ki [and...@lascii.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 4:34 PM
> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][OSC][Nova][Neutron] Launch instance
> > with Floating IP
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016, at 06:54 PM, Martin
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 09:34 +1200, Adrian Turjak wrote:
> This is exactly what something like Minstral would be fantastic for.
> Multi-project workflow.
> Rather than try and build logic like this directly into nova, looks
> at extending something like Minstral with a basic easy to call task.
I
Hi Matt,
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 16:39 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> Floating IPs aren't required in OpenStack deployments, and anyone
> running with cells v1 (Rackspace, GoDaddy, NeCTAR, CERN) doesn't use
> or
> support them, at least without patching Nova. So I'm not sure what
> 'industry
least not moddable)?
We're at the point where we want this so much that we'll do it regardless of
upstream, but I can't for the life of me think that we're alone with the use
case.
Regards,
Martin Millnert
[1] http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/index.
Hi Dolph,
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 17:50 -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Martin Millnert <mar...@millnert.se>
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're deploying Liberty (soon Mitaka) with heavy reliance on
> the SAML2
local
deployment. I do, A) believe we're not alone with this use case (***),
B) look for input on doability.
We'll be around in Austin for discussion with Horizon/Keystone regarding
this if necessary.
Regards,
Martin Millnert
(* The reason this is a problem: With Federation, there are no local
use
are your components/apps written in?
I believe most "serious" production deployments already run Java apps,
anyway, for other reasons. I'd wager that basically Erlang and Java are
already sunk, in most deployments, in terms of languages, already. It's
the cost of operation.