+1 – thanks for organizing
From: Kevin Benton [mailto:ke...@benton.pub]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 2:19 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Neutron team social in Atlanta on Thursday
Hi all,
I'm organizing a Neutron social event for Thursday evening
Is anyone able to provide a summary of which patches fix the startup scenarios.
Any startup issues are of interest but the one we specifically have bugs around
is the phsynets not being discovered by the server properly.
I see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-vpp/+bug/1631063 which says a f
I was trying to cherry pick a change in Liberty back to stable Kilo:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277962/
Many of the gate tests failed and I notice that appears to be the case with
most of the reviews going back a while in the past.From a quick check I did
not see anything related to t
, "John Joyce (joycej)"
mailto:joy...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Gal:
I am also slow to jump between this and other work so I think I should be
the one apologizing. I think we are receptive to any of the approaches QoS,
FWaaS or Security Groups. I am not an expert on FWaaS but from
might no longer fit as a QoS)
But if you feel this belongs in QoS this can certainly be added on top of the
framework as Miguel suggested.
Thanks
Gal.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:39 AM, John Joyce (joycej)
mailto:joy...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Gal:
I had seen the brute force blueprint
is is
something you would like to work together on and push
i can help and align the above code to use FWaaS.
Feel free to contact me if you have any question
Thanks
Gal.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:58 PM, John Joyce (joycej)
mailto:joy...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hello everyone:
I would like
Hello everyone:
I would like to test the waters on some new functionality we think is
needed to protect OpenStack deployments from some overload situations due to an
excessive user or DDOS scenario. We wrote this up in the style of an RFE.
Please let us know your thoughts and we can pr
