Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-11-13 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 11:12 AM Clark Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018, at 4:47 AM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:37 PM Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > > > > > Corey Bryant writes: > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-11-06 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM Corey Bryant wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to enable py37 unit tests in the gate. > > == Background == > > I work on OpenStack packaging for Ubuntu. During the Rocky release (Ubuntu > Cosmic) I tried to fix py37 bugs upstream as I came ac

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for a process to keep up with Python releases

2018-10-22 Thread Corey Bryant
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 3:46 PM Zane Bitter wrote: > On 19/10/18 12:30 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, at 8:17 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > >> Unit Tests > >> -- > >> > >> For unit tests, the most important thing is to test on the versions of > >> Python we target. It's

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-17 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 3:43 PM William M Edmonds wrote: > > Corey Bryant wrote on 10/15/2018 05:34:24 PM: > ... > > From an ubuntu perspective, ubuntu is going to support stein on 18. > > 04 LTS (3.6) and 19.04 (3.7) only. > ... > > So folks with Ubuntu 16.

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-16 Thread Corey Bryant
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:58 AM Zane Bitter wrote: > On 15/10/18 8:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 10/15/2018 06:39 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > >> > >> In fact, as far as we know the version we have to support in CentOS > >> may actually be 3.5, which seems like a good reason to keep it working

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-15 Thread Corey Bryant
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 4:11 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-10-15 15:00:07 -0400 (-0400), Zane Bitter wrote: > [...] > > That said, I don't think we should be dropping support/testing for 3.5. > > According to: > > > > https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/pti/python.html > > > > 3.5

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-15 Thread Corey Bryant
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:15 PM Corey Bryant wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:01 PM Zane Bitter wrote: > >> On 12/10/18 8:59 AM, Corey Bryant wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:19 AM Andreas Jaeger > > <mailto:a...@suse.

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-15 Thread Corey Bryant
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:01 PM Zane Bitter wrote: > On 12/10/18 8:59 AM, Corey Bryant wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:19 AM Andreas Jaeger > <mailto:a...@suse.com>> wrote: > > > > On 10/10/2018 23.10, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-12 Thread Corey Bryant
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corey Bryant wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:19 AM Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> On 10/10/2018 23.10, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> > I might have only pointed this out on IRC so far, but the >> > expectation is that

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-12 Thread Corey Bryant
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:19 AM Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 10/10/2018 23.10, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > I might have only pointed this out on IRC so far, but the > > expectation is that testing 3.5 and 3.6 at the same time was merely > > transitional since official OpenStack projects should be

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-12 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:36 PM Goutham Pacha Ravi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:10 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > > On 2018-10-10 16:00:40 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: > > [...] > > > I would rather see us testing 3.5 and 3.7 versus 3.5, 3.6, and > > > 3.7. > > [...] > > > > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-11 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:36 PM Goutham Pacha Ravi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:10 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > > On 2018-10-10 16:00:40 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: > > [...] > > > I would rather see us testing 3.5 and 3.7 versus 3.5, 3.6, and > > > 3.7. > > [...] > > > > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-10 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-10-10 16:09:21 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: > [...] > > So, I'm asking whether there is a good way to not duplicating all > > jobs to run on all three interpreters. Do we really need testing > > of all three versions? Or is

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-10 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:09 AM Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 10/10/2018 15.42, Corey Bryant wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 9:26 AM Andreas Jaeger > <mailto:a...@suse.com>> wrote: > > > > On 10/10/2018 14.45, Corey Bryant wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-10 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 9:26 AM Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 10/10/2018 14.45, Corey Bryant wrote: > > [...] > > == Enabling py37 unit tests == > > > > Ubuntu Bionic (18.04 LTS) has the 3.7.0 interpreter and I have reviews > > up to define the py37 zuul

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-10 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 9:27 AM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-10-10 08:45:39 -0400 (-0400), Corey Bryant wrote: > [...] > > Ubuntu Bionic (18.04 LTS) has the 3.7.0 interpreter > [...] > > Thanks for the heads up! Last time I looked it was still a pre-3.7.0 > beta

[openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

2018-10-10 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, I'd like to enable py37 unit tests in the gate. == Background == I work on OpenStack packaging for Ubuntu. During the Rocky release (Ubuntu Cosmic) I tried to fix py37 bugs upstream as I came across them. There ended up being a lot of py37 issues and after a while, due to time

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Rocky for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

2018-09-07 Thread Corey Bryant
The Ubuntu OpenStack team at Canonical is pleased to announce the general availability of OpenStack Rocky on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. Details of the Rocky release can be found at: https://www.openstack.org/software/rocky To get access to the Ubuntu Rocky packages: Ubuntu

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack lagging behind 2 major python versions: we need a Python 3.7 gate

2018-08-08 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:35:20AM -0400, Corey Bryant wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:43 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> >> On 08/07/2018 06:10 PM, Corey Bryant wrote: >>> > I was concerned that ther

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack lagging behind 2 major python versions: we need a Python 3.7 gate

2018-08-08 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:43 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 08/07/2018 06:10 PM, Corey Bryant wrote: > > I was concerned that there wouldn't be any > > gating until Ubuntu 20.04 (April 2020) > Same over here. I'm concerned that it takes another 2 years, which > rea

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack lagging behind 2 major python versions: we need a Python 3.7 gate

2018-08-07 Thread Corey Bryant
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > Top posting to avoid getting into the weeds. > > * OpenStack is indeed lagging behind > * The road to 3.7 (and eventually 3.8) runs through 3.6 > * As part of the project-wide python3-first goal we aim to have everything > working on 3.6 for

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [designate] [heat] [python3] deadlock with eventlet and ThreadPoolExecutor in py3.7

2018-07-25 Thread Corey Bryant
oks like those layers are not patched correctly > in the newest ThreadPoolExecutor). > > Otherwise yes, under eventlet imho swap out the executor (assuming you can > do this) and under threading swap in threadpool executor (ideally if done > correctly the same stuff should 'just work'

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [designate] [heat] [python3] deadlock with eventlet and ThreadPoolExecutor in py3.7

2018-07-25 Thread Corey Bryant
let everywhere but that likely requires rewrites of a lot of > things, oops...). > > -Josh > > Corey Bryant wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'm trying to add Py3 packaging support for Ubuntu Rocky and while there >> are a lot of issues involved with supporting Py3.7, thi

[openstack-dev] [all] [designate] [heat] [python3] deadlock with eventlet and ThreadPoolExecutor in py3.7

2018-07-25 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, I'm trying to add Py3 packaging support for Ubuntu Rocky and while there are a lot of issues involved with supporting Py3.7, this is one of the big ones that I could use a hand with. With py3.7, there's a deadlock when eventlet monkeypatch of stdlib thread modules is combined with use of

[openstack-dev] [packaging] Extended Maintenance and Distro LTS coordination

2018-06-07 Thread Corey Bryant
At the summit in Vancouver there were sessions discussing Extended Maintenance. The general focus was on keeping upstream branches open in extended maintenance mode after 18 months rather than EOLing them. If at some point fixes cannot land in a given project's branch, and there is no reasonable

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Queens for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

2018-04-27 Thread Corey Bryant
now > https://github.com/tobias-urdin/deb-kuryr-lib > > > Would love to see both Zun and Qinling in Ubuntu to get a good grip on the > container world :) > Best regards > > Awesome Tobias. I can take a closer look next week if you'd like. Thanks, Corey > > On 04/27/2018

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Queens for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

2018-04-27 Thread Corey Bryant
rovide package sources for zun that DTRT to create binary packages, and if they can test them, then I'd be happy to review/sponsor the Ubuntu and cloud-archive uploads. Thanks, Corey > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Corey Bryant <corey.bry...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Queens for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

2018-04-27 Thread Corey Bryant
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi Corey, > > What are the requirements to include OpenStack Zun into the Ubuntu > packages? We have a comprehensive installation guide [1] that are using by > a lot of users when they were installing Zun. However, the

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Queens for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

2018-04-27 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, With yesterday’s release of Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (the Bionic Beaver) the Ubuntu OpenStack team at Canonical is pleased to announce the general availability of OpenStack Queens on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. This release of Ubuntu is a Long Term Support release that will be supported for 5 years.

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Queens for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

2018-03-01 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, The Ubuntu OpenStack team at Canonical is pleased to announce the general availability of OpenStack Queens on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. Details of the Queens release can be found at: https://www.openstack.org/software/queens To get access to the Ubuntu Queens

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] heat-dashboard is non-free, with broken unit test env

2018-02-21 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi there! > > I'm having big trouble package heat-dashboard for Debian. I hope I can > get help through this list. > > In here: > > heat_dashboard/static/dashboard/project/heat_dashboard/template_generator/ > js/ > > we

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Native QEMU LUKS decryption review overview ahead of FF

2018-01-23 Thread Corey Bryant
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Lee Yarwood wrote: > A breif progress update in-line below. > > On 22-01-18 14:22:12, Lee Yarwood wrote: > > Hello, > > > > With M3 and FF rapidly approaching this week I wanted to post a brief > > overview of the QEMU native LUKS series. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [snaps] proposing Pete Vander Giessen for snaps-core and snaps-release group membership

2017-08-15 Thread Corey Bryant
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Ryan Beisner wrote: > Hi Snappers > > I'm writing to propose Pete Vander Giessen to the *snaps-core* and > *snaps-release* groups. Pete has done a good bit of work in OpenStack > Snaps, particularly snap testing and CI tooling. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [snaps] proposing David Ames for snaps-core and snaps-release group membership

2017-08-15 Thread Corey Bryant
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Ryan Beisner wrote: > Hi Snappers > > I'm writing to propose David Ames to the *snaps-core* and *snaps-release* > groups. David has done a good bit of work in OpenStack Snaps. I feel he > would add a lot of value to the general

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Onboarding session at next weeks summit

2017-05-04 Thread Corey Bryant
I'll be there as well. Looking forward to seeing everyone and meeting some new folks. Corey On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:36 AM, James Page wrote: > Hi All > > The OpenStack summit is nearly upon us and for this summit we're running a > project onboarding session on Monday at

Re: [openstack-dev] [snaps] proposing Dmitrii Shcherbakov for core review team

2017-03-22 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:02 AM, James Page wrote: > Hi Snappers > > Dmitrii did some good work on the ceilometer snap and has been providing > reviews and feedback of other changes in the queue over the last few months > as well has hanging out and being a sounding

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ubuntu][libvirt] Is libvirt 2.5.0 in ubuntu cloud archive ocata repo bust

2017-03-08 Thread Corey Bryant
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > Kolla deploy ubuntu gate is red now. here is the related bug[0]. > > libvirt failed to access the console.log file when booting instance. After > made some debugging, i got following. > > Jeffrey, This is likely

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][snaps][ansible][puppet][charms] OpenStack snaps delivery strategy

2017-03-02 Thread Corey Bryant
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Jesse Pretorius < jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > Adding the [deployment] tag as the catch-all for deployment projects as I > think they’d be interested. > > > > > Ah thanks Jesse, appreciate that. I didn't realize that tag existed. Corey

[openstack-dev] [snaps][ansible][puppet][charms] OpenStack snaps delivery strategy

2017-03-02 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, I'm working to get a strategy in place for delivery of OpenStack snaps. Below I've outlined an initial strategy, and I'd like to get your input. I'm particularly interested in input from snap folks of course, but also from projects that install OpenStack and may want to be involved in

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Ocata for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

2017-02-22 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, The Ubuntu OpenStack team at Canonical is pleased to announce the general availability of OpenStack Ocata on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. Ocata is the latest release of OpenStack and the first in the new OpenStack release cadence, with a focus on stabilization of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] scaling rabbitmq with cells v2 requires manual database update

2017-02-16 Thread Corey Bryant
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote: > Should be this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1664913 and > *https://review.openstack.org/434179* > ? > > Hey Kevin, sorry I didn't notice your patch/bug. It looks like this

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] scaling rabbitmq with cells v2 requires manual database update

2017-02-15 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Corey Bryant <corey.bry...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:26 PM, melanie witt <melwi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:12:14 -0500, Corey Bryant wrote: >> >>> This works but you ha

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] scaling rabbitmq with cells v2 requires manual database update

2017-02-15 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:26 PM, melanie witt <melwi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:12:14 -0500, Corey Bryant wrote: > >> This works but you have to specify all of the args (--cell_uuid, --name, >> --transport-url and --database_connection). Otherwise

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] scaling rabbitmq with cells v2 requires manual database update

2017-02-15 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > The problem is there's no way to update an existing cell's transport_url > > via nova-manage. > > There is: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431582/ Dan, This works but you have to specify all of the args

Re: [openstack-dev] The end of OpenStack packages in Debian?

2017-02-15 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi there, > > It's been a while since I planed on writing this message. I couldn't > write it because the situation makes me really sad. At this point, it > starts to be urgent to post it. > > As for many other folks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] scaling rabbitmq with cells v2 requires manual database update

2017-02-15 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > The problem is there's no way to update an existing cell's transport_url > > via nova-manage. > > There is: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431582/ > > > It appears the only way to get around this is manually

[openstack-dev] [nova] scaling rabbitmq with cells v2 requires manual database update

2017-02-15 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi all, Cells v2 in Ocata requires manual database updates each time you scale rabbitmq. In my opinion this is a pretty significant regression. Prior to cells v2 (no cells) rabbitmq could be scaled without manual database updates. The problem is there's no way to update an existing cell's

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Ocata B2 for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

2017-01-26 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, The Ubuntu OpenStack team is pleased to announce the general availability of the OpenStack Ocata B2 milestone in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. Ubuntu 16.04 LTS You can enable the Ubuntu Cloud Archive pocket for OpenStack Ocata on Ubuntu 16.04

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] CI status for Ubuntu

2017-01-24 Thread Corey Bryant
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Just FYI, > > We switched the Ubuntu scenario jobs to non-voting this week due to > the large amount of breakage caused by the ocata-proposed update to m2 > based packages. The Ubuntu beaker jobs are still voting on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] [glance] [oslo] webob 1.7

2017-01-20 Thread Corey Bryant
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Corey Bryant <corey.bry...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Joshua Harlow <harlo...@fastmail.com> > wrote: > >> Corey Bryant wrote: >> >>> >>> Added [nova] and [oslo] to the subj

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] [glance] [oslo] webob 1.7

2017-01-19 Thread Corey Bryant
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Joshua Harlow <harlo...@fastmail.com> wrote: > Corey Bryant wrote: > >> >> Added [nova] and [oslo] to the subject. This is also affecting nova and >> oslo.middleware. I know Sean's initial response on the thread was that >> th

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] [glance] [oslo] webob 1.7

2017-01-19 Thread Corey Bryant
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Corey Bryant <corey.bry...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> -----Original Message- >> From: Corey Bryant <corey.bry...@canonical.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] webob 1.7

2017-01-19 Thread Corey Bryant
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Corey Bryant <corey.bry...@canonical.com> > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] webob 1.7

2017-01-19 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Chuck Short > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: January 18, 2017 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Ocata B1 for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

2016-12-02 Thread Corey Bryant
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > Cool. And Kolla has upgrade ubuntu repo to b1 in master branch. > > btw, if there is any way or help doc for proposing a new package into > ubuntu-cloud-archive? like kolla. > > > Hi Jeffrey, There's currently no

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Ocata B1 for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

2016-12-01 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, The Ubuntu OpenStack team is pleased to announce the general availability of the OpenStack Ocata B1 milestone in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. Ubuntu 16.04 LTS You can enable the Ubuntu Cloud Archive pocket for OpenStack Ocata on Ubuntu

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Newton for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.10

2016-10-13 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, The Ubuntu OpenStack team is pleased to announce the general availability of OpenStack Newton, available in today’s release of Ubuntu 16.10 (Yakkety Yak) [0] and also available for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (Xenial Xerus) via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Newton B3 for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.10

2016-09-08 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, The Ubuntu OpenStack team is pleased to announce the general availability of OpenStack Newton B3 milestone in Ubuntu 16.10 and for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. Ubuntu 16.04 LTS You can enable the Ubuntu Cloud Archive pocket for OpenStack Newton

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Newton B2 for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.10

2016-07-21 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, The Ubuntu OpenStack team is pleased to announce the general availability of OpenStack Newton B2 milestone in Ubuntu 16.10 and for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. Ubuntu 16.04 LTS You can enable the Ubuntu Cloud Archive pocket for OpenStack Newton on

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Newton B1 for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.10

2016-06-13 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, The Ubuntu OpenStack team is pleased to announce the general availability of the OpenStack Newton B1 milestone in Ubuntu 16.10 and for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. Ubuntu 16.04 LTS You can enable the Ubuntu Cloud Archive pocket for OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] Plans to converge on one ldap client?

2016-05-24 Thread Corey Bryant
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Morgan Fainberg <morgan.fainb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Corey Bryant <corey.bry...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Morgan Fainberg < >> m

Re: [openstack-dev] Plans to converge on one ldap client?

2016-05-24 Thread Corey Bryant
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Morgan Fainberg <morgan.fainb...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Corey Bryant <corey.bry...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Are there any plans to converge on one ldap client

[openstack-dev] Plans to converge on one ldap client?

2016-05-24 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, Are there any plans to converge on one ldap client across projects? Some projects have moved to ldap3 and others are using pyldap (both are in global requirements). The issue we're running into in Ubuntu is that we can only have one ldap client in Ubuntu main, while the others will live

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][packaging][summit] input needed on summit discussion about global requirements

2016-04-20 Thread Corey Bryant
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Goirand > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: April 18, 2016 at 17:21:36

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] mitaka-3 development milestone

2016-03-08 Thread Corey Bryant
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The last milestone of the Mitaka development cycle, "mitaka-3", is now > reached. Some OpenStack projects following the milestone-based release > schedule took the opportunity to publish a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Any projects using sqlalchemy-utils?

2016-02-15 Thread Corey Bryant
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12 2016, Corey Bryant wrote: > > > taskflow started using it recently, however it's only needed for a single > > type in taskflow (JSONType). I'm wondering if it's worth the e

[openstack-dev] [all] Any projects using sqlalchemy-utils?

2016-02-12 Thread Corey Bryant
Are any projects using sqlalchemy-utils? taskflow started using it recently, however it's only needed for a single type in taskflow (JSONType). I'm wondering if it's worth the effort of maintaining it and it's dependencies in Ubuntu main or if perhaps we can just revert this bit to define the