Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ironic] How to proceed about deprecation of untagged code?

2015-11-04 Thread Gabriel Bezerra
Em 04.11.2015 17:19, Jim Rollenhagen escreveu: On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 02:55:49PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 11/04/2015 02:42 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 04:08:18PM -0300, Gabriel Bezerra wrote: >> Em 04.11.2015 11:32, Jim Rollenhagen escreveu: >>> On

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ironic] How to proceed about deprecation of untagged code?

2015-11-04 Thread Gabriel Bezerra
Em 04.11.2015 11:32, Jim Rollenhagen escreveu: On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 08:44:36AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: On 11/03/2015 11:40 PM, Gabriel Bezerra wrote: >Hi, > >The change in https://review.openstack.org/237122 touches a feature from >ironic that has not been released in any tag yet.

[openstack-dev] [all][ironic] How to proceed about deprecation of untagged code?

2015-11-03 Thread Gabriel Bezerra
etc. that are deprecated from their very first tag/release. How about sticking to min(next_release, 3 months)? Or next_tag? Or 3 months? max(next_tag, 3 months)? Best regards, Gabriel Bezerra. __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant

2015-03-10 Thread Gabriel Bezerra
Em 10.03.2015 14:34, Gabriel Bezerra escreveu: Em 10.03.2015 14:24, Carl Baldwin escreveu: Neutron currently does not enforce the uniqueness, or non-overlap, of subnet cidrs within the address scope for a single tenant. For example, if a tenant chooses to use 10.0.0.0/24 on more than one subnet

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Uniqueness of subnets within a tenant

2015-03-10 Thread Gabriel Bezerra
Em 10.03.2015 14:24, Carl Baldwin escreveu: Neutron currently does not enforce the uniqueness, or non-overlap, of subnet cidrs within the address scope for a single tenant. For example, if a tenant chooses to use 10.0.0.0/24 on more than one subnet, he or she is free to do so. Problems will