Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [FEMDC] [Edge] [tripleo] On the use of terms "Edge" and "Far Edge"

2018-10-18 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:45 PM John Fulton wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM Jim Rollenhagen > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:23 AM Dmitry Tantsur > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Sorry for chiming i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [FEMDC] [Edge] [tripleo] On the use of terms "Edge" and "Far Edge"

2018-10-18 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:23 AM Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for chiming in really late in this topic, but I think $subj is worth > discussing until we settle harder on the potentially confusing terminology. > > I think the difference between "Edge" and "Far Edge" is too vague to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo

2018-10-10 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:35 PM Greg Hill wrote: > > I'm not sure how using pull requests instead of Gerrit changesets would >> help "core reviewers being pulled on to other projects"? >> > > The 2 +2 requirement works for larger projects with a lot of contributors. > When you have only 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Open API 3.0 for OpenStack API

2018-10-10 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 10:25 PM Gilles Dubreuil wrote: > > > On 09/10/18 23:58, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2018-10-09 08:52:52 -0400 (-0400), Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > [...] > >> It seems to me that a major goal of openstacksdk is to hide differences >

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Open API 3.0 for OpenStack API

2018-10-09 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:58 AM Gilles Dubreuil wrote: > > On 05/10/18 21:54, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > GraphQL has introspection features that allow clients to pull the schema > (types, queries, mutations, etc): https://graphql.org/learn/introspection/ > > That said

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Tenks

2018-10-08 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 8:59 AM Mark Goddard wrote: > Hi, > > In the most recent Ironic meeting we discussed [1] tenks, and the > possibility of adding the project under Ironic governance. We agreed to > move the discussion to the mailing list. I'll introduce the project here > and give everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Open API 3.0 for OpenStack API

2018-10-05 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
GraphQL has introspection features that allow clients to pull the schema (types, queries, mutations, etc): https://graphql.org/learn/introspection/ That said, it seems like using this in a client like OpenStackSDK would get messy quickly. Instead of asking for which versions are supported, you'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-02 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:40 AM Eric Fried wrote: > > What Eric is proposing (and Julia and I seem to be in favor of), is > > nearly the same as your proposal. The single difference is that these > > config templates or deploy templates or whatever could *also* require > > certain traits, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-02 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 6:38 PM Jay Pipes wrote: > On 10/01/2018 06:04 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:41 PM Eric Fried wrote: > > > > > That said, what if it was: > > > > openstack config-profile create --name BOOT_MODE_UEFI --json - > > { > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-01 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 10:13 AM Jay Pipes wrote: > On 10/01/2018 09:01 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:03 AM Jay Pipes > <mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 10/01/2018 04:36 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-01 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:03 AM Jay Pipes wrote: > On 10/01/2018 04:36 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 00:46, Jay Pipes > > wrote: > > > > On 09/27/2018 06:23 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 9/27/2018 3:02 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [storyboard] Prioritization?

2018-09-26 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 8:17 AM Adam Coldrick wrote: > On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 18:40 +, CARVER, PAUL wrote: > [...] > > There is certainly room for additional means of juggling and > > discussing/negotiating priorities in the stages before work really gets > > under way, but if it doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][edge] Notes from the PTG

2018-09-19 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > Tuesday: edge > Since cdent asked in IRC, when we talk about edge and far edge, we defined these roughly like this: https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/NunkkS2y/edge_architecture1.JP

[openstack-dev] [ironic][edge] Notes from the PTG

2018-09-19 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
I wrote up some notes from my perspective at the PTG for some internal teams and figured I may as well share them here. They're primarily from the ironic and edge WG rooms. Fairly raw, very long, but hopefully useful to someone. Enjoy. Tuesday: edge Edge WG (IMHO) has historically just talked

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][python3] mixed versions?

2018-09-14 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:46 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > Excerpts from Mathieu Gagné's message of 2018-09-13 20:09:12 -0400: > >> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:41 PM, Doug Hellmann > wrote: > >> > Excerpts from Mathieu Gagné's message of

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][python3] mixed versions?

2018-09-13 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-09-12 12:04:02 -0600: > > Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2018-09-12 10:44:55 -0700: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 10:23 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > >

[openstack-dev] [goals][python3] mixed versions?

2018-09-12 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
The process of operators upgrading Python versions across their fleet came up this morning. It's fairly obvious that operators will want to do this in a rolling fashion. Has anyone considered doing this in CI? For example, running multinode grenade with python 2 on one node and python 3 on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo][oslo][all] Bumping eventlet to 0.24.1

2018-08-31 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 18-08-30 20:52:46, Matthew Thode wrote: > > On 18-08-23 09:50:13, Matthew Thode wrote: > > > This is your warning, if you have concerns please comment in > > > https://review.openstack.org/589382 . cross tests pass, so that's a > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Summit Forum in Berlin: Topic Selection Process

2018-08-29 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > Examples of typical sessions that make for a great Forum: > > Strategic, whole-of-community discussions, to think about the big > picture, including beyond just one release cycle and new technologies > > e.g. OpenStack One Platform for

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] proposing metalsmith for inclusion into ironic governance

2018-08-28 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like propose the metalsmith library [1][2] for inclusion into the > bare metal project governance. > > What it is and is not > - > > Metalsmith is a library and CLI tool for using Ironic+Neutron for

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][bifrost][sushy][ironic-inspector][ironic-ui][virtualbmc] sub-project/repository core reviewer changes

2018-08-23 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
++ // jim On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > Greetings everyone! > > In our team meeting this week we stumbled across the subject of > promoting contributors to be sub-project's core reviewers. > Traditionally it is something we've only addressed as needed or > desired by

Re: [openstack-dev] Stepping down from Ironic core

2018-08-21 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Julia Kreger wrote: > This is sad news to read, but completely understandable! > > Thank you for all of your excellent work on Ironic, and should time > and focus ever make sense later down the road for you to rejoin > ironic-core, know you'll be welcomed back.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers: what to do?

2018-08-14 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > Greetings fellow ironicans! > > As many of you might know an openstack/ironic-staging-drivers[1] > repository exists. What most might not know is that it was > intentionally created outside of ironic's governance[2]. > > At the time it was

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][rocky][tempest-plugins][ptl] Reminder to tag the Tempest plugins for Rocky release

2018-08-13 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
// jim On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2018-08-13 15:35:23 +0200: > > Hi, > > > > The plugins are branchless and should stay so. Let us not dive into this > madness > > again please. > > You are correct that we do not want to

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] #openstack-placement IRC channel requires registered nicks

2018-08-02 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 5:18 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > > I thought I should post a message here for visibility that yesterday > we made the openstack-placement IRC channel +r so that the recent > spate of spammers could be blocked. > > This means that you must have a registered nick to gain

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [FFE] Teach ironic about ppc64le boot requirements

2018-07-31 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Julia Kreger wrote: > Given that the ironic-lib version in question is already in > upper-constraints, I think it may be fine. Realistically we do want > people to be running the latest version of ironic-lib when deploying > anyway. That being said, I'm +1 for

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSSN-0084] Data retained after deletion of a ScaleIO volume

2018-07-10 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
gt; Great, that's super helpful. Thanks! Is there someone (Luke?) on the list that can send a correction for this OSSN to all the lists it needs to go to? // jim > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:41 AM Jim Rollenhagen > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 4:20 AM, Luke Hind

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSSN-0084] Data retained after deletion of a ScaleIO volume

2018-07-10 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 4:20 AM, Luke Hinds wrote: > Data retained after deletion of a ScaleIO volume > --- > > ### Summary ### > Certain storage volume configurations allow newly created volumes to > contain previous data. This could lead to leakage of sensitive > information between tenants. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][security][api-wg] Adding http security headers

2018-07-05 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Nishant Kumar E < nishant.e.ku...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have registered a blueprint for adding http security headers - > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/http-security-headers > > > > Reason for introducing this change - I work for AT

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Mark Goddard to ironic-core

2018-05-21 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Julia Kreger wrote: > Greetings everyone! > > I would like to propose Mark Goddard to ironic-core. I am aware he > recently joined kolla-core, but his contributions in ironic have been > insightful and valuable. The kind of value

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] late addition to forum schedule

2018-05-18 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:38 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 05/18/2018 12:23 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> On 5/17/2018 11:02 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >>> After some discussion on twitter and IRC, we've added a new session to >>> the Forum schedule for next week to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ALL][PTLs] Community Goals for Rocky: Toggle the debug option at runtime

2018-05-16 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Lingxian Kong's message of 2018-05-16 11:12:01 +1200: > > Hi, > > > > Maybe I missed the original discussion, I found the 'mutable' > configuration > > implementation relies on oslo.service, but is there

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift][ironic][ceph][radosgw] radosgw "support" in python-swiftclient droped for ocata and above

2018-05-10 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 18-05-10 11:09:41, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > > > Awesome. Can someone submit a patch? It will need to remove the special > URL > > building for radosgw linked earlier in t

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift][ironic][ceph][radosgw] radosgw "support" in python-swiftclient droped for ocata and above

2018-05-10 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 18-05-09 15:14:37, Matthew Thode wrote: > > On 18-05-09 12:24:32, Clay Gerrard wrote: > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Thode < > prometheanf...@gentoo.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > *

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift][ironic][ceph][radosgw] radosgw "support" in python-swiftclient droped for ocata and above

2018-05-09 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote: > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Thode > wrote: > >> >> * Proper fix would be to make ceph support the account field >> > > Is the 'rgw_swift_account_in_url' option not

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift][ironic][ceph][radosgw] radosgw "support" in python-swiftclient droped for ocata and above

2018-05-09 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > python-swiftclient prior to 3.2.0 seemed to incidentally support radosgw > tempurls. That is, there was no official support, but it still worked. > > In 3.2.0 (specifically the linked commit(s)) tempurls were

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How to specify OpenStack version for Zuul tests?

2018-05-02 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 2:10 AM, Sangho Shin wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any way to specify the OpenStack version for Zuul test? > > Currently, neteworking-onos project is very outdated, and I need to create > a stable version for the codes for each OpenStack version >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

2018-04-27 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Artom Lifshitz wrote: > Hi all, > > A CI issue [1] caused by tempest thinking some filters are enabled > when they're really not, and a proposed patch [2] to add > (Same|Different)HostFilter to the default filters as a workaround, has > led

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Monthly bug day?

2018-04-23 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 8:04 AM, Michael Turek wrote: > Hey everyone! > > We had a bug day about two weeks ago and it went pretty well! At last > week's IRC meeting the idea of having one every month was thrown around. > > What does everyone think about having Bug Day

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][infra][qa] Jobs failing; pep8 not found

2018-04-20 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
> > In the short term we only need to fix the few projects with conflicting > requirements. In the longer term we could have a concerted effort to > move those dependencies. Someone creative might even be able to script > it, since we do have a list of the blacklisted items. > Agree this is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config driveformat

2018-04-20 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote: > Thanks a lot for your sharing, that's good info, just curious why [1] need > zip and base64 encode if my understand is correct > I was told nova need format should be pure vfat or iso9660, I assume it's > because actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][infra][qa] Jobs failing; pep8 not found

2018-04-20 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:21 PM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> > wrote: >> >> >> Reading through that log more carefully, I see an early attempt to pin >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][infra][qa] Jobs failing; pep8 not found

2018-04-20 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:21 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Reading through that log more carefully, I see an early attempt to pin > pycodestyle <= 2.3.1 [1], followed later by pycodestyle == 2.4.0 being > pulled in as a dependency of flake8-import-order==0.12 when

[openstack-dev] [ironic][infra][qa] Jobs failing; pep8 not found

2018-04-18 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hi all, We have a number of stable branch jobs failing[0] with an error about pep8 not being importable[1], when it's clearly installed[2]. We first saw this when installing networking-generic-switch on queens in our multinode grenade job. We hacked a fix there[3], as we couldn't figure it out

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config driveformat

2018-04-18 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: > > > I agree with Mikal that needing more agent behavior than cloud-init does > > a disservice to the users. > > > > I feel like we get a lot of "but no, my hypervisor is special!" > > reasoning when people go to add a

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican][nova-powervm][pyghmi][solum][trove] Switching to cryptography from pycrypto

2018-04-09 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > >> Here's the current status. I'd like to ask the projects what's keeping >> the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

2018-04-04 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Dan Prince <dpri...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Kind of a support question but figured I'd ask here in case there are >> suggestions for workarounds for sp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

2018-04-04 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > Kind of a support question but figured I'd ask here in case there are > suggestions for workarounds for specific machines. > > Setting up a new rack of mixed machines this week and hit this issue > with HP machines using the

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican][nova-powervm][pyghmi][solum][trove] Switching to cryptography from pycrypto

2018-04-02 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > Here's the current status. I'd like to ask the projects what's keeping > them from removing pycrypto in facor of a maintained library. > > pyghmi: > - (merge conflict) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331828 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ALL][PTLs] [Community goal] Toggle the debug option at runtime

2018-03-27 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Glancing at the code[0], it looks like cotyledon has this built in already. Though, you'll probably want to pass in reload_method='mutate' like the oslo docs suggest[1]. [0] https://github.com/sileht/cotyledon/blob/master/cotyledon/oslo_config_glue.py#L68 [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] Adding "not docs" banner to specs website?

2018-03-21 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
> > We want them all to use the openstackdocstheme so you could look > into creating a "subclass" of that one with the extra content in > the header, then ensure all of the specs repos use it. We would > have to land a small patch to trigger a rebuild, but the patch > switching them from

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ironic] Rocky PTG summary - nova/ironic

2018-03-20 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Thanks for the writeup, Melanie :) On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:31 PM, melanie witt wrote: > > * For the issue of nova-compute crashing on startup, we could add a > try-except around the call site at startup and ignore a "NotReadyYet" or > similar exception from the Ironic

Re: [openstack-dev] Adding "not docs" banner to specs website?

2018-03-19 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2018-03-19 14:57:58 + (+0000), Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > [...] > > What do folks think about a banner at the top of the specs website > > (or each individual spec) that points this out? I'm

[openstack-dev] Adding "not docs" banner to specs website?

2018-03-19 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Ironic (and surely other projects) have had to point out many times that specs are a point in time design discussion, and not completed documentation. It's obviously too much work to go back and update specs constantly. What do folks think about a banner at the top of the specs website (or each

Re: [openstack-dev] [ALL][PTLs] Community Goals for Rocky: Toggle the debug option at runtime

2018-03-19 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 9:49 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Both of those are good ideas. > Agree. I like the socket idea a bit more as I can imagine some operators don't want config file changes automatically applied. Do we want to choose one to standardize on or allow each

Re: [openstack-dev] [ALL][PTLs] Community Goals for Rocky: Toggle the debug option at runtime

2018-03-16 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
knikolla brought up an interesting wedge in this goal in #openstack-keystone today. It seems mod_wsgi doesn't want python applications catching SIGHUP, as Apache expects to be able to catch that. By default, it even ensures signal handlers do not get registered.[0] I can't quickly find uwsgi's

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement] update_provider_tree design updates

2018-03-16 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
> > ...then there's no way I can know ahead of time what all those might be. > (In particular, if I want to support new devices without updating my > code.) I.e. I *can't* write the corresponding > provider_tree.remove_trait(...) condition. Maybe that never becomes a > real problem because

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Stepping down from Ironic core

2018-02-23 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Thank you for all of your good work, Vasyl. Sorry to see you go, but hopefully you'll still be around IRC and such :) // jim On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:02 AM, Vasyl Saienko wrote: > Hey Ironic community! > > Unfortunately I don't work on Ironic as much as I used to any

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][triploe] support for firmware update

2018-02-14 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Stig Telfer wrote: > Hi Moshe - > > It seems a bit risky to automatically apply firmware updates. For > example, given a node will probably be rebooted for firmware updates to > take effect, if other vendors also did this then perhaps

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][ironic][heat] Do we want a BM/VM room at the PTG?

2018-01-31 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 01/31/2018 06:15 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> On 1/30/2018 9:33 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: >> >>> At the last PTG we had some time on Monday and Tuesday for >>> cross-project discussions related to baremetal and

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][ironic][heat] Do we want a BM/VM room at the PTG?

2018-01-30 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: > At the last PTG we had some time on Monday and Tuesday for > cross-project discussions related to baremetal and VM management. We > don't currently have that on the schedule for this PTG. There is still > some free

Re: [openstack-dev] [ALL][requirements] A freeze is coming and you should be prepared

2018-01-26 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > Well, the requirements jobs seem to be busted as well: > > http://logs.openstack.org/93/538093/1/check/legacy-requireme > nts-integration-dsvm/157d877/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-01-26_11_17_31_182762 The fix is in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Remove in-tree policy and config?

2018-01-22 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Huge +1, I didn't realize this was in docs now. We can finally stop doing it manually \o/ // jim On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:45 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > Hi, > > While I was looking at the traits work, I noticed we still have policy and > config in tree for ironic and

[openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Goodbye^W See you later

2017-06-08 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hey friends, I've been mostly missing for the past six weeks while looking for a new job, so maybe you've forgotten me already, maybe not. I'm happy to tell you I've found one that I think is a great opportunity for me. But, I'm sad to tell you that it's totally outside of the OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

2017-04-03 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2017-03-30 15:08:13 -0400: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Doug Hellmann > > wrote: > > > > > Excerpts from Sean McGinnis's message of 2017-03-22

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

2017-03-30 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Sean McGinnis's message of 2017-03-22 10:44:05 -0500: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 08:42:42AM -0500, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > > > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 22:10 +, Taryma, Joanna wrote: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Project Navigator Updates - Feedback Request

2017-03-30 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > This (http://paste.openstack.org/show/604775/) is absolutely perfect. I > feel like the format could work for microversions as well. Anyone from > Neutron or another microversion project that could weigh in? > This

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

2017-03-23 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 08:42:42AM -0500, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 22:10 +, Taryma, Joanna wrote: > > > However, pep8 does not accept passing variable to translation > > > functions, so

Re: [openstack-dev] [swg][tc] Moving Stewardship Working Group meeting

2017-03-16 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:17 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:15 AM, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com > > <mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com>> wrote: > >> In the absence of tooling

Re: [openstack-dev] [swg][tc] Moving Stewardship Working Group meeting

2017-03-15 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:15 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > On 15 March 2017 at 09:50, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Colette Alexander wrote: > >> Currently the Stewardship Working Group meetings every other Thursday at > >> 1400 UTC. > >> > >> We've had a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

2017-03-13 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Heidi Joy Tretheway < heidi...@openstack.org> wrote: > Hi Ironic team, > Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true > as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, > color palette and style of the rest.

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

2017-03-13 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 03/10/2017 01:37 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > Now that micro-versions are *the API versioning scheme to rule them all* >> one >> question I've not been able to find an answer for is what we're going to >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] OpenStack client default ironic API version

2017-03-07 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 03/07/2017 12:32 PM, Miles Gould wrote: > >> On 06/03/17 20:46, Mario Villaplana wrote: >> >>> We also still have yet to decide what a suitable deprecation period is >>> for this change, as far as I'm aware. Please

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Boot from Volume meeting?

2017-03-01 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Thanks for writing this! > > On 02/28/2017 03:42 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > >> Greetings fellow ironic humanoids! >> >> As many have known, I've been largely attempting to drive Boot from >> Volume functionality in

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] End-of-Ocata core team updates

2017-02-22 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
We've a clear majority here, I took the liberty of adding Mario and Vasyl while Dmitry is busy running our sessions today. Welcome to the team, y'all :) // jim On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > I'd like to propose a few changes based on

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] please review the Ocata final release tags

2017-02-20 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Release liaisons and PTLs, > > The patch to tag the Ocata final releases for milestone-based > projects is up at [1]. Please check the patch to verify that it > matches your expectations and then sign off with a +1. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] End-of-Ocata core team updates

2017-02-17 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > I'd like to propose a few changes based on the recent contributor activity. > > I have two candidates that look very good and pass the formal barrier of 3 > reviews a day on average [1]. > > First, Vasyl

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] IRC Mishaps

2017-02-09 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: > On 08/02/2017 20:39, Kendall Nelson wrote: > > Hello All! > > > > So I am sure we've all seen it: people writing terminal commands into > > our project channels, misusing '/' commands, etc. But have any of you > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

2017-02-09 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: > Hey folks, > > Ironic plans to release Ocata this week, once we have a couple small > patches > and a release note cleanup landed. > > However, our grenade job is now testing mast

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] IRC Mishaps

2017-02-09 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Yubikey users tend to dump randomness in IRC at times, e.g.: ccduggvhtnbdlhnnggbudfciuvjvgbdininggijb // jim On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Hello All! > > So I am sure we've all seen it: people writing terminal commands into our > project

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

2017-02-09 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > On 02/09/2017 07:00 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > Ironic plans to release Ocata this week, once we have a couple small > patches > > and a release note cleanup landed. >

[openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

2017-02-09 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hey folks, Ironic plans to release Ocata this week, once we have a couple small patches and a release note cleanup landed. However, our grenade job is now testing master->master, best I can tell. This is pretty clearly due to this d-s-g commit:

[openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

2017-01-31 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hey ironic-ers, The foundation has passed along a new version of our mascot (attached) to us, and would like your feedback on it. They're hoping to have all mascot-related things ready in time for the PTG, so please do send your thoughts quickly, if you have them. :) // jim

[openstack-dev] [ironic] release timelines

2017-01-18 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hi all, As you probably know, ironic is a cycle-with-intermediary project that doesn't strictly follow the OpenStack feature freeze. Ocata is finishing up and we need to define some deadlines/goals around a final release. Please refer to the schedule here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] Nested KVM + the gate

2017-01-18 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote: > Hi all, > > Back in late October, Vasyl wrote support for devstack to auto detect, and > when possible, use kvm to power Ironic gate jobs ( > 0036d83b330d98e64d656b156001dd2209ab1903). This has lowered some job time > when it

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] User survey question

2017-01-10 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 01/04/2017 07:43 PM, Mario Villaplana wrote: > >> >> > > - What's been your most frustrating or difficult experience with ironic? >> > > I wanted to suggest this ^^^ question as well, thanks Mario. > FYI, this is

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Stepping down as PTL after this cycle

2017-01-06 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hi friends, I'll be stepping down as PTL after Ocata is done. I'll still be 100% dedicated to the project, but I'd like to be able to focus more on writing code and reinforcing the bridges between us and other projects (Nova, Neutron, etc). I'd love to see two or more people step up and run next

[openstack-dev] [ironic] PTG planning

2017-01-06 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hey folks, The PTG is about 6 weeks from now, so I figure we should start planning. As far as how we plan this, I'm trying to treat it similar to the summit. The only difference being we get a room for three days straight instead of 40 minute blocks, so we can be flexible with our time. Anyway,

[openstack-dev] [ironic] User survey question

2017-01-04 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hey all, We have an opportunity to ask a question on the upcoming User Survey, which will launch by February 1st. We can choose the audience to direct the question to, choosing from those USING, TESTING, or INTERESTED in Ironic (or some combination of these). The hope is that the Foundation

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] unsupported drivers and their future

2016-12-08 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy < pshchelokovs...@mirantis.com> wrote: > HI all, > > we (ironic community) some time ago decided [0] to require third-party CI > for any driver that is present in the main ironic code tree. I'd like to > discuss the state of currently

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement][ironic] Progress on custom resource classes

2016-12-05 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Ironic colleagues, heads up, please read the below fully! I'd like your > feedback on a couple outstanding questions. > > tl;dr > - > > Work for custom resource classes has been proceeding well this cycle, and > we're at

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] Proposing Jay Faulkner for ironic-stable-maint

2016-11-22 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:02:44PM +0100, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I'm formally proposing that the ironic-stable-maint team [1] adds Jay >> Faulkner. He's been consistently reviewing stable patches as shown

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] Proposing Jay Faulkner for ironic-stable-maint

2016-11-22 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:02:44PM +0100, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Ironic-qa meeting canceled this week (Nov 23rd)

2016-11-21 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Kurt Taylor wrote: > Hey everyone, due to projected low turnout for this weeks ironic-qa meeting, > it will be canceled. I will update the wiki meeting page to reflect this. > > FYI, I brought up a proposal last week to merge this meeting

[openstack-dev] [ironic] ocata summit summary

2016-11-16 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hi all, Sorry for the late-ness of this email, but wanted to send a wrap-up of the Ocata summit from ironic's perspective. It was another super productive summit and I'm thankful for all of the people who showed up and made it so. :) As always, we discussed priorities for the cycle and those

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] python-wsmanclient future

2016-11-15 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > In view of the Ironic governance discussion [1] I'd like to talk about > wsmanclient [2] future. > > This project was created to split away wsman code from python-dracclient to > be reused in other drivers

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Removing agent vendor passthru and unsupported drivers

2016-11-14 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:34 PM, wrote: > Agree with removal of unsupported drivers. > For supported drivers we will still need to support passthru. > First, because it is currently used by many customers and for many drivers. > Second, we will need to add support in

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] When should a project be under Ironic's governance?

2016-11-14 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
y stable branches. Does that help? // jim > Thanks, > Arkady > > -Original Message- > From: Jim Rollenhagen [mailto:j...@jimrollenhagen.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 9:37 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] New and next-gen libraries (a BCN followup)

2016-11-04 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Jay Faulkner wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 11:27 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >>> >>> Just as a followup from the summit, >>> >>> One of the sessions (the new lib one) had a few proposals: >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] When should a project be under Ironic's governance?

2016-11-02 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Michael Turek wrote: > Hello ironic! > > At today's IRC meeting, the questions "what should and should not be a > project be under Ironic's governance" and "what does it mean to be under > Ironic's governance" were raised. Log here: > >

  1   2   3   4   5   >