Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] "import only module" message and #noqa

2014-01-03 Thread Gabriel pettier
___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev I guess it could work too, but that would disable all warnings against these

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][keystone] Is the user password too simple?

2013-12-30 Thread Gabriel pettier
(and i do, using full sentences is quite convenient), don't force me to have numbers or symbols in it, it's already way harder to crack than an 8 chars word with a capital, a number, and a non-alphanumerical char. -- Gabriel Pettier Software Engineer at CloudWatt.com 06 85 10 36 34 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] "import only module" message and #noqa

2013-12-30 Thread Gabriel pettier
x27;s better for reviews, i understand. Sorry for the noise On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 03:43:03PM +0100, Gabriel pettier wrote: > Hi > > Reading horizon's code and recent reviews, i'm under the impression that > it's a common practice to use #noqa to bypass the "im

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] "import only module" message and #noqa

2013-12-30 Thread Gabriel pettier
hould be made more consistently applied to fix all these imports. Regards -- Gabriel Pettier Software Engineer at CloudWatt.com 06 85 10 36 34 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Enhance UX of Launch Instance Form

2013-12-17 Thread Gabriel pettier
ec 03, 2013 at 07:44:12PM +0100, Gabriel pettier wrote: > (Previous mail went out a bit fast) > > These features could be developed iteratively to improve upon the > existing code base: > - First allow the modal view system to expand for better usage of screen >real-estat

Re: [openstack-dev] How to best make User Experience a priority in every project

2013-12-06 Thread Gabriel pettier
l the UX-minded folks need a forum to coordinate, I think [UX] ML > >threads and, maybe, a UX weekly meeting would be an interesting first step. > > > >There would still be an issue with UX session space at the Design > >Summit... but that's a well known issue that affects

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Enhance UX of Launch Instance Form

2013-12-03 Thread Gabriel Pettier
we use it for the view implementation? Feedback/directions? [1] http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/81/wizard-ui-for-workflow/ On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:49:29PM +0100, Gabriel pettier wrote: > Hi there > > I read the proposal and related documentation, and intend

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Enhance UX of Launch Instance Form

2013-12-03 Thread Gabriel pettier
we use it for the view implementation? Feedback/directions? [1] http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/81/wizard-ui-for-workflow/ On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:49:29PM +0100, Gabriel pettier wrote: > Hi there > > I read the proposal and related documentation, and intend

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Enhance UX of Launch Instance Form

2013-12-03 Thread Gabriel pettier
everal wording updates ("cancel", "ephemeral boot source", ...) > >[1] http://cedricss.github.io/openstack-dashboard-ux-blueprints/launch-instance >[2] >http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/11/modals-and-supporting-different-screen-sizes/ >[3] http://ask-ope