[openstack-dev] [nova] Announcing new Focal Point for s390x libvirt/kvm Nova

2018-11-02 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Dear Nova Community, I want to announce the new focal point for Nova s390x libvirt/kvm. Please welcome "Cathy Zhang” to the Nova team. She and her team will be responsible for maintaining the s390x libvirt/kvm Thirdparty CI [1] and any s390x specific code in nova and os-brick. I personally

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] Stepping down from core

2018-06-06 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi Ihar, it was always a pleasure learning from and working with you. Wish you all the best for your new project! --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 4. Jun 2018, at 22:31, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi neutrinos and all, As some of you've already noticed, the last several months I

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2 plugin] unit test errors

2018-05-11 Thread Andreas Scheuring
succeed again in the check queue - merge it. Then you can put your new great custom code on top of this patch. --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 9. May 2018, at 10:04, Andreas Scheuring <scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: neutron.plugins.ml2.driver_api got moved to neutron-lib. You pr

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][third-party-ci]zKVM (s390x) CI broken

2018-05-09 Thread Andreas Scheuring
The root cause seems to be bug [1]. It’s related to nova cells v2 configuration in devstack. Stephen Finucane already promised to have a look later the day (thx!!!). I keep the CI running for now... [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1770143 --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 9

[openstack-dev] [nova][third-party-ci]zKVM (s390x) CI broken

2018-05-09 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi all, the nova CI for zKVM is currently broken - need to investigate. It seems like the vnc console gets configured for some reason (vnc is not supported on s390x)... --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2 plugin] unit test errors

2018-05-09 Thread Andreas Scheuring
neutron.plugins.ml2.driver_api got moved to neutron-lib. You probably need to update the networking-onos code and fix all imports there and push the changes... --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 9. May 2018, at 10:00, Sangho Shin <san...@opennetworking.org> wrote: Hello, I am g

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Changes toComputeVirtAPI.wait_for_instance_event

2018-04-11 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Looks good IMO. --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 11. Apr 2018, at 15:46, Eric Fried <openst...@fried.cc> wrote: Jichen was able to use this information immediately, to great benefit [1]. (If those paying attention could have a quick look at that to make sure he used it right, it

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Changes toComputeVirtAPI.wait_for_instance_event

2018-04-10 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Yes, that’s how it works! --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 10. Apr 2018, at 16:05, Matt Riedemann <mriede...@gmail.com> wrote: On 4/9/2018 9:57 PM, Chen CH Ji wrote: > Could you please help to share whether this kind of event is sent by > neutron-server or neutron agent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

2018-04-04 Thread Andreas Scheuring
No problem from s390x point of view. With Ubuntu we’re currently using* qemu: 2.10.1* libvirt: 3.6.0Thanks! ---Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 30. Mar 2018, at 16:26, Kashyap Chamarthy <kcham...@redhat.com> wrote:The last version bump was in "Pike" release (commit: b980df0,11-F

[openstack-dev] [nova][ThirdParty-CI] Nova s390x CI back online

2018-03-26 Thread Andreas Scheuring
]. [1] https://github.com/svinota/pyroute2/commit/02328faf0de10073bc9e71d593b1656db62f6f6b --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 14. Mar 2018, at 17:29, Andreas Scheuring <scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: A brief update: The root cause is that Neutron patch [1] broke Neutron DHCP a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ThirdParty-CI] Nova s390x CI currently broken

2018-03-14 Thread Andreas Scheuring
/openstack/neutron/commit/c4d4336 [2] https://github.com/svinota/pyroute2/pull/469 --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 13. Mar 2018, at 17:14, Andreas Scheuring <scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: Hello, the s390x CI for nova is currently broken again. The reason seems to be a recent

[openstack-dev] [nova][ThirdParty-CI] Nova s390x CI currently broken

2018-03-13 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hello, the s390x CI for nova is currently broken again. The reason seems to be a recent change that merged in neutron. I’m looking into it... --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][thirdparty-ci] s390x third party CI broken

2018-03-05 Thread Andreas Scheuring
CI seems to be running again, but with a reduced number of tests for now (only nova.api, excluded scenario tests). Will continue working on getting all tests executing again. --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 5. Mar 2018, at 09:35, Andreas Scheuring <scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

[openstack-dev] [nova][thirdparty-ci] s390x third party CI broken

2018-03-05 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi all, the s390x nova CI is currently broken due to the bump of the grpcio version. I’m working on fixing it…. Regards, --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][thirdparty][CI] Nova IBM zKVM CI broken

2018-01-25 Thread Andreas Scheuring
of the daily nodepool image build. --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 25. Jan 2018, at 10:57, Andreas Scheuring <scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: Hi, the Nova IBM zKVM CI is currently producing invalid builds. Please ignore the -1 results for now. I’m working on fixing it. Will let yo

[openstack-dev] [nova][thirdparty][CI] Nova IBM zKVM CI broken

2018-01-25 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, the Nova IBM zKVM CI is currently producing invalid builds. Please ignore the -1 results for now. I’m working on fixing it. Will let you know once it’s working fine again. Thanks! --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s

Re: [openstack-dev] IBM z/VM CI asks for reporting permission to Nova changes

2017-10-17 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi Laurene, at the moment the z/VM CI is posting a +1 even though the job failed. That’s because in zuul layout.yaml the job is probably set to "voting: false.” You can easily fix this by setting it to “true”. For example see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/512190/ Regards, --- An

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova] s390x zKVM CI

2017-10-06 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Yes, job_name_in_report = true did it! --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) > On 6. Oct 2017, at 17:01, Andreas Scheuring <scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > wrote: > > Probably it’s the following setting in zuul.conf > > job_name_in_report = true > > We’ll se

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova] s390x zKVM CI

2017-10-06 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Probably it’s the following setting in zuul.conf job_name_in_report = true We’ll see if it works out in 1.5h when the first test succeeded… Thanks! --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) > On 6. Oct 2017, at 12:53, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > > On 10/06/2017 04:07 AM, An

[openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova] s390x zKVM CI

2017-10-06 Thread Andreas Scheuring
com/project?project=nova> [3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/123195.html Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s)__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-de

Re: [openstack-dev] [DIB] DIB Meetings

2017-10-06 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Thanks! > On 6. Oct 2017, at 04:25, Ian Wienand <iwien...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 10/06/2017 02:19 AM, Andreas Scheuring wrote: >> seems like there is some confusing information about the DIB >> meetings in the wiki [1]. The meeting is alternating between 15:00 >

[openstack-dev] [DIB] DIB Meetings

2017-10-05 Thread Andreas Scheuring
! [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/diskimage-builder -- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova] Requesting +1/-1 reporting permission for s390x libvirt/kvm (zkvm) Nova CI

2017-10-04 Thread Andreas Scheuring
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-meeting/%23openstack-meeting.2017-02-02.log.html#t2017-02-02T21:08:46 --- Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: opens

[openstack-dev] [Barbican] Status of PKCS#11 Plug-in

2017-07-21 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi all, I would like to get clarity about the sate of the Barbican PKCS#11 Plug-in. We did some tests against against the PKCS#11 implementation opencryptoki configured with a s390x hardware backend. The main issue seems to be, that the plug-in has been developed against PKCS#11 2.40 draft [2]-

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] etcd3 enabled breaks s390x arch

2017-05-24 Thread Andreas Scheuring
devstack to track the discussion [3] [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467436/ [2] https://github.com/coreos/etcd/issues/7978 [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1693192 -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s On Mi, 2017-05-24 at 13:48 +0200, Andreas Scheuring wrote: > Hi toget

[openstack-dev] [devstack] etcd3 enabled breaks s390x arch

2017-05-24 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi together, recently etcd3 was enabled as service in devstack [1]. This breaks devstack on s390x Linux, as there are no s390x binaries availabe and there's no way to disable the etcd3 service. I pushed a patch to allow disabling the etcd3 service in local.conf [2]. It would be great if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] stepping down from core

2017-05-04 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Rossella, we will miss you! All the best for your future engagements! -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s On Do, 2017-05-04 at 15:52 +0200, Rossella Sblendido wrote: > Hi all, > > I've moved to a new position recently and despite my best intentions I > was not able to devote to Neutron as much

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] stepping down from infra liaison

2017-05-03 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Really sad to hear that. It was a pleasure working with you - all the best for your future! -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s On Mi, 2017-05-03 at 00:39 +, Das, Anindita wrote: > Hi All, > > > > Some of you already know about the recent changes in OSIC. > Unfortunately, I am impacted

[openstack-dev] [infra][requirements] Does proposal bot also update foo-requirements.txt?

2017-03-15 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, I wanted to understand which project requirement files get updated by the OpenStack proposal bot. Only requirements.txt and test-requirements.txt, or also foo-requirements.txt? Pointing me to the OpenStack proposal bot code would also help I guess... Thanks -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] Managing project requirements

2017-02-27 Thread Andreas Scheuring
? Or is it even daily except during the requirements freeze? Thanks! -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s On Fr, 2017-02-24 at 11:22 -0500, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:09:33PM +0100, Andreas Scheuring wrote: > > Hi, I have a couple of questions in regards of how updates of > &g

[openstack-dev] [requirements] Managing project requirements

2017-02-24 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, I have a couple of questions in regards of how updates of requirements are handled and what happens if I release a new version of a library. I read along the README [1], but a few points are still unclear to me. I have the following projects: * os-dpm [4] * is a openstack library that gets

Re: [openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] FFE for os-dpm

2017-01-31 Thread Andreas Scheuring
? -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s On Di, 2017-01-31 at 10:43 -0600, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 01/31/2017 09:35 AM, Andreas Scheuring wrote: > > Hi, I'm requesting a feature freeze exception for raising the upper > > constraint of the os-dpm library. Therefore the following patch got > > s

[openstack-dev] [FFE][requirements] FFE for os-dpm

2017-01-31 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, I'm requesting a feature freeze exception for raising the upper constraint of the os-dpm library. Therefore the following patch got submitted to gerrit [1]. os-dpm is a shared library between the projects nova-dpm [2] and networking-dpm [3]. Those projects are still under development (first

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][DevStack][Neutron] facing problem in devstack install - No Network found for private

2017-01-18 Thread Andreas Scheuring
T_IP=10.0.2.15 > > > PUBLIC_INTERFACE=eth0 > > > Q_USE_SECGROUP=True > ENABLE_TENANT_VLANS=True > TENANT_VLAN_RANGE=1000:1999 > PHYSICAL_NETWORK=default > OVS_PHYSICAL_BRIDGE=br-ex > > > > > Q_USE_PROVIDER_NETWORKING=True > Q_L3_ENABLED=False &

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][DevStack][Neutron] facing problem in devstack install - No Network found for private

2017-01-17 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Without looking into the details you're specifying Q_USE_PROVIDER_NETWORKING=True in your local.conf - usually this results in the creation of a single provider network called "public". But the manila devstack plugin seems not to be able to deal with provider networks as it's expecting

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL nominations deadline and non-candidacy

2017-01-09 Thread Andreas Scheuring
I'm sad to see you stepping down. Thanks a lot Armando for your amazing service as PTL! -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s On Mo, 2017-01-09 at 15:11 +0100, Armando M. wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > > The PTL nomination week is fast approaching [0], and as you might have > guessed by the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Miguel Lavalle as neutron core and Brian Haley as L3 Lt

2016-12-15 Thread Andreas Scheuring
+1 -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s On Fr, 2016-12-16 at 00:14 +0100, Armando M. wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > > Miguel Lavalle has been driving the project forward consistently and > reliably. I would like to propose him to be entrusted with +2/+A > rights in the areas he's been most prolific,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Stepping down from core

2016-12-01 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Henry, it was a pleasure working with you! Thanks! All the best for your further journey! -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s On Do, 2016-12-01 at 17:51 -0500, Henry Gessau wrote: > I've already communicated this in the neutron meeting and in some neutron > policy patches, but yesterday the PTL

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Adding myself to networking-dpm gerrit groups

2016-11-21 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi infra team, would you mind adding myself (andreas.scheur...@de.ibm.com) to the following gerrit groups? - networking-dpm-core - networking-dpm-release Thanks a lot! Andreas IRC: andreas_s __ OpenStack Development

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug Deputy Report

2016-11-14 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi everybody, as I cannot join todays Neutron meeting, I wanted to give a brief update via ML. All bugs are tracked in the following etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/bugs-2016-11-08 Of interest are the sections - High/Critical - Tagged but not able to confirm (reaching out to

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] Portbinding for live migration spec

2016-10-28 Thread Andreas Scheuring
I just pushed an update to the neutron spec [1], describing the general purpose portbinding API that we decided on in Tuesdays Nova-Neutron Cross project session. Please review it and let me know, if I understood everything correctly! When going down the path with the general purpose API,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

2016-10-27 Thread Andreas Scheuring
-1 I'm sorry, but I also need to cancel. Andreas On 10/26/2016 08:10 PM, John McDowall wrote: -1 Unfortunately, a business meeting has come up Regards John __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

2016-10-19 Thread Andreas Scheuring
+1 -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s On Di, 2016-10-18 at 16:18 -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > +1 > Thanks for organizing this. > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:30:57PM -0500, > Miguel Lavalle wrote: > > > Dear Neutrinos, > > > > I am organizing a social event for the

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Live-Migration] Cross l2 agent migration and solving Nova-Neutron live migration bugs

2016-06-28 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, I'm currently working on solving Nova-Neutron issues during Live Migration. This mail is intended to raise awareness cross project and get things kicked off. The issues == #1 When portbinding fails, instance is migrated but stuck in error state #2 Macvtap agent live Migration when

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [sr-iov] rename *device* config options to *interface*

2016-06-13 Thread Andreas Scheuring
While reviewing [1] I got hung up on the terms "device" and "interface". It seems like in sr-iov agent they are used in a different manner than in the linuxbridge agent. For Example the lb agent uses a config option "physical_interface_mappings" (mapping between uplink interface for bridge and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Getting project version from API

2016-06-08 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Now I'm blaming myself - had a closer look at the code - it's NOT a message via the Bus, but some nova external events interface that I was not aware of. Sorry for all the confusion -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s On Mi, 2016-06-08 at 08:09 +0200, Andreas Scheuring wrote: > > This han

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Getting project version from API

2016-06-08 Thread Andreas Scheuring
:17 +0200, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 6 June 2016 at 17:05, Andreas Scheuring > <scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Is there a chance to get rid of this vif-plugged event at all? > E.g. by > transitioning it to an ReST A

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Getting project version from API

2016-06-06 Thread Andreas Scheuring
The ovs agent reports if it uses hybrid plug or not since [1]. At least the hybrid plug is part of the agent state - haven't tested if it's visible via the API. Might that be helpful? [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/311814/ -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s (formerly scheuran) On Mo,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Getting project version from API

2016-06-06 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Is there a chance to get rid of this vif-plugged event at all? E.g. by transitioning it to an ReST API interface? As far as I know this is the only RPC interface between neutron and nova. -- - Andreas IRC: andreas_s (formerly scheuran) On Mo, 2016-06-06 at 20:25 +0900, Akihiro Motoki

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] FYI: Changed my irc nick to andreas_s (formerly scheuran)

2016-05-09 Thread Andreas Scheuring
-- - Andreas (IRC: andreas_s) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2][API]Binding a port to multiple hosts

2016-04-22 Thread Andreas Scheuring
After some discussion how portbinding handling could be improved during live migration, the following idea came up: Why not bind a port to both, the source and the target host during migration? This would allow us to set the portbinding for the target already in pre_live_migration. Doing so, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] [Live Migration] Prevent invalid live migration instead of failing and setting instance to error state after porbinding failed

2016-04-13 Thread Andreas Scheuring
After a great chat with Kevin we agreed to follow up the multiple binding approach until the summit and see if this is the right direction. [1] [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-neutron/% 23openstack-neutron.2016-04-13.log.html#t2016-04-13T09:43:46 -- - Andreas (IRC:

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][neutron] Eliminating the DevStack layer

2016-04-12 Thread Andreas Scheuring
I must admit, I really like this idea of getting rid of all the devstack params. It's always a mess looking up the functionality of the various variables in the code when trying out something new. I also understand the concern that was raised by somebody (couldn't find it anymore) that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] [Live Migration] Prevent invalid live migration instead of failing and setting instance to error state after porbinding failed

2016-04-12 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi Kevin, thanks for your input! See my comments in line -- - Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Di, 2016-04-12 at 04:12 -0700, Kevin Benton wrote: > We can't change the host_id until after the migration or it will break > l2pop other drivers that use the host as a location indicator (e.g. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] [Live Migration] Prevent invalid live migration instead of failing and setting instance to error state after porbinding failed

2016-04-12 Thread Andreas Scheuring
. Thanks! -- - Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Di, 2016-04-12 at 12:33 +0200, Rossella Sblendido wrote: > On 04/12/2016 12:05 PM, Andreas Scheuring wrote: > > Hi together, > > I wanted to start discussion about Live Migration problem that currently > > exists in the nova neutron commu

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] [Live Migration] Prevent invalid live migration instead of failing and setting instance to error state after porbinding failed

2016-04-12 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi together, I wanted to start discussion about Live Migration problem that currently exists in the nova neutron communication. Basics Live Migration and Nova - Neutron communication -- On a high level, Nova Live Migration happens in 3 stages.

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Update domain network xml on live migration

2016-03-24 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, On Live Migration, I want to update the domain.xml with the required network interface definition for the target node. For code, please see the prototype [2] I'm reaching our for feedback about the right way to implement this! Use Cases/Problem: = #1 Live Migration with

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] Proposal of Dashboard for TaaS

2016-03-16 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Just to make sure you're aware of that - there is this new Curvature Network Topology view since Liberty [1]. Maybe you want to integrate with it as well... [1] https://www.openstack.org/software/liberty/ -- - Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Mi, 2016-03-16 at 12:30 +0900, Soichi Shigeta wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] Vlan Tenant network

2016-02-29 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi Pratti, yes, this is working! For Openvswitch ml2 driver just configure on the neutron server in the ml2 configuration file [1][2] [ml2] tenant_network_types = flat type_drivers = local, flat, vlan, gre, vxlan [ml2_type_vlan] network_vlan_ranges = physnet1:30:40 #where 30-40 is the range of

Re: [openstack-dev] OVO Neutron

2016-01-25 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Nice overview! -- - Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Mo, 2016-01-25 at 17:26 +, Brian Stajkowski wrote: > We completed mapping relationships for OVO with this > ERD: https://www.gliffy.com/go/publish/9741595 > > > We are looking into adding sphinx for auto generation of these > diagrams but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Removing ml2_type_vxlan.vxlan_group parameter?

2016-01-21 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Convinced :) -- - Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Mi, 2016-01-20 at 19:58 +, Sean M. Collins wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 02:24:35PM EST, Sourabh Patwardhan wrote: > > This option is used to configure a global multicast group IP for VXLAN > > networks. > > The Cisco Nexus1000V mech

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC

2016-01-20 Thread Andreas Scheuring
+1 for Kyles proposal as well! I think we can give it a try. If we realize that it becomes kind of a "second class" meeting, as only less people will join or that the meeting has no impact, we still can go back to the weekly meeting slot on Monday IMO. Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Mi,

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Removing ml2_type_vxlan.vxlan_group parameter?

2016-01-20 Thread Andreas Scheuring
There was some discussion if the ml2_type_vxlan.vxlan_group of the ml2 config file (Neutron Server) can be removed [1], as it is not being used by in-tree drivers (ovs, lb, sriov). OVS: does not support vxlan mcast LB: uses it's own agent configuration today. SRIOV: does not support vxlan at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Removing ml2_type_vxlan.vxlan_group parameter?

2016-01-20 Thread Andreas Scheuring
I agree, I would vote for killing ml2 option, too! I wanted to reach out via the ML to find potential users of it or to clarify why it has been added at all! -- - Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Mi, 2016-01-20 at 10:11 +0100, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Andreas Scheuring <

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Docs] Definition of a provider Network

2016-01-18 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi everybody, I stumbled over a definition that explains the difference between a Provider network and a self service network. [1] To summarize it says: - Provider Network: primarily uses layer2 services and vlan segmentation and cannot be used for advanced services (fwaas,..) - Self-service

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting this Tuesday at 1400UTC

2015-12-15 Thread Andreas Scheuring
I want to quickly share the status on the modular l2 agent (common agent) refactoring blueprint [1] - I'm not able to attend this afternoon... - Till Christmas, I would like to see the extension manager patchset merged [2] - The goal for Mitaka-2 is to make the split between the common part and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Linux Bridge CI is now a voting gate job

2015-12-08 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Great work! -- Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Mo, 2015-12-07 at 21:05 +, Sean M. Collins wrote: > It's been a couple months - the last time I posted on this subject we > were still working on getting Linux Bridge to become an experimental[1] > job. During the Liberty cycle, the Linux Bridge CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk] VM creation fails with Unexpected vif_type=binding_failed

2015-11-26 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Praveen, there are many error in your q-svc log. It says: InvalidInput: Invalid input for operation: (u'Tunnel IP %(ip)s in use with host %(host)s', {'ip': u'10.81.1.150', 'host': u'localhost.localdomain'}).\n"] Did you maybe specify duplicated ips in your controllers and compute nodes neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk] VM creation fails with Unexpected vif_type=binding_failed

2015-11-24 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Please have a look at your neutron server log and neutron agent log and provide this information if you have troubles interpreting the messages. Probably you'll find the reason there! -- Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Di, 2015-11-24 at 12:17 +0100, Praveen MANKARA RADHAKRISHNAN wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-11-18 Thread Andreas Scheuring
r a second stage. Thanks -- Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Mi, 2015-11-18 at 15:28 +0100, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Andreas Scheuring <scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I wonder if this is somehow in conflict with the modular l2 agent >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-11-18 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi all, I wonder if this is somehow in conflict with the modular l2 agent approach I'm currently following up for linuxbridge, macvtap and sriov? - RFE: [1] - Frist patchset [2] I don't think so, but to be sure I wanted to raise it up. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1468803 [2]

[openstack-dev] Please add your timezone to your Launchpad account (voluntarily)

2015-10-05 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi together, I think it would be very helpful if you all could update your launchpad profile with your timezone information. This makes it more easy to figure out the timeframe when a person can be reached in theory. To update your account, use this link

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][macvtap] [ml2] New cycle started. What are you up to, folks?

2015-10-02 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi everybody, I'm trying to to achieve 2 things: #1 Add common macvtap support for all kind of interfaces to neutron core (via a macvtap ml2-plugin & agent) [1]. There has been a long discussion where this should land but finally we Kyle decided to do it in tree [2]. For the agent part, Sean

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron Development Wiki Update

2015-08-10 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, I wonder if it makes sense to update the section Proposing and Implementing a Feature [1] of the Neutron development wiki with the new RFE workflow described here [2]. Or even better just add a link? Thanks [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Common Base class for agents

2015-08-05 Thread Andreas Scheuring
$0.02. Carl On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Andreas Scheuring scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hi, I'm planning to add a new ml2 driver and agent to neutron supporting macvtap attachments [1]. Kyle already

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][neutron] How to give nested VM access to outside network?

2015-08-04 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Can you try answer 1 of [1]? I've never tried it, but I heard from folks who configured it like that. With this masquerading, your vm should be able to reach your 192.x network. But as it's NAT it won't work the other way round (e.g. establish a connection from outside into your vm) The proper

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Common Base class for agents

2015-08-03 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, I'm planning to add a new ml2 driver and agent to neutron supporting macvtap attachments [1]. Kyle already decided, that this code should land in the neutron tree [2]. The normal approach till now was to copy an existing agent code and modify accordingly, which lead to a lot of duplicated

[openstack-dev] [neutron] till when must code land to make it in liberty

2015-07-31 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, as there is no official feature freeze in neutron anymore, there still must be a cut off date or at least a cut off time frame for liberty code. Can anyone tell me when this is (round about)? Is this liberty-3? I wonder if it's still possible to propose a RFE and get it into liberty...

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] enriching port binding extension API dictionaries with key-values

2015-06-29 Thread Andreas Scheuring
. On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote: Hi Andreas, On 26/06/15 14:04, Andreas Scheuring wrote: Hi together, for a new ml2 plugin I would like to pass over some data from neutron

[openstack-dev] [neutron] enriching port binding extension API dictionaries with key-values

2015-06-26 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi together, for a new ml2 plugin I would like to pass over some data from neutron to nova on port creation and update (exploiting port binding extension [1]). For my prototype I thought of using one of the following response dictionaries to add my information: - binding:vif_details -

[openstack-dev] [neutron] new project: networking-macvtap

2015-06-25 Thread Andreas Scheuring
I want to proclaim a new networking project that we plan to start: It's called 'networking-macvtap'. This project will contain a neutron ml2 driver and an corresponding neutron l2 agent. It's aim is to allow instance network attachments via macvtap in bridge mode independent of the physical

[openstack-dev] [nova] Adding vif_type to nova

2015-06-19 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi John and others, for my new neutron ml2 driver [3] I depend on a new vif_type in nova being introduced [1]. I also added Sourabh to cc, as he probably tries to achieve the same goal for another driver. I'm also aware of the current discussion regarding vif-plug-script [2]. This approach

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-12 Thread Andreas Scheuring
But I still need to figure out more details about device renaming and what other side effects might come with it. Device renaming might not be a good idea in the macvtap context, as the interface used could also be used with by other applications that might insist on a fixed device name. It's

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-11 Thread Andreas Scheuring
interface towards the VM. Does that answer your question, and would that be possible with a libvirt network? Thanks, Neil -- Ian. On 10 June 2015 at 12:16, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com mailto:neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote: On 10/06/15 15:47, Andreas

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-11 Thread Andreas Scheuring
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 09:30 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: It seems the main reason for your new proposal is to deal with the fact that on migration, you need to specify a different NIC name in the XML. This is not particularly difficult - Nova already has code for dealing with pdating the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-11 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Daniel, thanks a lot for your input! Please see my novel below ;) I could have sworn I've previously reviewed patches which dealt with NIC device naming changes across migration, but I can't find them now. Did you ever submit patches which tried to fix this, or am I perhaps thinking of

Re: [openstack-dev] How does instance's tap device macaddress generate?

2015-06-11 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Maybe this helps (taken from [1]) Actually there is one way that the MAC address of the tap device affects proper operation of guest networking - if you happen to set the tap device's MAC identical to the MAC used by the guest, you will get errors from the kernel similar to this: kernel:

[openstack-dev] [nova] vif type libvirt-network

2015-06-10 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi Daniel, Neil and others, I was thinking about introducing libvirt-network as a new vif type to nova. It can be used when Neutron prepares a libvirt network for attaching guests. Would you see any general concerns with such an approach? Anything that I need to consider with libvirt networks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty Priorties for Nova

2015-06-10 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Daniel, if I got it right, the vif script blueprint only is about plug/unplug operations and not about generating new xml representations for vif types. What if for a new vif type it's sufficient to have the get_config_* method updated? In this case plug/unplug would be handled by libvirt (like

[openstack-dev] [nova] Add new VIF Type

2015-06-01 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, what are the prereqs to get a spec for a new nova VIF type approved? In my case I'm planning for a new neutron ml2 driver and agent (on stackforge) that adds general support for macvtap to neutron. I've not yet published anything regarding the neutron part so far - but this will happen in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Removing udp_port field from 'ml2_vxlan_endpoint' table

2015-03-24 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Mathieu, now I'm getting curious, is it possible to combine Linuxbridge and OVS VXLAN Nodes in the same cloud? I thought this does not work as Linuxbridge-vxlan uses multicast for instances broad- and multicasts (e.g. an arp request), while ovs-vxlan only does unicast? At least one can specify

[openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] devstack vpnaas and l3 router

2015-03-04 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hello everybody, is there a reason why devstack is only able to either deploy vpnaas or l3-router? Nevertheless both services are enabled in the local.conf on the HowToInstall Page [1]. But the code says it's a either or [2] (line 725). if is_service_enabled q-vpn; then run_process q-vpn

[openstack-dev] [neutron][ipv6] dhcp stateful

2015-02-19 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, I was playing around with the various dhcp/radvd options of neutron. Very helpful was the matrix [1] that describes the combinations of ra and adress mode that can be configured. For dhcpv6-stateful (ra adress mode) it says: VM obtains IPv6 address from dnsmasq using DHCPv6 stateful and

[openstack-dev] [neutron] IPv6 Status

2015-02-05 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, is there a central place where I can find a matrix (or something similar) that shows what is currently supposed to work in the sense of IPv6 Networking? I also had a look at a couple of blueprints out there, but I'm looking for a simple overview containing what's supported, on which

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [rhel7] minimal dnsmasq version

2015-01-26 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Thanks Ihar for sharing your thoughts! -- Andreas (irc: scheuran) On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 11:30 +0100, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi Andreas, On 01/26/2015 10:58 AM, Andreas Scheuring wrote: Hi Ihar, we're currently running stable/juno devstack on rhel7 base. But I see troubles to get

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [rhel7] minimal dnsmasq version

2015-01-26 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi Ihar, we're currently running stable/juno devstack on rhel7 base. But I see troubles to get it running on the master branch due to bug 1408297. The fix for this bug increases the minimal dnsmasq version for master branch up to 2.67. I also recognized the stable/juno item that leaves a

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] DVR Slides from Paris Summit

2014-12-03 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, is there a way to get access to the slides from the DVR session of the Paris summit? Unfortunately the slides in the video are not readable. Speakers were Swaminathan Vasudevan, Jack McCann, Vivekanandan, Narasimhan, Rajeev Grover, Michael Smith. So maybe one of you can post them on

[openstack-dev] [devstack] environment variables in local.conf post-config section

2014-11-26 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi together, is there a way to use Environment variables in the local.conf post-config section? On my system (stable/juno devstack) not the content of the variable, but the variable name itself is being inserted into the config file. So e.g. [[post-config|$NOVA_CONF]] [DEFAULT]

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] environment variables in local.conf post-config section

2014-11-26 Thread Andreas Scheuring
That's it. Thanks! -- Andreas (irc: scheuran) On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 15:10 +0100, jordan pittier wrote: Hi, It should work with your current local.conf. You may be facing this bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1386413 Jordan - Original Message - From: Andreas

[openstack-dev] [Devstack] Juno Backport for Bug Revert Single quote iniset argument in merge_config_file

2014-11-26 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hi, do you think we could backport this bug to the devstack stable/juno release? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131334/ This bug prohibits people to use the local.conf from icehouse, when they take use of variables for defining configuration values An example. The local.conf looks like

  1   2   >