Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping xenial jobs

2018-10-10 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 10/10/18, 5:54 AM, "Mohammed Naser" wrote: >So I’ve been thinking of dropping the Xenial jobs to reduce our overall > impact in terms of gate usage in master because we don’t support it. I think we can start dropping it given our intended supported platform for Stein is Bionic, not

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

2018-08-31 Thread Jesse Pretorius
> From: Andy McCrae > Now that Rocky is all but ready it seems like a good time! Since changing > roles I've not been able to keep up enough focus on reviews and other > obligations - so I think it's time to step aside as a core reviewer. > I want to say thanks to everybody in the community,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][kolla-ansible][DevStack][Tempest][openstack-ansible] Collaborate towards creating a unified ansible tempest role in openstack-ansible project

2018-08-27 Thread Jesse Pretorius
>On 8/27/18, 7:33 AM, "Chandan kumar" wrote: >I have summarized the problem statement and requirements on this etherpad > [3]. >Feel free to add your requirements and questions for the same on the >etherpad so that we can shape the unified ansible role in a better >way. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

2018-08-10 Thread Jesse Pretorius
> On 8/10/18, 3:20 AM, "Paul Belanger" wrote: > >This is basically what I do with roles i write, allow the user to decide > to step >over specific tasks. For example, I have created nodepool_task_manager > variable >with the following: > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Jonathan Rosser as core reviewer

2018-07-30 Thread Jesse Pretorius
>On 7/30/18, 9:19 AM, "jean-phili...@evrard.me" wrote: > >I'd like to propose Jonathan Rosser (jrosser) as core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. >The BBC team [1] has been very active recently across the board, but > worked heavily in our ops repo, making sure the experience is

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][openstack-ansible]

2018-05-09 Thread Jesse Pretorius
From: Alexandra Settle Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 2:18 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Implement rotations for meetings handling

2018-05-03 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi Mike – please see my responses in-line. From: Mike Carden Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 9:42 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Mohammed Naser as core reviewer

2018-04-24 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 4/24/18, 4:08 PM, "Jean-Philippe Evrard" wrote: >I’d like to propose Mohammed Naser [1] as a core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. A happy +2 from me. ( Rackspace Limited is a company registered in England & Wales (company

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

2018-03-27 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Ah Major, we shall definitely miss your readiness to help, positive attitude and deep care for setenforce 1. Oh, and then there're the gifs... so many gifs... While I am inclined to [1], I shall instead wish you well while you [2]. ( [1] https://media.giphy.com/media/1BXa2alBjrCXC/giphy.gif

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-10-12 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 10/12/17, 8:55 AM, "Thomas Goirand" wrote: > Now, there's something which I still am not completely sure. Are you > willing to push for *samples*, or real configuration files which we can > actually use? Depending on your answer, the destination location will be > different,

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-10-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 10/10/17, 9:26 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: > I still think we should just be looking at these files as sample > data and not active configuration files when we put them into the sdist > or wheel. There is agreement from all distributions bar one on this approach so far,

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-10-10 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 10/10/17, 12:08 PM, "Jesse Pretorius" <jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: >$ python setup.py install --skip-build --root /tmp/keystone --install-data > / Apologies – I copied the wrong command, it should have been: $ python setup.py install --root /tmp/k

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-10-10 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 10/9/17, 4:08 PM, "Thomas Goirand" wrote: >So yeah, you can push files in /usr/share/nova, but then we'll have to >actually *delete* them in the packaging, because it doesn't fit our use >case. So in fact, best would be if this could be overridden, for example >

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-10-10 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 9/29/17, 7:18 AM, "Thomas Bechtold" wrote: >This will still install the files into usr/etc : >$ python setup.py install --skip-build --root /tmp/sahara-install > > /dev/null >$ ls /tmp/sahara-install/usr/ >bin etc lib >It's not nice but packagers

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-10-09 Thread Jesse Pretorius
> From: James Page > 1) +1 for a consistent approach across projects - /usr/share/ sounds > like a sensible location - avoiding any complexity with managing changes made > by users in /etc/ for deploy from source use-cases, and allowing > packagers to know where to

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-10-03 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 10/3/17, 3:01 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: >> Given that this topic has gone through several cycles of discussion and has >> never gone anywhere, does it perhaps merit definition as a project interface >> so that we can define the problem this is trying to solve and set

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-10-03 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 10/2/17, 1:45 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: >etc implies they should be edited, though, and we're trying to move away >from that at least for the paste.ini files in most projects. So we may >need to decide on a case-by-case basis, unless we declare all of these

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-10-02 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 9/29/17, 6:26 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: On 2017-09-29 18:39:18 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Bechtold wrote: > There is /etc [1] [...] >Not really, no, because the system-context data_files path has to be >relative to /usr or /usr/local unless we want to have

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-09-29 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 9/29/17, 7:18 AM, "Thomas Bechtold" wrote: This will still install the files into usr/etc : It's not nice but packagers can workaround that. Yes, that is true. Is there a ‘better’ location to have them? I noticed that Sahara was placing the files into share,

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-09-28 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 9/28/17, 5:11 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: > In the past we had trouble checking those files into git and gating > against the results being "up to date" or not changing in any way > because configuration options that end up in the file are defined in > libraries used by

[openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

2017-09-28 Thread Jesse Pretorius
There’s some history around this discussion [1], but times have changed and the purpose of the patches I’m submitting is slightly different [2] as far as I can see – it’s a little more focused and less intrusive. The projects which deploy OpenStack from source or using python wheels currently

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Proposing Markos Chandras for osa-core

2017-07-18 Thread Jesse Pretorius
In case the meeting vote is lost somehow, you still have my +1 – looking forward to working more with Markos! From: Andy McCrae Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] New setuptools release, and the world is broken

2017-07-14 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 7/14/17, 5:18 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: >Is there a mechanism to leverage this in tox or when invoking >virtualenv? We don't run get-pip.py in most jobs because our images >have pip/setuptools preinstalled to get around bootstrapping issues, >though I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] New setuptools release, and the world is broken

2017-07-14 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 7/14/17, 4:54 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: > I wonder if we could convince the PyPA folks to allow get-pip.py >to take a version argument, so we could specify which version we want in >our jobs. We would still need a way to manage that version number, but >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] New setuptools release, and the world is broken

2017-07-14 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 7/14/17, 4:17 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: >Chicken and egg. Once you get to the point where pip can enforce > constraints, you already have a version of setuptools installed. And >as evidenced by, for example, this current bug you would just end up >breaking

[openstack-dev] [all] New setuptools release, and the world is broken

2017-07-14 Thread Jesse Pretorius
FYI if you see the following error in your job logs, you have the new setuptools to thank: AttributeError: Distribution instance has no attribute 'install_requires' I’ve registered https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/1086 to track the issue, and very quickly got a response and there’s a

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][openstack-ansible] Moving on

2017-05-19 Thread Jesse Pretorius
This is most unfortunate. :( I do wish you the absolute best with whatever lies ahead. I have found your skills, patience and willingness to debate and learn most inspirational. From: Steve Lewis Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Rename openstack-ansible-security role?

2017-05-17 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 5/17/17, 6:25 PM, "Major Hayden" wrote: 1) Should the openstack-ansible-security role be renamed to alleviate confusion? Sure, I’ve long thought that the name is misleading. 2) If it should be renamed, what's your suggestion? My uninspired suggestion is

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] etcd tarballs for CI use

2017-05-16 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 5/15/17, 11:20 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote: > At this moment, though Fedora has 3.1.7 [1], Xenial is way too old, So > we will need to pull down tar balls from either [2] or [3]. proposing > backports is a possibility, but then we need some flexibility if we > end up

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

2017-04-04 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 4/4/17, 12:06 AM, "Clark Boylan" wrote: > After some thought I think my preferred method of rolling this out would > be to blacklist libvirt-python from our wheel mirror building entirely > and force installs to happen from source so that we are base Xenial and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Adding a scenario for shade's functional tests

2017-04-04 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 4/4/17, 1:39 PM, "Monty Taylor" wrote: >I'd love to make a gate job that: > - Deploys a cloud with openstack-ansible > - Runs shade's functional tests against that cloud Fantastic. Let’s see how we can help. > Which makes me think it just needs to be an

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][snaps][ansible][puppet][charms] OpenStack snaps delivery strategy

2017-03-02 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Adding the [deployment] tag as the catch-all for deployment projects as I think they’d be interested. From: Corey Bryant Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

2017-02-28 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 2/28/17, 12:52 AM, "Michał Jastrzębski" wrote: I think instead of adding yet-another-irc-channel how about create weekly meetings? We can rant in scheduled time and it probably will get more attention Happy to meet, in fact I think it’ll be important for keeping

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

2017-02-27 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Comments in-line On 2/27/17, 4:02 PM, "Steven Hardy" wrote: If I go ahead and do this is "deployment" a sufficiently project-neutral term to proceed with? I think so. I'd suggest we start with an informal WG, which it seems just requires an update to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] So long, farewell, auf wiedersehen

2017-02-22 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Thank you for your valuable input, drive and commitment to make OSA better. You are already missed! I wish you the very best in your next career evolution. From: "Truman, Travis" Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

2017-02-03 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi everyone, I’d like to propose Marc Gariepy [1] as a core reviewer for OpenStack-Ansible. His tireless effort to get CentOS as a supported platform in the last two cycles is getting very close to completion, and I feel that it’s important that he’s able to safeguard this work and help grow

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Amy Marrich for core

2017-01-31 Thread Jesse Pretorius
+1 from me ☺ From: Alexandra Settle Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Friday, January 27, 2017 at 2:29 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-ansible-deployment] Periodic job in infra to test upgrades?

2017-01-12 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi Sean, Great to see you taking the initiative on this. I think the starting point we’d have to work from with the way the builds are executed now would be to have the upgrade job execute in a periodic pipeline that has a longer timeout. While it would be ideal to do on-commit tests it’s

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][openstack-ansible-plugins] error in rabbitmq installation , config template plugin

2016-11-17 Thread Jesse Pretorius
From: "Shtilman, Tomer (Nokia - IL)" <tomer.shtil...@nokia.com> Date: Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 2:11 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, Jesse Pretorius <jesse.pretor...@rackspace

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][openstack-ansible-plugins] error in rabbitmq installation , config template plugin

2016-11-17 Thread Jesse Pretorius
The error you’re seeing is because that role has dependencies which can’t be resolved. The deps are here: https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-rabbitmq_server/blob/stable/newton/meta/main.yml#L35 The roles are mostly designed to be re-usable without the integrated repository, but to

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] pip issues

2016-11-17 Thread Jesse Pretorius
For the sake of record and FYI - Instead of cross-posting, this discussion has been continued on the openstack-operators ML. From: Jean-Philippe Evrard Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] How do you haproxy?

2016-11-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 11/10/16, 2:01 PM, "Ian Cordasco" wrote: There are numerous existing HAProxy Ansible roles on Galaxy (https://galaxy.ansible.com/list#/roles?page=1_size=10=haproxy). Ostensibly one or more of these are already flexible enough for what users might need.

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Debugging slow Xenial gate

2016-11-02 Thread Jesse Pretorius
> On 11/2/16, 1:51 PM, "Major Hayden" wrote: >I tossed up a horribly written hack[0] to change some CPU scheduler > settings back to the Trusty settings. My initial tests were great! Also, > the first test in OpenStack CI was really good -- 62 minutes for trusty and > 65

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] running non-devstack jobs in Python projects aka "it works outside devstack"

2016-10-14 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 10/14/16, 12:33 PM, "Sean Dague" wrote: > I kind of wonder if that hints to a better model here instead of the > deployments running services from master. Instead running periodics and > moving forward reference hashes every day if tests pass, and not if they > fail. That

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] cinder volume lxc and iscsi

2016-09-16 Thread Jesse Pretorius
>I found in google a bug for use of open-iscsi inside lxc-container >(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1226855), a bug >commented by Kevin Carter (openstack-ansible core team) as a "blocking >issue" (in may 2015). >Is that bug still relevant ? Yes,

[openstack-dev] [ThirdParty][CI] DSS Cinder CI <budik...@list.ru> spam

2016-08-18 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi everyone, Today we started getting CI feedback for all our (OpenStack-Ansible) patches from DSS Cinder CI which always immediately fail. I expect this may be because they’re in the process of getting setup and are supposed to be targeting cinder repositories. We would

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] git repo in infra_repo container not working

2016-08-16 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi Linhao Lu, I expect that you might be hitting the fact that fastcgi is no longer available. Instead of using http the git protocol is now being used. See https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-repo_server/commit/c87a8c1d4ca008e03e8dcef4160503b622d1fc1f for details. Operating from

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Project Mascot

2016-07-15 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi everyone, As discussed in the community meeting yesterday [1] the foundation wishes each project to select a mascot for the project [2][3]. The mascot needs to be appropriate (please read the links for the constraints) and in some way linked to the project. We need to come up with a list of

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Nominating Jean-Philippe Evrard for core in openstack-ansible and all openstack-ansible-* roles

2016-07-13 Thread Jesse Pretorius
From: "Truman, Travis" > Subject: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Nominating Jean-Philippe Evrard for core in openstack-ansible and all openstack-ansible-* roles Jean-Philippe has been providing great code reviews and patches for

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] existing centralized syslog server

2016-07-07 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 7/6/16, 3:24 PM, "fabrice grelaud" wrote: > >I would like to know what is the best approach to customize our >openstack-ansible deployment if we want to use our existing solution of ELK >and centralized rsyslog server. > >We deploy openstack-ansible (mitaka

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

2016-07-05 Thread Jesse Pretorius
From: Joshua Hesketh > I assume you want to wait for the tag to merge before removing the branch? The only tag job I can see for openstack-ansible* projects is the releasenotes one. This should be harmless as it just generates the notes

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] When to purge the DB, and when not to purge the DB?

2016-07-02 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 7/1/16, 8:48 PM, "Ian Cordasco" <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> wrote: >-Original Message- >From: Jesse Pretorius <jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> > >> In a recent conversation on the Operators list [1] there was a discussion >> about purging

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

2016-07-01 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Now that OpenStack-Ansible has the final Swift kilo-eol tag implemented we’ve requested a final tag [1]. Once that merges we are ready to have our kilo-eol tag implemented and the ‘kilo’ branch removed. Whoops – I forget to add the link to the final Kilo tag request. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

2016-07-01 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi all, Now that OpenStack-Ansible has the final Swift kilo-eol tag implemented we’ve requested a final tag [1]. Once that merges we are ready to have our kilo-eol tag implemented and the ‘kilo’ branch removed. Just to make life interesting, we still have leftover ‘juno’ and ‘icehouse’

Re: [openstack-dev] [ansible] Fail to install Openstack all in one

2016-07-01 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Alioune > wrote: I'm trying to install OpenStack all in one using ansible but I got the error bellow. Someone knows how to solve this error? Regards, ERROR: + openstack-ansible --forks 1 openstack-hosts-setup.yml

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] When to purge the DB, and when not to purge the DB?

2016-07-01 Thread Jesse Pretorius
. What’re the thoughts on how often this should be done? Should we include it as an opt-in step, or an opt-out step? [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2016-June/010813.html — Jesse Pretorius IRC: odyssey4me <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Deeper diffs in OSA releases

2016-06-14 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 14 June 2016 at 13:50, Major Hayden wrote: > > > Every OpenStack-Ansible release consists of SHA bumps for roles as well as > OpenStack services (like keystone, nova, and glance). However, tracking > the diffs of the changes in those OpenStack services can be challenging. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Mid-cycle date selection (need input!)

2016-06-10 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 9 June 2016 at 19:51, Major Hayden wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hey folks, > > I've been able to secure a few dates at Rackspace's headquarters in San > Antonio, Texas: > > 1) August 10-12 > 2) August 22-26 > 3) August 29 - September 2 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Tagging kilo-eol for "the world"

2016-06-02 Thread Jesse Pretorius
__ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/op

Re: [openstack-dev] Ansible inventory - Would you need another inventory system for your openstack cloud and how would you like it to be?

2016-05-09 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 9 May 2016 at 15:27, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: > I am using ansible for some time now, and I think the current default > Ansible inventory system is lacking a few features, at least when working > on an OpenStack cloud - whether it's for its deployment, its support

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross-project deployment tool meeting

2016-05-06 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 26 April 2016 at 17:54, Jan Klare wrote: > > i just wanted to follow up on this session ( > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-deployment-tools-discussion) were > we talked about a cross-project meeting for deployment tools. I would love > to see something like that

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][packaging][summit] input needed on summit discussion about global requirements

2016-05-06 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 6 May 2016 at 15:25, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Someone had a tool that looked at second-order dependencies, I think. I > can't find the reference in my notes, but maybe someone else has it > handy? > I don't have a specific tool handy, but I'm guessing that we could

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

2016-05-06 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 6 May 2016 at 16:27, Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Jesse Pretorius <jesse.pretor...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> FWIW OpenStack-Ansible is choosing to support deployment on both Ubuntu >> 14.04 LTS and

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

2016-05-06 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 4 May 2016 at 19:21, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Jeffrey Zhang > wrote: > > I'd like to lock the tag version in certain branch. One branch only > support > > one > > distro release. > > > > For example, the mitaka

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Nominate Major Hayden for core in openstack-ansible-security

2016-05-06 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 3 May 2016 at 23:59, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: > > Sounds like a major win for the team! Haha! Quite! +1 for me on the proposal. I've spoken to Major and confirmed that he has the support from his employer to commit the time necessary on a consistent basis

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Bug Triage 26 Apr & Community Meeting 28 Apr

2016-04-23 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi everyone, Due to many of us being at the summit, the weekly meetings for 26 and 28 Apr have been cancelled. See you in Austin! -- Jesse Pretorius IRC: odyssey4me __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -The lifecycle of deploying openstack on production environment

2016-04-15 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 15 April 2016 at 07:53, Kenny Ji-work wrote: > > We wanner to deploy openstack to the production environment, so what's the > recommended way to complete it? By using *puppet-openstack *or any else > tool? > *Secondly*, we want to add *custom codes* into the openstack's.

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Design Summit Schedule

2016-04-08 Thread Jesse Pretorius
=OpenStackAnsible -- Jesse Pretorius IRC: odyssey4me __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Mitaka release

2016-04-03 Thread Jesse Pretorius
on Multi-OS enablement, adding support for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, taking advantage of Ansible 2.x, revisiting the dynamic inventory with a view on how environments are deployed across regions and with Cells v2, and of course adding support for Liberty->Mitaka upgrades. -- Jesse Pretorius IRC: odyssey

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Newton Summit: cross-project session for deployment tools projects

2016-03-31 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 31 March 2016 at 22:40, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > OpenStack big tent has different projects for deployments: Puppet, > Chef, Ansible, Kolla, TripleO, (...) but we still have some topics in > common. > I propose we use the Cross-project day to meet and talk about our >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing type:deployment

2016-03-22 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 22 March 2016 at 09:15, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > For OSA, we don't produce the deployment tool, only a set of playbooks. I > was thinking we might need a type:packaging tag to describe which things we > produce are just about packaging OpenStack things for usage by

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] PTL Candidacy

2016-03-14 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi everyone, The Mitaka cycle for OpenStack-Ansible (OSA) has had the following successes: 1. Our community has grown. The activity in the IRC channel has shown that we now have more people making use of OSA to deploy both private and public OpenStack clouds. Our development team now includes

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Security hardening backport to Liberty desirable?

2016-03-14 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 7 March 2016 at 14:25, Major Hayden wrote: > > That seems reasonable. Would it be appropriate to add some documentation > in the Liberty release that explains how to enable the role with that > release? > Yes, I think that's a perfectly reasonable thing to do.

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Security hardening backport to Liberty desirable?

2016-03-05 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 4 March 2016 at 16:50, Major Hayden wrote: > Hey folks, > > I have proposed a review[1] which adds the openstack-ansible-security[2] > role to OpenStack-Ansible's Liberty release. I would really appreciate > some feedback from deployers on whether this change is desirable in

Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-utils fails devstack install

2016-02-25 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 25 February 2016 at 06:43, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > Sorry, I don't use master. > But AFAICT there is no issue with stable/liberty. > It would seem that this is affecting neutron, oslo.messaging, kolla, barbican, openstack-ansible, octavia and is affecting master and liberty

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Meetings this week

2016-02-15 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi everyone, Due to being active at the Ops Mid Cycle, the OpenStack-Ansible Mid Cycle and Ansiblefest this week the bug triage and community meetings this week will not be taking place. We'll resume the normal scheduled meetings next week. Thanks, Jesse IRC: odyssey4me

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Helion HLM on GitHub and what next?

2016-02-08 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Darragh - thanks for sharing your thoughts. We look forward to working with you! On 1 February 2016 at 14:20, Bailey, Darragh wrote: > > My initial thoughts are that the first 2 places to focus for alignment > (assuming people agree with the idea of life cycle phases) would be:

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Security hardening is now integrated!

2016-02-08 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 27 January 2016 at 13:29, Major Hayden wrote: > > After four months and 80+ gerrit reviews, the security hardening > configurations provided by the openstack-ansible-security role are now > integrated with OpenStack-Ansible! The Jenkins gate jobs for > OpenStack-Ansible are

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Should the playbook stop on certain tasks?

2016-02-08 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 13 January 2016 at 15:10, Major Hayden wrote: > > For example, the STIG requires[1] that all system accounts other than root > are locked. This could be dangerous on a running production system as > Ubuntu has non-root accounts that are not locked. At the moment, the >

Re: [openstack-dev] Use of restricted and multiverse in the gate

2016-02-08 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 7 February 2016 at 14:11, Monty Taylor wrote: > We're working on getting per-region APT mirrors stood up for the nodepool > nodes to use in the gate. As part of working on this, it struck me that we > currently have restricted and multiverse enabled in our sources.list

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Improving SSL/TLS in OpenStack-Ansible

2016-02-08 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 15 January 2016 at 14:18, Major Hayden wrote: > > > I've attended some of the OpenStack Security Mid-Cycle meeting this week > and Robert Clark was kind enough to give me a deep dive on the Anchor > project[1]. We had a good discussion around my original email thread[2] on >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Proposal: Separate design summits from OpenStack conferences

2016-02-08 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Simply replying to the last reply in the thread to add a thought: As someone who wants to be speaking more in presentations and be involved in 'User' or 'Operator' conversations, but also wants to participate in project-specific design sessions, I find that the context switches make it difficult

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Multi-OS Support

2016-02-06 Thread Jesse Pretorius
://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-multi-os-support [2] https://review.openstack.org/274290 [3] https://github.com/openstack/?query=openstack-ansible- -- Jesse Pretorius IRC: odyssey4me __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Mid Cycle Sprint

2016-02-04 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi everyone, As discussed in the community meeting today [1] we will be able to include remote participants in the Mid Cycle via Video Conference. In order to facilitate this I need to ensure that we have an attendance list for me to send the Video Conference invitations to, so please get a

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Mid Cycle Sprint

2016-01-22 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi everyone, We've finalised the arrangements for the Mid Cycle sprint. Given that the Ops Mid Cycle [1] is in the UK (15-16 Feb) and AnsibleFest [2] is also in the UK (18 Feb), Rackspace has offered to host the Mid Cycle sprint at their offices in Hayes (West London) on 17 Feb from 8am to 6pm.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ansible] tox functional testing rename

2016-01-06 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 20 December 2015 at 19:24, Paul Belanger wrote: > > > I've proposed a series of patches[1] to rename tox -eansible-functional to > tox -efunctional. While the change is trival, it is meant to workaround an > interpreter issue with tox[2]. Additionally, the change brings

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][designate] Regarding Designate install through Openstack-Ansible

2016-01-06 Thread Jesse Pretorius
t; Thanks & Regards > Swati Sharma > System Engineer > Tata Consultancy Services > Mailto: sharma.swa...@tcs.com > Website: http://www.tcs.com > ____ > Experience certainty. IT Services > Business Solutions > Consulting > ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Mid Cycle Sprint

2015-12-17 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi everyone, Thank you all for responding and giving your feedback. Given that the Ops Mid Cycle [1] is in the UK (15-16 Feb) and AnsibleFest [2] is also in the UK (18 Feb), and also that everyone seems ok with the UK as a location for the mid cycle then we shall have it in the UK! The Ops Mid

Re: [openstack-dev] Regarding Designate install through Openstack-Ansible

2015-12-17 Thread Jesse Pretorius
f what you're trying > to do and allows other people on the project to point out areas of > concern and improvement. > > > To add the new roles in openstack-ansible repository, shall I create > > the directory looking at what is there for keystone or other > > components a

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Mid Cycle Sprint

2015-12-09 Thread Jesse Pretorius
, testing, how to develop a new role, etc) - Upgrade Framework [2] - Multi-OS Support [3] [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oa-install-docs [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-upgrade-framework [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-multi-os-support -- Jesse

Re: [openstack-dev] Regarding Designate install through Openstack-Ansible

2015-12-08 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 8 December 2015 at 08:26, Sharma Swati6 wrote: > Hi *Major, Jean, Jesse and Kevin,* Howdy! > I have been interacting with you lately on openstack mailing lists and IRC > chats regarding *Designate component inclusion in Openstack-Ansible*, so > that its deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Random ssh errors in gate check jobs

2015-11-23 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 23 November 2015 at 01:36, Major Hayden wrote: > Hey folks, > > Some of my recent reviews have been frequent fliers in the land of CI gate > jobs and I've spent a fair amount of time diagnosing random ssh failures to > containers in AIO builds. The error I get most often is

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][infra][neutron] branches for release-independent projects targeting Openstack release X

2015-11-20 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 19 November 2015 at 09:43, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > So we have three models. The release:independent model is for projects > that don't follow the common development cycle, and therefore won't make > a "liberty" release. The release:cycle-with-milestones model is the >

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Documentation update planning

2015-11-18 Thread Jesse Pretorius
to the etherpad [2], respond to this email and ideally be in the meeting. :) [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-ansible#Agenda_for_next_meeting [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oa-install-docs -- Jesse Pretorius IRC: odyssey4me

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Fedora/CentOS/other Support

2015-11-18 Thread Jesse Pretorius
to volunteer to assist with the work, please feel free to add a note to that effect on the etherpad. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-ansible#Agenda_for_next_meeting [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-multi-os-support -- Jesse Pretorius IRC: odyssey4me

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Mitaka Summit Summary

2015-11-17 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Hi everyone, I've put together some thoughts based on the Mitaka Summit from the OpenStack-Ansible point of view: http://odyssey4me.github.io/openstack/ansible/mitaka/summit/2015/11/17/mitaka-summit.html Please feel free to ping me with any feedback! Thanks, -- Jesse Pretorius IRC: odyssey4me

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Next steps: openstack-ansible-security

2015-11-16 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 9 November 2015 at 19:38, Major Hayden wrote: > > What would you propose as the final steps to get the blueprint marked as > completed? Should documentation be added into openstack-ansible about > integrating openstack-ansible-security or should a script be provided for >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Converting the AIO bootstrap script to Ansible

2015-11-16 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 6 November 2015 at 21:34, Major Hayden wrote: > Feel free to critique it and I'll get to work on making the changes. The > spec[2] should answer most of the questions about the effort. > > Thanks! :) > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239525/ > [2] >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

2015-11-13 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 9 November 2015 at 14:42, Sean Dague wrote: > > So lets figure out where the snags are. I'm pretty uninterested in > threads that just scream LTS without a list of upgrade bugs that have > been filed to describe why rapid upgrade isn't the right long term > solution. I agree

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Next steps: openstack-ansible-security

2015-11-06 Thread Jesse Pretorius
use-cases. I think that the best option for now will be to add the implementation of the security role as an additional use-case. Depending on the results there we can figure out whether the role should be a default in all use cases. -- Jesse Pretorius mobile: +44 7586 906045 email: jesse.pretor...

  1   2   >