Same.
On 3 August 2018 at 13:15, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
> Dougal, the policy looks good for me. I gave it the second +2 but didn’t
> approve yet so that others could also review (e.g. Adriano and Vitalii).
>
> Thanks
>
> Renat Akhmerov
> @Nokia
> On 3 Aug 2018, 16:46 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrot
Agreed.
On 10 July 2018 at 05:42, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
> Dougal, I’m totally OK with this idea.
>
> Thanks
>
> Renat Akhmerov
> @Nokia
> On 9 Jul 2018, 22:14 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> I'd like to propose that we start abandoning old Gerrit reviews.
>
> This report shows
+1
On 19 June 2018 at 10:47, Dougal Matthews wrote:
>
>
> On 19 June 2018 at 10:27, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’d like to promote Vitalii Solodilov to the core team of Mistral. In my
>> opinion, Vitalii is a very talented engineer who has been demonstrating it
>> by providing very h
I'm good for helping with the Monday and Friday time slots
Cheers,
Adriano
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote:
>
>
> On 5 February 2018 at 07:48, Renat Akhmerov
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Not so long ago we decided to stop holding weekly meetings in one of the
>> general IR
>
>
> Cheers,
> Lingxian Kong (Larry)
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Renat Akhmerov > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’d like to promote Adriano Petrich to the Mistral core team. Adriano has
>> shown the good review rate and quality at least over th
I have
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-workflow-executions-yaql-function
almost all implemented and I would like submit an FFE for it
Cheers,
Adriano
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Tony Breeds
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:01:41PM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote:
>
Amazing! Thanks for the effort that took to get the promotion fixed!
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Jason E. Rist wrote:
> On 11/03/2017 03:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > since the failures in Tuesday's tests were caused by infra problems, we
> > believed a specific hash involved
king
> about various modifications of this class yet.
>
> So if you see a concrete idea about using zope interfaces please share.
> I’m interested in that.
>
> Renat Akhmerov
> @Nokia
>
> On 14 Mar 2017, at 22:14, Adriano Petrich wrote:
>
> Sorry if I'm
Sorry if I'm missing the point here, and for being late on the discussion.
But what about zope interfaces?
Would not that be clearer?
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote:
>
>
> On 14 March 2017 at 11:14, Renat Akhmerov
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I finally understood too what Tho
Mathieu,
That sounds exactly what we need. Do we run tempest or something on
those to validate it?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:34 PM, mathieu bultel wrote:
> Hi Adriano
>
> On 01/17/2017 03:05 PM, Adriano Petrich wrote:
>
> So I want to make a backwards compatibility job u
So I want to make a backwards compatibility job upstream so from last scrum
I got the feeling that we should not be adding more stuff to the
experimental jobs due to lack of resources (and large queues)
Is that so? I was thinking about using nonha-multinode-oooq that seems to
be working.
Is that
11 matches
Mail list logo