Re: [openstack-dev] [policy] AWS IAM session

2017-10-04 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
+1 I spent some time recently studying IAM models of AWS and GCP. Based on this I had created following post comparing and summarizing the two models at high-level: http://devcentric.io/2017/07/13/comparing-iam-models-of-aws-and-gcp/ Thought of sharing it here as it may help with big-picture

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][deployment] Deployment Working Group (DWG)

2017-03-16 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
This is a great initiative. Coming from Solum - a project that in on the fringes with regards to user adoption [1][2], I feel that one of the things that can help in increasing the adoption is deployment tooling available for operators. If there is a standardized way to introduce a project in

[openstack-dev] [Solum] PTL Candidacy for Pike

2017-01-26 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
on the Python 3.5 support [8], which has been approved as the community-wide goal for this cycle. If you are interested in Solum feel free to reach out to us here, or on Solum IRC channel (#solum on chat.freenode.net). Regards, Devdatta Kulkarni [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402225/ [2

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][solum] is solum-infra-guestagent an unmaintained project?

2016-11-05 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hello Michael, Steve, Thanks again to both of you for providing patches to remove oslo-incubator code from solum-infra-guestagent. As I mentioned earlier in this thread, I will probably propose to remove this repository from official Solum repositories. I had it on this week's IRC meeting agenda,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][solum] is solum-infra-guestagent an unmaintained project?

2016-10-28 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi Steve, Your observation is correct. Solum team had created solum-infra-guestagent repository to investigate the idea of a build agent for building applications. However the work in that direction has not progressed in a while. So it should be okay to remove solum-infra-guestagent repo from

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Nominating Zhu Rong for Solum core

2016-09-28 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi team, I would like to propose Zhu Rong (irc: zhurong) to be included as Solum core. Zhu Rong has been very active in different parts of Solum over several months now. His primary contribution has been moving Solum to use Oslo libraries, thereby making our project satisfy one of the

[openstack-dev] [Solum] PTL candidacy

2016-09-16 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
g. (If you are interested in helping out with any of these, please reach out to our team on IRC (#solum on chat.freenode.net)). Best regards, Devdatta Kulkarni __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) U

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] persistently single-vendor projects

2016-08-03 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi, As current PTL of one of the projects that has the team:single-vendor tag, I have following thoughts/questions on this issue. - Is the need for periodically deciding membership in the big tent primarily stemming from the question of managing resources (for the future design summits and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][rfc] Booting docker images using nova libvirt

2016-07-27 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi Sudipta, There is another approach you can consider which does not need any changes to Nova. The approach works as follows: - Save the container image tar in Swift - Generate a Swift tempURL for the container file - Boot Nova vm and pass instructions for following steps through cloud init /

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Proposal to change weekly IRC meeting time

2016-05-24 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi team, In today's IRC meeting [1], we discussed about changing our weekly IRC meeting time from current time of 1700 UTC to 1400 UTC to allow our team members from Germany, India, and China to participate regularly. I have submitted a WIP patch [2] to make this change. Please provide your

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack Foundation] [board][tc][all] One Platform – Containers/Bare Metal? (Re: Board of Directors Meeting)

2016-04-12 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi, Reading through the thread I thought of adding following points which might be relevant to this discussion. 1) Related to the point of providing an abstraction for deploying apps to different form factors: OpenStack Solum is a project which allows deploying of applications starting

[openstack-dev] [Solum] PTL candidacy

2016-03-18 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
us work together on achieving these goals in this cycle. Best regards, Devdatta Kulkarni __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Nominating Vijendar Komalla for Solum core

2016-02-02 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi team, I would like to propose Vijendar Komalla for our core team. Vijendar has been actively contributing to Solum for several months now submitting patches, providing great reviews, and participating actively in our IRC meetings and on Solum IRC channel. You can find Vijendar's

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Nesting /containers resource under /bays

2016-01-28 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi, I agree with this view point. Let me provide Solum team's perspective on this. Solum currently uses Heat to deploy application docker containers that it creates. We have been looking at Magnum as an alternative deployment mechanism. The fact that Magnum is supporting containers endpoint

[openstack-dev] [Solum] No meeting on December 29, 2015

2015-12-28 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi team, We will not be holding our weekly IRC meeting on December 29 due to holidays. We will convene again on January 5. Regards, Devdatta __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Hack day / Bug triage day

2015-11-10 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi Solum team, In last two IRC meetings we have discussed about spending a day triaging Solum bugs. In today's meeting, participants agreed to do this on November 18, 2015. You can find today's meeting logs here:

[openstack-dev] [Solum] No meeting on October 27, 2015

2015-10-21 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi team, In this week's IRC meeting we decided to cancel next week's meeting (on October 27, 2015) due to Tokyo summit. We will convene again on November 3. Regards, Devdatta __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Proposal to change weekly IRC meeting time

2015-10-05 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
weekly IRC meeting will be held at 1700 UTC in openstack-meeting-3 channel. I will update project wiki to reflect this change. Regards, Devdatta From: Devdatta Kulkarni <devdatta.kulka...@rackspace.com> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 8:12 AM To: Ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?

2015-09-30 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
+1 Hongbin. From perspective of Solum, which hopes to use Magnum for its application container scheduling requirements, deep integration of COEs with OpenStack services like Keystone will be useful. Specifically, I am thinking that it will be good if Solum can depend on Keystone tokens to

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Proposal to change weekly IRC meeting time

2015-09-28 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi team, In last week's IRC meeting [1], we discussed about changing our weekly IRC meeting time from current time of 2100 UTC to 1700 UTC to, (a) avoid conflict with the cross-project meeting, and (b) accommodate participants from India/Asia. I have submitted a WIP review [2] to make this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Solum] Using os-auth-token and os-image-url with glance client

2015-09-25 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
e Core [Inactive hide details for Devdatta Kulkarni ---2015/09/24 06:44:57 PM---Hi, Glance team, In Solum, we use Glance to store Docke]Devdatta Kulkarni ---2015/09/24 06:44:57 PM---Hi, Glance team, In Solum, we use Glance to store Docker images that we create for applications. We From: De

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Solum] Using os-auth-token and os-image-url with glance client

2015-09-25 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
ct: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Solum] Using os-auth-token and os-image-url with glance client On 24/09/15 22:44 +, Devdatta Kulkarni wrote: >Hi, Glance team, > > >In Solum, we use Glance to store Docker images that we create for applications. >We use Glance client internally to uplo

[openstack-dev] [Glance][Solum] Using os-auth-token and os-image-url with glance client

2015-09-24 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi, Glance team, In Solum, we use Glance to store Docker images that we create for applications. We use Glance client internally to upload these images. Till recently, 'glance image-create' with only token has been working for us (in devstack). Today, I started noticing that glance

[openstack-dev] [Solum] PTL Candidacy

2015-09-15 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
in the project can be found here: http://stackalytics.com/?module=solum http://stackalytics.com/?module=python-solumclient I hope you will give me an opportunity to serve as Solum's PTL for Mitaka. Best regards, Devdatta Kulkarni [1] https://github.com/openstack/solum-specs/blob/master/specs/liberty/app

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Implementing app and workflow resources

2015-08-21 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hey Solum team, Recently we had accepted a spec to add new API resources to Solum [1]. Thanks to Ed Cranford, the 'app' resource is already implemented. I am working on implementing the workflow resource. I have created a spec [2] outlining the approach taken for adding the workflow

[openstack-dev] [Solum][Mistral] Help with merging a patch to python-mistralclient

2015-06-24 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi, Mistral team, With recent introduction of programmatic annotations in requirements [1], projects need to upgrade their version of pbr to work nicely with such annotations. Solum's devstack gate is currently failing [2] because the version of pbr in python-mistralclient is incompatible

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [all] To changes-since or not to changes-since

2015-06-19 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
From: Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 4:07 AM To: OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [api] [all] To changes-since or not to changes-since There's an open question in the API-WG on whether to formalize or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum][app-catalog] [ Supporting swift downloads for operator languagepacks

2015-06-18 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Kevin, You are right. To avoid overloading the app catalog servers, Solum operators can (should?) have local copies of the languagepacks (LPs) in their Glance/Swift installations which are part of their Solum install. Solum currently does have the ability to download LPs from Glance or

[openstack-dev] [api][Solum] Request for feedback on new API resource

2015-06-18 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi, API WG team, In Solum, recently we have been working on some changes to our REST API. Basically, we have introduced a new resource ('app'). The spec for this has been accepted by Solum cores. https://github.com/stackforge/solum-specs/blob/master/specs/liberty/app-resource.rst Right now

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Update on current status

2015-06-17 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi team, With the recent application from our team to be included in the big tent (https://review.openstack.org/190949), I wanted to give a quick update on the state of our project. Before I do that, here is a quick overview of the current capabilities of Solum and a very high-level view

[openstack-dev] [Solum][Mistral] Help with a patch

2015-06-17 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi Mistral team, Solum's devstack gate is running into an issue probably due to the change in location of mistral's repositories. Here is the bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1466149 There is a patch which tries to fix the issue: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192754/1 If

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Why do app names have to be unique?

2015-06-15 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi Adrian, The new app resource that is being implemented (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185147/) does not enforce name uniqueness. This issue was discussed here sometime back. Earlier thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/058858.html The main argument

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Should logs be deleted when we delete an app?

2015-06-15 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Yes, the log deletion should be optional. The question is what should be the default behavior. Should the default be to delete the logs and provide a flag to keep them, or keep the logs by default and provide a override flag to delete them? Delete-by-default is consistent with the view that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] OpenStack Design Summit Solum sessions

2015-05-20 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi Mark, As Adrian mentioned in another email on this chain, hopefully we can have a session for the next summit. In the meantime, you can check out current capabilities of Solum here: https://solum.readthedocs.org/en/latest/getting_started/index.html We also have a vagrant environment where

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum][Heat][Solum] Expression of Bay Status

2015-03-12 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hey Magnum team, Just thought of sharing here that in Solum we have a similar requirement. We want to know when a Heat stack corresponding to an 'app' is ready so that we can mark that app as ready in Solum's database. We periodically query Heat to get this information (so essentially a

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Should app names be unique?

2015-03-11 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi Solum team, In yesterday's team meeting the question of whether Solum should enforce unique app name constraint within a tenant came up. As a recollection, in Solum one can create an 'app' using: solum app create --plan-file plan-file --name app-name Currently Solum does support

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Addition to solum core

2014-12-27 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
+1 From: James Y. Li [yuel...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2014 9:03 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Addition to solum core +1! -James Li On Dec 27, 2014 2:02 AM, Adrian Otto

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Contributing to Solum

2014-11-18 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi Keyvan, Great to hear that your team is interested in contributing to Solum. While there is no 'Ideas' page, there is this: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/HighLevelRoadmap The team is currently working on the Juno-3 milestone. In coming weeks we will be discussing the next milestone.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Core Reviewer Change

2014-09-30 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
+1 From: Georgy Okrokvertskhov [gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:18 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Core Reviewer Change +1 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:03

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Get rid of the sample config file

2014-09-25 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi, We have faced this situation in Solum several times. And in fact this was one of the topics that we discussed in our last irc meeting. We landed on separating the sample check from pep8 gate into a non-voting gate. One reason to keep the sample check is so that when say a feature in your

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] reviews for the new API

2014-06-04 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi Angus, Julien, No major disagreements. My thinking is that we should provide more application developer focused mechanism for customizing workflows (point #3). This may not necessarily be an entirely new DSL. It could just be additions to the current Plan structure. For example, we could

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] use of the plan for m1

2014-03-04 Thread devdatta kulkarni
I support this approach. Customization of build and deploy lifecycle actions depends on the ability to register different kinds of services for performing these actions. I can imagine that operators would want to provide such services as part of their Solum install. Then, app developers would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP

2014-02-17 Thread devdatta kulkarni
Hi Shaunak, -Original Message- From: Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 3:47pm To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum

2014-02-12 Thread devdatta kulkarni
Hi, I have been looking at Zuul for last few days and had a question about its intended role within Solum. From what I understand, Zuul is a code gating system. I have been wondering if code gating is something we are considering as a feature to be provided in Solum? If yes, then Zuul is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Milestone 1 End to end scenario

2014-02-10 Thread devdatta kulkarni
Hi Roshan, Great to see the big picture that we are targeting. Some minor comments/suggestions: 1) It will be helpful to explicitly call out in the first step that the git repositories are not hosted by Solum but are public repositories on github.com 1) In step 3, what do you mean by

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Lang-pack working group meeting cancelled today due to freenode DOS, will be rescheduled

2014-02-04 Thread devdatta kulkarni
Sounds good to me. - Devdatta -Original Message- From: Clayton Coleman ccole...@redhat.com Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 12:10pm To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Lang-pack working

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Lang-pack working group meeting cancelled today due to freenode DOS, will be rescheduled

2014-02-03 Thread devdatta kulkarni
Which time zone? On Wednesdays between 11.00am - noon (US Central time) there is git integration working group meeting. -Original Message- From: Clayton Coleman ccole...@redhat.com Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 10:35am To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Deployment units and plans

2014-01-31 Thread devdatta kulkarni
Hi, In this week's language pack working group meeting we briefly touched upon questions regarding creation of deployment units, their handling with respect to plans, etc. I have created a etherpad page where I have put these and other questions.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Proposed changes to solum-core

2014-01-27 Thread devdatta kulkarni
+1 -Original Message- From: Murali Allada murali.all...@rackspace.com Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 8:19pm To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Using Zuul in the Git-pull blueprint

2013-12-13 Thread devdatta kulkarni
, at 1:39 PM, devdatta kulkarni devdatta.kulka...@rackspace.com wrote: We followed on the Zuul question in this week's git-integration working group meeting. mordred has created an etherpad with a high-level description of Zuul and how it might fit with Solum't git integration workflow

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Using Zuul in the Git-pull blueprint

2013-12-12 Thread devdatta kulkarni
We followed on the Zuul question in this week's git-integration working group meeting. mordred has created an etherpad with a high-level description of Zuul and how it might fit with Solum't git integration workflow https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ZuulSolum The working group seemed to be

[openstack-dev] [Solum] [Plan]

2013-12-10 Thread devdatta kulkarni
Hi Adrian, Thanks for creating https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/solum-demystified I am really excited to see the examples. Especially cool is how examples 2 and 3 demonstrate using a component (solum_glance_id) created as part of example 1. Some questions/comments: 1) Summarizing the sequence

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Some initial code copying for db/migration

2013-11-08 Thread devdatta kulkarni
There are several different points being raised here, all very interesting. Trying to separate them below. 1) Using objects as an abstraction for versioned data: This seems like a good direction overall, especially from the point-of-view of backwards compatibility of consumers of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Separation of concerns for 0.1 git deploy blueprint

2013-10-30 Thread devdatta kulkarni
Hi Clayton, Thank you for creating these diagrams. They are a great starting point for discussions around the git deploy blueprint. Some questions/comments: In both the diagrams, what do the arrows indicate? Data flow, control-flow, or some kind of ordering relationship? Especially, the arrow