[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Posibilities to aggregate/merge configs across templates

2018-09-04 Thread Kamil Sambor
merget env and move all files and add them into deployment plan enviroments. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/599559/ What do you think about each of solution?Which solution should be used in TripleO? Best, Kamil Sambor [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1716391 [1] https

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecation warnings in python-fuelclient-6.1.*

2015-03-04 Thread Kamil Sambor
. Also we discuss 4th solution, simply we should inform users about deprecation of client and encourage users to use fuel_v2 client with new commands and parameters. Best regards, Kamil Sambor On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Przemyslaw Kaminski pkamin...@mirantis.com wrote: Maybe add a Changelog

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecation warnings in python-fuelclient-6.1.*

2015-03-04 Thread Kamil Sambor
to switch to new client and it will be easy for us to migrate only old commands. Now when we add new command we add to old client and then in future still need to migrate it. SO keeping two entry points for fuel-client IMHO will be convenient for developers and for users. Best regards, Kamil Sambor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separating granular tasks validator

2015-02-23 Thread Kamil Sambor
Thank you guys for response. There is no cons, so we migrate validation to separate repo. Best regards, Kamil Sambor On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 to extract validators for granular deployment tasks Dmitry, do you mean that we should create some cli

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel-client and Nailgun API

2015-02-09 Thread Kamil Sambor
mocks if it is necessary. If we will have test run on nailgun we can be sure that even if responses has been changed, client can still work or when we add new API our client realy works with API, not only with mocked responses. Best regards, Kamil Sambor On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Nikolay

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Dropping Python-2.6 support

2015-01-13 Thread Kamil Sambor
Tomasz we are not using ssl in our client so now we not gain anything from moving to 2.7 . Best regards, – Kamil S. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski bpiotrow...@mirantis.com wrote: On 01/13/2015 11:16 PM, Tomasz Napierala wrote: On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:51, Przemyslaw

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Nailgun] Web framework

2014-12-03 Thread Kamil Sambor
Additionaly to what Przemek wrote, also Pecan is released more often, IMHO documentation is better written, and described a lot of possibilities of modification, also as Lukasz wrote in previous thread that Pecan is used in openstack. So I'm also for Pecan Best regards, Kamil S. On Wed, Dec 3,

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Authentication is turned on - Fuel API and UI

2014-07-24 Thread Kamil Sambor
Hi folks, All parts of code related to stage I and II from blueprint http://docs-draft.openstack.org/29/96429/11/gate/gate-fuel-specs-docs/2807f30/doc/build/html/specs/5.1/access-control-master-node.htm