Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new keystone core (breton)

2016-10-31 Thread Chen, Wei D
Nice to hear you are onboard, congratulation Boris! Best Regards, Dave Chen From: Steve Martinelli [mailto:s.martine...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 3:47 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new keystone

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

2016-09-01 Thread Chen, Wei D
Well deserved! Congrats! Best Regards, Dave Chen From: Steve Martinelli [mailto:s.martine...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 10:44 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose) I want to

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] changes to keystone-core!

2016-01-27 Thread Chen, Wei D
Hi, Many thanks to everyone for your patient guidance and mentoring me in the past years! It's your help to make me grow up from a newbie! As a core project in OpenStack, keystone has grown to be several sub-projects, I strongly believe that we will continue to provide a stable/great

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Let's get together and fix all the bugs

2015-10-09 Thread Chen, Wei D
Great idea! core reviewer’s advice is definitely much important and valuable before proposing a fixing. I was always thinking it will help save us if we can get some agreement at some point. Best Regards, Dave Chen From: David Stanek [mailto:dsta...@dstanek.com] Sent: Saturday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] PTL non-candidacy

2015-09-10 Thread Chen, Wei D
Morgan, thanks for your great leadership, all the best in your new journey. Best Regards, Dave Chen From: Lance Bragstad [mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 8:56 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][keystone][openstackclient] Standards for object name attributes and filtering

2015-09-02 Thread Chen, Wei D
experience, I'd expect them to be ignored, but I can't think of a reason why a 400 would be a bad idea (but I suspect there's some prior art / discussion out there). On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Ryan Brown <rybr...@redhat.com> wrote: On 08/27/2015 11:28 PM, Chen, Wei D wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][keystone][openstackclient] Standards for object name attributes and filtering

2015-08-27 Thread Chen, Wei D
On Aug 26, 2015, at 4:45 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hi With keystone, we recently came across an issue in terms of the assumptions that the openstack client is making about the entities it can show - namely that is assumes all entries have a 'name' attribute

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][keystone][openstackclient] Standards for object name attributes and filtering

2015-08-27 Thread Chen, Wei D
Hi With keystone, we recently came across an issue in terms of the assumptions that the openstack client is making about the entities it can show - namely that is assumes all entries have a ‘name’ attribute (which is how the openstack show command works). Turns out, that not all keystone

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][keystone][openstackclient] Standards for object name attributes and filtering

2015-08-27 Thread Chen, Wei D
Hi With keystone, we recently came across an issue in terms of the assumptions that the openstack client is making about the entities it can show - namely that is assumes all entries have a ‘name’ attribute (which is how the openstack show command works). Turns out, that not all

[openstack-dev] Recall: [api][keystone][openstackclient] Standards for object name attributes and filtering

2015-08-27 Thread Chen, Wei D
Chen, Wei D would like to recall the message, [openstack-dev] [api][keystone][openstackclient] Standards for object name attributes and filtering. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] SQLite support (migrations, work-arounds, and more), is it worth it?

2015-04-06 Thread Chen, Wei D
I am the another one who like the idea, let SQLite goes where it belongs to, we have already knew there is couples of limitation in SQLite, actually, it hides some issues in some cases. As to functional testing, MySQL or other popular RDBMS is the better candidate. +1 Best Regards,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]difference between spec merged and BP approval

2015-03-11 Thread Chen, Wei D
-03-07 at 02:22 +, Chen, Wei D wrote: I thought the feature should be approved as long as the SPEC[1] is merged, but it seems I am wrong from the beginning[2], both of them (SPEC merged and BP approval[4][5]) is necessary and mandatory for getting some effective reviews, right? anyone can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone]ON DELETE RESTRICT VS ON DELETE CASCADE

2015-03-08 Thread Chen, Wei D
+1, I am fan of checking the constraints in the controller level instead of relying on FK constraints itself, thanks. Best Regards, Dave Chen From: Morgan Fainberg [mailto:morgan.fainb...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 2:29 AM To: David Stanek; OpenStack Development

[openstack-dev] [Keystone]ON DELETE RESTRICT VS ON DELETE CASCADE

2015-03-07 Thread Chen, Wei D
Hi, I did some homework to follow up the inline comment about on delete cascade subclauses of the foreign key clause[1], when ' ON DELETE CASCADE ' is given, delete a recode from parent table will DELETE all the corresponding rows from the CHILD table automatically *without any warning*. 'ON

[openstack-dev] [cinder]difference between spec merged and BP approval

2015-03-06 Thread Chen, Wei D
Hi, I thought the feature should be approved as long as the SPEC[1] is merged, but it seems I am wrong from the beginning[2], both of them (SPEC merged and BP approval[4][5]) is necessary and mandatory for getting some effective reviews, right? anyone can help to confirm with that? Besides,

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone knows whether there is freezing day of spec approval?

2014-12-15 Thread Chen, Wei D
Hi, I know nova has such day around Dec. 18, is there a similar day in Cinder project? thanks! Best Regards, Dave Chen smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Support Modifying Volume Image Metadata

2014-12-04 Thread Chen, Wei D
Hi all, We talked about this topic (Support Modifying Volume Image Metadata) in this week's IRC meeting. Unfortunately, I didn't prepared well and couldn't detail one concrete use case on this spec. Apologize for messing up the meeting! Now, we have updated the spec and addressed some comments