So what the conclusion with kolla-salt deliverable, has this work started,
if yes where is the code etc etc ?
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
> > I agree this would make good PTG discussion for us, and maybe someone
> >
thanks for heads up.
suggest we add this to the kolla docs as is easy to forget about it
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Jeffrey Zhang
wrote:
> When using ansible template module, you may see the trailing newline
> is stripped by blocks, like
>
> # template.j2
> a =
Superb report Jim, thanks !
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Markus Zoeller
wrote:
> David Pursehouse wrote on 11/12/2015 09:22:50
> PM:
>
> > From: David Pursehouse
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>
Hi,
While #1 does improve things further it doesn't cover the use case where
you have 2 tenants and you would like to have the VMs spun up different dns
domains.
I suspect this was intentionally left out?
Dani
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Miguel Lavalle
wrote:
> Zhi
thanks for sharing, useful indeed.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz <
ricardo.carrillo.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Erm, yeah, I hear your pain with processing output with awk.
>
> Having the option to output CSV is cool :-).
> Thanks for sharing.
>
> Cheers
>
> 2015-10-02
Great job Henry !
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> It has been about three years in the making but now it is finally here.
> A screenshot doesn't do it justice, so here is a short video overview:
> https://youtu.be/PxFd-lJV0e4
>
> Isn't that neat? I am
Kevin,
am i right in saying that the merge above was packaged into Liberty ?
Any chance to be ported to Juno?
Cheers,
Dani
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Support for that blueprint already merged[1] so it's a little late to
> change it to
Kyle,
Is the dashboard available to a limited set of users? curious by nature
tried to access it and it said Session expired, please login again
however i thought i don't have to login to Gerrit, am i missing something?
Cheers,
Dani
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kyle Mestery
From Operators point of view i'd love to see less technology proliferation
in OpenStack, if you wear the developer hat please don't be selfish, take
into account the others :)
ZK is a robust technology but hey is a beast like Rabbit, there is a lot to
massage and over 2 data centers ZK is not
I couldn't put it better, nice write up Morgan!! +1
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Aug 2, 2015, at 16:00, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote:
From Operators point of view i'd love to see less technology
proliferation
+100 on what Sean said
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote:
We should have the Wiki page redirect, or link to:
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/TESTING.rst#debugging
And then update that RST file it to add any info we have about
Can i understand the use case for that?
What i don't get it is how will you know the MAC for a new created instance
via HEAT so you can set at the same time the SG based on MAC?
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:29 PM, yan_xing...@163.com yan_xing...@163.com
wrote:
Thank you, Kevin.
I search the
Right, thanks a lot Assaf!
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote:
You can mark the network as shared and have it exposed to all of your
tenants.
- Original Message -
Hi,
I'm running openstack ( IceHouse ) configured for provider networks.
Hi,
I'm running openstack (IceHouse) configured for provider networks.
For a tenant i've created the network/ subnet using the below commands and
everything works as expected.
neutron net-create --tenant-id f557a3f5303d4e7c9218c5539456eb37
--provider:physical_network=physnet2
.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Fuel 6.1 and i've seen an interesting behavior which i think
match bug [1]
Basically the adminUrl publicUrl part of keystone endpoint are
different
And the result of that is that you can't run
access
to management network to be able to work with internal and admin endpoints.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
I know about the flow but what i'm questioning is:
admin endpoint is mapped to br-mgmt subnet (you do have the HAproxy as
below
Hi,
I'm running Fuel 6.1 and i've seen an interesting behavior which i think
match bug [1]
Basically the adminUrl publicUrl part of keystone endpoint are different
And the result of that is that you can't run keystone cli - i.e create/list
tenants etc
keystone --debug tenant-list
:
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=9380ba70d67db6b69f817d8e318de5ba1e990b12
Neil
On 01/07/15 07:34, Daniel Comnea wrote:
Hi,
sorry for no feedback, i've been doing more and more test and after
enabled the dnsmasq log i found the error which i'm not longer
, Daniel Comnea wrote:
Neil, much thanks !!!
Any idea if i can go and only run apt-get --only-upgrade install
packagename or that will be too crazy?
Cheers,
Dani
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com
mailto:neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote:
Well
it seems i'm hitting this bug [1] but not clear from the
description what was the problem on dnsmasp 2.59 (which comes wiht Fuel 5.1)
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Dani
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1271344
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks
Ian,
a while ago it was discussed on operator's mailing list between Kevin,
Steve co
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-June/007267.html
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On 6/29/15, 23:59, Steven Dake (stdake)
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200:
Hi!
tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
As per the
+ Operators
Much thanks in advance,
Dani
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running IceHouse (build using Fuel 5.1.1) on Ubuntu where dnsmask
version 2.59-4.
I have a very basic network layout where i have a private net which has 2
Any help, ideas please?
Thx,
Dani
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote:
+ Operators
Much thanks in advance,
Dani
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running IceHouse (build using Fuel 5.1.1
Hi all,
I'm running IceHouse (build using Fuel 5.1.1) on Ubuntu where dnsmask
version 2.59-4.
I have a very basic network layout where i have a private net which has 2
subnets
2fb7de9d-d6df-481f-acca-2f7860cffa60 | private-net
| e79c3477-d3e5-471c-a728-8d881cf31bee
+1
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Vilobh Meshram
vilobhmeshram.openst...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:52 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com
wrote:
On 12 May 2015 at 20:33, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 05/12/2015 01:12 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-05-12
My vote doesn't count but as an operator i'd give Assaf +100 for all the
great knowledge he has and shared through his blog - incredible source of
information for everyone who wants to understand in a dummy way how Neutron
does things.
Dani
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Akihiro Motoki
mentioned scheduler hints to work, the
following scheduler filter should be enabled for nova scheduler
SameHostFilter and
DifferentHostFilter
There’s another way of doing it using OS::Nova::ServerGroup, but it’s
available only since Juno.
-
Dimitri
From: Daniel Comnea
--
*From:* Daniel Comnea
*Sent:* Saturday, May 23, 2015 3:17:11 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* [openstack-dev] [heat][nova]: anti-affinity policy via heat in
IceHouse?
Hi,
I'm aware of the anti-affinity policy which you can
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 May 2015 at 04:43, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote:
There's no real reason as far as I'm aware, just an implementation
decision.
This is inaccurate. There is a reason(s), and this has been asked before:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote:
There's no real reason as far as I'm aware, just an implementation
decision.
[DC]: in this case wouldn't this bee seen suitable as best practicies vs
what every blog/ manual is suggesting?
On 21 במאי 2015, at 01:48,
Hi,
I'm aware of the anti-affinity policy which you can create via nova cli and
associated instances with it.
I'm also aware of the default policies in nova.conf
by creating instances via HEAT is any alternatives to create instances part
of anti-affinity group?
Thx,
Dani
My $0.2 cents:
I echo what Maish said with regards to functionality:
- integration with HEAT is a must from Day -1 (if there is anything like
this :) ) otherwise will be hard to gain operators traction. Look it as the
entry point for everyone trying to move from Neutron LB
- white/ black listing
+1
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Maish Saidel-Keesing mais...@maishsk.com
wrote:
Hello all,
Going over today's presentation Load Balancing as a Service, Kilo and
Beyond[1] (great presentation!!) - there are a few questions I have
regarding the future release:
For Octavia 1.0:
1. Can
Great info, thanks for sharing.
Since i couldn't attend the summit, are there any AIs which needs to
happen/ take place and which i can keep an eye on?
thanks,
Dani
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Richard Raseley rich...@raseley.com
wrote:
I apologize if this message is inappropriately
HI all,
Recently i used Fuel 5.1 to deploy Openstack Icehouse on a Lab (PoC) and a
request came with enabling Neutron LBaaS.
I have looked up on Fuel doc to see if this is supported in the version i'm
running but failed ot find anything.
Anyone can point me to any docs which mentioned a) yes it
) and configure it with accordance to
standard OpenStack cloud administrator guide [1].
[1]
http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/content/install_neutron-lbaas-agent.html
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
HI all,
Recently i used Fuel 5.1 to deploy
that is not the
present direction of development.
Thanks,
doug
On May 4, 2015, at 1:57 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to gather more info about the differences between
Neutron LBaaS v1
Neutron LBaaS v2
Octavia
I know Octavia is still not marked
, 2015, at 06:45, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Great job Kevin co !!
Are there any plans in supporting configure the baremetal as well ?
Dani
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Liu, Guang Jun (Gene)
gene@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
cool
Hi all,
I'm trying to gather more info about the differences between
Neutron LBaaS v1
Neutron LBaaS v2
Octavia
I know Octavia is still not marked production but on the other hand i keep
hearing inside my organization that Neutron LBaaS is missing few critical
pieces so i'd very much appreciate
Dean, quick question:
will i be able to run this new client against Icehouse too ?
Thanks,
Dani
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenStackClient 1.2.0 has been released to PyPI.
python-openstackclient can be installed from the following locations:
Great job Kevin co !!
Are there any plans in supporting configure the baremetal as well ?
Dani
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Liu, Guang Jun (Gene)
gene@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
cool!
From: Kevin Carter [kevin.car...@rackspace.com]
Sent:
Good luck Sean!! Hopefully you can sort out the DNS and the Qoutas.
Thanks again !
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/22/2015 04:33 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com
mailto:s...@coreitpro.com
Monty many thanks for a clear summary, fully agree with you. I have a
nightmare trying to educate developers (mainly from client side) in my
group that they need to get used with private net and not consume all FIP
because is not an unlimited resource
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Monty
the
complex state transitions associated with session and connection loss.
'''
Daniel Comnea wrote:
My $2 cents:
I like the 3rd party backend however instead of ZK wouldn't Consul [1]
fit better due to lighter/ out of box multi DC awareness?
Dani
[1] Consul - https://www.consul.io/
On Mon
My $2 cents:
I like the 3rd party backend however instead of ZK wouldn't Consul [1] fit
better due to lighter/ out of box multi DC awareness?
Dani
[1] Consul - https://www.consul.io/
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Wangbibo wangb...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Totally agree with you
could even pin dev/test to specific
hypervisors/areas of the cloud and let production have the rest via those
flavors.
Kris Lindgren
Senior Linux Systems Engineer
GoDaddy, LLC.
From: Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, April 8
+ operators
Hard to believe nobody is facing this problems, even on small shops you end
up with multiple stacks part of the same tenant/ project.
Thanks,
Dani
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Any ideas/ thoughts please?
In VMware world is basically
Thanks Angus for feedback.
Best,
Dani
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know if the above use case has made it into the convergence
project
Hi all,
Does anyone know if the above use case has made it into the convergence
project and in which release was/ is going to be merged?
Thanks,
Dani
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks all for reply.
I have spoke with Qiming and @Shardy (IRC
Sorry to chime in but i will throw in another use case for Steven since is
about the HA/ auto-scaling and i think it does match what i asked back in
October.
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-October/049375.html
If you need more info let me know
Dani
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015
+ developers mailing list, hopefully a developer might be able to chime in.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Marc Heckmann marc.heckm...@ubisoft.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I was going to post a similar question this evening, so I decided to just
bounce on Mathieu’s question. See below inline.
On
Any ideas/ thoughts please?
In VMware world is basically the same feature provided by the resource pool.
Thanks,
Dani
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to understand what options i have for the below use case...
Having
I see this spec has been merged however can anyone point out if this will
make it into final Kilo release?
Thanks,
Dani
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
Are we yet at the point in the New Year to register requests for
exceptions ?
There is strong interest
No thoughts?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone shed some light as to how you upgrade/ applies the
security/back-ported patches?
E.g - let's say i already have a production environment running Icehouse
2014.1 as per the link
Hi all,
Can anyone shed some light as to how you upgrade/ applies the
security/back-ported patches?
E.g - let's say i already have a production environment running Icehouse
2014.1 as per the link [1] and i'd like to upgrade it to latest Icehouse
release 2014.1.4.
Also do you have to go via
This project looks very interesting and i might give it a go by installing
standalone. I have a question though: are there any plans to expose the
current output as part of Horizon or any other UI ?
Thx,
Dani
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Zhou, Zhenzan zhenzan.z...@intel.com
wrote:
Just
Congrats Steve!
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Daneyon Hansen (danehans)
daneh...@cisco.com wrote:
Congratulations Steve!
Regards,
Daneyon Hansen
Software Engineer
Email: daneh...@cisco.com
Phone: 303-718-0400
http://about.me/daneyon_hansen
From: Angus Salkeld
Thanks Adam, Thierry!
Dani
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
Short term answers:
The amount of infrastructure we would have to build to replicate CRON is
not worth it.
Figuring out a CRON strategy for nontrivial deployment is part of a larger
data
(configurable, ideally).
If we are all configuring this as a cron job, is there a reason that it
could not be built into the code ?
Tim
*From:* Mike Smith [mailto:mism...@overstock.com]
*Sent:* 24 January 2015 18:08
*To:* Daniel Comnea
*Cc:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
Hi all,
I just bumped into Sebastien's blog where he suggested a cron job should
run in production to tidy up expired tokens - see blog[1]
Could you please remind me if this is still required in IceHouse/ Juno? (i
kind of remember i've seen some work being done in this direction but i
can't
case hence is not generic because the assumption is that my instances
are hooked behind a LBaaS which is not always the case.
Looking forward to see the 'convergence' in action.
Cheers,
Dani
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Daniel Comnea comnea.d
HI all,
Unfortunately i couldn't find any resource - blueprint/ document/ examples/
presentations about my below use case, hence the question i'm raising now
(if this is not the best place to ask, please let me know).
Having a group of 5 instances, i'd like to always maintain a minimum of 2
63 matches
Mail list logo