Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo

2018-10-21 Thread Adam Harwell
Octavia relies heavily on Taskflow and Futurist as well. Personally I agree with basically everything Monty said earlier. The problem here really isn't anything besides relaxing the social review policy, which is as simple as just deciding it as a team and saying "well, ok then". :) I also use a

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][octavia] Containerize the amphora-agent

2018-09-30 Thread Adam Harwell
I was coming to the same conclusion for a completely different goal -- baking lighter weight VMs (and eliminating a number of compatibility issues) by putting exactly what we need in containers and making the base OS irrelevant. So, I am interested in helping to do this in a way that will work

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Optimize the query of the octavia database

2018-09-14 Thread Adam Harwell
It's high priority for me as well, so we should be able to get something done very soon, I think. Look for something early next week maybe? Thanks, --Adam On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 21:18 Jeff Yang wrote: > Thanks: > I found the correlative patch in neutron-lbaas: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Proposing Carlos Goncalves (cgoncalves) as an Octavia core reviewer

2018-08-31 Thread Adam Harwell
+1 for sure! On Sat, Sep 1, 2018, 01:41 Carlos Goncalves wrote: > Ha! Gracias for the kind words, Miguel! :-) > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Miguel Lavalle > wrote: > >> Well, I don't vote here but I stiil want to express my +1. I knew this >> was going to happen sooner rather than later

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ptg] Denver PTG on-site or virtual

2018-08-17 Thread Adam Harwell
using and/or contributing to Kolla, let's be > sure to make time for that. > Mark > > On 17 August 2018 at 12:54, Adam Harwell wrote: > >> As one of the other two in the etherpad, I will say that I was looking >> forward to getting together face to face with other contrib

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ptg] Denver PTG on-site or virtual

2018-08-17 Thread Adam Harwell
As one of the other two in the etherpad, I will say that I was looking forward to getting together face to face with other contributors for the first time (as I am new to the project), but I guess the majority won't actually be there, and I understand that we need to do what is best for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [barbican] [tc] key store in base services

2018-06-20 Thread Adam Harwell
Looks like I missed this so I'm late to the party, but: Ade is technically correct, Octavia doesn't explicitly depend on Barbican, as we do support castellan generically. *HOWEVER*: we don't just store and retrieve our own secrets -- we rely on loading up user created secrets. This means that

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Multiple availability zone and network region support

2018-05-26 Thread Adam Harwell
I have a patch up here for multi AZ: https://review.openstack.org/558962 But, it doesn't really handle other networks... It works for me because I use my own L3 network driver: https://review.openstack.org/435612 It might be possible to use it with an AZ aware networking driver as well? If you

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Proposing Jacky Hu (dayou) as an Octavia core reviewer

2018-03-26 Thread Adam Harwell
+1, definitely a good contributor! Thanks especially for your work on the dashboard! On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:09 PM German Eichberger < german.eichber...@rackspace.com> wrote: > +1 > > Really excited to work with Jacky -- > > German > > On 3/26/18, 8:33 PM, "Michael Johnson"

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Proposing Nir Magnezi as Octavia core reviewer

2017-10-09 Thread Adam Harwell
+1 On Thu, Oct 5, 2017, 05:48 Daniel Mellado wrote: > +1 > > Go, Nir, Go! > > congrats! > > On 10/05/2017 03:51 AM, German Eichberger wrote: > > +1 > > > > Welcome Nir, well earned. > > > > German > > > > On 10/4/17, 4:28 PM, "Michael Johnson"

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] haproxy fails to receive datagram

2017-10-08 Thread Adam Harwell
When was the old image built and when was the new one built? I noticed my images had stopped working on our older (Liberty) production cloud, and discovered that recently Ubuntu and Centos have both upgraded cloud-init to 0.7.9 in their base images (from something like 0.7.5), which finished the

Re: [openstack-dev] [forum] Future of Stackalytics

2017-06-08 Thread Adam Harwell
I wish I'd made it to that Forum session, but here's my two cents now: As a core reviewer for LBaaS I actually find Stackalytics quite helpful for giving me a quick snapshot of contributions, and it lines up almost perfectly in my experience with what I see when I'm actually reviewing and working

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][barbican][castellan] Proposal to rename Castellan to oslo.keymanager

2017-03-22 Thread Adam Harwell
ome of you may think of this as a meaningless gesture, but I am personally very sure it is not. +1 from me as an interested user/contributor. Personally I'd go in for the complete rename to oslo.keymanager, but just oslo is a good start. --Adam Harwell On Wed, Mar 22, 2017, 00:34 Flavio Percoco <f

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron-lbaas][barbican][octavia]certs don't get deregistered in barbican after lbaas listener delete

2017-01-27 Thread Adam Harwell
move_consumer() method > for cert_manager and call them in neutron_lbaas as well. > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:48 Adam Harwell <flux.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've got this on my list of things to look at -- I don't know if it was > you I was talking with on IRC the other day ab

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron-lbaas][barbican][octavia]certs don't get deregistered in barbican after lbaas listener delete

2017-01-25 Thread Adam Harwell
I've got this on my list of things to look at -- I don't know if it was you I was talking with on IRC the other day about this issue, but I'm definitely aware of it. As soon as we are past the Ocata feature freeze crunch, I'll take a closer look. My gut says that we should be calling the delete

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Nominating German Eichberger for Octavia core reviewer

2017-01-20 Thread Adam Harwell
+1 Welcome back German! On Fri, Jan 20, 2017, 11:43 Michael Johnson wrote: > > Hello Octavia Cores, > > I would like to nominate German Eichberger (xgerman) for reinstatement as > an > Octavia core reviewer. > > German was previously a core reviewer for Octavia and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-16 Thread Adam Harwell
nger story). --Adam Harwell On Mon, Jan 16, 2017, 14:36 Duncan Thomas <duncan.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > To give a totally different prospective on why somebody might dislike > Barbican (I'm one of those people). Note that I'm working from pretty hazy > memories so I don't guar

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-16 Thread Adam Harwell
) otherwise (though I am fully behind just using Barbican). --Adam Harwell (LBaaS/Octavia) On Mon, Jan 16, 2017, 11:57 Adrian Otto <adrian.o...@rackspace.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 16, 2017, at 11:02 AM, Dave McCowan (dmccowan) < > dmcco...@cisco.com> wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][octavia][tacker][designate][manila][sahara][magnum][infra] servicevm working group meetup

2016-10-24 Thread Adam Harwell
I'll be there. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016, 20:29 Doug Wiegley wrote: > > On Oct 24, 2016, at 8:23 PM, Doug Wiegley > wrote: > > As part of a requirements mailing list thread [1], the idea of a servicevm > working group, or a common

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-19 Thread Adam Harwell
(not anything a deployer will need to install on their control-plane instances) is suggested as a binary dependency, when it is a python module that we include in our code just like *everything else* in our requirements file. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:02 PM Adam Harwell <flux.a...@gmail.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-19 Thread Adam Harwell
equirements-files > http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=platform=nope=bindep.txt= > > Thanks, > Dims > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Adam Harwell <flux.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, but we need to use SOMETHING for our own devstack gate tests -- > maybe > > it

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-19 Thread Adam Harwell
To reply more directly and clearly: On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:30 PM Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:41:16AM +0000, Adam Harwell wrote: > > I wonder if maybe it is not clear -- for us, gunicorn is a runtime > > dependency for

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-19 Thread Adam Harwell
Yes, but we need to use SOMETHING for our own devstack gate tests -- maybe it is easier to think of our devstack code as a "third party setup", and that it uses gunicorn for its DIB images (but not every deployer needs to). In this case, how do we include it? Devstack needs it to run our gate

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-19 Thread Adam Harwell
I wonder if maybe it is not clear -- for us, gunicorn is a runtime dependency for our gate jobs to work, not a deploy dependency. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, 11:16 Tony Breeds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:12:45PM -0600, Doug Wiegley wrote: > > > Right, so, we’re

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Harwell
Yep, I believe we did this in the past when we first started down this path with Octavia, but we may have been too early -- maybe now is a better time to do it. I will be at the summit and more than happy to attend a related meeting. But, I agree with Doug that we shouldn't stall this because of

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Harwell
Adam Harwell <flux.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > Inline comments. > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:38 AM Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 10/18/2016 02:37 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > On Oct 17, 2016 7:27 PM, "Thomas Goirand" <z...@

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Harwell
Inline comments. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:38 AM Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > On 10/18/2016 02:37 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > On Oct 17, 2016 7:27 PM, "Thomas Goirand" <z...@debian.org > > <mailto:z...@debian.org>> wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Harwell
We really don't want bindep IMO -- it's much safer to use the non-packaged version from pypi for our purposes, since we may not be running on a system that packages things like this. Again, our use case may be strange though, as we're really using the python module and not the binaries. --Adam

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Harwell
If there's no objection to us using gunicorn without it being present in g-r, then I don't know if I want to argue strongly for adding it -- the only benefit I see to tracking g-r at all is that it lets us continue to get free version tracking for our amphora dependencies as they are updated in

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Harwell
, and I think the amphora image should still retain ties to OpenStack. :/ --Adam On Tue, Oct 18, 2016, 09:42 Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 17, 2016 7:27 PM, "Thomas Goirand" <z...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > On 10/17/2016 08

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

2016-10-17 Thread Adam Harwell
Jim, that is exactly my thought -- the main focus of g-r as far as I was aware is to maintain interoperability between project dependencies for openstack deploys, and since our amphora image is totally separate, it should not be restricted to g-r requirements. I brought this up, but others thought

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

2016-10-17 Thread Adam Harwell
+1 On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 3:05 AM Michael Johnson wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Miguel Lavalle > wrote: > > Dear Neutrinos, > > > > I am organizing a social event for the team on Thursday 27th at 19:30. > After > > doing some

Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing Bharath Munirajulu as Octavia Core

2016-04-04 Thread Adam Harwell
+1 From: Brandon Logan Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:04 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing Bharath Munirajulu as Octavia Core +1 On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 13:56

Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing Stephen Balukoff as Octavia Core

2016-02-04 Thread Adam Harwell
+1 from me! From: Michael Johnson Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 7:03 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing Stephen Balukoff as Octavia Core Octavia

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][barbican]TLS container could not be found

2016-02-04 Thread Adam Harwell
Could you provide your neutron-lbaas.conf? Depending on what version you're using, barbican may not be the default secret backend (I believe this has been fixed). Alternatively, it depends on what user accounts are involved -- this should definitely work if you are using only the single admin

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Is SSL offload config possible using non "admin" tenant?

2015-09-18 Thread Adam Harwell
sion is marked for tenant “admin” lbaas is not able to get the tenant’s container/certificate. I have filed a bug for the same. https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1497410 This is an important fix required since tenants wont be able to use SSL Offload. Will try to upload a fix for this

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Is SSL offload config possible using non "admin" tenant?

2015-09-15 Thread Adam Harwell
ts/containers. What is the API or CLI that the admin will use to allow access of the tenant’s secret+container to Neutron-LBaaS tenant. From: Adam Harwell [mailto:adam.harw...@rackspace.com] Sent: 15 September 2015 03:00 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Is SSL offload config possible using non "admin" tenant?

2015-09-14 Thread Adam Harwell
You need to set up ACLs on the Barbican side for that container, to make it readable to the Neutron-LBaaS tenant. For now, the tenant-id should just be documented, but we are looking into making an API call that would expose the admin tenant-id to the user so they can make an API call to

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

2015-05-28 Thread Adam Harwell
I haven’t seen any responses from my team yet, but I know we’d be interested as well — we have done quite a bit of work on this in the past, including dealing with the Designate team on this very subject. We can be available most hours between 9am-6pm Monday-Friday CST. --Adam

Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] [barbican] Relationship between Octavia and Barbican and Octavia 1.0 questions

2015-05-21 Thread Adam Harwell
Barbican is using SQLAlchemy, so I assume PostgreSQL is not a hard requirement. I know it deploys fine with SQLite for local development, and I am not aware of anything that would prevent it from running on MySQL. I am told it actually does use MySQL in devstack, so those docs may just be out

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent

2015-05-01 Thread Adam Harwell
+1 --Adam https://keybase.io/rm_you From: Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.commailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet when creating a pool?

2015-05-01 Thread Adam Harwell
The subnet_id on the pool specifies what networks to plug when everything is first configured.Iif you add a member to the pool that is outside this subnet, there may not be a route to it, since it is probably on a different network that is not correctly plugged on the LB host. (I hope this is

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Dependency of pyenv configuration in Barbican.sh script

2015-04-23 Thread Adam Harwell
douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.commailto:douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com, Paul Kehrer paul.keh...@rackspace.commailto:paul.keh...@rackspace.com, Adam Harwell adam.harw...@rackspace.commailto:adam.harw...@rackspace.com, Alexis Lee alex...@hp.commailto:alex...@hp.com Subject: Re: Barbican

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Use of consumer resource

2015-03-30 Thread Adam Harwell
a...@redhat.commailto:a...@redhat.com, Paul Kehrer paul.keh...@rackspace.commailto:paul.keh...@rackspace.com, Adam Harwell adam.harw...@rackspace.commailto:adam.harw...@rackspace.com Subject: Re: Barbican : Use of consumer resource (Including Adam, who implemented this feature last year to make sure I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] LBaaS Haproxy performance benchmarking

2015-02-04 Thread Adam Harwell
At Rackspace we have been working on automated testing with Ansible and Tsung, but I don’t know if that code ever made it to a public repository… We found Tsung to be very useful for parallel testing though! :) --Adam https://keybase.io/rm_you From: Varun Lodaya

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Mid-cycle hack-a-thon

2014-11-06 Thread Adam Harwell
with that, I would like to do the Octavia hack-a-thon the previous week: Dec. 1 through 5 in Seattle. On Nov 5, 2014 11:05 PM, Adam Harwell adam.harw...@rackspace.commailto:adam.harw...@rackspace.com wrote: I can probably make it up there to attend. --Adam https://keybase.io/rm_you From: Stephen

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Paris Summit talking points

2014-10-22 Thread Adam Harwell
Let's get a list of questions / talking points set up on this etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/paris_absentee_talking_points If you can't make it to the summit (like me) then you can put any questions or concerns you have in this document. If you are going to the summit, please take a

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Barbican Integration for Advanced Services

2014-10-03 Thread Adam Harwell
for Neutron (and other OpenStack projects). I assume there may be other teams investigating very similar integration schemes as well, so if anyone has comments or suggestions, I'd love to hear them. Thanks, --Adam Harwell https://keybase.io/rm_you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Interaction with Barbican and Keystone

2014-09-24 Thread Adam Harwell
in Horizon? Will there just be a popup saying Establish Trust (Y/N). I am wondering as you how other teams are handling that... Thanks, German -Original Message- From: Adam Harwell [mailto:adam.harw...@rackspace.com] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 3:16 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Interaction with Barbican and Keystone

2014-09-18 Thread Adam Harwell
I've made an attempt at mapping out exactly how Neutron Advanced Services will communicate with Barbican to retrieve Certificate/Key info for TLS purposes. This is far from solidified, since there are some issues that I'll go over momentarily. First, here is a *high level* diagram of the process

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Responsibilities for controller drivers

2014-09-15 Thread Adam Harwell
I pretty much completely agree with Stephen here, other than believing we should do N:1 on VIPs (item 2 in your list) from the start. We know we're doing IPv6 this way, and I'd rather not put off support for it at the controller/driver/whatever layer just because the underlying infrastructure

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]

2014-09-02 Thread Adam Harwell
:09 PM, Adam Harwell adam.harw...@rackspace.com wrote: Only really have comments on two of your related points: [Susanne] To me Octavia is a driver so it is very hard to me to think of it as a standalone project. It needs the new Neutron LBaaS

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]

2014-08-30 Thread Adam Harwell
Only really have comments on two of your related points: [Susanne] To me Octavia is a driver so it is very hard to me to think of it as a standalone project. It needs the new Neutron LBaaS v2 to function which is why I think of them together. This of course can change since we can add whatever

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]

2014-08-28 Thread Adam Harwell
Yeah, I think I agree there. If we were to go the Neutron-incubator route, we'd end up with Neutron-Octavia, and I don't think that's what we want, right? I believe to be Openstack-Octavia we need to be incubated as a separate project. --Adam https://keybase.io/rm_you From: Kevin Benton

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Consumer Registration API

2014-07-07 Thread Adam Harwell
List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc: John Wood john.w...@rackspace.commailto:john.w...@rackspace.com, Adam Harwell adam.harw...@rackspace.commailto:adam.harw...@rackspace.com Subject: [barbican] Consumer Registration API I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Barbican Neutron LBaaS Integration Ideas

2014-06-10 Thread Adam Harwell
would rather it behaved this way. What's your proposal for cleaning up copied secrets when they're actually no longer in use by any LB? Stephen On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Adam Harwell adam.harw...@rackspace.commailto:adam.harw...@rackspace.com wrote: So, it looks like any sort

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Meetup?

2014-05-12 Thread Adam Harwell
I'm not sure if there's anything super important today that everyone is attending. I'm in the Future of Neutron panel right now, but would people want to meet up after that? Maybe over some lunch, since I think most of my team missed breakfast? :) After that would probably work too, again

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Meetup?

2014-05-12 Thread Adam Harwell
Some of us are at a table towards the back by the B3b door (and a large restrooms sign). On May 12, 2014 12:24 PM, Adam Harwell adam.harw...@rackspace.com wrote: Yeah, I guess we'll try to catch people after this session (lunch officially starts at 12:45 apparently). On May 12, 2014 11:48 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] API proposal review thoughts

2014-05-08 Thread Adam Harwell
Just a couple of quick comments since it is super late here and I don't want to reply to the entire email just yet... Firstly, I think most of us at Rackspace like the way your proposal handles L7 (hopefully my team actually agrees and I am not speaking out of turn, but I definitely like it),

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-06 Thread Adam Harwell
I'd like to add that size of the organization (or really, size of the development team) that is voting in this quiz does not directly correlate to size of customer base. If there were any weighting happening, I'd hope these answers would be weighted by size of user base, since really it is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Fulfilling Operator Requirements: Driver / Management API

2014-05-03 Thread Adam Harwell
AM, Adam Harwell adam.harw...@rackspace.commailto:adam.harw...@rackspace.com wrote: I am sending this now to gauge interest and get feedback on what I see as an impending necessity — updating the existing haproxy driver, replacing it, or both. I agree with Stephen's first point here. For HAProxy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Use-Cases with VPNs Distinction

2014-05-03 Thread Adam Harwell
Sounds about right to me. I guess I agree with your agreement. :) Does anyone actually oppose this arrangement? --Adam From: Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thoughts on current process

2014-05-01 Thread Adam Harwell
With regard to the last paragraph/sentence about a new driver, I am writing a lengthy analysis of that specific topic currently — hopefully we will be able to start an in-depth discussion on that later today. --Adam From: Jorge Miramontes

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Fulfilling Operator Requirements: Driver / Management API

2014-05-01 Thread Adam Harwell
is on these topics, because these are some of the assumptions I've been operating under during the rest of our discussions, and if they're invalid, I may need to rebase my view on the API discussion as a whole. Thanks ya'll, I'm looking forward to getting some additional viewpoints! --Adam Harwell

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]L7 conent switching APIs

2014-05-01 Thread Adam Harwell
My thoughts are inline (in red, since I can't figure out how to get Outlook to properly format the email the way I want). From: Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Use-Cases with VPNs Distinction

2014-05-01 Thread Adam Harwell
Comments in red. I'm tired, so hopefully most of what I say makes sense. :) From: Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] Summit ticket needed, help?

2014-04-17 Thread Adam Harwell
very much for your consideration, --Adam Harwell (prospective Neutron-LBaaS contributor) PS: I apologize if this is not the place for this, I am on IRC often but somewhat unused to Mailing List etiquette. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Load balancing use cases and web ui screen captures

2014-04-11 Thread Adam Harwell
Most everything non-http(s) related can simply be load-balanced under the generic umbrella of UDP or TCP protocol. MySQL often gets it's own special protocol (Libra has MySQL/Galera), but of what you listed, SSH is the only real special case I can think of, wherein something more specialized