from:"Gandhi, Kunal"

Re: [openstack-dev] [kosmos][designate][lbaas] Intial Kosmos source files for review in gerrit

2015-09-02 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

A gentle reminder to please take a look at the code review and provide feedback.

Regards
Kunal

> On Aug 30, 2015, at 8:26 PM, Gandhi, Kunal  wrote:
> 
> Hi All
> 
> I have checked in the initial source files to gerrit for review.
> 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218709/ 
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218709/>
> 
> Please take a look a look at it and provide feedback.
> 
> Regards
> Kunal
> 

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [kosmos][designate][lbaas] Intial Kosmos source files for review in gerrit

2015-08-30 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

Hi All

I have checked in the initial source files to gerrit for review.

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218709/ 


Please take a look a look at it and provide feedback.

Regards
Kunal

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

2015-08-24 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

HI All

As per action items from last week’s meeting, I have represented the arch 
diagram into source files and modules in the gslb code base. I have created a 
pull request with all the changes for further discussion in tomorrow’s meeting

https://github.com/gslb/gslb/pull/1/commits 
<https://github.com/gslb/gslb/pull/1/commits>


Regards
Kunal

> On Aug 16, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Gandhi, Kunal  wrote:
> 
> Hi all 
> 
> I have included the architecture diagram and an er diagram in the pull 
> request below. It would great if you all could provide some feedback on it.
> 
> https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/4 
> <https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/4>
> 
> Regards
> Kunal
> 
> 
> 
>> On Aug 4, 2015, at 5:40 AM, Hayes, Graham > <mailto:graham.ha...@hp.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Sure, we need the other cores to merge it - I cannot merge my own change.
>> 
>> If you are OK with the current version, you can leave a comment on the
>> pull request, which helps cores decide if the PR is ready.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Graham
>> 
>> On 03/08/15 18:10, Gandhi, Kunal wrote:
>>> Hi Graham,
>>> 
>>> Can we have your GSLB pull request merged to the
>>> repo https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/1/files 
>>> <https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/1/files> ? I would like to
>>> send another pull request based on these changes.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Kunal
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 30, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Hayes, Graham >>> <mailto:graham.ha...@hp.com>
>>>> <mailto:graham.ha...@hp.com <mailto:graham.ha...@hp.com>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I have started to put together a working draft of an API here:
>>>> 
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nw5jVn0hjmhlhkZJAohx-gqRkkbVhMMJ79Pogd0ysEk/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>  
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nw5jVn0hjmhlhkZJAohx-gqRkkbVhMMJ79Pogd0ysEk/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>> 
>>>> I would suggest we skip this weeks meeting, and review this doc, and
>>>> circle back next week?
>>>> 
>>>> I have opened it for comment, and I will add anyone who sends on their
>>>> email to the editors list.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Graham
>>>> 
>>>> On 24/06/15 15:16, Samuel Bercovici wrote:
>>>>> Great!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks you. I have missed this one.
>>>>> 
>>>>> *From:*Gandhi, Kunal [mailto:kunalhgan...@gmail.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 24, 2015 12:21 PM
>>>>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and
>>>>> backend support
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Sam
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes. we discussed the use cases 2 weeks ago on irc. The IRC logs can be
>>>>> found here
>>>>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/gslb.2015-06-09-16.00.log.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> and the use case document can be found here
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1016shVnPaK8l8HxMpjADiYtY2O94p4g7JxjuIA-qv7w/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kunal
>>>>> 
>>>>>   On Jun 24, 2015, at 12:35 AM, Samuel Bercovici >>>>   <mailto:samu...@radware.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Hi Kunal,
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Did you also include use cases per our last discussion on IRC?
>>>>>   I prefer to start with use cases before we dive into APIs.
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Thanks,
>>>>>   -Sam.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   -Original Message-
>>>>>   From: Gandhi, Kunal [mailto:kunalhgan...@gmail.com]
>>>>>   Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 6:47 AM
>>>>>   To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>>   Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and
>>>>>   backend support
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Hi All,
>>>>> 
>>>>>   I have a very draft for the GSLB API and would like to upload it
>>>>>   somewhere for discussion. What is the best place to upload and
>>>>>   collaborate the draft ? Since the API docs have a lo

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

2015-08-16 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

Hi all 

I have included the architecture diagram and an er diagram in the pull request 
below. It would great if you all could provide some feedback on it.

https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/4 
<https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/4>

Regards
Kunal



> On Aug 4, 2015, at 5:40 AM, Hayes, Graham  wrote:
> 
> Sure, we need the other cores to merge it - I cannot merge my own change.
> 
> If you are OK with the current version, you can leave a comment on the
> pull request, which helps cores decide if the PR is ready.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Graham
> 
> On 03/08/15 18:10, Gandhi, Kunal wrote:
>> Hi Graham,
>> 
>> Can we have your GSLB pull request merged to the
>> repo https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/1/files ? I would like to
>> send another pull request based on these changes.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Kunal
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jun 30, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Hayes, Graham >> <mailto:graham.ha...@hp.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have started to put together a working draft of an API here:
>>> 
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nw5jVn0hjmhlhkZJAohx-gqRkkbVhMMJ79Pogd0ysEk/edit?usp=sharing
>>> 
>>> I would suggest we skip this weeks meeting, and review this doc, and
>>> circle back next week?
>>> 
>>> I have opened it for comment, and I will add anyone who sends on their
>>> email to the editors list.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Graham
>>> 
>>> On 24/06/15 15:16, Samuel Bercovici wrote:
>>>> Great!
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks you. I have missed this one.
>>>> 
>>>> *From:*Gandhi, Kunal [mailto:kunalhgan...@gmail.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 24, 2015 12:21 PM
>>>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and
>>>> backend support
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Sam
>>>> 
>>>> Yes. we discussed the use cases 2 weeks ago on irc. The IRC logs can be
>>>> found here
>>>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/gslb.2015-06-09-16.00.log.html
>>>> 
>>>> and the use case document can be found here
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1016shVnPaK8l8HxMpjADiYtY2O94p4g7JxjuIA-qv7w/edit?usp=sharing
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> 
>>>> Kunal
>>>> 
>>>>   On Jun 24, 2015, at 12:35 AM, Samuel Bercovici >>>   <mailto:samu...@radware.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>   Hi Kunal,
>>>> 
>>>>   Did you also include use cases per our last discussion on IRC?
>>>>   I prefer to start with use cases before we dive into APIs.
>>>> 
>>>>   Thanks,
>>>>   -Sam.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>   -Original Message-
>>>>   From: Gandhi, Kunal [mailto:kunalhgan...@gmail.com]
>>>>   Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 6:47 AM
>>>>   To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>   Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and
>>>>   backend support
>>>> 
>>>>   Hi All,
>>>> 
>>>>   I have a very draft for the GSLB API and would like to upload it
>>>>   somewhere for discussion. What is the best place to upload and
>>>>   collaborate the draft ? Since the API docs have a lot of JSON
>>>>   payloads in it, I am not sure whether Google Docs will be
>>>>   appropriate for that.
>>>> 
>>>>   Regards
>>>>   Kunal
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>   On Jun 15, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Doug Wiegley
>>>>   mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com>>
>>>>   wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>   Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>>   We don’t have a rough draft API doc yet, so I’m suggesting that we
>>>>   postpone tomorrow morning’s meeting until next week. Does anyone
>>>>   have any other agenda items, or want the meeting tomorrow?
>>>> 
>>>>   Thanks,
>>>>   doug
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>   On Jun 2, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Doug Wiegley
>>>>   mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com>>
>>>>   wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>   Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>>   The initial meeting logs can be found at
>>>>   http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

2015-08-03 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

Hi Graham,

Can we have your GSLB pull request merged to the repo 
https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/1/files 
<https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/1/files> ? I would like to send 
another pull request based on these changes.

Regards
Kunal


> On Jun 30, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Hayes, Graham  wrote:
> 
> I have started to put together a working draft of an API here:
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nw5jVn0hjmhlhkZJAohx-gqRkkbVhMMJ79Pogd0ysEk/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> I would suggest we skip this weeks meeting, and review this doc, and 
> circle back next week?
> 
> I have opened it for comment, and I will add anyone who sends on their 
> email to the editors list.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Graham
> 
> On 24/06/15 15:16, Samuel Bercovici wrote:
>> Great!
>> 
>> Thanks you. I have missed this one.
>> 
>> *From:*Gandhi, Kunal [mailto:kunalhgan...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 24, 2015 12:21 PM
>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and
>> backend support
>> 
>> Hi Sam
>> 
>> Yes. we discussed the use cases 2 weeks ago on irc. The IRC logs can be
>> found here
>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/gslb.2015-06-09-16.00.log.html
>> 
>> and the use case document can be found here
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1016shVnPaK8l8HxMpjADiYtY2O94p4g7JxjuIA-qv7w/edit?usp=sharing
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Kunal
>> 
>>On Jun 24, 2015, at 12:35 AM, Samuel Bercovici ><mailto:samu...@radware.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>Hi Kunal,
>> 
>>Did you also include use cases per our last discussion on IRC?
>>I prefer to start with use cases before we dive into APIs.
>> 
>>Thanks,
>>-Sam.
>> 
>> 
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Gandhi, Kunal [mailto:kunalhgan...@gmail.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 6:47 AM
>>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and
>>backend support
>> 
>>Hi All,
>> 
>>I have a very draft for the GSLB API and would like to upload it
>>somewhere for discussion. What is the best place to upload and
>>collaborate the draft ? Since the API docs have a lot of JSON
>>payloads in it, I am not sure whether Google Docs will be
>>appropriate for that.
>> 
>>Regards
>>Kunal
>> 
>> 
>>On Jun 15, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Doug Wiegley
>>mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com>>
>>wrote:
>> 
>>Hi all,
>> 
>>We don’t have a rough draft API doc yet, so I’m suggesting that we
>>postpone tomorrow morning’s meeting until next week. Does anyone
>>have any other agenda items, or want the meeting tomorrow?
>> 
>>Thanks,
>>doug
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>On Jun 2, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Doug Wiegley
>>mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com>>
>>wrote:
>> 
>>Hi all,
>> 
>>The initial meeting logs can be found at
>>http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/ , and we will be
>>having another meeting next week, same time, same channel.
>> 
>>Thanks,
>>doug
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>On May 31, 2015, at 1:27 AM, Samuel Bercovici ><mailto:samu...@radware.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>Good for me - Tuesday at 1600UTC
>> 
>> 
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Doug Wiegley [mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:37 PM
>>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and
>>backend support
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>On May 28, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Hayes, Graham ><mailto:graham.ha...@hp.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>On 28/05/15 19:38, Adam Harwell wrote:
>> 
>>I haven't seen any responses from my team yet, but I know we'd be
>>interested as well - we have done quite a bit of work on this in
>>the past, including dealing with the Designate team on this very
>>subject.
>>We can be available most hours between 9am-6pm Monday-Friday CST.
>> 
>>--Adam
>> 
>>https://keybase.io/rm_you
>> 
>> 
>>From: Rakesh Saha ><mailto:rsahaos...@gmail.com
>><mailto:rsaha

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

2015-07-21 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

I have created a doc in ether pad to get a voting started on the project name. 
Please feel free to suggest names or vote on existing names.

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/GSLB_project_name_vote 


Regards
Kunal

> On Jul 21, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Hayes, Graham  wrote:
> 
> I forgot to add there is also an IRC channel created -
> #openstack-gslb
> 
> I also have one item for the agenda that we should think about over the
> week - do we want to have a project name?
> 
> If we do we should add it soon, so we can name projects/repo etc correctly.
> 
> - Graham
> 
> On 21/07/15 20:02, Hayes, Graham wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I have created a github org and 2 repos for us to get started in.
>> 
>> https://github.com/gslb/ is the org, with https://github.com/gslb/gslb
>> as the main code repo.
>> 
>> There is 2 "teams" (Github's name for groups) gslb-core, and gslb-admin.
>> 
>> Core have read/write access to the repos, and admin can add / remove
>> projects.
>> 
>> I also created https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs which will
>> automatically publish to https://gslb-specs.readthedocs.org
>> 
>> There is also a launchpad project https://launchpad.net/gslb with 2
>> teams:
>> 
>> gslb-drivers - people who can target bugs / bps
>> gslb-core - the maintainers of the project
>> 
>> All the info is on the wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GSLB
>> 
>> So, next question - who should be in what groups? I am open to
>> suggestions... should it be an item for discussion next week?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Graham
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

2015-07-21 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

+1. I think the group discussion should be one of the items on the meeting 
agenda for next week.

Regards
Kunal

> On Jul 21, 2015, at 12:21 PM, Susanne Balle  wrote:
> 
> correction: I think that discussing who should be in what group at next 
> week's meeting make sense. Susanne
> 
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Susanne Balle  > wrote:
> cool! thanks. I will request to be added to the correct groups.
> 
> Susanne
> 
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Hayes, Graham  > wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I have created a github org and 2 repos for us to get started in.
> 
> https://github.com/gslb/  is the org, with 
> https://github.com/gslb/gslb 
> as the main code repo.
> 
> There is 2 "teams" (Github's name for groups) gslb-core, and gslb-admin.
> 
> Core have read/write access to the repos, and admin can add / remove
> projects.
> 
> I also created https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs 
>  which will
> automatically publish to https://gslb-specs.readthedocs.org 
> 
> 
> There is also a launchpad project https://launchpad.net/gslb 
>  with 2
> teams:
> 
> gslb-drivers - people who can target bugs / bps
> gslb-core - the maintainers of the project
> 
> All the info is on the wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GSLB 
> 
> 
> So, next question - who should be in what groups? I am open to
> suggestions... should it be an item for discussion next week?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Graham
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> 
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

2015-06-24 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

Hi Sam

Yes. we discussed the use cases 2 weeks ago on irc. The IRC logs can be found 
here 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/gslb.2015-06-09-16.00.log.html
 
<http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/gslb.2015-06-09-16.00.log.html>
and the use case document can be found here 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1016shVnPaK8l8HxMpjADiYtY2O94p4g7JxjuIA-qv7w/edit?usp=sharing
 
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1016shVnPaK8l8HxMpjADiYtY2O94p4g7JxjuIA-qv7w/edit?usp=sharing>

Regards
Kunal


> On Jun 24, 2015, at 12:35 AM, Samuel Bercovici  wrote:
> 
> Hi Kunal,
> 
> Did you also include use cases per our last discussion on IRC?
> I prefer to start with use cases before we dive into APIs.
> 
> Thanks,
>   -Sam.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Gandhi, Kunal [mailto:kunalhgan...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 6:47 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend 
> support
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have a very draft for the GSLB API and would like to upload it somewhere 
> for discussion. What is the best place to upload and collaborate the draft ? 
> Since the API docs have a lot of JSON payloads in it, I am not sure whether 
> Google Docs will be appropriate for that.
> 
> Regards
> Kunal
> 
>> On Jun 15, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Doug Wiegley  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> We don’t have a rough draft API doc yet, so I’m suggesting that we postpone 
>> tomorrow morning’s meeting until next week. Does anyone have any other 
>> agenda items, or want the meeting tomorrow?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> doug
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jun 2, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Doug Wiegley  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> The initial meeting logs can be found at 
>>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/ , and we will be having 
>>> another meeting next week, same time, same channel.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> doug
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On May 31, 2015, at 1:27 AM, Samuel Bercovici  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Good for me - Tuesday at 1600UTC
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Doug Wiegley [mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:37 PM
>>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and 
>>>> backend support
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On May 28, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Hayes, Graham  wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 28/05/15 19:38, Adam Harwell wrote:
>>>>>> I haven't seen any responses from my team yet, but I know we'd be 
>>>>>> interested as well - we have done quite a bit of work on this in 
>>>>>> the past, including dealing with the Designate team on this very subject.
>>>>>> We can be available most hours between 9am-6pm Monday-Friday CST.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --Adam
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://keybase.io/rm_you
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: Rakesh Saha >>>>> <mailto:rsahaos...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>>>>> >>>>> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
>>>>>> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 12:22 PM
>>>>>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>>>>> >>>>> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API 
>>>>>> and backend support
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Kunal,
>>>>>> I would like to participate as well.
>>>>>> Mon-Fri morning US Pacific time works for me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Rakesh Saha
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam 
>>>>>> >>>>> <mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>We would like to participate as well.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>__ __
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>Monday-

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

2015-06-23 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

Hi All,

I have a very draft for the GSLB API and would like to upload it somewhere for 
discussion. What is the best place to upload and collaborate the draft ? Since 
the API docs have a lot of JSON payloads in it, I am not sure whether Google 
Docs will be appropriate for that.

Regards
Kunal

> On Jun 15, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Doug Wiegley  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> We don’t have a rough draft API doc yet, so I’m suggesting that we postpone 
> tomorrow morning’s meeting until next week. Does anyone have any other agenda 
> items, or want the meeting tomorrow?
> 
> Thanks,
> doug
> 
> 
>> On Jun 2, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Doug Wiegley  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> The initial meeting logs can be found at 
>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/ , and we will be having 
>> another meeting next week, same time, same channel.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> doug
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 31, 2015, at 1:27 AM, Samuel Bercovici  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Good for me - Tuesday at 1600UTC
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Doug Wiegley [mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com] 
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:37 PM
>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend 
>>> support
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On May 28, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Hayes, Graham  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 28/05/15 19:38, Adam Harwell wrote:
>>>>> I haven't seen any responses from my team yet, but I know we'd be 
>>>>> interested as well - we have done quite a bit of work on this in the 
>>>>> past, including dealing with the Designate team on this very subject. 
>>>>> We can be available most hours between 9am-6pm Monday-Friday CST.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --Adam
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://keybase.io/rm_you
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: Rakesh Saha >>>> <mailto:rsahaos...@gmail.com>>
>>>>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>>>> >>>> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
>>>>> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 12:22 PM
>>>>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>>>> >>>> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and 
>>>>> backend support
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Kunal,
>>>>> I would like to participate as well.
>>>>> Mon-Fri morning US Pacific time works for me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Rakesh Saha
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam
>>>>> >>>> <mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> We would like to participate as well.
>>>>> 
>>>>> __ __
>>>>> 
>>>>> Monday-Friday Morning US time works for me..
>>>>> 
>>>>> __ __
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Vijay V.
>>>>> 
>>>>> __ __
>>>>> 
>>>>> *From:*Samuel Bercovici [mailto:samu...@radware.com
>>>>> <mailto:samu...@radware.com>]
>>>>> *Sent:* 26 May 2015 21:39
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> *Cc:* kunalhgan...@gmail.com <mailto:kunalhgan...@gmail.com>;
>>>>> v.jain...@gmail.com <mailto:v.jain...@gmail.com>;
>>>>> do...@a10networks.com <mailto:do...@a10networks.com>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB
>>>>> API and backend support
>>>>> 
>>>>> __ __
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> __ __
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would also like to participate.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Friday is a non-working day in Israel (same as Saturday for most
>>>>> of you).
>>>>> 
>>>>> So Monday- Th

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

2015-06-08 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

Hi All

I have created an initial draft of the GSLB use cases and uploaded it to Google 
Doc 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1016shVnPaK8l8HxMpjADiYtY2O94p4g7JxjuIA-qv7w/edit?usp=sharing
 
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1016shVnPaK8l8HxMpjADiYtY2O94p4g7JxjuIA-qv7w/edit?usp=sharing>

Please provide feedback on this doc. We can discuss more about it at tomorrow’s 
meeting - 9 AM PST on irc chat, #openstack-meeting-4.

Regards
Kunal

> On Jun 2, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Doug Wiegley  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The initial meeting logs can be found at 
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gslb/2015/ , and we will be having 
> another meeting next week, same time, same channel.
> 
> Thanks,
> doug
> 
> 
>> On May 31, 2015, at 1:27 AM, Samuel Bercovici  wrote:
>> 
>> Good for me - Tuesday at 1600UTC
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Doug Wiegley [mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com] 
>> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:37 PM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend 
>> support
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 28, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Hayes, Graham  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 28/05/15 19:38, Adam Harwell wrote:
>>>> I haven't seen any responses from my team yet, but I know we'd be 
>>>> interested as well - we have done quite a bit of work on this in the 
>>>> past, including dealing with the Designate team on this very subject. 
>>>> We can be available most hours between 9am-6pm Monday-Friday CST.
>>>> 
>>>> --Adam
>>>> 
>>>> https://keybase.io/rm_you
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: Rakesh Saha >>> <mailto:rsahaos...@gmail.com>>
>>>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>>> >>> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
>>>> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 12:22 PM
>>>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>>> >>> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and 
>>>> backend support
>>>> 
>>>>  Hi Kunal,
>>>>  I would like to participate as well.
>>>>  Mon-Fri morning US Pacific time works for me.
>>>> 
>>>>  Thanks,
>>>>  Rakesh Saha
>>>> 
>>>>  On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam
>>>>  >>>  <mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>  We would like to participate as well.
>>>> 
>>>>  __ __
>>>> 
>>>>  Monday-Friday Morning US time works for me..
>>>> 
>>>>  __ __
>>>> 
>>>>  Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>>  Vijay V.
>>>> 
>>>>  __ __
>>>> 
>>>>  *From:*Samuel Bercovici [mailto:samu...@radware.com
>>>>  <mailto:samu...@radware.com>]
>>>>  *Sent:* 26 May 2015 21:39
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>  *Cc:* kunalhgan...@gmail.com <mailto:kunalhgan...@gmail.com>;
>>>>  v.jain...@gmail.com <mailto:v.jain...@gmail.com>;
>>>>  do...@a10networks.com <mailto:do...@a10networks.com>
>>>>  *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB
>>>>  API and backend support
>>>> 
>>>>  __ __
>>>> 
>>>>  Hi,
>>>> 
>>>>  __ __
>>>> 
>>>>  I would also like to participate.
>>>> 
>>>>  Friday is a non-working day in Israel (same as Saturday for most
>>>>  of you).
>>>> 
>>>>  So Monday- Thursday works best for me.
>>>> 
>>>>  __ __
>>>> 
>>>>  -Sam.
>>>> 
>>>>  __ __
>>>> 
>>>>  __ __
>>>> 
>>>>  *From:*Doug Wiegley [mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com]
>>>>  *Sent:* Saturday, May 23, 2015 8:45 AM
>>>>  *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>  *Cc:* kunalhgan...@gmail.com <mailto:kunalhgan...@gmail.com>;
>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] No LBaaS agent?

2015-06-01 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

Hi Wanjing

We at PayPal/eBay have integrated with a multi-vendor solution. One of the 
vendor solution is agent less and off loads all the business logic to a vendor 
controller that manages the devices.

Regards
Kunal


> On Jun 1, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Wanjing Xu  wrote:
> 
> Is there a way to add an LBaaS service without having to use neutron 
> plugin/agent framework?
> 
> I want to add a LBaaS service without  an LBaaS agent running and still want 
> to have lb cli and horizon.  When the user configure loadbalance via cli or 
> horizon, neutron will send the events(pool, member, vip create/delete 
> event)in the notification info queue and our application will listen to the 
> queue and program  the LBaaS box.  So far, I have tried to enable the 
> built-in HAProxy LBaaS(enable the service_plugin to be LoadBalancerPlugin and 
> service provider to be haproxy).  By doing that , horizon and cli are all 
> enabled and our application can successfully program LBaaS box using the 
> notification events.  The problem with that is that there is a haproxy agent 
> running in the background although we are not using its function.  But if I 
> don't enable the agent, we can not use horizon.  Currently we don't want to 
> write a LBaaS agent of our own.  Is there a way to not to use LBaaS agent and 
> still  be able to use horizon/cli to configure loadbalance?  During openstack 
> summit at vancouver, I saw paypal loadbalance presentation, they use two 
> providers, one is agent , the other is agentless controller, not sure how 
> that controller works, could not find it through googling.
> 
> Regards
> Wanjing Xu
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org 
> ?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> 
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

2015-05-22 Thread Gandhi, Kunal

Hi All

I wanted to start a discussion about adding support for GSLB to neutron-lbaas 
and designate. To be brief for folks who are new to GLB, GLB stands for Global 
Load Balancing and we use it for load balancing traffic across various 
geographical regions. A more detail description of GLB can be found at my talk 
at the summit this week here .

To my understanding, there are two sides to a GSLB - DNS side and LB side. 

DNS side
Most of the GSLB’s provided by various vendors are DNS servers and are 
authoritative for the GLB domains. The global fqdn’s that belong the GLB 
domains resolve to multiple public VIP’s across various regions based on 
various configurations on the global fqdn on the GLB.

LBaaS side
A few of the common functionalities provided by a standard GSLB 
provides are health monitoring on the public VIP’s and the local LB’s on which 
these public VIP’s sit on. Some additional features that a GSLB can provide are 
configuring admin status and weights on your public VIP’s. Based on these 
configurations and settings, the GLB returns the appropriate number of public 
VIP’s to any DNS resolve queries for the global fqdn’s.

I would like to have the designate and lbaas to start a discussion on GSLB and 
discuss the following topics:

What parts of GSLB belongs to Designate and LBaaS ?
Once we have an understanding of the above, my team at eBay/PayPal would like 
work with the community on submitting a blueprint for this.


To kick start this conversation, I would like to schedule an irc meeting 
regarding this with folks from designate and neutron-lbaas. Please let me know 
a time and day that works for you guys. I am available on Thursday and Friday 
next week.


Regards
Kunal

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [kosmos][designate][lbaas] Intial Kosmos source files for review in gerrit

[openstack-dev] [kosmos][designate][lbaas] Intial Kosmos source files for review in gerrit

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] No LBaaS agent?

[openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

12 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information