Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to HealthCheck OpenStack deployments

2015-05-13 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com writes: On 05/12/2015 02:16 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Nagios/watever As A Service would actually be very useful I think. Frankly, so do tenants. Tenants install software on their images using configuration management tools like mentioned above... I don't see a

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] eventlet 0.17.3 is now fully Python 3 compatible

2015-04-23 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Victor Stinner vstin...@redhat.com writes: Is there already a static analysis tool that helps find these things? (Would a pylint check for the above be useful? Some of them would be hard to find reliably, but a bunch of the above would be trivial) I read that hacking has some checks. It's

Re: [openstack-dev] Regarding openstack swift implementation

2015-04-21 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Subbulakshmi Subha subbulakshmisubh...@gmail.com wrote: I want to simulate it one javasim,so I want to know how are objects stored in the partitions in swift.I computed the md5 hash of the objects url, n the medium of storage is hashmap,so I want to

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo] Optional Ansible deployment coming

2015-04-01 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On 03/31/2015 03:30 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hey folks, One of our community members submitted a review to add optional Ansible support to deploy OpenStack using Ansible and the containers within Kolla. Our main objective remains: for third party deployment tools to use Kolla as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Re: Questions about kolla

2015-03-30 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com wrote: We plan to dockerize any service needed to deploy OpenStack. We haven’t decided if that includes ceph, since ceph may already be dockerized by someone else. But it does include the HA services we need as well as

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] What do people think of YAPF (like gofmt, for python)?

2015-03-26 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:02 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: This is purposefully done to ensure that developers do not inadvertently run code on their workstations from a source they may not trust. Sure, but is that really make a difference between having some scripts in a

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] What do people think of YAPF (like gofmt, for python)?

2015-03-26 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: git review is used by a ton of people who write in non-python. I think adding openstack-specific style enforcement to it would make it way less generally useful. I think if we wanted to do that we could just extend

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Re: Why we didn't use k8s in kolla?

2015-03-25 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, So if I understand correctly Kubernetes was avoided since there is no control point and using fig/docker-compose would get you a top to the bottom deployment that easy to control. At this point is there any reasons not using something like ansible+docker plugin instead? I have used

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.config][kolla] modular backends for oslo.cfg

2015-03-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: This however won't remove the need of a config file. For instance, plugins like etcd's will need the host/port options to be set somewhere - or passed as a cli parameter. Yes totally! I have been using command line

[openstack-dev] [oslo.config][kolla] modular backends for oslo.cfg

2015-03-19 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, While on a long oversea flight with Sebastien Han we were talking how he had implemented ceph-docker with central configuration over etcd. We quickly came up to the conclusion that if we wanted to have that in Kolla it would be neat if it was done straight from oslo.config so that would

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Infra cloud: infra running a cloud for nodepool

2015-02-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: A group of folks from HP is interested in starting an effort to run a cloud as part of the Infrastructure program with the purpose of providing resources to nodepool for OpenStack testing. HP is supplying two racks of machines, and we will operate

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Deprecation of Eventlet deployment in Kilo (Removal for M-release)

2015-02-20 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com writes: The Keystone development team is planning to deprecate deployment of Keystone under Eventlet during the Kilo cycle. Support for deploying under eventlet will be dropped as of the “M”-release of OpenStack. great! glad there is one project

Re: [openstack-dev] Pluggable Auth for clients and where should it go

2015-02-19 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: I think one thing needs to be clarified...what you are talking about is utilizing keystoneclient's auth plugins in neutronclient. Phrasing it as 'novaclient parity' reinforces the old notion that novaclient is the model

Re: [openstack-dev] The root-cause for IRC private channels (was Re: [all][tc] Lets keep our community open, lets fight for it)

2015-02-18 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com writes: Personally I think all our IRC channels should be logged. There is really no expectation of privacy when using IRC in an open collaborative project. Agreed with Daniel. I am not sure how a publicly available forum/channel can be assumed that there

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [third-party] how to use a devstack external plugin in gate testing

2015-02-12 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Jaume Devesa devv...@gmail.com writes: Following the conversation... We have seen that glusterfs[1] and ec2api[2] use different approach when it comes to repository managing: whereas glusterfs is a single 'devstack' directory repository, ec2api is a whole project with a 'devstack' directory

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [third-party] how to use a devstack external plugin in gate testing

2015-02-12 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: I'm going to be -1ing most new or substantially redone drivers at this point. External plugins are a better model for those. +1 Chnmouel __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-announce] [keystonemiddleware] keystonemiddlware release 1.3.0

2014-12-19 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: * http_connect_timeout option is now an integer instead of a boolean. * The service user for auth_token middlware can now be in a domain other than the default domain. fyi it has a fix in there as well so you

Re: [openstack-dev] [hacking] proposed rules drop for 1.0

2014-12-09 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: 1 - the entire H8* group. This doesn't function on python code, it functions on git commit message, which makes it tough to run locally. I do run them locally using git-review custom script features which would launch a flake8

[openstack-dev] [devstack] external plugin support for Devstack

2014-11-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, Thanks to the work of Dean and others we have a pretty solid plugins/extras support in Devstack. People can add new features in devstack within just a single file and that add a whole new feature or driver to devstack. It seems that there is quite a bit of people who wants to have those

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] external plugin support for Devstack

2014-11-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: We should also make this something which is gate friendly. I think the idea had been that if projects included a /devstack/ directory in them, when assembling devstack gate, that would be automatically dropped into devstack's

Re: [openstack-dev] Alembic 0.7.0 - hitting Pypi potentially Sunday night

2014-11-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: 1. read about the new features, particularly the branch support, and please let me know of any red flags/concerns you might have over the coming implementation, at

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] keystone doesn't restart after ./unstack

2014-11-04 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hi, If you do ./unstack.sh you probably want to do ./stack.sh back again to restack, ./rejoin-stack.sh is here when you have your screen session killed and want to rejoin it without having to ./stack.sh the full shenanigan again. Cheers, Chmouel On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Angelo Matarazzo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [Devstack]

2014-10-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Yves-Gwenaël Bourhis yves-gwenael.bour...@cloudwatt.com wrote: Le 23/10/2014 23:55, Gabriel Hurley a écrit : 1) If you’re going to store very large amounts of data in the session, then session cleanup is going to become an important issue to prevent

Re: [openstack-dev] Travels tips for the Paris summit

2014-10-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: I found this: http://www.topito.com/top-meilleurs-restaurants-vegetariens-paris The Creperies (Brittany pancakes) are also great choices for vegetarians since you can easily pick a vegetarian filling. my

Re: [openstack-dev] 2 Minute tokens

2014-10-01 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote: 1. Identify the roles for the APIs that Cinder is going to be calling on swift based on Swifts policy.json FYI: there is no Swifts policy.json in mainline code, there is one external middleware available that provides it

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Kolla Blueprints

2014-09-30 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote: I've done a first round of prioritization. I think key things we need people to step up for are nova and rabbitmq containers. For the developers, please take a moment to pick a specific blueprint to work on. If your

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][swift] Has anybody considered storing tokens in Swift?

2014-09-29 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Dmitry Mescheryakov dmescherya...@mirantis.com wrote: As a result of operation #1 the token will be saved into Swift by the Keystone. But due to eventual consistency it could happen that validation of token in operation #2 will not see the saved token.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][swift] Has anybody considered storing tokens in Swift?

2014-09-29 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On 30/09/2014 01:05, Clay Gerrard wrote: eventual consistency will only affect container listing and I don't think there is a need for container listing in that driver. well now hold on... if you're doing an overwrite in the face of server failures you could still get a stale read if a

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Diagnosing problems with containers

2014-09-26 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com wrote: As people are starting to look at Kubernetes and Docker, there have Nice, thanks for sharing! I think that may be nice to have this in a blog article (if it wasn't done already) Chmouel

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tripleo] New Project - Kolla: Deploy and Manage OpenStack using Kubernetes and Docker

2014-09-25 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: However, this does make me think that Keystone domains should be exposable to services inside your cloud for use as SSO. It would be quite handy if the keystone users used for the VMs that host Kubernetes could use the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tripleo] New Project - Kolla: Deploy and Manage OpenStack using Kubernetes and Docker

2014-09-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote: I'm pleased to announce the development of a new project Kolla which is Greek for glue :). Kolla has a goal of providing an implementation that deploys OpenStack using Kubernetes and Docker. This project will begin as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [All] API standards working group

2014-09-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I'd be willing to head up the working group... or at least participate in it. I am certainly interested, count me in. Chmouel ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-19 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote: So you can remove all that code and just let requests/urllib3 handle it on 3.2+, 2.7.9+ and for anything less than that either use conditional dependencies to have glance client depend on pyOpenSSL, ndg-httpsclient, and

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-18 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com writes: urllib3 do that automatically. I haven’t started to investigate exactly why they do this. Likewise, glance client has custom certificate verification in glanceclient.common.https. Why? I’m not exactly certain this probably come from pre-requests

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-18 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote: Distributions are not the only place that people get their software from, unless you think that the ~3 million downloads requests has received on PyPI in the last 30 days are distributions downloading requests to package

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] OpenStack bootstrapping hour - Friday Sept 19th - 3pm EST

2014-09-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: Episode 0 - Mock best practices will kick off this Friday, Sept 19th, from 3pm - 4pm EST. Our experts for this will be Jay Pipes and Dan ah too bad this is when the week-end start in Europe (and usually mean family time for me) but no complaining I guess there

Re: [openstack-dev] adding RSS feeds to specs repositories

2014-09-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com writes: I have completed a series of patches [1] for (I think) all of the specs repositories to add RSS feeds so that when specs are approved and merged they are easily publicized. Col, thanks for setting this up. [...] I originally thought we would

Re: [openstack-dev] memory usage in devstack-gate (the oom-killer strikes again)

2014-09-09 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: 1) Should we explicitly set the number of workers that services use in devstack? Why have so many workers in a small all-in-one environment? What is the right balance here? This is what we do for Swift, without

Re: [openstack-dev] Review change to nova api pretty please?

2014-08-30 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Alex Leonhardt aleonhardt...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a list of things not to send to this list somewhere accessible (link?) that I could review, to not send another (different) request by mistake and possibly upset or annoy people on here ? There is this

Re: [openstack-dev] [specs] script to help with spec reviews to convert them in html or pdf

2014-08-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: Not to detract from your suggestion, but if the specs project in question has a docs job then the link zuul leaves for it in each check report takes you to a draft rendering of the specs with the change applied rather

[openstack-dev] [specs] script to help with spec reviews to convert them in html or pdf

2014-08-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, If like me you find it difficult to read a large text file like the rst specs inside gerrit diff interface viewer, I have created a script that gets rst files in a review to generate them in a html or pdf files and open it with your desktop default viewer (linux/mac) . Script is available

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:05 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: You may have noticed that this has merged, along with a further change that shows the latest results in a table format. (You may need to force-reload in your browser to see the change.) Very cool!! this is really

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:27 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: If it is not worth looking at a job that is run by the OpenStack CI system, please propose a patch to openstack-infra/config to delete it from the Zuul config. We only want to run what's useful, and we have other

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Core team proposals

2014-08-08 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: Please respond in the usual manner, +1 or concerns. +1, I would be happy to see Ian joining the team. Chmouel ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] Tox run failure during installation of dependencies in requirements

2014-08-06 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Narasimhan, Vivekanandan vivekanandan.narasim...@hp.com wrote: Timeout: (pip._vendor.requests.packages.urllib3.connection.VerifiedHTTPSConnection object at 0x37e4790, 'Connection to pypi.python.org timed out. (connect timeout=15)') I think this error

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on the patch test failure rate and moving forward

2014-07-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, Thanks for writing this summary, I like all those ideas and thanks working hard on fixing this. * For all non gold standard configurations, we'll dedicate a part of our infrastructure to running them in a continuous background loop, as well as making these configs available

Re: [openstack-dev] REST API access to configuration options

2014-07-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Do people think this is a good idea? Useful in other projects? Concerned about the risks? FWIW, we have this in Swift for a while and we actually uses it for different testing in cloud capabilities. I personally

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: Fwd: Debian people don't like bash8 as a project name (Bug#748383: ITP: bash8 -- bash script style guide checker)

2014-06-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: bashate ftw. +1 to bashate Chmouel ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] masking X-Auth-Token in debug output - proposed consistency

2014-06-12 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Actually swiftclient is one of the biggest offenders in the gate - http://logs.openstack.org/96/99396/1/check/check-tempest-dsvm-full/4501fc8/logs/screen-g-api.txt.gz#_2014-06-11_15_20_11_078 I'd be happy to fix that but that

Re: [openstack-dev] masking X-Auth-Token in debug output - proposed consistency

2014-06-12 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Actually swiftclient is one of the biggest offenders in the gate - http://logs.openstack.org/96/99396/1/check/check-tempest-dsvm-full/4501fc8/logs

Re: [openstack-dev] masking X-Auth-Token in debug output - proposed consistency

2014-06-12 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: The only thing it makes harder is you have to generate your own token to run the curl command. The rest is there. Well I would have imagine that the curl command debug are here so people can easily copy and paste them and/or

Re: [openstack-dev] Selecting more carefully our dependencies

2014-05-30 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: So I'm wondering: are we being careful enough when selecting dependencies? In this case, I think we haven't, and I would recommend against using wrapt. Not only because it embeds six.py, but because upstream looks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Swift] storage policies merge plan

2014-05-27 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Hua ZZ Zhang zhu...@cn.ibm.com wrote: Do it make sense to support storage policy work in devstack so that it can be more easily tested? -Edward Zhang I don't think storage policy on one VM (which has other OpenStack services) like usually setup for

Re: [openstack-dev] Spec repo names

2014-05-26 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
jebl...@openstack.org (James E. Blair) writes: about this, the more I think that the right answer is that we should stick with codenames for the spec repos. The codenames are actually I hereby +1 this, except old timers that i don't think many people knows the OpenStack components by their

[openstack-dev] [swift] swiftclient functional tests gate for python-swiftclient

2014-05-07 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
/test_multithreading.py R tests/unit/test_swiftclient.py R tests/unit/test_utils.py R tests/unit/utils.py M tox.ini 13 files changed, 320 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Approvals: Alistair Coles: Looks good to me (core reviewer); Approved Chmouel Boudjnah: Looks good to me (core reviewer) Jenkins: Verified

Re: [openstack-dev] SSL in Common client

2014-05-05 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com writes: From what I found nothing has changed either upstream or in swift. If you are asking about the ability to disable SSL compression it is up to the OS to provide that so nothing was added when we changed swiftclient to requests. Most modern OSes have

Re: [openstack-dev] SSL in Common client

2014-05-05 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.com writes: Most modern OSes have SSL compression by default, only Debian stable was still enabling it. I mean have SSL compression *disabled* by default. Chmouel. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit downtime and upgrade on 2014-04-28

2014-04-28 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Zaro zaro0...@gmail.com wrote: Gerrit 2.8 allows setting label values on patch sets either thru the command line[1] or REST API[2]. Since we will setup WIP as a -1 score on a label this will just be a matter of updating git-review to set the label on new

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit downtime and upgrade on 2014-04-28

2014-04-28 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:40 AM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.orgwrote: There are a few changes that will impact developers. We will have more detailed documentation about this soon, but here are the main things you should know about: What plugins are going to be enabled under gerrit?

Re: [openstack-dev] [SWIFT] swift and authorization policy

2014-04-25 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
I haven't done a full review but I like what you did and this should be the proper way to handle ACL for keystoneauth. I am not sure tho that forking oslo.common.policy is any better than copy/pasting it with its dependences. I would suggest we move `swift-keystoneauth` to its own project part

Re: [openstack-dev] [Devstack] add support for ceph

2014-04-18 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: That being said, there are 2 devstack sessions available at design summit. So proposing something around addressing the ceph situation might be a good one. It's a big and interesting problem. I have add a session that just do

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] /bin/bash vs. /bin/sh

2014-04-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
FWIW: we are using bash in devstack if we were going to try to make it POSIX bourne shell (or whatever /bin/sh is) it would have been a huge pain. On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Dougal Matthews dou...@redhat.com wrote: Another +1 for using bash. Sounds like an easy win. On 15/04/14 12:31,

[openstack-dev] [Devstack] add support for ceph

2014-04-04 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, We had quite a lengthy discussion on this review : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65113/ about a patch that seb has sent to add ceph support to devstack. The main issues seems to resolve around the fact that in devstack we support only packages that are in the distros and not having

[openstack-dev] [Aws as a seervice] Jumpgate review

2014-03-30 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
A good article mentioned here: http://bodenr.blogspot.fr/2014/03/managing-openstack-softlayer-resources.html for me, it's a gateway instead of I think our better approach of drivers inside openstack. I would imagine it's not a static one and would pass down everything it doesn't know about. If

Re: [openstack-dev] [marconi] sample config files should be ignored in git...

2014-03-28 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Kurt Griffiths kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com wrote: P.S. - Any particular reason this script wasn't written in Python? Seems like that would avoid a lot of cross-platform gotchyas. I think it just need to have someone stepping up doing it. Chmouel

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa][all] Home of rendered specs

2014-03-28 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Thierry Carrez wrote: specs instead of docs because docs.openstack.org http://docs.openstack.org should only contain what is actually implemented so keeping specs in another subdomain is an attempt to avoid confusion as we don't expect every approved blueprint to get implemented. Great

Re: [openstack-dev] [MagnetoDB] Best practices for uploading large amounts of data

2014-03-28 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Maksym Iarmak wrote: I suggest taking a look, how Swift and Ceph do such things. under swift (and CEPH via the radosgw which implement swift API) we are using POST and PUT which has been working relatively well Chmouel ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-18 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: We've not required UCA for any other project to pass the gate. Is it that bad to have UCA in default devstack, as far as I know UCA is the official way to do OpenStack on ubuntu, right? Chmouel.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-18 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: So I'm still -1 at the point in making UCA our default run environment until it's provably functional for a period of time. Because working around upstream distro breaks is no fun. I agree, if UCA is not very stable ATM, this

Re: [openstack-dev] Moving swift3 to stackforge (was: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Intermittent failures cloning noVNC from github.com/kanaka)

2014-03-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Pete Zaitcev zait...@redhat.com wrote: I think we should've not kicked it out. Maybe just re-fold it back into Swift? we probably would need to have a vote/chat of some sort first. Chmouel ___ OpenStack-dev mailing

[openstack-dev] Moving swift3 to stackforge (was: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Intermittent failures cloning noVNC from github.com/kanaka)

2014-03-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: In Juno I'd really be pro removing all the devstack references to git repos not on git.openstack.org, because these kinds of failures have real impact. Currently we have 4 repositories that fit this bill:

Re: [openstack-dev] Replication multi cloud

2014-03-13 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
You may be interested by this project as well : https://github.com/stackforge/swiftsync you would need to replicate your keystone in both way via mysql replication or something like this (and have endpoint url changed as well obviously there). Chmouel On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Marco

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova client] gate-python-novaclient-pypy

2014-03-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
FYI: this is all over for all clients that gates with pypy : http://logs.openstack.org/28/74328/2/check/gate-python-swiftclient-pypy/c0058f2/console.html On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, The client gate seems to be broken with the following error:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][FYI] Bookmarklet for neutron gerrit review

2014-03-07 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
if peoples like this why don't we have it directly on the reviews? Chmouel. On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: Nachi, Great! I'd been meaning to do something like this. I took yours and tweaked it a bit to highlight failed Jenkins builds in red and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: Ephemeral RBD image support

2014-03-07 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote: What would be awesome in Juno is some CI around RBD/Ceph. I'd feel a lot more comfortable with this code if we had CI running Tempest Seb has been working to add ceph support into devstack which could be a

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] config sample tools on os x

2014-02-20 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: I'm pretty sure it'd be OK to use getopt in a portable way rather than specifically the GNU version, but I had no idea if it was acceptable. If everybody think it is, I can give it a try. In which sort of system setup

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-announce] python-heatclient 0.2.7 released

2014-02-19 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote: Changes in this release: https://launchpad.net/python-heatclient/+milestone/v0.2.7 It is probably worth mentioning[1] that python-heatclient is now using the requests library instead of its homegrown httpclient library which

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] config sample tools on os x

2014-02-19 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote: tools/config/generate_sample.sh isn't working on OS X due to the getopt usage. Any recipes / proposals to fix it? I have a workaround at least. thanks for the workaround, I had a look on this while reporting bug

Re: [openstack-dev] pep8 gating fails due to tools/config/check_uptodate.sh

2014-02-05 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote: Including the config file in either the developer documentation or the packaging build makes more sense. I'm still worried that adding it to the sdist generation means you would have to have a lot of tools

Re: [openstack-dev] Python 3 compatibility

2014-02-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: Last, but not least, trollius has been created by Victor Stinner, who actually did that work with porting OpenStack in mind and as the first objective. AFAIK: victor had plans to send a mail about it to the list later

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] How to model resources in Heat

2014-01-29 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com writes: As I said, figuring this all out is really hard to do, and the existing resources in Heat are by no means perfect (we even had a session at the Design Summit devoted to fixing some of them[1]). If anyone has a question about a specific model, feel free

Re: [openstack-dev] Hacking repair scripts

2014-01-28 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.comwrote: Thought people might find it useful and it could become a part of automatic repairing/style adjustments in the future (similar to I guess what go has in `gofmt`). nice, it would be cool if this can be hooked

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchicical Multitenancy Discussion

2014-01-28 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.comwrote: The key use case here is to delegate administration rights for a group of tenants to a specific user/role. There is something in Keystone called a domain which supports part of this functionality, but without

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][oslo] Upgrade six to 1.5.2?

2014-01-22 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: On Tue, Jan 21 2014, ZhiQiang Fan wrote: six 1.5.2 has been released on 2014-01-06, it provides urllib/urlparse compatibility. Is there any plan to upgrade six to 1.5.2? (since it is fresh new, may need some time to

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote: Once a common library is in place, is there any intention to (or resistance against) collapsing the clients into a single project or even a single command (a la busybox)? that's what openstackclient is here for

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Jesse Noller jesse.nol...@rackspace.comwrote: Can you detail out noauth for me; and I would say the defacto httplib in python today is python-requests - urllib3 is also good but I would say from a *consumer* standpoint requests offers more in terms of usability

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Right, but requests supports chunked-transfer encoding properly, so really there's no reason those clients could not move to a requests-based codebase. We had that discussion for swiftclient and we are not against it but

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote: On Jan 16, 2014, at 2:36 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: 2) major overhaul of client libraries so they are all based off a common base library. This would cover namespace changes, and possible a push to move

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Organizing a Gate Blocking Bug Fix Day

2014-01-09 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Specifically I'd like to get commitments from as many PTLs as possible that they'll both directly participate in the day, as well as encourage the rest of their project to do the same I'll be more than happy to participate (or

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.config] Centralized config management

2014-01-09 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: One example of such case is neuron + nova vif parameter configuration regarding to security group. The workflow is something like this. nova asks vif configuration information for neutron server. Neutron server ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] libvirt unit test errors

2014-01-07 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: 2014-01-07 11:59:47.428http://logs.openstack.org/10/60010/2/check/gate-nova-python27/ebd53ea/console.html#_2014-01-07_11_59_47_428| Requirement already satisfied (use --upgrade to upgrade): markupsafe in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-06 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo) vijayakumar.kodam@nsn.com wrote: In this case, simply changing the meter properties in a configuration file should be enough. There should be an inotify signal which shall notify ceilometer of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2013-12-31 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
I am not sure if this is the global .gitignore you are thinking of but this is the one I am in favor of: https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-files#global-gitignore Maintaining .gitignore in 30+ repositories for a potentially infinite number of editors is very hard, and thankfully we

[openstack-dev] [testr] debugging failing testr runs

2013-12-17 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, I was wondering what was the strategy to debug a failed run with tox? I was trying to see which tests was failing with python-keystoneclient and py33 and this is the type of error i am getting : http://paste.openstack.org/show/gc3xMk34ELuSF5Fk1mvP/ (bet it with tox directly or from the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystoneclient] [Keystone] [Solum] Last released version of keystoneclient does not work with python33

2013-12-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On 10 Dec 2013, at 09:20, Morgan Fainberg m...@metacloud.com wrote: I think the correct way to sync is to run the update.py script and submit a review (I don’t think it’s changed recently). Seems pretty straightforward then, thanks. let see how the review goes here then :

Re: [openstack-dev] Catalog type naming guidelines

2013-12-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote: we have a concern about the correct catalog type naming for projects who'd like to have a name like data processing. just out of interests why is it a problem and need to be standardized, isn't that supposed to be

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [qa][tempest] Bug Triage Day - Thu 12th - Prep

2013-12-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
would be nice to participate for the ppl interested with tempest Chmouel. -- Forwarded message -- From: Adalberto Medeiros adal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Date: Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:52 PM Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest] Bug Triage Day - Thu 12th - Prep To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] OK to Use Flufl.enum

2013-12-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: The IntEnum is my new definition of the most worthless class ever invented in the Python ecosystem -- taking the place of zope.interface on my personal wall of worthlessness. this is the kind of things you can do with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Core criteria, review stats vs reality

2013-12-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: That's why I thought creating VIP parties for +2 reviewers (or giving them special badges or T-shirts) is spreading the wrong message, and encourage people to hang on to the extra rights associated with the duty.

[openstack-dev] [Swift] python-swiftclient, verifying SSL certs by default

2013-12-04 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hello, There has been a lengthy discussion going on for quite sometime on a review for swiftclient here : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33473/ The review change the way works swiftclient to refuse to connect to insecure (i.e: self signed) SSL swift proxies unless you are specifying the

  1   2   >