+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Ihor Kalnytskyi <i...@kalnytskyi.com>
wrote:
> Hey fellow fuelers,
>
> I'd like to nominate Alexander Kislitsky to the fuel-web-core team.
> He's doing thorough review [1], participate in feature developments
> (e.g. C
+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Maksim Malchuk <mmalc...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to nominate Stanislaw
+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Sergey Vasilenko <svasile...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscrib
Hi,
-1 to the proposal. We have the ability (and we use it) to add guys to
several core groups. So, AFAIC, Vladimir's pros point #1 is covered. IMO,
pros point #2 looks questionable and not so important. Cons could be worse
(agree with Lukasz).
Thanks,
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016
+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Igor Kalnitsky <ikalnit...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Vitaly's doing a great job. +2, no doubts!
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Tatyana Leontovich
> <tleontov...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> > A huge +1
> >
Well, the agreement is reached. I've added Artur to fuel-web-core group.
Let's continue discussion on time management questions if it will
become an issue.
Artur, congratulations!
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
for
HugePages support and of NUMA/CPU pinning support) and in bug-fixing in
Fuel project.
Core reviewers, please reply back with +1/-1.
[1] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/fuel-web/90
Best regards,
Aleksey Kasatkin
+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Sergey Vasilenko <svasile...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> /sv
> On Jun 9, 2016 09:24, "Julia Aranovich" <jkirnos...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:5
Matthew,
It's great that we have this test. But why to rerun it for no changes?
It was executed only when a new patch was published for CR or CR was
rebased.
Now it is executed on "fuel:recheck".
Agree, adding a plugin would be helpful.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016
patch/rebase only.
Its run takes about 1.5 hour and there is little sense to run it more than
once for the same patch.
Thanks,
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Dmitry Kaiharodsev <
dkaiharod...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> please be informed that
:
ep: br-mon
...
network_scheme:
custom:
roles:
influxdb_vip: br-mon
...
...
I hope, this helps.
Regards,
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Simon Pasquier <spasqu...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> I've got a question regarding
Hi Ryan,
Thank you. We had a talk with Evgeniy. As a preliminary plan, we will have
meetings with all interested people from Networking team.
Regards,
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ryan Moe <r...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi Aleksey,
>
>
>
>> What
Hi,
I'm agree with Alex, keys should remain immutable. 'node-{uid}' is Okay, we
have a method for this in Nailgun already. It should be a very simple fix
in Nailgun.
Thanks,
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Kyrylo Galanov <kgala...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
&g
s 2.1 is in progress already, 2.3 seems to be
rejected..?
I'd like to participate in design discussions. Please add me into meetings.
Thanks,
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/network-config-refactoring
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290767/
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Mar
iov
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Aleksandr Didenko <adide...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to to request a feature freeze exception for "Support for SR-IOV
> for improved networking performance" feature [0].
>
> Part of this f
+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Sergey Vasilenko <svasile...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
>
> /sv
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Tatyana Leontovich <
tleontov...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Igor Kalnitsky <ikalnit...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Fuelers,
>>
>> I'd like to
> jsonpatch
There were +1's regarding overriding VIPs above. I'd stick with that. It is
done for tasks now. But we will need to check conflicts between plugins
there (as for tasks).
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko <m...@romcheg.me> wrote:
>
Good idea, overally.
How about multiple plugins? We don't have any sequence or priorities
between them.
What if one plugin assumes that VIP is present but other one wants to
remove it?
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk <sgolovat...@mirantis.com
> wrote:
Roman, please provide more details on how VIPs are overridden. And how do
you deal with multiple plugins.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin <akasat...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Good idea, overally.
>
> How about multiple plugins? We don't ha
maybe find a way to do exactly this.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Aleksandr Didenko <adide...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> > How are we handling this now for multiple plugins?
>
> OK, so right now we can only add VIPs to array, we can't remove them. S
Folks, you are welcome to review a spec: https://review.openstack.org/254796
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin <akasat...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Mike, Vladimir,
>
> Yes,
> 1. We need to add IPs on-the-fly (need to add POST functional
+ Konstantin
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Aleksandr Didenko <adide...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just finished deployment of multirack env with ceph and external LB (not a
> standard multi-rack deployment scheme, actually, but still):
>
> ht
+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Aleksandr Didenko <adide...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Tatyana Leontovich <
> tleontov...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Absolutely agree
>>
>> +1
>>
+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Aleksandr Didenko <adide...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Andrey Sledzinskiy <
> asledzins...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015
Corresponding ticket:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1528613 (Prohibit creation of
Nova-Network enabled 8.0 environments)
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Sheena Gregson <sgreg...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> I agree – I don’t think we can change the user’s ability
Sergii,
We could remove it completely from nailgun if support for 7.0 and earlier
is not required.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk <sgolovat...@mirantis.com
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Finally we can deprecate nova-network ...
> We should remove i
+1.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Vladimir Sharshov <vshars...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 from me to Bulat.
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Igor Kalnitsky <ikalnit...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Fuelers,
>&
+1.
No doubts. )
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Dmitry Pyzhov <dpyz...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I propose to promote Roman Prykhodchenko to python-fuelclient cores. He is
> the main contributor and maintainer of this repo. And he did a great jo
It can be selected but we have no tests for deployment which are run on
periodical basis. So, we do not have any recent status.
Also, serializer in Nailgun for Nova-Network is now not in use (it is not
tested how serialization will work in 8.0).
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:36 AM
.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Sheena Gregson <sgreg...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> As a reminder: there are no individual networking options that can be used
> with both vCenter and KVM/QEMU hypervisors once we deprecate nova-network.
>
>
>
> The code for
We have more generic ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1354803
and corresponding CR: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245941/
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Aleksey Kasatkin <akasat...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> It's not about Public networks only.
It's not about Public networks only. There can be the same problem with
other networks as well.
It's required to check all the networks (across all node groups).
But it is done just for Public network now (and VIPs for plugins are not
taken into account).
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015
node group where
ceph nodes are located. ceph nodes cannot be located
in more than one node group then (as VIP cannot migrate between node groups
now).
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Vladimir Kuklin <vkuk...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> +1 to Mike
>
> It would be awes
k which is different from the one that network role bound to
the VIP has.
E.g. IP address matches the 'public' network but VIP is bound to
'management/vip' role
which is mapped to 'management' network.
Thanks,
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Igor Kalnitsky <ikalnit...@m
this and share your comments here,
Thanks,
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Aleksey Kasatkin <akasat...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Igor,
>
> > For VIP allocation we should use POST request. It's ok to use PUT for
> setting (changing) IP address.
>
> My proposal is
the
network role of the VIP?
My opinion that those should pass with a warning message.
Please share your proposals and comments on this,
Thanks,
Aleksey Kasatkin
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
Sergii,
1. We only have auto-doc for developers which should be changed
automatically.
2. We do not have proper API versioning. We didn't decide yet how to
resolve it. Let's discuss versioning in "[Fuel] Changing APIs and API
versioning" thread.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Wed, Oct 21, 20
> Then we should close [1] as invalid, shoudn’t we?
AFAIC, no. We should check whether there is enough IPs for nodes /
VIPs with current network configuration.
I'd propose to add a handler for allocation of VIPs if VIPs can be useful
before deployment.
I'm not sure what are the cases.
Alek
+ Pavlo, Andrey.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:45 AM, <loic.nico...@orange.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I’m currently searching for information about Ironic Fuel plugin :
> https://github.com/openstack/fuel-plugin-ironic I don’t find any
> documentatio
run CheckBeforeDeployment task
separately (only within ApplyChanges for now). It will help the user to
diagnose different problems. It seems to be a subject for another
discussion/ticket though.
Thanks,
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Igor Kalnitsky <ikalnit...@mirantis.com&
+1 to Sebastian. And, AFAIK, there is no user docs (or about no docs) on
CLI v2. Even for 7.0 new features were documented using CLI v1.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Igor Kalnitsky <ikalnit...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> +1 to Sebastian.
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2
Hi,
Just a remark: python-fuelclient is missing here.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Mike Scherbakov <mscherba...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
> as of my larger proposal on improvements to code review workflow [1], we
> need to have cores f
. There is no jinja nor ERB features granted within template language.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi Alexander, I don't agree with your statements
[1] - I just
for this?
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com
wrote:
If we need only substitution, probably it's better to use standard
templating
in python [1], there is a way to redefine tokens, so you will be able to
use
% % syntax if you want to.
[1] https
Evgeniy, do we need to remove jinja before July 30th ?
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin akasat...@mirantis.com
wrote:
AFAIU, string.Template doesn't help.
This seems to be helpful:
import re
def interp(string, params):
for item in re.findall(r
Okey, will do fix for validation first.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote:
Aleksey, here is working version [1].
Evgeniy, do we need to remove jinja before July 30th ?
With this issue feature can leave, and it won't have huge user impact
Evgeniy, thank you for solution proposal.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin akasat...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Okey, will do fix for validation first.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote:
Aleksey, here
validation cannot be completed tomorrow. We can test tokens
today.
For some basic validation - the is a chance, but no certaincy.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Evgeniy,
3. Change tokens in template language
I'm not sure what do
Evgeniy, I need some response in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1476779
AFAIC, it can be 30th (Thursday) for basic validation of template itself
(regardless of present nodes and their node roles) but including known node
roles/network roles for particular environment.
Aleksey Kasatkin
Yes, it is the only CR left (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204321/).
It is tested manually, is on review and should be merged today or the next
workday.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Looks like the only CLI part left
those to FFE ?
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Sebastian Kalinowski
skalinow...@mirantis.com wrote:
I agree here with Evgeniy. Even if it's not a trivial change, we cannot
leave a new API in such shape.
2015-07-24 11:41 GMT+02:00 Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com:
Hi Igor,
I
+1 for an exception. Do we have time estimate though?
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Sebastian Kalinowski
skalinow...@mirantis.com wrote:
+1 for this exception - as Evgeniy said it is developed not in the core
but in extension and risk is low.
2015-07-24 10:17 GMT+02
to this
request.
Thanks in advance.
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/templates-for-networking
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204321/
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203602/
[4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201217/
--
Best regards,
Aleksey Kasatkin
/nailgun/nailgun/consts.py
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Oleg Gelbukh ogelb...@mirantis.com wrote:
Excellent, nice to know that we're on the same page about this.
Thank you!
--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko m
it.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko m...@romcheg.me wrote:
Hi folks!
Recently I encountered an issue [1] that the Deploy Changes button in the
web ui is still active when a provisioning of single node is started using
the command line client
1/ +1
2/ +1
3/ +1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Tatyana Leontovich
tleontov...@mirantis.com wrote:
3/ +1
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk
sgolovat...@mirantis.com wrote:
+1 for separating.
Let's follow the formal well established process
+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Anastasia Urlapova aurlap...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Andrey,
congratulations on your new role!
Nastya.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Yegor Kotko yko...@mirantis.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Tatyana Leontovich
/fuel/+bug/1355764 for this BP) is can be closed
almost without doubt. But some of them can be solved separately somehow or
have workarounds. Sometimes scope of BP can be changed (e.g. split to
several BPs) or its timeline is changed so bugs should not be lost without
care.
Aleksey Kasatkin
with API versioning yet.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh vkramsk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
I think all these operations for nodes (grouping, sorting, filtering) can
be done on the backend, but we can do it completely on the UI side and
shouldn't wait
+1 for this option. I use log while creating new tests sometimes.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko m...@romcheg.me wrote:
Hi folks,
at the moment run_test.sh script removes Nailgun's log file after running.
The question is whether it is necessary to add
might be not supported by network checker.
Agree, this should be done on backend.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Lukasz Oles lo...@mirantis.com wrote:
Big +1, it would save me a lot of debugging time :)
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh
vkramsk
+1 to show as is. We don't get benefits from parsing now (like filtering
by value of particular parameter, date/time intervals). It only adds
complexity.
Aleksey Kasatkin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Tomasz Napierala tnapier...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Also +1 here.
In huge envs we already
+1
Aleksey Kasatkin
Hi everyone!
I would like to propose Igor Kalnitsky as a core reviewer on the
Fuel-web team. Igor has been working on openstack patching,
nailgun, fuel upgrade and provided a lot of good reviews [1]. In
addition he's also very active in IRC and mailing list.
Can
Agree for Bogdan and Sergii
Aleksey Kasatkin
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
track assign_ips() and assign_vip() usage to see all calls to them.
Aleksey Kasatkin
-- Forwarded message --
From: zh...@certusnet.com.cn zh...@certusnet.com.cn
Date: Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:36 AM
Subject: [openstack-dev] Networks Generating In Fuel
To: openstack-dev openstack
the same.
Regards,
Aleksey Kasatkin
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
67 matches
Mail list logo
