Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Austin summit priorities session recap

2016-06-14 Thread Bias, Randy
We understand. We¹re willing, ready, and able to assist with all of the upstream items that need to happen in order to get our submission in and more. We just need to know so we can help. Best, ‹Randy On 6/8/16, 6:09 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: >That

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Austin summit priorities session recap

2016-06-08 Thread Bias, Randy
I just want to point out that this appears to imply that open source storage backends for OpenStack would be prioritized over closed-source ones and I think that runs counter to the general inclusivity in the community. I assume it¹s just a turn of phrase, but I suspect it could be easily

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ec2-api] EC2 API Future

2016-03-20 Thread Bias, Randy
Hello, First of all, let me apologize for answering on Alex Levine's behalf, but it's late night/early morning in Moscow, so I'm taking the liberty. Second, Alex Levine was recently made PTL of the EC2-API project when it was formally accepted as an official project, but failed to

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack Foundation] Finding people to work on the EC2 API in Nova

2015-01-30 Thread Bias, Randy
As you know we have been driving forward on the stack forge project and it¹s our intention to continue to support it over time, plus reinvigorate the GCE APIs when that makes sense. So we¹re supportive of deprecating from Nova to focus on EC2 API in Nova. I also think it¹s good for these APIs to