Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Please vote -> Removal of Harm Weites from the core reviewer team

2016-01-15 Thread Harm Weites
lists.openstack.org>> > Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 5:12 PM > To: openstack-dev <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Please vote -> Removal of Harm Weites from > the core reviewer team > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposing Michal Rostecki for Core Reviewer (nihilfer on IRC)

2015-11-13 Thread Harm Weites
+1 :) Jeff Peeler schreef op 2015-11-13 19:51: On 12/11/15 08:41, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hey folks, Its been awhile since we have had a core reviewer nomination, but I really feel like Michal has the right stuff. If you look at the 30 day stats for kolla[1] , he is #3 in reviews (70

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Integrating kollacli as python-kollaclient

2015-10-23 Thread Harm Weites
+1 this sort of stuff makes live a lot better :) Swapnil Kulkarni schreef op 2015-10-23 07:08: On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hello Folks, Oracle has developed a CLI tool for managing OpenStack Kolla clusters.  Several months ago at our

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] proposing Michal Jastrzebski (inc0) for core reviewer

2015-09-30 Thread Harm Weites
Looks like he passed 3 already, but here's another +1 :) Steven Dake (stdake) schreef op 2015-09-30 00:20: Hi folks, I am proposing Michal for core reviewer. Consider my proposal as a +1 vote. Michal has done a fantastic job with rsyslog, has done a nice job overall contributing to the project

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposing Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap) for kolla core reviewer team

2015-08-14 Thread Harm Weites
great! +1 :) Op 14-08-15 om 15:38 schreef Paul Bourke: +1, Swapnil has made a ton of useful contributions and continues to do so :) On 14/08/15 14:29, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hi folks, Swapnil has done a bunch of great technical work, participates heavily in IRC, and has contributed

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][magnum] Removal of Daneyon Hansen from the Core Reviewer team for Kolla

2015-07-23 Thread Harm Weites
Agreed, everyone should do what they love - so I wish you the best of luck with the Magnum crew Daneyon! Op 22-07-15 om 22:47 schreef Steven Dake (stdake): Fellow Kolla developers, Daneyon has been instrumental in getting Kolla rolling and keeping our project alive. He even found me a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for Paul Bourke for Kolla Core

2015-07-14 Thread Harm Weites
no-brainer: +1 Op 14-07-15 om 13:19 schreef Ryan Hallisey: +1 I echo all the prior comments. -Ryan - Original Message - From: Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Monday, July

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for new core-reviewer Harm Waites

2015-06-16 Thread Harm Weites
Thanks guys, both for all the nice words and the acceptance! harmw Op 16-06-15 om 16:32 schreef Steven Dake (stdake): Its unanimous! Welcome to the core reviewer team Harm! Regards -steve From: Steven Dake std...@cisco.com mailto:std...@cisco.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for changing 1600UTC meeting to 1700 UTC

2015-06-16 Thread Harm Weites
I'm ok with moving to 16:30 UTC instead of staying at 16:00. I actually prefer it in my evening schedule :) Moving to 16:30 would already be a great improvement to the current schedule and should at least allow me to not miss everything. - harmw Op 12-06-15 om 15:44 schreef Steven Dake

Re: [openstack-dev] ipv6 and ipv4 dual stack for floating IP

2014-10-30 Thread Harm Weites
I'm seeing the same error when trying to setup a whole new network through Horizon with external gateway and an ipv4 and ipv6 subnet. Eg, without floating ip. l3_agent.py is trying this: prefixlen = netaddr.IPNetwork(port['subnet']['cidr']).prefixlen Looking inside port[] lists the following

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-29 Thread Harm Weites
will get approved for Juno, but I'll see what I can do. Thanks, Dane *From:*Harm Weites [mailto:h...@weites.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:53 PM *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack Thiago, My

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-19 Thread Harm Weites
Provider Networks`, no Neutron L3 Router. Where each VLAN have v4/v6 addrs, same upstream router (also dual-stacked - still no radvd enabled). Looking forward to start testing L3 + IPv6 in K... Best, Thiago On 16 August 2014 16:21, Harm Weites h...@weites.com mailto:h...@weites.com wrote

[openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-16 Thread Harm Weites
Hi, Given the work on [1] has been abandoned, I'm wondering what the current status of going dual stack is. Of course, given Neutron got something like that on it's roadmap. The initial BP [2] aimed for Havana and Icehouse, and I'm unaware of something similar to achieve a dual stack network.

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-16 Thread Harm Weites
on a gateway port hasn't been added yet. I should be adding this soon. There was a request for a Juno feature freeze exception for this blueprint, but there's been no response, so this may not get approved until K release. -Dane -Original Message- From: Harm Weites [mailto:h...@weites.com