I'd prefer 1400UTC.
zhiyan
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Nikhil Komawar
nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, we've alternating time for Glance meetings. Now, with the
Daylight savings being implemented in some parts of the world, we're
thinking of moving the meeting
, the profiler prefix is redundant to me still from the
perspective of operator/configuration.
zhiyan
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Louis Taylor krag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 12:16:44PM +0800, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
Why not change other services instead of glance? I see one reason
Greetings,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
Back in Havana a, partially-implemented[0][1], Cinder driver was merged
in Glance to provide an easier and hopefully more consistent interaction
between glance, cinder and nova when it comes to
Replied in inline.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/22/2014 02:30 PM, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
Greetings,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
Back in Havana a, partially-implemented[0][1], Cinder driver
Thanks Doug for your reminder/message!
Field https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1381870 for glance stuff.
btw, currently I prepared three patches to fix this defect, any input
are welcome:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127487/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127923/
Hi Mark,
Many thanks for your great work and leadership! Personally I have to
say thank you for your mentorship for me. Let's still keep in touch in
Glance/OpenStack.
zhiyan
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Mark Washenberger
mark.washenber...@markwash.net wrote:
Greetings,
I will not be
Frankly I don't like the idea of using single configuration for all
service too, I think it will be cool if we can generate separated
configuration template files automatically for each Glance service. So
besides https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83327/ , actually I'm working
on that idea as well,
Hello Hemanth,
Thanks for your summary, and raise it up in ML.
All of them are sensible to me, there is only one concern from
implementation perspective for me like to get folks notice.
If we follow 'POST /images/{image_id}/actions/{action_type}' approach,
I think we will hard to write common
module
Best,
-jay
At 2014-04-23 07:21:27,Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Vincent, Zhi, Huiba, sorry for delayed response. See comments inline.
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 10:59 +0800, Sheng Bo Hou wrote:
I actually support the idea Huiba has proposed, and I am thinking of
how to optimize
and Distributed
Processing, College of Computer Science, National University of Defense
Technology, Changsha, Hunan Province, P.R. China
410073
At 2014-04-18 12:14:25,Zhi Yan Liu lzy@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:53 AM, lihuiba magazine.lihu...@163.com wrote:
It's not 100
prevent to reading data from remote image every time by
CoR.
zhiyan
===
From: Zhi Yan Liu lzy@gmail.com
Date: 2014-04-17 0:02 GMT+08:00
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][blueprint] Accelerate the booting
process of a number of vms via
interesting to me, will take a look, thanks for sharing.
National Key Laboratory for Parallel and Distributed
Processing, College of Computer Science, National University of Defense
Technology, Changsha, Hunan Province, P.R. China
410073
At 2014-04-17 17:11:48,Zhi Yan Liu lzy
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:19 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
If you'd like to have a go at implementing this in nova's Juno
release, then you need to create a new-style blueprint in the
nova-specs repository. You can find more details about that process at
need to be resolved as well.
At 2014-04-18 06:05:23,Zhi Yan Liu lzy@gmail.com wrote:
Replied as inline comments.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:33 PM, lihuiba magazine.lihu...@163.com wrote:
IMO we'd better to use backend storage optimized approach to access
remote image from compute node instead
Hello Yongquan Fu,
My thoughts:
1. Currently Nova has already supported image caching mechanism. It
could caches the image on compute host which VM had provisioning from
it before, and next provisioning (boot same image) doesn't need to
transfer it again only if cache-manger clear it up.
2. P2P
Hi
We have no plan to update sample template in I release for it, but
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77379/ is on reviewing, IFY.
zhiyan
Sent from my iPad
On 2014年3月30日, at 13:04, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 27/02/14 18:47, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 27/02/14 12:12 +0800,
Hi Doug,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-03-10 12:24, Chris Friesen wrote:
Hi,
I'm using havana and recent we ran into an issue with heat related to
+1. Nice work Arnaud!
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/03/14 19:19 -0700, Mark Washenberger wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to nominate Arnaud Legendre to join Glance Core. Over the past
cycle
his reviews have been consistently high quality and I
Jay thanks your correct analysis and quick fix.
zhiyan
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 14:18 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 3/10/2014 11:20 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
+1! according to the low rise and the usefulness for the real cloud deployment.
zhiyan
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd Like to request A FFE for the remaining patches in the Ephemeral
RBD image support chain
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59148/
Hi,
We decided multi-attach feature must be implemented as an extension to
core functionality in Cinder, but currently we have not a clear
extension support in Cinder, IMO it's the biggest blocker now. And the
other issues have been listed at
I have a related BP:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/image-location-selection-strategy
IMO, as I mentioned in its description, it can be applied in glance
and consumer (glance's client) both sides: in glance internal, this
can be used for image-download handling and direct_url_
One quick question, do you think there is a potential backward-capability
breaking issue for end user or ISV if we remove existing
standardizing/normalizing logic? I'd like to know the gains/advantages on this
fix.
thanks,
zhiyan
Sent from my iPad
On 2014年1月26日, at 23:49, Fei Long Wang
FSM +1
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/image-status-global-state-machine
btw, I remember I had posted this information in your change as a
review comment, which is a simple state validation mechanism in image
domain object and already been merged.
thanks,
zhiyan
On Mon, Jan 27,
is make
sense, at last it is better if we keep same property name as client
provided.
zhiyan
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Fei Long Wang flw...@cn.ibm.com wrote:
Zhi Yan,
I think you're talking about backward-compatibility, right? I would say
it's possible, just like the v2 is not compatible
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 23/12/13 09:00 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/23/2013 08:48 AM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/23/2013 05:42 AM,
Hello John,
04:00 or 05:00 UTC works for me too.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:05 PM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:57 PM, 赵钦 chaoc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
I think the current meeting schedule, UTC 16:00, basically works for China
TZ (12AM),
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Regards,
Zhi Kun Liu
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
Hi Koo,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:15 AM, David koo david@huawei.com wrote:
Hi All,
A quick question about simple janitorial tasks ...
I noticed that glance.api.v2.image_data.ImageDataController.upload has two
identical except clauses (circa line 98):
except
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256207
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Zhi Yan Liu lzy@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Koo,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:15 AM, David koo david@huawei.com wrote:
Hi All,
A quick question about simple janitorial tasks ...
I noticed that glance.api.v2
. If it doesn't work
with other projects, we should work to help those projects get updated
to work with it.
--Morgan
On Thursday, October 24, 2013, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
Hi all,
Adopt 0.1.8 as iso8601 minimum version:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53567/
zhiyan
that mean Tempest could not run on python 2.6 in the future?
--
Regards,
Zhi Kun Liu
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
by this suggestion.
However, after talking with Zhi Yan after the session, I think it makes
sense to support this in a local sense rather than storing such information
in the database. Locality is critical because different glance nodes likely
have different relationships to the underlying locations
+1, This is a great idea. We could consider it as a general process for
all tests.
2013/11/14 Koderer, Marc m.kode...@telekom.de
Hi all,
I think we have quite the same issue with the neutron testing. I already
put it on the agenda for the QA meeting for today.
Let's make it to a general
of these testcases have
possible impact on other tests. Anyone has ideas about it? Should we
remove such testcases?
Regards,
Zhi Kun
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Hi Nikhil,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Nikhil Komawar
nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi all,
There seem to be varying ideas about the worker interface design for our
blueprint async-glance-workers. Fei and Zhi already have posted detailed
comments on https://review.openstack.org
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Iccha Sethi iccha.se...@rackspace.com wrote:
Maty,
Can you link the launchpad bug? I have used image-list for glance v2 and it
seemed to work fine for me. Maybe you could provide more details?
Also maybe we should continue this discussion on openstack
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Masashi Ozawa moz...@cloudian.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
We already created the blueprint for this feature below belore, if
Glance can use S3 MultiPart Upload REST API for the large objects in
future release as Amazon recommends it for the large object to be
I am out of the office until 10/07/2013.
I will take vacation from 28th Sep to 7th Oct . If have any urgent, please
call 13910806810
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: [openstack-dev]
[scheduler] [heat] Policy specifics sent on 09/27/2013 23:58:16.
This is the only
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
Currently in Havana development, RBD as ephemeral storage has serious
stability
and performance issues that makes the Ceph cluster a bottleneck for using an
image as a source.
Nova has to currently communicate with
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
