The serviceBase and insertion spec has been up for review for a while. It
would be great if it can be reviewed and moved forward.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93128/
Thanks,
Kanzhe
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
htt
; How does Tuesdays at 1800 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt sound?
>
> --
> Sean M. Collins
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/open
gt;
> > Cheers,
> > main(i){putchar((5852758>>((i-1)/2)*8)-!(1&i)*'\r')^89&&main(++i);}
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bi
can meet here in the summit and discuss
> how to proceed with the blueprint.
>
> Cheers,
> main(i){putchar((5852758>>((i-1)/2)*8)-!(1&i)*'\r')^89&&main(++i);}
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack
Hi Carlos,
This is Kanzhe. We discussed your port-based SFC on the Neutron advanced
service IRC.
I would like to reach out to you to discuss a bit more.
As you know, Neutron port is a logic abstraction for network interfaces
with a MAC and IP address. However, network services could be used at
di
inbound traffic from a (public) network, traffic
> should be steered first to the VM running the DPI and then to the final
> destination. Currently in OpenStack it is not possible to configure this
> and I don't see how in the proposed BP it would be. It was given t
Hi Mohammad,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Kanzhe
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote:
> We have started looking at how the Neutron advanced services being defined
> and developed right now can be used within the Neutron policy framework we
> are building. Furt
I am interested too. UTC-8.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Gary Duan wrote:
> I'm interested in the discussion. UTC-8.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Mandeep Dhami
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I would be interested as well (UTC-8).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mandeep
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12,
