[openstack-dev] [TripleO][release][deployment] Packaging problems due to branch/release ordering

Hi all, I wanted to raise visibility of a problem we're experiencing in TripleO CI, which I think will potentially affect other projects that consume trunk builds from the RDO repositories (and potentially other distros too I guess) The problem is that we tag our final ocata releases after branch

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][heat] Heat memory usage in the TripleO gate: Ocata edition

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:21:54PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > > Following up on the previous thread: > > > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109748.html > > > > Here is the latest data, which includes the Oca

Re: [openstack-dev] [dib][heat] dib-utils/dib-run-parts/dib v2 concern

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was merged > to master, I noticed this commit[1], which bring dib-run-parts back into dib > itself. Unfortunately I missed the original proposal to do this, but I have > s

Re: [openstack-dev] [dib][heat] dib-utils/dib-run-parts/dib v2 concern

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:30:48AM -0500, Gregory Haynes wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, at 05:18 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] How to Preview the Overcloud Stack?

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 01:43:39PM -0700, Dan Sneddon wrote: > I've been trying to figure out a workflow for previewing the results of > importing custom templates in an overcloud deployment (without actually > deploying). For instance, I am overriding some parameters using custom > templates, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Status of monitoring tools

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 04:34:09PM +0530, Sanjay Upadhyay wrote: >Hi Folks, >I recently started work with a requirement to integrate a security tool >with monitoring framework for alerting and logging. I fail to  find >relevant docs in this direction. After looking around for more

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:09:43PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Bringing an old topic on the table. > > We might have noticed: > > 1. Some tripleo-specs take huge amount of time before getting merged > (or even reviewed). We have been asking folks to review them every > week but unfortunately t

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] container jobs are unstable

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:07:24PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:56:59AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > > > On 23/03/17 16:24 +0100, Martin André

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][heat] Nominate huangtianhua for heat-stable-maint

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 04:45:38PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > We are feeling the pinch on stable-branch reviewers in Heat, so now that I > understand the process a bit better, let's try this again. > > I'd like to nominate Huang Tianhua to join the heat-stable-maint team. > Tianhua is a heat-core

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Roadmap for Container CI work

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 04:01:48PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > After our weekly meeting of today, I found useful to share and discuss > our roadmap for Container CI jobs in TripleO. > They are ordered by priority from the highest to lowest: > > 1. Swap ovb-nonha job with ovb-containers, enable

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Florian Fuchs for tripleo-validations core

On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:53:04AM +0200, Martin André wrote: > Hellooo, > > I'd like to propose we extend Florian Fuchs +2 powers to the > tripleo-validations project. Florian is already core on tripleo-ui > (well, tripleo technically so this means there is no changes to make > to gerrit groups).

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] blog post about being PTL in OpenStack

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:22:50PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Exceptionally, I'll self-promote a blog post that I wrote about my > personal experience of being PTL in OpenStack. > > http://my1.fr/blog/my-journey-as-an-openstack-ptl/ Thanks for writing this up Emilien - it aligns pretty well w

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] pingtest vs tempest

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:48:32PM -0400, Justin Kilpatrick wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > Tempest isn't really either of those things. According to another message > > in this thread it takes around 15 minutes to run just the smoke tests. > > That's unacceptable

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Heat] Conditionally passing properties in Heat

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 02:51:28PM -0700, Dan Sneddon wrote: > On 04/13/2017 12:01 AM, Rabi Mishra wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Dan Sneddon > > wrote: > > > > On 04/12/2017 01:22 PM, Thomas Herve wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Dan

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][ironic][tripleo] ironic resources in heat

e first time there was some >opposition from ironic community (although I personally find it reasonable >to have those) but AFAIU this is no longer the case. >I would gladly revive old Steven Hardy patches [0] (have them starred on >Gerrit since then :) ) and make it happen if

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][heat][murano][daisycloud] Removing Heat support from Tempest

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:56:56PM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:51:13AM +, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:33 PM Matthew Treinish > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:49:14AM +0530, Rabi Mishra wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Project On-Boarding Info Collection

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:57:38PM +, Kendall Nelson wrote: >Hello! > >If you are running a project onboarding session and have etherpads/slides/ >etc you are using to educate new contributors  please send them to me! I >am collecting all the resources you are sharing into a s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Heat template example repository

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:21:30AM -0400, Lance Haig wrote: >Good to know that there is interest. Thanks for starting this effort - I agree it would be great to see the example templates we provide improved and over time become better references for heat features (as well as being more well te

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Heat template example repository

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:46:28PM +0200, Lance Haig wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I am happy to assist in any way to be honest. > > The backwards compatibility is not always correct as I have seen when > developing our library of templates on Liberty and then trying to deploy it > on Mitaka for example

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Validations before upgrades and updates

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 02:45:08PM +0300, Marios Andreou wrote: >Hi folks, after some discussion locally with colleagues about improving >the upgrades experience, one of the items that came up was pre-upgrade and >update validations. I took an AI to look at the current status of >tr

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Issue while applying customs configuration to overcloud.

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 04:33:33AM +, Dnyaneshwar Pawar wrote: > Hi TripleO team, > > I am trying to apply custom configuration to an existing overcloud. (using > openstack overcloud deploy command) > Though there is no error, the configuration is in not applied to overcloud. > Am I missing a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Onboarding rooms postmortem, what did you do, what worked, lessons learned

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:22:07AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > This is a thread for anyone that participated in the onboarding rooms, > on either the presenter or audience side. Because we all went into this > creating things from whole cloth, I'm sure there are lots of lessons > learned. > > If yo

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][tripleo][heat] Projects holding back requirements updates

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 03:15:13PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > Tagging with tripleo and heat teams for the os-*-config projects. I'm not > sure which owns them now, but it sounds like we need a new release. I think they're still owned by the TripleO team, but we missed them in the pike-1 release, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Making stack outputs static

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 06/09/2017 03:10 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: >> >> History lesson: a long, long time ago we made a very big mistake. We >> treated stack outputs as things that would be resolved dynamically when >> you requested them, instead of having values f

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Deprecate/Remove deferred_auth_method=password config option

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Kaz Shinohara wrote: > Hi Rabi, > > > I still takes `deferred _auth_method=password` behalf of trusts because we > don't enable trusts in the Keystone side due to some internal reason. > The issues what you pointed are correct(e.g. user_domain_id), we don't use >

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][mistral][deployment] how to add deployment roles

Hi Dan, On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Dan Trainor wrote: > Hi - > > I'm looking for the glue that populates the overcloud role list. > > I can get a list of roles via 'openstack overcloud role list', however I'm > looking to create new roles to incorporate in to this list. > > I got as far as

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Pt. 2 of Passing along some field feedback

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > A few weeks later than I had planned, but here's the other half of the field > feedback I mentioned in my previous email: > > * They very emphatically want in-place upgrades to work when moving from > non-containerized to containerized. I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo]: overcloud deploy --templates fails.

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Dnyaneshwar Pawar wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am getting following error. Do I need to specify anything else in the > command? > > This command was working fine before commit > 3e6147dee4497bbb607e6377bd588e32f62be2b7 . There is a Depends-On: I961624723d127aebbaacd0c2b

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Deprecate/Remove deferred_auth_method=password config option

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Kaz Shinohara wrote: > Hi, > >> No, I think we still need this, because it is disabled by default - >> this option allows you to enable defeating token expiry via trusts, > My understanding for the current implementation is.. > `deferred_auth_method=trust` triggers

Re: [openstack-dev] How to test private patches on overcloud ?

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Dnyaneshwar Pawar wrote: > Hi, > > while testing my patches i am getting errors with command 'openstack deploy > --templates' any idea what is wrong here? > > http://paste.openstack.org/show/614074/ This shows rabbit is failing to start: Error: Systemd start for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] proposing Alex Schultz tripleo-core in all projects

+1 On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Alex has demonstrated high technical and community skills in TripleO - > where he's already core on THT, instack-undercloud, and puppet-tripleo > - but also very involved in other repos. > I propose that we extend his core status to all T

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Forming our plans around Ansible

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:50 PM, James Slagle wrote: > I proposed a session for the PTG > (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ptg-queens) about forming a > common plan and vision around Ansible in TripleO. > > I think it's important however that we kick this discussion off more > broadly befo

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Forming our plans around Ansible

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote: > What i'd like to dig more is how Ansible and Heat can live together. And > what features do Heat offer that are not covered by Ansible as well? Is > there still the need to have Heat as the main engine, or could that be > replaced by Ansi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] pingtest vs tempest

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Justin Kilpatrick wrote: > Maybe I'm getting a little off topic with this question, but why was > Tempest removed last time? > > I'm not well versed in the history of this discussion, but from what I > understand Tempest in the gate has > been an off and on again t

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] CLI extensions for the undercloud

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto wrote: > Hello guys, > > After integrating BGPVPN and L2GW Neutron drivers in TripleO, I've realized > I always have to jump to the overcloud controller (and copy-pasting the > overcloudrc file) in order to use the CLI extensions such "neutr

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] plans on testing minor updates?

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Marios Andreou wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:50 AM, mathieu bultel wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> On 09/28/2017 05:05 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> > I was reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487496/ and >> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487488/ when

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][quickstart][rdo] shipping python-virtualbmc in Newton to allow undercloud upgrades from Newton to Queens

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lee Yarwood wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm currently working to get the tripleo-spec for fast-forward upgrades > out of WIP and merged ahead of the Queens M-1 milestone next week. One > of the documented pre-requisite steps for fast-forward upgrades is for > an operato

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [stable] [tripleo] [kolla] [ansible] [puppet] Proposing changes in stable policy for installers

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Emilien, > > I generally thought the stable policy seemed reasonable enough for lifecycle > management tools. I’m not sure what specific problems you had in TripleO > although I did read your review. Kolla was just tagged with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] roles_data.yaml equivalent in containers

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Abhishek Kane wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In THT I have an environment file and corresponding puppet service for > Veritas HyperScale. > > https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/master/environments/veritas-hyperscale/veritas-hyperscale-config.yaml > >

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Next steps for pre-deployment workflows (e.g derive parameters)

Hi all, Today I had a productive hallway discussion with jtomasek and stevebaker re $subject, so I wanted to elaborate here for the benefit of those folks not present. Hopefully we can get feedback on the ideas and see if it makes sense to continue and work on some patches: The problem under dis

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nominate akrivoka for tripleo-validations core

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Honza Pokorny wrote: > Hello people, > > I would like to nominate Ana Krivokapić (akrivoka) for the core team for > tripleo-validations. She has really stepped up her game on that project > in terms of helpful reviews, and great patches. > > With Ana's help as a co

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Next steps for pre-deployment workflows (e.g derive parameters)

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:55 PM, James Slagle wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:16 AM, James Slagle wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Today I had a productive hallway discussion with jtomasek and >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing John Fulton core on TripleO

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose John Fulton core on TripleO. >> >> I think John did an awesome work during the Pike cycle around the >> integration of ceph-ansible as a replacement fo

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on the TripleO on Kubernetes work

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 4:56 PM, James Slagle wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> Integration with TripleO Heat Templates >> === >> >> This work is on-going and you should eventually see some patches popping-up >> on >> the review

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

+1 On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Attila Darazs wrote: > On 11/29/2017 08:34 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: >> >> I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has >> been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the >> beginning. She has solid review

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Wesley Hayutin core on TripleO CI

+1! On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Team, > > Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work. > He has a very well understanding on how tripleo-quickstart and > tripleo-quickstart-extras work, his number and quality of reviews are > excellent so far. His

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Some historic digging

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > Hello, > > While trying to add some unit tests for some resources in the > puppet-tripleo repository, I stumbled on a not-so-nice case: the > tripleo::firewall::service_rules definition. > > In there, a resource is dynamically taken from hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleO] quickstart with containers deployment failed

On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Moshe Levi wrote: > Hi, > > > > We are trying to add container support ovs hw offload. > > We were able to do the deployment a few weeks ago, but now we getting an > errors . > > Jan 14 07:14:32 localhost os-collect-config: "2018-01-14 07:14:28,568 > WARNING: 1847

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][os-net-config] add support for NFV virtual switch

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 04:38:49PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 07/07/2016 05:45 PM, Xin Wu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is Xin from Big Switch. I'm proposing to make os_net_config support > > DPDK switch for NFV workloads. > > Current os_net_config supports ovs_bridge, linux_bridge, ivs_bridg

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making TripleO CI easier to consume outside of TripleO CI

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 03:39:41PM -0400, John Trowbridge wrote: > Howdy folks, > > In the TripleO meeting two weeks ago, it came up that tripleo-quickstart > is being used as a CI tool in RDO. This came about organically, because > we needed to use RDO CI to self-gate quickstart (it relies on hav

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] 3rd party CI

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:45:03PM -0400, Wesley Hayutin wrote: >Greetings, >Just wanted to let folks know we're bringing up two 3rd party gates for >TripleO CI atm. >1. The first gate will be for upgrading from mitaka -> newton/master >2. The second gate will be for running Tri

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][release] TripleO Newton Release schedule and Feature Freeze

Hi all, So we discussed $subject in our weekly meeting, and I wanted to follow up with some proposals to clarify our plan wrt the final Newton release, feature freeze, and how the dates will line up given that we're now following[1] the cycle-trailing release model[2] for most TripleO deliverables

[openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Heat map replacement options

Hi all, I'm trying to figure out the cleanest way to do a replacement of values in a mapping (json parameter) in a heat template, e.g: ServiceNetMap: type: json default: IronicApiNetwork: internal_api CephPublicNetwork: storage NetIpMap: type: json default:

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Heat map replacement options

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:35:51PM +0300, Peter Razumovsky wrote: >Try this: >yaql: >  expression:let(root => $) -> >dict($root.data.service.items().select([$[0], $root.data.ip[$[1]]])) >  data: >    service: { get_param: ServiceNetMap } >    ip: { get_param: NetIpMap}

Re: [openstack-dev] [DIB] [TripleO] Should we have a DIB meeting?

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 04:20:35PM -0700, Stephane Miller wrote: >There are a lot of interesting and complex changes going on with DIB at >the moment. This is a good thing, but it also means that we have more >complex decisions to make for the project. We've already taken one step to >

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Heat map replacement options

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:25:39AM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to figure out the cleanest way to do a replacement of values in > a mapping (json parameter) in a heat template, e.g: > > ServiceNetMap: > type: json > default: >

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Integration of non-puppet service configuration?

Hi all, Recently I've had a few discussions around $subject, and in particular there are folks involved in our community who would like to enable an optional alternative so puppet-ceph for configuring ceph services in a deployed overcloud. The alternative under discussion is ceph-ansible, and I d

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Gabriele Cerami for tripleo-quickstart core

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:06:53AM -0400, John Trowbridge wrote: > Howdy, > > I would like to propose Gabriele (panda on IRC), for tripleo-quickstart > core. He has worked on some pretty major features for the project > (explicit teardown, devmode), and has a good understanding of the code base. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo-common bugs, bug tracking and launchpad tags

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:28:10PM +0100, Julie Pichon wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday Dougal mentioned on IRC that he hadn't realised there was a > separate project for tripleo-common bugs on Launchpad [1] and that he'd > been using the TripleO main tracker [2] instead. > > Since the TripleO tracker

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] moving tripleo-ci/test-environments into THT

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:32:23PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > We're currently using tripleo-ci to store our test-environments files > (ie: multinode.yaml, etc). > To make it compatible with our different versions of TripleO, we have 2 > options: > > * Duplicate templates and use bash

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] moving tripleo-ci/test-environments into THT

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:30:37PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > On 07/21/2016 11:31 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:32:23PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] service validation during deployment steps

Hi Emilien, On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:59:33PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > I would love to hear some feedback about $topic, thanks. Sorry for the slow response, we did dicuss this on IRC, but providing that feedback and some other comments below: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Emilien Ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Modifying just a few values on overcloud redeploy

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:23:21PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: >I worked through how to do a complete clone of the templates to do a >deploy and change a couple values here: > >http://adam.younglogic.com/2016/06/custom-overcloud-deploys/ > >However, all I want to do is to set two con

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 08:41:32AM -0300, Honza Pokorny wrote: > Hello folks, > > As the tripleo-ui project is quickly maturing, it might be time to start > versioning our code. As of now, the version is set to 0.0.1 and that > hardly reflects the state of the project. > > What do you think? I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:08:08PM +0100, Dougal Matthews wrote: >On 27 July 2016 at 12:41, Honza Pokorny wrote: > > Hello folks, > > As the tripleo-ui project is quickly maturing, it might be time to start > versioning our code.  As of now, the version is set to 0.0.1 and th

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Modifying just a few values on overcloud redeploy

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:04:22AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > On 07/27/2016 06:04 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:23:21PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > > > I worked through how to do a complete clone of the templates to do a > > > deploy and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Improving Swift deployments with TripleO

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:36:45PM +0200, Christian Schwede wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to improve the Swift deployments done by TripleO. There are a > few problems today when deployed with the current defaults: Thanks for digging into this, I'm aware this has been something of a known-

Re: [openstack-dev] Project mascots update

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:19:10AM -0700, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: >Thanks to all of you for contributing unique and inspiring ideas to choose >a team mascot. You can view a list of projects that have chosen their >mascots here: http://www.openstack.org/project-mascots, and more will

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to > > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the > > recent "composable services" work we've

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:56:32PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > > > Last week I started some prototy

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Progress on overcloud upgrade / update jobs

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:46:20PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently working by iteration to get a new upstream job that test > upgrades and update. > Until now, I'm doing baby steps. I bootstrapped the work to upgrade > undercloud, see https> ://review.openstack.org/#/c/346995/

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making the nonha-multinode and undercloud jobs voting

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:14:24PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > I've proposed: > https://review.openstack.org/353019 > > which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and > gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs. > > I think these jobs have proven to be stable enough

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fernet Key rotation

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:31:29AM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 09/08/16 21:21, Adam Young wrote: > > On 08/09/2016 06:00 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > > > > > > In either case a good mechanism might be to use a Heat Software > > > Deployment via the Heat API directly (i.e. not as part of a stack) to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] release reminder

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:17:16AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > This is a quick release update: > > - We're currently R-6, "Final release for non-client libraries". > - Next week will be R-5, "Feature freeze" and "newton-3 milestone". > We'll proceed to a TripleO b3 release. If you need FFE, ple

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Barcelona Design Summit space needs

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:04:15AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Team, > > Thierry sent an email to all PTLs about space needs for next Summit. Thanks for raising this while I was out Emilien - indeed we need to provide some feedback (before the end of August, ideally sooner) about our needs for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Testing optional composable services in the CI

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:20:59AM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > However, the current gate system allows to run jobs based on files affected. > > So we can also run a scenario covering ironic on THT check/gate if > > puppet/services/*ironic

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] collaboration request with vendors

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:11:38PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > TripleO does support multiple vendors for different type of backends. > Here are some examples: > Neutron networking: Cisco, Nuage, Opencontrail, Midonet, Plumgrid, Biswitch > Cinder: Dell, Netapp, Ceph > > TripleO developers are st

[openstack-dev] [heat][tripleo][horizon][tripleo-ui] Parameter groups, tags and deprecation

Hi all, So I'm following up on a discussion that started here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356240 Basically I recently suggested[1] that relaxing the restriction where a parameter can only exist in exactly one parameter_group would be a way to help work around some pain-points we have in Tr

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][tripleo][horizon][tripleo-ui] Parameter groups, tags and deprecation

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:19:12PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 25/08/16 14:02, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > So I'm following up on a discussion that started here: > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356240 > > > > B

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][release] Plans re newton-3 release and feature freeze exceptions

Hi all, There have been some discussions on $subject recently, so I wanted to give a status update. Next week we will tag our newton-3 release, and we're currently working to either land or defer the remaining features tracked here: https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/newton-3 We need to l

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] FFE request for Manila integration

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:26:51AM -0400, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > The 3 patches we need to wrap up the Manila integration for TripleO still > haven't gotten enough review attention to merge: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354019 > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354014 > https://review.op

[openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Deep merge map of lists?

Hi all, I have a need to merge a list of maps of lists: heat_template_version: 2016-10-14 outputs: debug: value: yaql: # dict(vms=>dict($.vms.select([$.name, $]))) expression: dict($.data.l.select([$.keys().toList()[0], $.values().toList()[0]])) data:

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Deep merge map of lists?

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:07:09AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a need to merge a list of maps of lists: > > > > heat_template_version: 2016-10-14 > > > > output

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][release] Plans re newton-3 release and feature freeze exceptions

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:18:17PM +0300, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: >On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi all, > > There have been some discussions on $subject recently, so I wanted to > give > a status update. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Deep merge map of lists?

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:07:09AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a need to merge a list of maps of lists: > > > > heat_template_version: 2016-10-14 > > > > output

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Manila CephFS Native backend integration

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS > > driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy > > gating left 'till

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Requesting FFE for improved Swift deployments

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:32:09PM +0200, Christian Schwede wrote: > Hello, > > kindly asking for a FFE for a required setting to improve Swift-based > TripleO deployments: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358643/ This looks like it's associated with a bug, and if it's a bugfix then no FFE i

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Deep merge map of lists?

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:03:27PM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:07:09AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > >> dict($.groupBy($.keys().toList()[0], $.values().toList()[0][0])) > >> &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Ironic composable services

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:20:00AM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > Bare metal provisioning is a hot topic right now. These services are also > required for Dan's heat-driven undercloud work. The majority of changes has > landed already, but there a few changes waiting on puppet-ironic c

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Feature freeze exception for OVN

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 07:53:07PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote: > Hi, > > The THT patch for OVN [1] has no more dependencies with the recent merging > of [2]. The changes in heat templates does not have any impact on the > existing templates as major of the changes are in new templates and will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Deep merge map of lists?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:10:47PM +0200, Jiří Stránský wrote: > > On 30.8.2016 10:17, Steven Hardy wrote: > > > > > Yeah, that gets us closer, but we do need to handle more than one value > > (list entry) per key, e.g: > > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] FFE request for Ceph RGW integration

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 03:25:30PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Here's my 2 cents: > > The patch in puppet-ceph has been here for long time now and it still > doesn't work (recent update of today, puppet-ceph is not idempotent > when deploying RGW service. It must be fixed in order to get > succ

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Barcelona Design Summit space needs

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 07:18:26PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:04:15AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> As a reminder, here's what we had for Austin: > >> Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu)

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] RC1 status & request for reviews

Hi all, We had a bunch of CI issues this week, so there's still a lot to land before we cut RC1 next week. https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/newton-rc1 Please help by prioritizing·reviews to help burn down that list (especially the features), and please update the status of your FFE featu

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Overriding internal_api network name

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:21:43PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > I'm looking into support for multiple overclouds with shared control plane. > I'm porting a downstream guide: https://review.openstack.org/368840. > > However, this no longer works, probably because "internal_api" net

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Alex Schultz core on puppet-tripleo

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 05:26:31PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Team, > > Alex Schultz (mwhahaha on IRC) has been active on TripleO since a few > months now. While he's very active in different areas of TripleO, his > reviews and contributions on puppet-tripleo have been very useful. > Alex is

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] On allowing null as a parameter default

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:27:50PM -0500, Zane Bitter wrote: > Any parameter in a Heat template that has a default other than None is > considered optional, so the user is not required to pass a value. Otherwise, > however, the parameter is required and creating the stack will fail pretty > immedia

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][heat][mistral][magnum] Manage Ironic resource in Orchestration.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:18:59PM +0800, Rico Lin wrote: >Think about bare metal (ironic) deployment, we can do directly ironic >call, or use nova to deploy. >Right now I have a spec about implemented Ironic resources [1] in Heat. >Including Chassis, Port and some state setting f

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Requesting files from the overcloud from the undercloud

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 01:54:34PM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey folks, > > So I'm in the process of evaluating options for implementing the > capture-environment-status-and-logs[0] blueprint. At the moment my > current plan is to implement a mistral workflow to execute the > sosreport to bund

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Re-defining network templates/isolation

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Tim Rozet wrote: > Hello, > I wanted to get thoughts about re-thinking how users configure and create new > networks with OOO. The current way to configure network settings for a > deployment requires creating nic + network environment templates, and >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >