:
On Jun 19, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
I was made aware of the following blueprint today:
http://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/add-quota-api-for-heat
http://review.openstack.org/#/c/96696/14
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:08:08AM +1200, Steve Baker wrote:
I'd like to nominate Sergey Kraynev for heat-core. His reviews are
valuable and prolific, and his commits have shown a sound understanding
of heat internals.
http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/heat-group/60
+1
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 03:02:14PM +0800, Qiming Teng wrote:
Just some random thoughts below ...
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:47:03PM -0400, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
In AWS, an autoscaling group includes health maintenance functionality ---
both an ability to detect basic forms of failures and
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:41:19AM +, Adrian Otto wrote:
Zane,
If you happen to have a link to this blueprint, could you reply with it? I
took a look, but did not find it.
I'd like to suggest that the implementation allow apps to call
unauthenticated (signed) webhook URLs
Hi all,
Recently I've been adding review comments, and having IRC discussions about
changes to update behavior for CloudFormation compatible resources.
In several cases, folks have proposed patches which allow non-destructive
update of properties which are not allowed on AWS (e.g which would
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:13:57AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
In current Alarm implementation, Ceilometer will send back Heat an
'alarm' using the pre-signed URL (or other channel under development).
By the other channel, do you mean the trusts-based interaction?
We discussed this at
1 - 100 of 512 matches
Mail list logo
