lists.openstack.org>>
> Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 5:12 PM
> To: openstack-dev <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Please vote -> Removal of Harm Weites from
> the core reviewer team
>
&
+1 :)
Jeff Peeler schreef op 2015-11-13 19:51:
On 12/11/15 08:41, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Hey folks,
Its been awhile since we have had a core reviewer nomination, but I
really feel like Michal has the right stuff. If you look at the 30 day
stats for kolla[1] , he is #3 in reviews (70
+1 this sort of stuff makes live a lot better :)
Swapnil Kulkarni schreef op 2015-10-23 07:08:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Steven Dake (stdake)
wrote:
Hello Folks,
Oracle has developed a CLI tool for managing OpenStack Kolla
clusters. Several months ago at our
Looks like he passed 3 already, but here's another +1 :)
Steven Dake (stdake) schreef op 2015-09-30 00:20:
Hi folks,
I am proposing Michal for core reviewer. Consider my proposal as a +1
vote. Michal has done a fantastic job with rsyslog, has done a nice
job overall contributing to the project
great! +1 :)
Op 14-08-15 om 15:38 schreef Paul Bourke:
+1, Swapnil has made a ton of useful contributions and continues to do
so :)
On 14/08/15 14:29, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Hi folks,
Swapnil has done a bunch of great technical work, participates
heavily in IRC, and has contributed
Agreed, everyone should do what they love - so I wish you the best of
luck with the Magnum crew Daneyon!
Op 22-07-15 om 22:47 schreef Steven Dake (stdake):
Fellow Kolla developers,
Daneyon has been instrumental in getting Kolla rolling and keeping our
project alive. He even found me a new
no-brainer: +1
Op 14-07-15 om 13:19 schreef Ryan Hallisey:
+1 I echo all the prior comments.
-Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Monday, July
Thanks guys, both for all the nice words and the acceptance!
harmw
Op 16-06-15 om 16:32 schreef Steven Dake (stdake):
Its unanimous! Welcome to the core reviewer team Harm!
Regards
-steve
From: Steven Dake std...@cisco.com mailto:std...@cisco.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing
I'm ok with moving to 16:30 UTC instead of staying at 16:00.
I actually prefer it in my evening schedule :) Moving to 16:30 would
already be a great improvement to the current schedule and should at
least allow me to not miss everything.
- harmw
Op 12-06-15 om 15:44 schreef Steven Dake
I'm seeing the same error when trying to setup a whole new network
through Horizon with external gateway and an ipv4 and ipv6 subnet. Eg,
without floating ip.
l3_agent.py is trying this: prefixlen =
netaddr.IPNetwork(port['subnet']['cidr']).prefixlen
Looking inside port[] lists the following
will get approved for Juno, but I'll see what I can do.
Thanks,
Dane
*From:*Harm Weites [mailto:h...@weites.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:53 PM
*To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack
Thiago,
My
Provider Networks`, no Neutron L3 Router. Where each VLAN have
v4/v6 addrs, same upstream router (also dual-stacked - still no radvd
enabled).
Looking forward to start testing L3 + IPv6 in K...
Best,
Thiago
On 16 August 2014 16:21, Harm Weites h...@weites.com
mailto:h...@weites.com wrote
Hi,
Given the work on [1] has been abandoned, I'm wondering what the current
status of going dual stack is. Of course, given Neutron got something
like that on it's roadmap.
The initial BP [2] aimed for Havana and Icehouse, and I'm unaware of
something similar to achieve a dual stack network.
on a gateway port
hasn't been added yet. I should be adding this soon.
There was a request for a Juno feature freeze exception for this blueprint,
but there's been no response, so this may not get approved until K release.
-Dane
-Original Message-
From: Harm Weites [mailto:h...@weites.com
14 matches
Mail list logo