]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 5:30 PM
To: joehuang
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Zhiyuan Cai
Subject: Re: [Tricircle] Error runnig py27
Hi joehuang,
by removing self it is showing following error.
File
"/home/khayam/tricircle/.tox/py27/local/lib/python2.7
Hi, Khayam,
@mock.patch('self.app.post_json')
No “self.” needed.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: Khayam Gondal [mailto:khayam.gon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 2:50 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: joehuang; Zhiyuan Cai
Hi, Lige,
What’s your email address in https://review.openstack.org? Not able to add you
as the reviewer.
Now the cross pod L2 networking BP is in review.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304540/, you can add yourself as reviewer and
comment on it. It’s quite important for your comments from
Hi,
We have a very good discussion about cross OpenStack L2 networking
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleCrossPodL2Networking and Dynamic Pod
Binding https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleDynamicPodBinding. This week
we will discuss what's missing in first release of Tricircle for
Hello, team,
As scheduled in the weekly meeting, we will have a meeting to discuss “dynamic
pod binding” at
#openstack-tricircle(http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-tricircle)
at UTC 1:00 (Beijing time 9:00am) Apr.8.
The etherpad for discussion is:
, April 07, 2016 4:16 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint
Hi Chaoyi,
Just to clarify more.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:02 PM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi, Shinobu,
>
> Thanks for yo
Hi, Shinobu,
This part has been deleted just few minutes ago. No UUID mapping in stateless
design, but a resource routing table is used there, but read the "7.2 Resource
Routing Table".
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
-Original Message-
From: Shinobu Kinjo
Hi, Shinobu,
Thanks for your review. Just replied in the google doc, that the table is the
latest design, not old one, and some fields need to be implemented in new
patches.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
-Original Message-
From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com]
Hi, Zhiyuan,
You can also add some reviewers in the patch directly.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: Vega Cai [mailto:luckyveg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 9:16 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle]
, in
short between DCs.
Any thought would be appreciated as usual.
Cheers,
Shinobu
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:24 PM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We have a very good discussion about cross OpenStack L2 networking
> last
> week: https
Hi,
We have a very good discussion about cross OpenStack L2 networking last week:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleCrossPodL2Networking
Let's continue the discussion and other topics in this weekly meeting.
IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every
Hi, Lige,
Welcome to join Tricircle. You can start from
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle, and the todo-list is listed in
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo, and last week we just discussed
the cross OpenStack L2 networking:
ore though.
Cheers,
Shinobu
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:08 AM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi, Shinobu,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion. When using PyCharm as the IDE, one issue is that
> if we use abbreviation for the word to name the function or variables, the
Huang )
-Original Message-
From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2016 7:40 AM
To: joehuang; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention
One of examples is:
"""
...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 4:18 PM
To: joehuang
Cc: Yipei Niu; Vega Cai; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node
configuration
Very good.
Cheers,
S
- Original Message -
From
Hi,
IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every
Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00.
Agenda:
# Cross OpenStack L2 networking
# pod scheduling
# Reliable aync. Job
# Link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo
If you have other topics to be discussed
is the same as the sample
>> file of tricircle.
>>
>> [1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/sample_config.html
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Yipei
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com>
&g
Hi, Thierry,
One question about this ' The transition to the "big tent" governance model is
now finished, with all the expected projects now officially part of the
OpenStack community. The big tent is all about community: answering the "are
you one of us" question.'.
Does it mean that no
enable_service q-agt
And also check the configuration in Nova to use Neutron
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: Vega Cai [mailto:luckyveg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 2:55 PM
To: Yipei Niu
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); joehuang
Subject: Re
to foreseen that it would be bottleneck, and be able
not to realize what the Tricircle is trying to do.
Honestly it's already bottleneck.
Cheers,
Shinobu
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 6:31 PM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi, Shinobu,
>
> This BP is a good entrance for Tricircle sourc
Hi, Shinobu,
This BP is a good entrance for Tricircle source code, this BP listed the all
basic patches building Tricircle from scratches.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tricircle/+spec/implement-stateless
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
-Original Message-
From: Shinobu
Yes, It would be better to avoid the field name duplicated with DB key words.
These tables are ported from Nova and Neutron, it would be good to change the
field name.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
-Original Message-
From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com]
Sent:
(not for usage questions)
Cc: joehuang; Rochelle Grober; huangzhipeng; Gordon Chung
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev][release]how to release an non-official project in
Mitaka
joehuang wrote:
> Thanks for the help. There is a plan for not only Tricircle but also
> Kingbird to do a release in Mitaka, both o
Hi,
IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every
Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00.
Agenda:
# Mitaka release preparation
#Newton release features discussion
# Link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
List (not for usage questions)
Cc: joehuang; Zhiyuan Cai
Subject: [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration
Hi, Joe and Zhiyuan,
I have already finished installing devstack in two nodes with tricircle. I
encounter some errors when testing cross-pod L3 networking with DevStack. I
, 2016 7:09 AM
To: Rochelle Grober; joehuang; huangzhipeng; Gordon Chung; Thierry Carrez
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mitaka Release of Tricircle
I pinged Thierry on IRC (he's Release Core) about how to perform and announce
the release. He said he'd be "Happy to consult" on how to do a go
; huangzhipeng; newypei; caizhiyuan (A)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:22 AM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hello, Shinobu,
>
> Yes, as what you described here, the "initialize" in "core.py"
Thanks to Kevin’s explanation. Some more comment on Tricircle.
Hybrid cloud is only one of the use cases, there are two other use cases for
Tricircle:
1. massive distributed edge clouds
Current Internet is good at processing downlink service. All contents are
stored in centralized data
tter to using
>migration script to instantiate the DB, and tested in the unit test too.
(Also move the discussion to the openstack-dev mail-list)
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
-Original Message-
From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:ski...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016
git clone tricircle.
cd tricircle, where you can find tox.ini
run command:
sudo tox -epy27
Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice
发件人：khayam.gondal
收件人：openstack-dev,
抄送：黄朝意,luckyvega.g,
时间：2016-03-17 18:13:08
主题:[Tricircle] Run unit/functional tests
How to run tests in /tricircle/test/functional *... .
Agree with Kevin,
Currently Tricircle mainly focuses on the API gateway and networking automation
across multiple OpenStack instances. The hybrid cloud PoC is built based on
Tricircle in Tokyo Summit:
Hi,
IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every
Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00.
Agenda:
# Progress review of To-do list: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo
# Mitaka release preparation
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
Interesting, maybe we can co-present on Tricircle in Linux con. For the m-l is
mainly for development topics. Let's move it to non-maillist discussion.
Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice
发件人：shinobu.kj
收件人：openstack-dev,
抄送：openst...@lists.openstack.org,
时间：2016-03-08 19:21:15
主题:Re: [openstack-dev]
Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice
发件人：shinobu.kj
收件人：openstack-dev,
抄送：openst...@lists.openstack.org,
时间：2016-03-08 19:21:15
主题:Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )
If you want anyone to joint this linuxcon to present the Tricle, let me know.
IMHO I could -;
Cheers,
S
On
Hi,
If you have any topic to discuss, please reply in the M-L.
IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every
Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00.
Agenda:
# Progress of To-do list review: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo
# Reliable async. job
# L2
( Joe Huang )
From: Yipei Niu [mailto:newy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:02 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Vega Cai; joehuang; 时鹏飞
Subject: Re: [tricircle] playing tricircle with devstack under two-region
configuration
Hi Pengfei,
I also
Hi, Pengfei,
Volume type is not supported in Tricircle yet.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: 时鹏飞 [mailto:shipengfe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 9:36 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing
management
# exception logging, flavor mapping
# Pod scheduling
# L2 networking across pods
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: joehuang
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 9:32 AM
To: 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)'
Subject: [openstack-dev][tricircle] weekly
( Joe Huang )
From: Yipei Niu [mailto:newy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 10:04 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: joehuang; Vega Cai
Subject: Re: [tricircle] playing tricircle with devstack under two-region
configuration
Hi Joe and Zhiyuan
Hi, Ian, Jay and Brian,
Glad to know that the use case could be defined as "Image cloning", a feature
ever discussed. As Ian said, the "Image Cloning" seems not only required in
OPNFV, but also other cloud operators.
So would it possible to discuss "Image cloning" in Austin design summit, and
Hi, Yipei,
Is this port disabled to be visit in your host? Pls. check iptables.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: Yipei Niu [mailto:newy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 8:49 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: joehuang; Zhiyuan Cai
Subject: [tricircle
k-dev@lists.openstack.org <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]one more use case for Image Import
Refactor from OPNFV
> On 02/18/2016 10:29 PM, joehuang wrote:
> > There is difference between " An end user is able to import image
> > fro
rt
Refactor from OPNFV
On 02/18/2016 08:34 PM, joehuang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Glad to know that the "Image Import Refactor" is the essential BP in
> Mitaka. One more use case from OPNFV as following:
>
> In OPNFV, one deployment scenario is each data center will
Hello,
Glad to know that the "Image Import Refactor" is the essential BP in Mitaka.
One more use case from OPNFV as following:
In OPNFV, one deployment scenario is each data center will be deployed with
independent OpenStack instance, but shared identity management. That means
there will be
Hi,
After the Chinese new year festival, let's resume the weekly meeting, and
agenda as following.
Agenda:
# Progress of To-do list review: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo
# SEG
# Quota management
# exception logging, flavor mapping
# Pod scheduling
# L2 networking across pods
Hi, Doug,
Partly agree with you that " Tracebacks should be logged for errors the
application can't recover from." From maintenance perspective, if some
exception happened, the engineer needs to find out what causes the exception
and decide to do some work to prevent more sever issue occurred.
Hi,
The Chinese new year is approaching, let's have a weekly meeting, and agenda as
following. After this meeting, we'll cancel the meeting of next week, and
resume on Feb.17.
Agenda:
# Progress of To-do list review: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo
# Query optimization.
# Quota
ack.org
Cc: joehuang; Zhiyuan Cai
Subject: Re: [tricircle] Playing Tricircle with Devstack
Hi Jeo,
This error occurred when installing devstack on node2.
Best regards,
Yipei
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Yipei Niu
<newy...@gmail.com<mailto:newy...@gmail.com>> wrote:
--
Hi, Yipei,
have you installed two nodes devstack successfully or not? This error is
occurred during or after the installation?
If you have installed them successfully, then Volume type is not supported in
Cinder-apigw yet (you can help to implement it ☺ ). You can use –os-region-name
Pod2
Hello,
Let's continue the discussion on L3 Networking N-S and Quota management
IRC meeting: #openstack-meeting, every Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting
Agenda:
* Progress of To-do list review:
Except paste the result for the command with –debug parameter "openstack
--debug project show admin -f value -c id" in Node2, please also attach your
configuration file in Node1 and Node2 ( local.conf in the devstack folder )
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: Vega Cai
Hello,
This RFE[1] “extend l2gw api to support multi-site connectivity” needs review
after it’s registered several weeks ago.
There are several projects looking forward for the feature of extending L2
network across Neutron, or say, across sites.
For example: OPNFV multisite[2]: VNF(Telecom
networking N-S.
l Quota management.
Design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kZZ1snMOCD9IQvUKI5NVDzSASpw-QKj7l2zNqMEd3g/edit#
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: joehuang [joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent: 14 January 2016 17:33
To: OpenStack Development
Hello,
As the stateless design in the experiment branch has a quite positive feedback,
the stateless design is moved from the experiment branch to the master branch.
You can try it through Devstack: https://github.com/openstack/tricircle
If you find bug, please feel free to report it at
@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [api][all] api variation release by release
On 1/12/2016 7:27 PM, joehuang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As more and more OpenStack release are deployed in the production
> cloud, multiple releases of OpenStack co-located in a cloud is a ve
list review: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo
l Discussion of phase 2 of stateless design.
Design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kZZ1snMOCD9IQvUKI5NVDzSASpw-QKj7l2zNqMEd3g/edit#
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent
Hello,
As more and more OpenStack release are deployed in the production cloud,
multiple releases of OpenStack co-located in a cloud is a very common
situation. For example, "Juno" and "Liberty" releases co-exist in the same
cloud.
Then the cloud management software has to be aware of the API
Hi, Thierry,
Thanks for explanation. One question is whether these projects (like Kingbird,
Tacker, Tricircle) will be listed in stackalytics.com any more, maybe not in
the "OpenStack others", but "Others" category?
It's also important for Technical Committee/others to know the contribution of
on stackalytics.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/tacker/
Bob
On 1/7/2016 3:02 AM, joehuang wrote:
Hello,
Both Kingbird[1] and Tricircle[2] are not visible in stackalytics.com now,
which are projects under OpenStack name space. Some days ago these two
projects are listed in http
://launchpad.net/tricircle
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
From: joehuang
Sent: 23 December 2015 17:34
To: joehuang; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] weekly meeting of Dec.23
Hi,
A weekly meeting
( joehuang )
From: joehuang
Sent: 23 December 2015 17:34
To: joehuang; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] weekly meeting of Dec.23
Hi,
A weekly meeting will be held today at the UTC1300 at #openstack-meeting
( joehuang )
From: joehuang
Sent: 23 December 2015 17:34
To: joehuang; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] weekly meeting of Dec.23
Hi,
A weekly meeting will be held today at the UTC1300 at #openstack-meeting
://launchpad.net/tricircle
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
From: joehuang
Sent: 23 December 2015 17:34
To: joehuang; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] weekly meeting of Dec.23
Hi,
A weekly meeting
Hi,
A weekly meeting will be held today at the UTC1300 at #openstack-meeting before
the X’Mas and New Year holiday.
Agenda:
Progress of To-do list: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo
Discussion of stateless design.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: joehuang
Sent
OpenStack is called
a Pod : ) )
1. The basic function of nova api gateway is done and code has been merged
(joehuang<http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tricircle/2015/tricircle.2015-12-23-13.04.log.html#l-18>,
13:08:12)
2. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo
(joehuan
Hi,
Sorry that the network connection problem stopped me attending the meeting.
Hope that we can arrive at the phase 1 milestone in the todo-list by the end of
this week.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
From: joehuang
Sent: 16 December 2015 14:05
Hi, Ihar,
Thank you very much. You are correct, it's a new Neutron plugin but not
"Neutron-ovn like agent" :)
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
From: Ihar Hrachyshka [ihrac...@redhat.com]
Sent: 16 December 2015 18:28
To: OpenStack D
Hi, Ihar,
Is there any sub-project under Neutron stadium dealing with cross Neutron L2/L3
networking? If there is no one, why not introduce a new one.
More information about what the plugin wants to do:
Hi,
Let’s have regular meeting today starting UTC1300 at #openstack-meeting
Agenda:
Progress of To-do list: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo
Discussion of stateless design.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday
Hi, Sridhar,
Great to know that Tacker also begins to address multi-VIM ( multi-OpenStack )
requirement in OPNFV cloud, and your concerns on OPNFV multisite and OpenStack
Tricircle project.
I just gave some comment on the spec. And I think the most important one for
Tacker integration with
Hi,
Let’s have regular meeting today starting UTC1300 at #openstack-meeting
Agenda:
Progress of To-do list: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleToDo
Discussion of stateless design.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: joehuang
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 2:37 PM
To: 'Zhipeng Huang'; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions); caizhiyuan (A); Irena Berezovsky; Orran Krieger; Mohammad
Badruzzaman; 홍석찬
Subject: [openstack-dev][tricircle] weekly
Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: Zhipeng Huang [mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 5:44 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); joehuang;
caizhiyuan (A); Irena Berezovsky; Orran Krieger; Mohammad Badruzzaman; 홍석찬
Subject: Re
Hi,
Currently the Nova provides VM snapshot API, which will take a consistency
snapshot of a VM and regarding volumes, and will quiesce/unquiesce VM
automatily with guest agent support.
We learned that the exposure of quiesce/unquiesce api in Nova was "abandoned"
in the history. Now we have
Hello,
Could you or someone else pls. help us to open a new project? We learned that
Stackforge will be retired soon, so shall we open this new project under
OpenStack directly instead? How to do it ?
A new project, a standalone new service Kingbird
(https://launchpad.net/kingbird ) for
Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: Zhipeng Huang [mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 10:23 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: joehuang; caizhiyuan (A); Eran Gampel; Saggi Mizrahi; Irena Berezovsky
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev][tricircle]Weekly
ommon.fileutils
[req-e905e497-2f45-4bb2-a384-ee4f97a23cec 3c94437bbd0a455d938ed1d95c7049d1
791854
27679a44019d919ce34112c971 - - -] Reloading cached file /etc/glance/policy.json
read_cached_file /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_policy/openstack/co
mmon/fileutils.py:64
2015-09-07 09:02:1
Hello, Jamie and Hans,
The patch " Allow specifying a region name to auth_token "
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/216579 has just been merged.
But unfortunately, when I modify the source code as this patch did in the
multisite cloud with Fernet token, the issue is still there, and routed to
Hello, Jamie,
I hope I am wrong :)
One comment for your patch.
using region name to filter the endpoint for the token validation may not work
if no-catalog is configured in keystone server. include_service_catalog =
True(BoolOpt) (Optional) Indicate whether to set the
Huang ( Joe Huang )
From: e...@gampel.co.il [mailto:e...@gampel.co.il] On Behalf Of Eran Gampel
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 7:07 PM
To: joehuang; Irena Berezovsky; Eshed Gal-Or; Ayal Baron; OpenStack Development
Mailing List (not for usage questions); caizhiyuan (A); Saggi Mizrahi; Orran
Hello,
As what we discussed in the yesterday’s meeting, the contradict is how to scale
out cascade services.
1) In PoC, one proxy node will only forward to one bottom openstack, the
proxy node will be added to a regarding AZ, and multiple proxy nodes for one
bottom OpenStack is feasible
Hi, Dolph,
You are right, it’s same issue. Hans and I work together on this prototype, and
Hans first found the token validation is not routed to local KeyStone, and I
tried to find why in the source code. The patch in the bug description could be
reference for the correction. (I am not sure
tools) to find a
leader cascade service. Leader cascade service is responsible for periodically
creating status synchronization task and other members finish the task.
BR
Zhiyuan
On 3 August 2015 at 14:48, joehuang
joehu...@huawei.commailto:joehu...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi,
In the PoC, the status
Hi, Lance,
May we store the keys in Barbican, can the key rotation be done upon Barbican?
And if we use Barican as the repository, then it’s easier for Key distribution
and rotation in multiple KeyStone deployment scenario, the database replication
(sync. or async.) capability could be
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:11 AM, joehuang
joehu...@huawei.commailto:joehu...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi, Lance,
May we store the keys in Barbican, can the key rotation be done upon Barbican?
And if we use Barican as the repository, then it’s easier for Key distribution
and rotation in multiple
to reduce the number of API calling to the top layer.
In the top layer, using a task to process the status change in case of burst
status refresh.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
Hi,
Glad to know you guys are talking about the key distribution and rotation for
Fernet token. Hans and I did a prototype for multisite identity service
management, and have a similar issue.
The use case is : a user should, using a single authentication point be able to
manage virtual
address, then ends the session at the end.
BR
Zhiyuan
On 31 July 2015 at 09:05, joehuang
joehu...@huawei.commailto:joehu...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi, Vega,
Multiple DB access will be a use case for one session , especially for DB data
insertion, multiple table will be involved. To embed the session
Hi, Vega,
Multiple DB access will be a use case for one session , especially for DB data
insertion, multiple table will be involved. To embed the session in Context,
it’s ok to start a session if the session is empty, but how to decide when to
commit the data, end a session?
Best Regards
Hello, all,
Welcome to review and comment on the open design of tricircle, the first BP
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tricircle/+spec/new-design
Detailed discussion can also be found on the weekly meeting log:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Tricircle
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (
Hello,
The scenario I mentioned in the weekly meeting is described in the following
google doc:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1s0tRI3GtzSR5Dcl0YGSZ2upEwdqPsqU0d6-rq0CRMQo/edit#slide=id.gb6e146160_0_25
To reduce the complexity, I suggest we focus on the scenario 1 in the current
( Joe Huang )
From: Zhipeng Huang [mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 8:20 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: joehuang; Eran Gampel; caizhiyuan (A); Gal Sagie; Saggi Mizrahi
Subject: [openstack-dev][Tricircle] Ubernetes and Tricirle
Hi
Hi,
We just tested that OpenStack API response is not very fast. From nova-client,
if a boot-vm request is issued to Nova, it takes about 1.9 seconds to get the
response. (The token format is UUID). Query is short, but it still take about
0.9 second.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
Hello, Swifter,
It's often recommended to use shared Glance service with shared Swift as the
backend to support image replication in multi-sites.
The question is how many sites Swift can support to work as the image store?
Is there any limitation on the multi-site image replication?
Can Swift
on the tricircle
from scratch, with a PoC as reference.
Best regards
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] on behalf of Rodriguez, Iben
[iben.rodrig...@spirent.com]
Sent: 05 June 2015 23
+1 Really funny, and helpful for innovation.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] on behalf of Daniel Smith
[daniel.sm...@ericsson.com]
Sent: 06 June 2015 21:35
Hello,
My idea for Ceilometer scaling is to partition Ceilometer based on project ID
( Sorry I am newbie to Ceilometer, correct me if I am wrong ).
Why?
1. Each tenant only cares about the metering data/event/alarm for himself,
doesn't cares who else is also using the ceilometers. Project ID
and don'ts: Unit, functional, full-stack, API and Tempest (amuller)
Neutron cascading to address scalability (joehuang)
ML2 MechanismDrivers for bare-metal deployments (Sukhdev)
Stateful OpenFlow Firewall Driver (ajo)
distributed data-plane performance testing with Shakar (obondarev)
multi-node
Hi, Loy,
+100. Really interesting topic.
Cascading[1] has holistic thinking on the question list, and one cross project
topic is just submitted yesterday:
a) Any other value for partitioning besides scalability? e.g. fault domain
isolation, heterogeneous integration...
Sure, each cascaded
Hello, all,
This is Chaoyi Huang (Joe Huang). I am not TC, nor TC candidate, but I have a
technical vision for OpenStack to be ubiquitous cloud service. I would like to
apply one cross project session in the Vancouver design summit to give a
lightning talk for the vision, TC/TC
301 - 400 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
