Hi
Looks good approach. Lets start discussion.
I propose API spec for it
https://gist.github.com/andreyshestakov/8559309
Please look it and add your advices and comments.
Thanks
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:44 AM, McReynolds, Auston
wrote:
> With "Multiple Datastore Types/Versions" merged to mas
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Tim Simpson wrote:
>
> >> 4. Additionally, in the current pull request to implement this it is
> >> possible to avoid passing a version, but only if no more than one version
> >> of the datastore_type exists in the database.
> >>
> >> I think instead the datasto
e should still add a 'default_version_id' field to the
'datastore_types' table.
Thanks,
Tim
*From:* Andrey Shestakov [ashesta...@mirantis.com]
*Sent:* Monday, October 21, 2013 7:15 AM
*To:* OpenStack De
1. Good point
2. Got this case in irc, and decided to pass type and version together
to avoid confusing.
3. Names of types and maybe versions can be good, but in irc
conversation rejected this case, i cant remember exactly reason.
4. Actually, "active" field in version marks it as default in ty
