Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder][ceph] should Tempest tests the backend specific feature?

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > In Cinder, there are many features/APIs which are backend specific and > will return 405 or 501 if same is not implemented on any backend [1]. > If such tests are implemented in Tempest, then it will break some gate

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptls] Apologies and update

Hi Tony, Thank you for this email and the good work you've been doing for OpenStack. Take care, Jordan On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi All, > I'd belatedly like to apologise for my recent absence from my OpenStack > duties. As a few people

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev] [Designate]

Hi, On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Carmine Annunziata < carmine.annunziat...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > I'm trying to integrate designate in openstack by devstack, the standard > procedure uses rejoin-stack.sh after the stack.sh but in the last release > there isn't anymore. So what may i

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][gate] tempest slow - where do we execute them in gate?

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi all, > > so I tried to inject a failure in a tempest test and was surprised > that no gate job failed because of that: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/457102/1 > > It turned out that the test is not executed

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > On 03/17/2017 09:24 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net > > <mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote: > > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > On 03/17/2017 08:27 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > The patch that reduced the number of Tempest Scenarios we run in every > > job and also reduce the test run concurrency [0] was merged 13 days ago. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

The patch that reduced the number of Tempest Scenarios we run in every job and also reduce the test run concurrency [0] was merged 13 days ago. Since, the situation (i.e the high number of false negative job results) has not improved significantly. We need to keep looking collectively at this.

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA]Refactoring Scenarios manager.py

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:18 AM, wrote: > I think it a good solution, I already put +1 :) > > > And, as to the scenario testcases, shall we: > > 1) remove test steps/checks already coverd in API test > Duplicate test steps/checks is not good and should be removed. It's not

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA]Refactoring Scenarios manager.py

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > Doing gradual refactoring and fixing plugins time to time needs lot of > wait and sync. > > That needs: > 1. Plugins to switch from current method usage. Plugins to have some other > function or same copy paste code

[openstack-dev] [QA]Refactoring Scenarios manager.py

Hi guys, So I have a problem with these 2 patches here [1] and here [2]. You basically are blocking any attempt of refactoring manager.py. Refactoring that file has been our number one priority for 2 cycles, and so far hardly no one stepped up really to do the work, except me with these 2 patches.

[openstack-dev] [QA]Removal of test runner wrapper scripts in Tempest

Hi, I've proposed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/436983/ in Tempest which says: *Remove deprecated test runner wrappers (.sh files) This patch removes run_tempest.sh, run_tests.sh, tools/pretty_tox.sh tools/pretty_tox_serial.sh. They all have been deprecated between 7 and 9 months ago. As

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][all] HELP NEEDED: test failures blocking requirements ocata branch and opening of pike

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-02-08 23:54:06 -0500: >> The patch to update the XStatic package versions [1] is blocked by a >> patch to remove nova-docker from the requirements project sync list [2], >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Announcing my candidacy for PTL of the Pike cycle

Hi gmann, Thanks for your candidacy. Let me ask one question if it's not too late. What's the role of the QA team when it comes to API change ? I have in mind the recent Glance change related to private vs shared image status. Someone in our community asked : * "I need to get an official decision

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] PTL Candidacy for Pike

Hi Andrea, Thanks for your candidacy. Let me ask one question if it's not too late. What's the role of the QA team when it comes to API change ? I have in mind the recent Glance change related to private vs shared image status. Someone in our community asked : * "I need to get an official

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > 2017-02-03 9:56 GMT-08:00 Chris Dent : > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > >>> > >>> In today's meeting [0] after briefly covering old business we spent > >>> nearly > >>> 50

Re: [openstack-dev] gate jobs - papercuts

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Thanks Melanie! Since the last report 4 hours ago, the > ServersNegativeTestJSON failed 8 more times. > > Is the following one of the libvirt ones? > >

[openstack-dev] [QA][Nova]Libvirt frequent crashes on Ubuntu Xenial

Hi, After investigating several gate failures and thanks to logstash, I found out that Libvirtd often crashes badly on Ubuntu Xenial. I know of 3 distinct crashes, with the following fingerprints in syslog.txt * libvirtd: malloc.c:3720: _int_malloc: Assertion `(unsigned long) (size) >= (unsigned

Re: [openstack-dev] How change a section name in oslo.config but keep compatibility with the old format

Hi, Look at this file https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/config.py and search for "deprecated_opts" Not sure you can deprecate a whole section, but you can set the old location (old section/old config name) for each new config option. On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:01 AM,

[openstack-dev] [QA][Nova]Making gate-tempest-dsvm-full-devstack-plugin-ceph-ubuntu-xenial non voting

Hi, I don't know if you've noticed but the gate-tempest-dsvm-full-devstack-plugin-ceph-ubuntu-xenial job has a high rate of false negative. I've queried Gerrit and analysed all the "Verified -2" messages left by Jenkins (i.e Gate failure) for the last 30 days. (script is here [1]). On project

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

Again ? Are we going to have that discussion every 3 months... ? On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > I literally just posted a thing on my blog with some thoughts of what I'd > expect > any new language being proposed for OpenStack to cover

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest] Failing to run a test on a remote devstack server

Hi Yossi, I suggest you carefully read the source code of this test and all the options in your tempest.conf file. Jordan On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Yossi Tamarov wrote: > Hello everyone, > When trying to run the next test: TestNetworkBasicOps.test_ >

[openstack-dev] [QA][Ironic]Removal of Ironic tests from Tempest

Hi guys, As you may know we are pushing projects to use Tempest plugins and we are only keeping "core" projects tests in Tempest tree. There has been several attempts to remove Ironic from Tempest so I guess it doesn't come as a surprise (hopefully). I am starting to work on the removal now, as

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Cinder]Removing Cinder v1 in Tempest

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Thanks for pointing this up, Jordan > > Before removing volume v1 API tests, it is nice to make the v2 API the > default of Tempest scenario tests. > Now the v1 and v2 is set as True on the default in the >

[openstack-dev] [QA][Cinder]Removing Cinder v1 in Tempest

Hi, I'd like to reduce the duration of a full Tempest run and I noticed that Cinder tests take a good amount of time (cumulative time 2149sec vs 2256sec for Nova, source code [0]) So I'd like to not run the Cinder v1 tests anymore, at least on the master branches. I remember that Cinder v1 is

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][infra][all] Measuring code coverage in integration tests

Hi, On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:43 AM, milanisko k wrote: > Dear Stackers, > I'd like to gather some overview on the $Sub: is there some infrastructure > in place to gather such stats? Are there any groups interested in it? Any > plans to establish such infrastructure? > I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl] code churn and questionable changes

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Folks, > > We want to be inviting to new contributors even if they are green. New > contributors reflect on OpenStack’s growth in a positive way. The fact > that a new-to-openstack contributor would make such and

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] resigning from Tempest core

Hi Marc, Thanks for your good work on Tempest all these years. I know you are still contributing to other areas of OpenStack so that's good for the project as a whole. Cheers, Jordan On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Koderer, Marc wrote: > Hi folks, > > as already mentioned

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSC] Tenant Resource Cleanup

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Boris Bobrov wrote: > Hello, > > I wonder if it would be worth integrating ospurge into openstackclient. > > Are there any osc sessions planned at the summit? > > > Hi, I am the current "PTL" of the openstack/ospurge project. The project is

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Reliable way to filter CI in gerrit spam?

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Matthew Booth wrote: > > Is there anything I missed? Or is it possible to unsubscribe from gerrit > mail from bots? Or is there any other good way to achieve what I'm looking > for which doesn't involve maintaining my own bot list? If not, would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Support specified volume_type when boot instance, do we like it?

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Hi, all > > Currently we have customer demands about adding parameter "volume_type" to > --block-device to provide the support of specified storage backend to boot > instance. And I find one newly drafted Blueprint

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][cinder] Clone feature toggle not in clone tests

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > Originally the NFS driver did support snapshots, but it was implemented by > just 'cp'ing the file containing the raw bits. This works fine (if > inefficiently) for unattached volumes, but if you do this on an

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][cinder] Clone feature toggle not in clone tests

t; toggle in them. I thought it obvious that if clone is disabled > in tempest, the tests that simply clone should be disabled. > > So I put up a bug and fix for it, but have been talking with > Jordan Pittier and he suggested I come to the mailing list to > get this figured out. >

Re: [openstack-dev] Why do we need a Requirements Team and PTL

On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 16-08-06 10:34 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> Question asked by Julien here: >> https://twitter.com/juldanjou/status/761897228596350976 >> >> Answer: >> There's a boat load of work that goes on in global

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Pending removal of Scality volume driver

Hi Sean, Thanks for the heads up. On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > The Cinder policy for driver CI requires that all volume drivers > have a CI reporting on any new patchset. CI's may have some down > time, but if they do not report within a two

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] test strategy for the serial console feature

Hi Markus You don"t really need a whole new job for this. Just turn that flag to True on existing jobs. 30/40 seconds is acceptable. But I am surprised considering a VM usually boots in 5 sec or so. Any idea of where that slowdown comes from ? On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Markus Zoeller <

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Integration testing for Nova API os-assisted-volume-snapshots

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > In the nova-api meeting today we were talking about the nova > os-assisted-volume-snapshots API and whether or not it was a proxy API to > cinder. We determined it's not, it performs an action on a server

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest pre-provisioned credentials in the gate

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > Dear all, > > TL;DR: I'd like to propose to start running some of the existing dsvm > check/gate jobs using Tempest pre-provisioned credentials. > > Full Text: > Tempest provides tests with two mechanisms to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.config] Encrypt the sensitive options

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:19:23AM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Guangyu Suo's message of 2016-04-26 07:28:42 -0500: > > > Hello, oslo team > > > > > > For now, some sensitive options like password

Re: [openstack-dev] [Designate] Tempest Tests - in-repo or separate

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: > As we have started to move to a tempest plugin for our functional test > suite, we have 2 choices about where it lives. > > 1 - In repo (as we have [0] currently) > 2 - In a repo of its own (something like

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] No rejoin-stack.sh script in my setup

Hi, rejoin-stack.sh has been removed 14 days ago by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291453/ You should use the "screen" command now. (e.g screen -R) On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Ouadï Belmokhtar < ouadi.belmokh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Could you give any help to my question

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] Cirros image

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Eran Kuris <eku...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > - Original Message ----- > > From: "Jordan Pittier" <jordan.pitt...@scality.com> > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > o

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] Cirros image

Hi, On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Eyal Dannon wrote: > Hi, > > I'm writing a tempest scenario test, the test will check the SCTP protocol, > the ncat utility in the current image of cirros does not support the > "--sctp" flag, > so we opened a bug :

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][openstackclient] Required name option for volumes, snapshots and backups

I am going to play the devil's advocate here but why can"t python-openstackclient have its own opinion on the matter ? This CLI seems to be for humans and humans love names/labels/tags and find UUIDS hard to remember. Advanced users who want anonymous volumes can always hit the API directly with

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

Hi, On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi > > I have one proposal[1] related to negative tests in Tempest, and > hoping opinions before doing that. > > Now Tempest contains negative tests and sometimes patches are being > posted for adding more

[openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest]Run only multinode tests in multinode jobs

Hi list, I understood we need to limit the number of tests and jobs that are run for each Tempest patch because our resources are not unlimited. In Tempest, we have 5 multinode experimental jobs: experimental-tempest-dsvm-multinode-full-dibtest gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-full

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cinder Mitaka Midcycle Summary

Thanks a lot for this summary. I enjoyed the reading. Jordan On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > War and Peace > or > Notes from the Cinder Mitaka Midcycle Sprint > January 26-29 > > Etherpads from discussions: > *

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] towards a keystone v3 only devstack

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:09 PM, gordon chung wrote: > yeah... the revert broke us across all telemetry projects since we fixed > plugins to adapt to v3. i'm very much for adapting to v3 since it's > lingered around for years. i think given the time lapsed, if it breaks > them,

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][security] New BP for anti brute force in keystone

Hi, Can't you just do some rate limiting at your webserver level ? On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:55 PM, McPeak, Travis wrote: > One issue to be aware of is the use of this as a Denial of Service > vector. Basically an attacker can use this to lock out key accounts > by

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] kilo and liberty is blocked on bug 1532048

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Matt Riedemann > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: January 7, 2016 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][stable] Horizon kilo gate fails due to testrepository dependency

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:26:24PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: > > On 5 January 2016 at 12:04, Robert Collins > wrote: > > ... > > > Indeed - >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

Hi, I am sure oslo.policy would be good under Keystone's governance. But I am not sure I understood what's wrong in having oslo.policy under the oslo program ? Jordan On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Brant Knudson wrote: > > I'd like to propose moving oslo.policy from the oslo

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tox 2.3.0 broke tempest jobs

Tox 2.3.1 was released on pypi a few minutes ago, and it fixes this issue. Jordan On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 13 December 2015 at 03:20, Yuriy Taraday wrote: > > Tempest jobs in all our projects seem to become

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Dependencies of snapshots on volumes

Hi, FWIW, I completely agree with what John said. All of it. Please don't do that. Jordan __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][tempest][defcore] Process to imrpove tests coverge in temepest

Hi Flavio, On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > > Oh, I meant ocasionally. Whenever a missing test for an API is found, > it'd be easy enough for the implementer to sohw up at the meeting and > bring it up. >From my experience as a Tempest reviewer, I'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] Disabling HA for RPC queues in RabbitMQ

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Dmitry Mescheryakov < dmescherya...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > > My point is simple - lets increase our architecture scalability by 2-3 > times by _maybe_ causing more errors for users during failover. The > failover time itself should not get worse (to be tested by

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest] Use tempest-config for tempest-cli-improvements

Hi, I think this script is valuable to some users: Rally and Red Hat expressed their needs, they seem clear. This tool is far from bullet proof and if used blindly or in case of bugs, Tempest could be misconfigured. So, we could have this tool inside the Tempest repository (in the tools/) but not

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

Hi On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Young Yang wrote: > Hi, > I'm using devstack to deploy stable/Kilo in my Xenserver. > I successfully deploy devstack. But I found that every time I restart it, > devstack always run ./stack.sh to clear all my data and resintall all the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FKs in the DB

Hi, However, data > integrity /can/ be preserved in other ways than RDBMS constraints, while > persistence layer performance caps that of the whole system Is the DB the limiting factor of openstack performance ? De we have hard evidence of this ? We need numbers before acting otherwise it will

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Young Yang wrote: > Really thanks for responsing so rapidly!! > > @ozamiatin > I forget to mention that I've run rejoin-stack.sh and manually started > apache. > However, something is not still properly configured. Such as lvm volume >

[openstack-dev] [Tempest]Non service clients migration to tempest-lib

Hi guys, As discussed this morning, here is an etherpad to track the progress in the migration of files other than the service clients from Tempest to tempest-lib: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tempest-lib-non-service-clients-migration A couple of work items already have assignee, thanks :) If

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Rant] About blank rechecks

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Herve wrote: > Hi all, > > You've seen me complain about people doing blank rechecks in Gerrit on > IRC, and it seems it had little to no effect. So here I am trying to spread > the word here. I'll try to stay calm. > > I'm seeing way

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] Try to introduce RFC mechanism to CI.

Hi, On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Tang Chen wrote: > Hi, > > CI systems will run tests for each patch once it is submitted or modified. > But most CI systems occupy a lot of resource, and take a long time to > run tests (1 or 2 hours for one patch). > > I think, not

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing Liberty RC1 availability in Debian

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi everyone! > > 1/ Announcement > === > > I'm pleased to announce, in advance of the final Liberty release, that > Liberty RC1 not only has been fully uploaded to Debian Experimental, but > also that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Devstack][Sahara][Cinder] BlockDeviceDriver support in Devstack

Hi Sean, Because the recommended way in now to write devstack plugins. Jordan On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Sean Collins wrote: > This review was recently abandoned. Can you provide insight as to why? > > On September 17, 2015, at 2:30 PM, "Sean M. Collins"

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev] Devstack broken - third party CI broken

Also, as I believe your CI is for Cinder, I recommend that you disable all uneeded services. (look how the DEVSTACK_LOCAL_CONFIG is used in devstack-gate to add the proper disable_service line). On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Chris

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] upcoming glanceclient release

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:12 PM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: I've compiled a list of backwards incompatabilities where the new client will impact (in some cases break) existing scripts: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glance-v2-v1-client-compatability Awesome! To be honest there's a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][third-party][ci] Announcing CI Watch - Third-party CI monitoring tool

Hi, On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 08/24/2015 07:59 PM, Skyler Berg wrote: Hi all, I am pleased to announce CI Watch [1], a CI monitoring tool developed at Tintri. For each OpenStack project with third-party CI's, CI Watch shows the status of

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] Cannot get compute endpoint when running nodepool.

Hi, Please have a look at http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-August/072556.html Jordan On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:12 AM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote: Hi, all, I got following error message while running nodepoold with nodepoold -d $ DAEMON_ARGS

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest] kwargs of service clients for POST/PUT methods

Hi, So after I took a lot at Ken'ichi's recent proposed changes, I think this is the good approach. The kwargs approach has the good benefit of being generic so that if a consumer (say Nova) of the client class wants to add a new parameter to one of its API, it can do it without the need of

[openstack-dev] [Tempest]No way to skip S3 related tests

Hi, With the commit [1] minimize the default services that happened in April, nova-objectstore is not run by default. Which means that by default, Devstack doesnt provide any S3 compatible API (because swift3 is not enabled by default, of course). Now, I don't see any config flag or mechanism in

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] snapshot and cloning for NFS backend

Hi The patch [4] has been abandoned but it's not clear why. I too think that having a full fledged NFS driver would be great ! [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149037/ Jordan On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Kekane, Abhishek abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com wrote: Hi Devs, There is an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest] Can we add testcase for Unshelving volume backed instance?

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Deore, Pranali11 pranali11.de...@nttdata.com wrote: Hi, Unshelving a volume backed instance was not working before merging the patch [1]. In case of volume backed instance, snapshot is not taken when an instance is shelved, so shelve_image_id key is

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] openstack install error with stable/kilo

Hi, FYI I got the same error since Wednesday or Thursday last week. With devstack master. I haven't had the chance to spend some time on it yet. Jordan On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Danny Choi (dannchoi) dannc...@cisco.com wrote: Hi, I’m trying to run devstack install of stable/kilo on

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Use devstack/master to install older releases

Hi, On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Emmanuel Cazenave cont...@emcaz.fr wrote: My first approach was to use devstack/icehouse to install swift/icehouse, devstack/juno for swift/juno, etc This is the only approach

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest] Proposing Jordan Pittier for Tempest Core

Everyone, I'd like to propose we add Jordan Pittier (jordanP) to the tempest core team. Jordan has been a steady contributor and reviewer on tempest over the past few cycles and he's been actively engaged in the Tempest community. Jordan has had one of the higher review counts on Tempest

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Tempest] Regarding deleting snapshot when instance is OFF

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Jordan Pittier jordan.pitt...@scality.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/08/2015 11:22 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: + [Cinder] and [Tempest] in the $subject since this affects them too On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Tempest] Regarding deleting snapshot when instance is OFF

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/08/2015 11:22 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: + [Cinder] and [Tempest] in the $subject since this affects them too On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/08/2015 12:01 PM, Deepak

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Adopt mox3

Hi, Shouldn't we move to use mock instead ? If mox3 is supported and active, why would we recommend to use mock ? Jordan On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote: Oslo folks, everyone, mox3 needs to be maintained since some of our projects use it and we

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] cinder support matrix, chap support?

Hi, Isn't CHAP iscsi-specific ? Jordan On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Dave Walker em...@daviey.com wrote: Hi, Recently I have been curious as to which Cinder drivers support authentication. It seems that only a subset do. I wondered, is this something that would be useful on the

Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack live migration using devstack

Hi Double check that sql_connection in the [database] section of cinder.conf is not empty. Jordan On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Erlon Cruz sombra...@gmail.com wrote: Had the same error, but with cinder. Did you find find out something about this error? 2015-04-17

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Driver broken

Hey, From http://packages.cloudfounders.com/ci_logs/47/85847/47/check/openvstorage-cinder-functionality/b073fb9/console.html : Running ` python setup.py testr --testr-args='--subunit --concurrency 1 test_openvstorage'` == Totals == Ran: 10 tests in 2. sec. - Passed: 10 - Skipped:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] CI report formatting (citrix / hyperv / vmware )

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: On 25 March 2015 at 14:21, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/25/2015 09:03 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: From: Jordan Pittier jordan.pitt...@scality.com mailto:jordan.pitt...@scality.com Reply-To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] CI report formatting (citrix / hyperv / vmware )

Hi On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Currently Citrix, HyperV, and VMWare CI systems reporting on Nova patches have a different formatting than the standard that Jenkins and other systems are using: * test-name-no-spaces http://link.to/result :

[openstack-dev] [third-party]Properly format the status message with gerrit trigger

Hi guys, I am in charge of a third party CI (for Cinder). My setup is based on Jenkins + gerrit trigger plugin. As you may know, its hard to customize the message in the Gerrit Verified Commands config. In particular, its not possible to add white/empty line. And you need white lines if you have

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.policy] guraduation status

Hi, FYI there might be something related to what you plan : https://github.com/stackforge/swiftpolicy/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89568/ The project is abandoned but the initial goal was to have the code somehow proposed to be merged in Openstack Swift. Feel free to have a look a continue

Re: [openstack-dev] Module_six_moves_urllib_parse error

Hi You probably have an old python-six version installed system-wide. Jordan On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Manickam, Kanagaraj kanagaraj.manic...@hp.com wrote: Hi, I see the below error in my devstack and is raised from the package ‘six’ AttributeError:

Re: [openstack-dev] LOG.debug()

Hi, Also, make sure you have : debug = True verbose = True in the [DEFAULT] section of your nova.conf Jordan On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, Please see http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/logging_monitoring.html If you have installed

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]'Add' capability to the HTTP store

...@redhat.com wrote: On 13/02/15 17:01 +0100, Jordan Pittier wrote: Humm this doesn't have to be complicated, for a start. Sorry for my late reply - Figuring out the http method the server expects (POST/PUT) Yeah, I agree. Theres no definitive answer to this but I think PUT makes sense here. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]'Add' capability to the HTTP store

PUT/GET/DELETE operations. So having a full blown HTTP store makes sense, imo, because it gives more deployment options. Is that clearer ? What do you think ? Jordan On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/13/2015 11:55 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: Jay, I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]'Add' capability to the HTTP store

to find the right POST curl/wget command to properly upload his image. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/13/2015 09:47 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: Hi list, I would like to add the 'add' capability to the HTTP glance store. Let's say I (as an operator

[openstack-dev] [glance]'Add' capability to the HTTP store

Hi list, I would like to add the 'add' capability to the HTTP glance store. Let's say I (as an operator or cloud admin) provide an HTTP server where (authenticated/trusted) users/clients can make the following HTTP request : POST http://server1/myLinuxImage HTTP/1.1 Host: server1

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]'Add' capability to the HTTP store

the different Python modules (httplib etc.) Regards, Jordan On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 13/02/15 16:01 +0100, Jordan Pittier wrote: What is the difference between just calling the Glance API to upload an image, versus adding add() functionality

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]'Add' capability to the HTTP store

, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/13/2015 10:01 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: What is the difference between just calling the Glance API to upload an image, versus adding add() functionality to the HTTP image store? You mean using glance image-create --location

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Ceilometer] Real world experience with Ceilometer deployments - Feedback requested

Hi, My experience with Ceilometer is that MongoDB is/was a major bottleneck. You need sharding + servers with lot of RAM. You need to set TTL on your samples, and only save in DB the metrics that really mater to you. MongoDB v3 should also help. Regarding RabbitMQ pressure, I think this blueprint

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] volume / host coupling

. Arne On 08 Jan 2015, at 16:50, Jordan Pittier jordan.pitt...@scality.com wrote: Hi, Some people apparently use the ‘host’ option in cinder.conf to make the hosts indistinguishable, but this creates problems in other places. I use shared storage mounted on several cinder-volume nodes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] volume / host coupling

Hi, Some people apparently use the ‘host’ option in cinder.conf to make the hosts indistinguishable, but this creates problems in other places. I use shared storage mounted on several cinder-volume nodes, with host flag set the same everywhere. Never ran into problems so far. Could you elaborate

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Progress of the port to Python 3

Hi Victor. Thanks for your effort. Did you read the ML thread [nova]nova not work with eventlet 0.16.0 ? It looks important. Jordan On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:51 PM, victor stinner victor.stin...@enovance.com wrote: Hi, I'm still working on porting OpenStack to Python 3. I'm fixing Python 3

Re: [openstack-dev] HTTPS for spice console

Hi, You'll need a recent version of spice-html5. Because this commit here http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-html5/commit/?id=293d405e15a4499219fe81e830862cc2b1518e3e is recent. Jordan On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Akshik DBK aks...@outlook.com wrote: Are there any recommended

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] environment variables in local.conf post-config section

Hi, It should work with your current local.conf. You may be facing this bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1386413 Jordan - Original Message - From: Andreas Scheuring scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Wednesday, 26

[openstack-dev] [swift]Questions on concurrent operations on the same object

Hi guys, We are currently benchmarking our Scality object server backend for Swift. We basically created a new DiskFile class that is used in a new ObjectController that inherits from the native server.ObjectController. It's pretty similar to how Ceph can be used as a backend for Swift

  1   2   >