Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Nova][Neutron] Multi-tenancy support

UTC (8am Pacific time) on > #openstack-meeting-4. Feel free to drop by or join us - as this is one of > the things we plan on discussing next Monday's meeting. This will give you > a better feel. > > Hope this helps. > > -Sukhdev > P.S. feel free to ping me on IRC (IRC handle: Su

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Nova][Neutron] Multi-tenancy support

Hello Sean, Jim, Thanks for your comments. I've created separate repo: https://github.com/jumpojoy/generic_switch -- Sincerely Vasyl Saienko On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:38:28PM +, Sean M. Coll

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Nova][Neutron] Multi-tenancy support

Hello community, I would like to start preliminary testing of Ironic multi-tenant network setup which is supported by Neutron in Liberty according to [1]. I found the following patches that are on review. Also neutron ML2 plugin is needed. I can't find any plugin that supports multi-tenancy and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic]Boot physical machine fails, says "PXE-E11 ARP Timeout"

Hello Zhi, It seems that there is no connectivity between HW server and Gateway/TFTP server. You can boot live CD on it, assign the same IP manually and check if you are able to ping 10.0.0.1 Sincerely, Vasyl Saienko On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Zhi Chang <chang...@unitedstack.com>

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] Integration status

://review.openstack.org/#/c/258596/3/devstack/doc/source/guides/ironic-neutron-integration.rst [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/ironic+branch:master+topic:bp/ironic-ml2-integration [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-neutron-mid-cycle Sincerely, Vasyl Saienko

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] Integration status

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Vasyl Saienko <vsaie...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hello Ironic/Neutron community, > > Ironic patches were stale and were in merge conflict during last time. > Yesterday I've rebased those pathes and put them in single chain. I already >

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] Testing of Ironic/Neutron integration on devstack

on openstack.org for [1] [0] https://github.com/jumpojoy/ironic-neutron/blob/master/devstack/examples/ironic-neutron-vm.md [1] https://github.com/jumpojoy/generic_switch -- Sincerely Vasyl Saienko __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] Testing of Ironic/Neutron integration on devstack

65/ > > Cheers, > Kevin Benton > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Vasyl Saienko <vsaie...@mirantis.com> > wrote: > >> Hello Community, >> >> As you know Ironic/Neutron integration is planned in Mitaka. And at the >> moment we don't have any CI t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] Testing of Ironic/Neutron integration on devstack

demo 7. Make sure that there is no packets with MAC of *alt_demo vm *on *demo: vm *(can use tcpdump) -- Sincerely Vasyl Saienko On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Sukhdev Kapur <sukhdevka...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Vasyl, > > This is great. Kevin and I was working on the simila

[openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][ironic][nova] When Nova should mark instance as successfully deleted?

it. Sincerely, Vasyl Saienko __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][ironic][nova] When Nova should mark instance as successfully deleted?

Lucas, Andrew Thanks for fast response. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016, at 09:25 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for bringing this up Vasyl! > > > > > At the moment Nova with ironic virt_driver consider

[openstack-dev] [Tempest] [Devstack] Where to keep tempest configuration?

] https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/lib/tempest#L509-L513 [2] https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/lib/tempest#L514-L523 Thank you in advance, Vasyl Saienko __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] Integration status

://review.openstack.org/206144/ [3] https://review.openstack.org/296432/ [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/ironic+branch:master+topic:bug/1526403 Sincerely, Vasyl Saienko __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova][neutron][qa] Injecting code into grenade resource create phase

Hello Jim, Thanks for rising this question. My personal feeling that we don't need to tune tests that won't pass due to design limitations. It is Ironic pre-requirement to have network access from control plane to server during provisioning. Until Ironic Neutron integration is completed we may

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] Cruft entries found in global-requirements.txt

netmiko is in networking-generic-switch requirements.txt https://github.com/openstack/networking-generic-switch/blob/master/requirements.txt#L2 On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Haïkel wrote: > Started on removing some entries, I guess I have big cleanup to do RDO >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] Integration status

; wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 03:37:53PM +0300, Vasyl Saienko wrote: >> > Hello Community, >> > >> > I'm happy to announce that new experimental job >> > 'ironic-multitenant-network' is stabilized and working. This job allows >> to >> >

[openstack-dev] [ironic-staging-drivers] Tests at the gates

drivers has started successfully. The devstack plugin is on review already: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/299229/ Sincerely, Vasyl Saienko __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic-staging-drivers] Tests at the gates

, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: > On 04/20/2016 04:57 PM, Vasyl Saienko wrote: > > Hello Ironic-staging-drivers team, > > > > At the moment there is no tests for ironic-staging-drivers at the gates. > > I think we need to have a simple test that install dri

[openstack-dev] [ironic] static Portgroup support.

Hello Community, Current portgroup scenario is not fully clear for me. The related spec [3] doesn't clearly describe it. And based on implementation [1] and [2] I guess it should work in the following fashion for node with 3 NICs, where eth1 and eth2 are members of Porgroup Po0/1 Node network

[openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron][nova] Sync port state changes.

Hello Community, I'm working to make Ironic be aware about Neutron port state changes [0]. The issue consists of two parts: - Neutron ports for baremetal instances remain in DOWN state [1]. The issue occurs because there is no mechanism driver that binds ports. To solve it we need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] static Portgroup support.

Hello Ironic'ers! We've recorded a demo that shows how static portgroup works at the moment: Flat network scenario: https://youtu.be/vBlH0ie6Lm4 Multitenant network scenario: https://youtu.be/Kk5Cc_K1tV8 Sincerely, Vasyl Saienko On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Vasyl Saienko <vs

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] network_interface, defaults, and explicitness

The proposed approach is reasonable. Just a small adding. I think for a longterm concept it would be good to avoid setting binding_host_id in ironic virt_driver. We should force users to set it when 'binding_profile' is updated. It looks weird that we telling Neutron to bind port at one place and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron][nova] Sync port state changes.

339143 [1] https://review.openstack.org/339129 [3] https://review.openstack.org/340695 [4] https://review.openstack.org/345211 > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:07 AM, Vasyl Saienko <vsaie...@mirantis.com> > wrote: > >> Hello Community, >> >> I'm working to make Ironic be a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] why do we need setting network driver per node?

Dmitry thanks for rising this question! On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > I was reviewing https://review.openstack.org/317391 and realized I don't > quite understand why we want to have node.network_interface. What's the > real life use

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] End-of-Ocata core team updates

l! >> >> I'd like to propose a few changes based on the recent contributor >> activity. >> >> I have two candidates that look very good and pass the formal barrier of >> 3 reviews a day on average [1]. >> >> First, Vasyl Saienko (vsaienk0). I'm pretty confiden

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

The root cause why ironic grenade job was broken is described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1663371 In two words, during Ocata we removed DEFAULT_IMAGE_NAME setting logic from devstack [0]. As soon stable/ocata was cut for devstack variable DEFAULT_IMAGE_NAME is not visible in grenade,

[openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] PTG cross team session

Hello Ironic/Neutron teams, Ironic team would like to schedule cross session with Neutron team on Mon - Tues except for Tue 9.30 - 10.00 The topics we would like to talk are added to: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-ptg-pike L151 Sincerely, Vasyl Saienko

[openstack-dev] [ironic][devstack][devstack-gate][networking-generic-switch] Ironic multinode job

e steps for multinode case" https://review. openstack.org/#/c/368646/ "Add devstack setup_vxlan_network()" https:/ /review.openstack.org/#/c/368647 "Update iptables rules and services IPs for multinode" https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368648/ "Testing multinod

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/12/2016 03:01 PM, Vasyl Saienko wrote: > >> Hello Dmitry, >> >> Thanks for raising this question. I think the problem is deeper. There >> are a lot >> of use-cases th

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

Hello Dmitry, Thanks for raising this question. I think the problem is deeper. There are a lot of use-cases that are not covered by our CI like cleaning, adoption etc... The main problem is that we need to change ironic configuration to apply specific use-case. Unfortunately tempest doesn't

[openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] ML2 plugin for Ironic needs

://review.openstack.org/357779 [5] https://review.openstack.org/357780 Sincerely, Vasyl Saienko __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][devstack][devstack-gate][openstack-infra][networking-generic-switch] Ironic multinode job

for multinode case" https://review.openstack .org/#/c/368646/ - "Add devstack setup_vxlan_network()" https:/ /review.openstack.org/#/c/368647 <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368647> - "Update iptables rules and services IPs for multinode" http

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Vlan aware VMs or trunking

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Kevin Benton <ke...@benton.pub> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Vasyl Saienko <vsaie...@mirantis.com> > wrote: > >> @Armando: IMO the spec [0] is not about enablement of Trunks and >> baremetal. This spec is r

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Vlan aware VMs or trunking

nd doesn't tie you to VLANs on the backend. > > 1. http://ipcisco.com/vlan-mapping-vlan-translation-%E2%80%93-part-2/ > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 7 December 2016 at 04:02, Vasyl Saienko <vsaie..

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Vlan aware VMs or trunking

n Gig0/1 uplink. It will not work in this case, but if configure VLAN mapping at ports where baremetal are plugged (i.e: Fa0/1 - 0/5) it should work :) I definitely need more practice with VLAN mapping... > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Vasyl Saienko <vsaie...@mirantis.com> >

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Vlan aware VMs or trunking

-guide/source/config-trunking.rst [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trunk-api-dump-newton Thanks in advance, Vasyl Saienko __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Vlan aware VMs or trunking

? Reference: [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308521/1/specs/newton/vlan-aware-vms.rst@118 Thanks in advance, Vasyl Saienko On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 6 December 2016 at 08:49, Vasyl Saienko <vsaie...@mirantis.com> wrot

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [neutron] Should the ironic-neutron meeting start back up for pike?

Michael thanks for raising this question. I don't have strong opinion here. We didn't spent much time for network related things during past several meetings. But now we have a 'networking-baremetal' repo under our control. We will need a time to talk about design of our Neutron plugin,

[openstack-dev] [ironic][nova][grenade] Ironic CI grenade job degradation

Hello Community! Recently with CI performance degradation ironic team meet with the following problem. Quick automated cleaning is enabled on grenade jobs which is started exactly after nova instance is deleted. We do not wait for cleaning is finished in nova virt driver before mark instance as

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] ironic-stable-maint update proposal

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > I'd like to propose the following changes to the ironic-stable-maint group > [0]: > > 1. Add Ruby Loo (rloo) to the group. Ruby does not need introduction in > the Ironic community, she has been with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Goodbye ironic o/

Mario, So sorry to hear that you won't be working on Ironic anymore :( Good luck with your new assignments! On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Ranganathan, Shobha < shobha.ranganat...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Mario, > > > > Sorry to hear that you won’t be working on Ironic anymore! > > Best of luck

[openstack-dev] [ironic] networking-generic-switch core team update

Hello Ironic! Recently networking-generic-switch was added to OpenStack baremetal program [0]. And I would like to announce n-g-s core team changes: * add ironic-core to n-g-s-core as it is done for other ironic sub-projects * add mgoddard to n-g-s-core team as his reviews/commits are very

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Multi-tenant network with multiple port

Hello, We using the following order when picking candidate port/portgroups when attaching VIFs: - For Ironic <= Ocata 1. portgroups 2. ports with pxe_enabled=True 3. any other ports - For Ironic >= Pike (port has new attribute physical_netowrk: 1. portgroups with

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Hironori Shiina for ironic-core

+1 On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > I would like to nominate Hironori Shiina to ironic-core. He has been > working in the ironic community for some time, and has been helping > over the past several cycles with more complex features. He has >

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Stepping down from Ironic core

Hey Ironic community! Unfortunately I don't work on Ironic as much as I used to any more, so i'm stepping down from core reviewers. So, thanks for everything everyone, it's been great to work with you all for all these years!!! Sincerely, Vasyl Saienko